HOT TOPICS:   Election 2014  |    Regional development   |  OCR                                                                 RESOURCES:    Economic calendar   |  Travel currency tool

The comment stream

Reader poll

Below $6.
48% (68 votes)
Between $6 and $6.50.
40% (57 votes)
About the $7 per kgMS Fonterra's currently forecasting.
12% (17 votes)
Total voters: 142

Older polls

Commerce Minister Craig Foss today announced the selection of nine KiwiSaver default providers for a seven year term starting in July

Posted in KiwiSaver

Commerce Minister Craig Foss today announced the selection of nine KiwiSaver default providers for a seven year term starting in July

Five new KiwiSaver default providers have been announced as part of the Government's first seven-yearly review of the providers.

All of the original providers have also been re-appointed and form the nine-strong list announced today by Finance Minister Craig Foss.

The full list is: AMP, ANZ, ASB, BNZ, Grosvenor, Kiwibank, Mercer, Fisher Funds and Westpac.

The completely new ones are BNZ, Grosvenor, Westpac and Kiwibank. Fisher Funds is also technically new, but did take over the funds management businesses of Tower (originally on the list) last year. A missing name from the list this time is AXA, but it merged with AMP, which had been on the list.

The selections follow a Request for Proposal process that began last year. The tenders were assessed by an independent panel according to a range of criteria including the provider’s organisational and investment capabilities and fee levels.

Foss said it was important that individual KiwiSaver members actively decide how their KiwiSaver funds are invested.

"The purpose of the default funds is as a temporary holding fund. They have a conservative investment approach aimed at providing stable returns and maintaining and building confidence in KiwiSaver while members consider the best fund for them," he said.

"It is important KiwiSaver members are equipped with the information to actively decide which fund best suits their individual circumstances taking into account factors such as risk level, fees, investment returns and service.

"As a requirement of their appointment, the KiwiSaver default providers will also offer investor education to encourage people to make this active choice. This reflects the Government’s commitment to build on KiwiSaver’s contribution to developing a savings culture and lifting New Zealanders’ confidence in our financial sector."

In addition to technical criteria, one focus throughout the process was on keeping fees lower than the current default provider fees, in particular for smaller fund balances.

For a typical $7000 balance in the new default funds, the total fee will be on average approximately $56 a year compared to the current average fee of around $69. There are currently 2.2 million KiwiSaver members with about $20 billion funds under management. Around 22 per cent of all KiwiSaver members are in default funds.

For more information visit www.med.govt.nz/business/business-law/current-business-law-work/changes-to-kiwisaver/default-provider-arrangements/q-and-a.pdf

People can compare current KiwiSaver funds’ performance, fees and service by visiting the Sorted’s KiwiSaver Fund Finder calculator. http://fundfinder.sorted.org.nz/

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment in the box on the right or click on the "'Register" link at the bottom of the comments.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current Comment policy is here.

1 Comments

Interesting to see that with

Interesting to see that with the inclusion of the new default members decreases the average fee based on a balance of $7,000. Looks like those in default funds for the past 7 years have been taken for a bit of a ride.
I am intrigued as to how active managers like AMP & Grosvenor can undercut a passively managed provider (ASB) on fees. Everyone keeps telling me passive is supposed to be cheaper.
The banks are amongst the highest fee chargers (variable fees) of the new default panel providers - this will not surprise too many I wouldn't think.