In this section
Offers for readers
The comment stream
Recent comments
- 1 of 19075
- ››
Editors choice
- 1 of 274
- ››
Finance sector jobs
This position is in the Investment Operations team within MLC's Asset Management business ...more
Australia
Provide L&D support for all technical requirements for the business banking teamBuild a st...more
Australia
We are looking for a highly skilled Pega Development Lead, who is capable of leading a tea...more
Australia
You will use your actuarial and statistical expertise to provide technical advice to achie...more
Australia

The news stream
Latest news
Most commented
- Wednesday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 52
- Tuesday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 47
- Crafar Farms OIO approval justified 37
- A $72K losing position? 34
- 90 seconds at 9 am with BNZ 25
- Home loan affordability better in Dec 22
- 90 seconds at 9 am with BNZ 21
- Govt lifts minimum wage 50 cts to $13.50 an hour 15
- Amanda's Take Five for Wednesday 12
- Amanda's Take Five for Tuesday 12
Most viewed
Interest on Twitter
Top 10 at 10: Ban commissions; Fortress strikes; Banks Mukhtared; Christmas robots; Dilberts
Here are my Top 10 links from around the Internet at 10am. I welcome your additions and comments below or please email your suggestions for Tuesday's Top 10 at 10 to bernard.hickey@interest.co.nz I'm beginning to feel sorry for Dilbert.
1. 'Clear fiduciary duty' - The Sunday Star Times' Rob Stock reports the Capital Markets Development Taskforce is about to recommend that financial advisers would have a 'clear fiduciary duty', which means they would act in the best interests of clients... The taskforce would stop short of banning commissions, but it seems this fiduciary duty thing is going to outlaw it anyway. I'm not sure I get it. Weren't financial advisers supposed to be looking after clients anyway? The UK is banning commissions and AMP is moving away from commissions, so why can't we just ban them? I'm glad I don't have to defend advisers.
Independent financial adviser Robert Oddy said commissions went hand in hand with some of New Zealand's most unsavoury financial practices, such as fund manager secrecy. "In my opinion people who take commissions are sales agents." He said banning commissions would be a shock to the financial planning industry but advisers like him were living proof there would be advice without them. "It would take time, but we could achieve it," he said. But Phil Macalister, publisher of the GoodReturns news website for financial advisers, said it would be a mistake to assume that banning commission would end bad advice. "Fee-based advice is no route to a Utopia of investment advice," he warned, saying consumers should be free to choose whether to go with an adviser who charged fees or one who was paid by commission.
2. Fortress strikes again - Greg Ninness at the Sunday Star Times reportsthat the 5 Mile land looks like it has been sold to Progressive for a supermarket and to Auckland developer Tony Gapes for a total of about NZ$22 million. But it seems vulture fund Fortress will get their hands on the first NZ$20 million, leaving Hanover investors with peanuts after fees. Allied Farmers is starting to look pretty good.
The Star-Times understands most of the money raised from the sale is likely to go towards paying off a mortgage owed to a joint venture between interests associated with Auckland businessman Martyn Reesby, who owns property financier Structured Finance, and US-based financier Fortress Credit Corp. It is understood the Reesby/Fortress joint venture is owed around $20m and this will probably be repaid ahead of money owed to Hanover. That would leave only about $2m for Hanover investors, but, once selling and legal costs are deducted, the amount they may actually receive could be little more than small change.
3. Real reform - I don't always agree with Rod Oram, but his column about monetary policy in the Sunday Star Times is ultimately on the money. He is saying serious structural reform is necessary and it's a good idea to debate monetary policy. I agree on both.
The Reserve Bank and its colleagues around the world are also working on other measures to regulate financial institutions through the entire economic cycle, not just the boom times. Hopefully, these will help deal with the dramatic and probably permanent increase in volatility and inter-dependence of markets. But they will only be very small steps towards the nirvana our productive sector craves: low interest rates, a comfortable currency and stability in both. The Reserve Bank couldn't deliver them even if it were loaded up with multiple goals such as growth, jobs and exchange rate stability, in addition to its core one of price stability, and it had all sorts of tools yet-to-be-invented. Quite simply, it can't fly in the face of our economic reality of being a deep deficit country. We will achieve a somewhat more stable currency only when our interest rates are down near international norms. We'll do that only when we stop needing to import so much capital. We'll do that only when we save more. We'll do that only when we earn more through exports. We'll do that only when many more companies learn how to export high value, sophisticated goods that are immune to commodity cycles. These achievements will require massive changes to business models, science and innovation, the tax regime, government finances, delivery of public services and a myriad other government and business drivers. It remains to be seen whether the government's work in many of these areas will be as game-changing as it promises. But it is hobbling itself by parking monetary policy. It is cutting itself off from the global debate about how to better run the world economy.
4. Bank who? - There's something very fishy going on in Kazakhstan that may cost banks such as Royal Bank of Scotland, Morgan Stanley, ING and Credit Suisse as much as US$10 billion. The New York Times is reporting that loans to Bank Turalem (BTA) may have been funneled via the back door to companies associated with the chairman Mukhtar Ablyazov. Mr Ablyazov has now fled the country and is living in London after the government in the oil-rich former Soviet republic took over the bank and started an investigation. I've got a feeling our Mukhtar is not living at the local backpackers in London...My favourite of his company names is 'Best Catch Trading'.
So many of these loans are now bust that many foreign banks are facing write-offs of as much as 80 percent of their value, prompting investigations into why the loans went so bad so fast, according to officials at Bank Turalem, which was taken over by the government earlier this year. Hoping to become the dominant bank in the region, BTA, as the bank is known, cast its eye well beyond Kazakhstan and lent billions of dollars to finance vast real estate projects in Russia and Ukraine, as well as offshore companies with vague business plans and no trading histories to speak of, according to executives at BTA who did not want to be identified because of the sensitivity of the matter. The money went to companies with names like Best Catch Trading and Sandown Holding, based in places as diverse as the Seychelles, the British Virgin Islands and England, that offered up little in the way of collateral, according to these executives. Among other things, prosecutors in Kazakhstan and a team of international lawyers and accountants hired by Bank Turalem are investigating whether the foreign banks may have unwittingly financed a scheme by BTA's former chairman, Mukhtar Ablyazov, to direct between $8 billion and $12 billion worth of BTA loans "” about half of the bank's loan book "” to companies that he secretly controlled, according to lawyers representing BTA as well as prosecutors in Kazakhstan. Mr. Ablyazov denies the allegations, insisting that the loans were proper and that the investigation is politically inspired because he has been a critic of the government.
Related Topics
5. Grow tomatoes - Jeff Clark at The Growth Stock Wire recounts how 'I Single Handedly crushed the dreams of the next generation' when he went to give a talk to a bunch of High School parents and their teachers about what careers they should pursue. He suggested they give up on careers and the whole capitalism thing to grow vegetables. He may be going a tad over the top here, but he has a bit of a point, which the students and teachers seemed to catch on. I sense the anti-bailout and anti-Wall St mood is building from the grassroots up in America. HT Gertraud.
It took me less than 30 seconds to crush those dreams. "Every year, I'm asked about how best to prepare for a career in finance," I started my speech. "And for the past six years, I've suggested taking courses in statistics, human psychology, behavioral finance, and demographics. Today, however, I'm going to give you the same advice I've given my children, the same advice I've given my friends, the same advice for which people pay me thousands of dollars every year..." I paused just long enough to notice the students were on the edge of their seats. The faculty, standing in the back of the room, stopped whispering to each other. The parents stopped texting on their Blackberries and sipping their lattes, anticipating the wisdom I was about to provide. "If you want to be successful in life," I said, "learn to grow a frickin tomato." I then explained to my audience how the government is devaluing the dollar, how the politicians are catering to the lowest common denominator of the population, how the "let's get everything I can for myself right now" society is leading to the destruction of this once-great country, and how if you want to take care of yourself and your family in the future... you need to learn to grow a tomato.
6. Inside the Chinese bubble - Michael Pettis is a professor at a Peking University's Guanghua School of Management and is widely viewed as one of the closest observers of China's economy who speaks publicly. Here in his latest post Pettis talks about the problems inside the banking system there and the economy. Essentially the banks pumped up their lending last year and are now starting to see more bad loans so are having to raise new equity.
There seems to be a real tug of war. On the one hand much of China's industrial and exporting sectors along with provincial and local leaders, are eager to see a continuation of the financial policies that have goosed employment and GDP growth at the expense of domestic consumption. On the other hand the macro and financial specialists are worried about the growing imbalances and their impacts on the financial sector. Professor Yu Yonding of the CASS Post-Graduate school, a former member of the Monetary Policy Committee and one of the smartest analysts on China, gave a speech in Melbourne yesterday in which he warned about China's over-reliance on exports and investment and suggested that the imbalances are worsening, not improving. I strongly recommend that interest readers check out the speech for themselves. In part the debate resolves around the issue of financial sector reform, especially of the banking system. This is an extremely important topic because most economists and analysts, including me, believe strongly that financial sector reform will be one of the most important steps forward for the healthy development of the Chinese economy. The Chinese financial system misallocates capital on an heroic scale.
7. Flee to safety - The one sure thing we all used to know about financial markets is that when there was a panic investors would flee to safety in the US dollar and US Treasuries. Interestingly, Felix Salmon at Reuters points out that the Dubai shock triggered yen buying and US dollar selling this time around.
It's clearly not good news that a severe-if-not-life-threatening shock such as this one sends the dollar down rather than up. The immense fiscal cost of the financial crisis has hurt the dollar's standing as the global reserve currency, and if I were at Treasury right now I'd be very concerned about this reaction. Not that there's much Treasury can do about it.
8. The Irish connection - Simon Johnson over at The Baseline Scenario points to a curious connection between the Dubait default and fears of a default in Ireland. Here's the argument:
The credit default swap spreads for Irish banks have widened signficantly "” even relative to HSBC, with its direct Dubai involvement. In part, this is hedge funds betting that others will want to insure against the rising risk of an Irish default, but what's the connection? The thinking is that a partial bailout "“ with creditor losses "“ for Dubai from Abu Dhabi implies something about how Ireland will be treated within the European Union (and the same reasoning is also more vaguely in the air for Greece). This may make sense for three reasons. If Dubai can effectively default or reschedule its debts without disrupting the global economy, then others can do the same. If Abu Dhabi takes a tough line and doesn't destabilize markets, others (e.g., the EU) will be tempted to do the same (i.e., for Ireland and Greece). "No more unconditional bailouts" is an appealing refrain in many capitals. If the US supports some creditor losses for Dubai (e.g., because of its connections with Iran), this makes it easier to impose losses on creditors elsewhere (even perhaps where IMF programs are in place, such as Eastern Europe). The main effect will be to strengthen the hand of Ben Bernanke in Fed policymaking discussions "“ so US interest rates will stay low for a long while. If financial intermediaries draw the appropriate lessons from Dubai, Ireland, and Greece (and Iceland, the Baltics, Hungary, etc), they will be more careful about extending credit to places that are becoming overexuberant "“ even when it is cheap to increase debt levels.
9. You've never heard of this guy - And I hadn't too until I read his obituary. But the passing of financial journalist Mark Pittman from Bloomberg should be noted. It's worth having people to aspire to and deeds to admire. I certainly have both with this guy.
A former police-beat reporter who joined Bloomberg News in 1997, Pittman wrote stories in 2007 predicting the collapse of the banking system. That year, he won the Gerald Loeb Award from the UCLA Anderson School of Management, the highest accolade in financial journalism, for "Wall Street's Faustian Bargain," a series of articles on the breakdown of the U.S. mortgage industry. "He was one of the great financial journalists of our time," said Joseph Stiglitz, a professor at Columbia University in New York and the winner of the 2001 Nobel Prize for economics. "His death is shocking." Pittman's fight to make the Fed more accountable resulted in an Aug. 24 victory in Manhattan Federal Court affirming the public's right to know about the central bank's more than $2 trillion in loans to financial firms. He drew the attention of filmmakers Andrew and Leslie Cockburn, who gave him a prominent role in their documentary about subprime mortgages, "American Casino," which was shown at New York City's Tribeca Film Festival in May.
10. Totally irrelevant video - Dancing Christmas Robots. It was the best I could do. Enjoy...I think.
Synchronized Robot Christmas Dance - Watch more Funny Videos
30 Comments
Top 10 @ 10 p.m.
Top 10 @ 10 p.m. Bernard ? Getting it in , prior to the Task-Force release ! Well done . Enjoy your audience with Dr Don & the Fiscal Lumineries . At least you'll get a laugh out of Gareth Morgan , he's always entertaining , and forthright .
NZ monetary policy need not
NZ monetary policy need not depend on all those factors outlined by Rod Oram. NZ could have a stable currency and low interest rates simply by fixing the NZD to a basket of foreign currencies, or to gold. This would provide an internationally stable currency automatically, and likewise eliminate the NZ risk premium (so long as the fix was legally certian). NZ factor and consumer prices would adjust rather than the exchange rate and interest rates.
Bernard - I think you'll
Bernard - I think you'll find over the months a number of links to Pittman articles have been posted up here - he did a number of opinion pieces on Bloomberg which were first rate (the sort that necessitated the disclaimer 'This is not the opinion of Bloomberg'etc at the end of each piece).
A very great shame he has died.
#3 "But they will only
#3
"But they will only be very small steps towards the nirvana our productive sector craves: low interest rates, a comfortable currency and stability in both. The Reserve Bank couldn't deliver them even if it were loaded up with multiple goals such as growth, jobs and exchange rate stability, in addition to its core one of price stability, and it had all sorts of tools yet-to-be-invented."
".... yet-to-be-invented."
No need to reinvent wheels Rod. It's called 'Public Credit', see here:
http://www.interest.co.nz/ratesblog/index.php/2009/11/20/special-report-...
Keep taking the red pills Rod, your'e getting there!
Bleeding heck Roger...4.28am..for Pete's sake...try
Bleeding heck Roger...4.28am..for Pete's sake...try a nurofen with milk and throw the coffee away..sleeeeeeep man you gotta get sleeeep..
Someone better tell Tolley while she's on her trolley to put another test in the standards tests for tots....how to grow a tomato..
Are we ready for the big Brashy report everyone?...don't hold your breath...it was really just a bumph job for an old coot to keep him happy. Key doesn't want to be remembered as Don Brash's Brush...sposed to be the other way round..right John!
Hope Mark Pittmans good work
Hope Mark Pittmans good work continues, Aduit the Fed
On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order 11110, was signed with the authority to basically strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business. Just months later he was shot dead.
an interesting read
http://www.john-f-kennedy.net/thefederalreserve.htm
I find Rod Oram difficult.
I find Rod Oram difficult. He obviously means well but still to my mind hasn't quite thrown off the mindset that he is a 1970s socialist.
Finally he is waking up to the very clever changes the Reserve Bank has made. Except that in his introduction he gives the impression he hasn't heard of them.
This bit is just rubbish:
"But they will only be very small steps towards the nirvana our productive sector craves: low interest rates, a comfortable currency and stability in both."
Low interest rates are bad. They give rise to high debt levels and high asset prices and low savings rates. Is this not obvious to a six year old?
Low exchange rates are bad. They allow people who do not live here to buy our assets cheaply. They encourage us to invest in low productivity and low wage businesses (tourism??).
We need savings invested as equity in businesses with the potential for a high rate of productivity growth (I think Rod would probably agree with that). He is a bright and well meaning chap and it would be nice if he joined the blogosphere here.
David For those of us
David
For those of us with long memories, what you advocate was exactly the policies that Muldoon imposed on a economy. An exchange rate fixed against a basket of currencies.
To get it to work we needed price and wage controls (because to defend the rate the Government has to flood the economy with printed money causing inflation), currency rationing, import liciencing and many other controls. There was terrible misallocation of labour & capital and in the end it all fell apart.
Why would it work now in a more open world when it didn't work 30 yrs ago?
Bit behind with the tomatoes
Bit behind with the tomatoes this morning - I'm playing ketchup.
RT @ 4.28am - were
RT @ 4.28am - were you out on the sauce?
No worries Powerdownkiwi. We love
No worries Powerdownkiwi.
We love yolks like that on our open sauce website
cheers
Bernard
fair enough powerdown. i mean,
fair enough powerdown. i mean, when when the chips are down...
Re:6 Reform of the entire
Re:6
Reform of the entire government and how it is elected would be the best thing for the Chinese economy.
Why Mike?
Why Mike?
Ha! I knew it... <strong>Floral
Ha! I knew it...
Floral expenses become thorny issue at Beehive
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10612467
See this, written in February:
Opinion: More flowers and chocolates under new tax scheme
http://www.interest.co.nz/ratesblog/index.php/2009/02/09/opinion-more-fl...
Cheers
Alex
Wally / Trev : Someone
Wally / Trev : Someone has to print the city's fish & chip paper . But thankyou for your concern . I do get plenty of ..............................zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Nice find Alex. "Mr Hipkins
Nice find Alex.
"Mr Hipkins said he believed it was appropriate for ministers to have some form of floral arrangement, but questioned the high level given the calls for cutbacks the Government had made."
Sides splitting man....
"You do have to question at a time [really, y' dont say] when they're asking everybody else to be cutting back if it's an essential or is there something else they could be doing, like getting a couple of potplants in instead."
No. Danger, danger. Think what could get planted in the Green's offices? Pot plants - yeah right.
Surely there's enough pansies and wall-flowers in parliament anyway - why the hell are we being asked to pay for more?
What next, subsidise their personal proprty portfolios?
@RW: I dont agree, 1)
@RW: I dont agree,
1) The other side is it makes it easier for businesses to expand...ie they have access to "cheap" capital to do things profitable with, so No "Low interest rates are bad. They give rise to high debt levels and high asset prices and low savings rates. Is this not obvious to a six year old?" is not correct, in fact it could be counter-productive,
Indeed business endeavors that might be marginal or not profitable with a high interest rate now become worthwhile and which can create jobs....
Also high interest rates encourage savers to put money is safe items like bank deposits instead of looking at investing in businesses in order to get a decent return....
However rather than low or high rates I would suggest the most important thing is to have a stable rate so businesses can plan....it reduces risk.
Low interest rates can certainly stimulate bad lending ie retail consumption but I cannot see why this cant be dealt with "somehow else" without crippling [sensible] business borrowing.
Excessively low (or high) rates are I think bad...0.25% is silly....4%~7% seems OK ish, >8% seems too high.
regards
Thanks , RW . I've
Thanks , RW . I've been wondering why I had this niggly naggly feeling of un-ease over Rod Oram's views . A socialist with a '70's outlook sums it neatly . Akin to Queen Helen and Michael Cullen methinks . And yes , it would be grand to have him join us for a tete-a-tete .
Thanks Steven, I guess i
Thanks Steven,
I guess i was trying to put forward there is another (old fashioned) way.
Our experience over many years is those who borrow most do best, based on rising property prices; but this is an illusion, it is just the devaluation of the currency via inflation that has created the effect.
If you actually really want people to save you need to make it worth their while. Those who have saved have been a rich target for the clever and fraudulent in the finance industry. So why would anyone save.
You can't have it both ways, low interest rates will lead to high asset prices and high debt levels. High debt levels create an instability which leads to interesting times.
RT - I think Rod
RT - I think Rod is trying to reform but hasn't quite thrown off old habits from when he was a student.
The current "sauce" of flavour
The current "sauce" of flavour that leaves a foul aftertaste - outsourcing
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/employment/news/article.cfm?c_id=11&objectid=1...
http://www.techday.co.nz/telecommunicationsreview/news/telstraclear-look...
@RW High asset prices is
@RW High asset prices is money being invested in the wrong thing IMHO...but ppl will always take the easiest and most profitable course....that's fair on an individual basis...not good for NZ and probably employment and certainly exports...so somehow the easiest way has to be made exporting businesses...
regards
Re Roger Witherspoon's comments -
Re Roger Witherspoon's comments - if interest rates give a better return on investment than investment in productive enterprise (done well), then there is a problem. Capital assumes a proprtional value greater than effort. Things get really messed up when that happens, and additionally normal consumers pay too much for loans on houses and some of the simple things in life as well as businesses being unable to make a quid to invest in new job creating things.
Low exchange rates aren't either good or bad per se. If the excahnge rate doesn't reflect the true productive output of a country then they are bad (either way). Right now our productivity is low for many reasons, and we can't make enough pofit at these rates for our export sector to make enough money (in local currency) to pay for all the things we need to do to improve. So right now in NZ they are too high. Hopefully this changes and they go lower, we improve our economy's balance and performance, and we can afford for it to be higher so we can enjoy the fruits of our efforts. I agree they can be too low and that can prevent the people enjoying the things other countries take for granted like good consumer products. That isn't the case in NZ right now. They're too high.
We live in a complex adaptive environment so statements that tjings are good or bad or high or low etc should always be prefaced with -in our environment right now this is too low because it is having the following effect RIGHT NOW. Or the reverse etc.
Liking Number 5 Learn to
Liking Number 5
Learn to grow your own vegetables. Always useful.
Thanks for sharing with us
Thanks for sharing with us about capital loans.Your blog is Very informative...Keep posting (capital loans)
A recent CNN television broadcast
A recent CNN television broadcast gave the impression that Esperanto aims to be a single global language. The comparison was with a global reserve currency, instead of the US dollar.
See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZpC8mPk4QBM
May I put the record straight? Esperanto intends to be an auxiliary language, or a second language for all.
Please see http://www.lernu.net for confirmation.
Brian W I just cannot
Brian W
I just cannot get away from the problem that low interest rates leads to high debts leads to instability.
The point I was trying to make was that savings can be lent or invested directly. To me "invested" is different from lent, it means you own something or a share of something. You know the part of your house you don't owe to the bank. It is called equity. Not loan.
There is another way. The finance bods have messed up the language. Investment has no relation to borrowing. Investment and profit are related. Borrowing and lending are related.
I know you understand this but these massively important distinctions have been lost. We do not have to borrow or to lend.
Thanks for sharing with us.Your
Thanks for sharing with us.Your blog is very informative.keep posting.. capital loans
I’m just wondering if all
I'm just wondering if all this numbers will grow more and more with each of these movies"¦ The 3rd one is already being expected, even before the release of New Moon"¦ And
definitely if the 4th one gets to be done (and I think I will, considering Summit said the green light would be given according to how New Moon went"¦ tho, not confirmed yet)"¦
IF Breaking Dawn gets done, I'm sure it will break each one of these records! ugg classic tall sale
ugg tall Boots in stock