In this section
Offers for readers
The comment stream
Recent comments
- 1 of 19015
- ››
Editors choice
- 1 of 274
- ››
Finance sector jobs
Sought after opportunity to move to one of the most beautiful westernised countries in the...more
Australia
You will be reporting into the head of Corporate Finance and work in liaison with the gene...more
Australia
Bloomberg Tradebook is a global agency broker offering innovative trading algorithms and s...more
Australia
Bloomberg News seeks an experienced Corporate Finance Reporter in our Sydney office to cov...more
Australia

The news stream
Latest news
Most commented
- A plan for Auckland's housing crisis 80
- Thursday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 48
- Bank CEO defends bank profits 37
- 90 seconds at 9 am with BNZ 33
- Wednesday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 28
- 90 seconds at 9 am with BNZ 23
- Floating mortgage share hits record 61% 19
- Barfoots says strongest Jan in 4 yrs 17
- Why Labour is fine with some foreign buyers 11
- Govt courts Chinese investment 7
Most viewed
Interest on Twitter
Opinion: RBNZ's 'Dumb and Dumber' monetary policy
By Rodney Dickens With Jim Carrey and Jeff Daniels in Dumb and Dumber you know that whatever they get up to they will mess it up. They are destined to make mistake after mistake and that is part of what is funny about the movie. By contrast, monetary policy is supposed to be a serious game because it has major impacts on people and therefore one would hope that the brains trust at the Reserve Bank had more commonsense than to repeat the same mistake time and time again. But it seems that NZ monetary policy is destined to follow the lead of Carrey and Daniels. In the one-page statement released on 30 April in support of the RBNZ's decision to cut the OCR 0.5% to 2.5% Governor Bollard said: "Overall, developments since March point to lower medium-term inflation than previously projected." "The main factors behind this are weaker global growth, and an unwarranted tightening in financial conditions via both higher long-term interest rates and a stronger exchange rate than expected." He concluded: "We consider it appropriate to provide further policy stimulus to the economy. We expect to keep the OCR at or below the current level through until the latter part of 2010. The OCR could still move modestly lower over the coming quarters." Consistent with the Governor's views a number of economists/commentators have suggested the rise in the exchange rate is reason for the RBNZ to cut the OCR more. And this would make sense if the higher NZD wasn't justified by prospects for the economy (i.e. if a higher exchange rate would choke off the recovery without further interest rate cuts).
But there are plenty of historical precedents for believing the forex market has pushed the exchange rate up because it has correctly assessed that NZ growth prospects have improved. The foreign exchange (forex) market has a much better track record than the RBNZ at assessing prospects for the economy which means the RBNZ's puzzling decision to commit to keeping the OCR at or below the current level until the second half of 2010 could well mean Governor Bollard is about to repeat the mistake he made only a few years ago, as well as repeating the mistake his predecessor made a decade earlier. The RBNZ is in part worried about a rising NZD hurting growth but students of NZ's economic history might remember that Governor Brash made the same mistake in the early 1990s. The forex market tends to be much quicker than the RBNZ at picking economic recoveries (and downturns). Look at the experience in the early 1990s when the currency started to rise, which was a vote of confidence in the economy, but the RBNZ allowed interest rates to fall much further which resulted in the economic recovery that followed being much, much stronger than the RBNZ and the economists were predicting.
We saw a similar experience in the early 2000s when the rising NZD foretold of the unfolding strong upturn in economic growth which the RBNZ again helped fuel via lowering interest rates more than was required. So rather than fear the recent rise in the NZD we suggest it should be interpreted as mirroring the unfolding improvement in NZ and global leading economic indicators, while the RBNZ's action to cut the OCR on 30 April and signal the potential for further cuts will probably mean that the upturn is again much stronger than expected by most economists. An economic recovery is great but when growth turns out to be unsustainably strong the result is higher interest rates, a temporarily uncompetitive exchange rate, and unnecessary and disruptive volatility in economic growth that is especially reflected in excessive cycles in activity in the housing sector. The forex market is also better than the RBNZ and the economists at picking downturns with the fall in the NZD in 1997 in response to the East Asian crisis being a case in point (see the area in the chart on the previous page highlighted by the red oval). Thailand, South Korea and Indonesia lead the East Asian crisis "“ see here for more information - and the forex market reacted to this by pushing the NZD down sharply. The RBNZ reacted to this negative shock to the export sector by forcing up interest rates because it was concerned about the inflationary implications of the falling exchange rate. And by chance this all coincided with a severe drought that hit agricultural producing in the 1997/98 summer and meant that an accidental recession followed in the first half of 1998.
Being smarter than central bankers and economists the forex market responded to the interest rate increases imposed by the RBNZ by pushing the NZD lower not higher because the forex market could see the recession that was coming with recessions being what puts forex traders off the NZD more than anything. Right now the RBNZ appears to have become spell bound by what it sees in the rear view mirror and is unduly discounting or ignoring the plethora of "green shoots" becoming evident both locally and globally. By contrast, the forex market is responding to the unfolding improvement in the local and international leading indicators by underwriting a recovery in the NZD. The irony is that the more the RBNZ cuts the OCR to fuel the recovery, the more the NZD is likely to appreciate just as has happened previously. The lower interest rates will help underwrite a strong recovery in the housing market and domestic economy more generally while the higher NZD, encouraged by the domestic recovery, will eat into the competitiveness of the export sector and local firms competing against imports. The RBNZ's rediscovered "go for growth" approach will help underwrite a strong rebound in economic growth but in so doing it will undermine the quality of the recovery by shifted the focus away from the export/traded-goods sector and towards the domestic sector.
Another irony is that the RBNZ stated on 30 April that "business sentiment is low" on the same day the NBNZ survey for April showed one of the largest monthly improvements, following in the footsteps of the improvement in the BNZ survey of business confidence and improvements in consumer confidence surveys. Conclusion As demonstrated in our monthly Interesting Times reports, interest rate cuts take some time to filter through the economy, so if the RBNZ continues to cut when the first signs of recovery are clearly evident then it will ensure the recovery will be strong and most likely unhelpfully/unhealthily strong. This is particularly relevant in the housing and residential building markets with our Housing Prospects and Building Barometer reports covering prospects for housing and residential building respectively and showing why there is the potential for a surprisingly strong recovery this year. Here is an earlier opinion piece from Rodney Dickens which argued for much more stability in the OCR.
_________________ * Rodney Dickens is the Managing Director and Chief Research Officer for Strategic Risk Analysis (SRA), which is a boutique economic, industry and property research company. Rodney produces regular free reports on topical issues and on specific property markets. Find out more about SRA here and sign up to SRA's free reports here.
"lower interest rates will help
"lower interest rates will help underwrite a strong recovery in the housing market "
Don't buy into the argument that property should stage a strong recovery in 09 or 2010. The burden of debt and rising unemployment will see to that.
As well we have the Aussie property sector sliding into a collapse.
Apart from that, the banks have not rushed to cut rates have they? Why not?
Well it has clearly been
Well it has clearly been Bollard's goal to re-inflate the housing market (though of course he would deny it) - in effect his version of 'the Greenspan put'. Having seen the effect on the economies of various other nations of the collapse of their respective property bubbles he has been running scared for the past 6 months that something similar will eventuate here. Fortunately for the longer term health of the economy it seems as he is in the process of being stymied in terms of ultra-stimulatory
rates.
Rodney does point out some interesting possibilities - with even a sniff of a recovery he suggests we now have a strengthening NZ$ which will go considerably higher if the recovery is genuine, with interest rates to follow - as he suggests take that trend further 18 months out and we would have a much higher dollar (marvellous for exporters), much higher mortgage rates (marvellous for the housing bubble) and much higher unemployment (as a residue from what is happening to the labour market at the moment). Commodities would of course have recovered too given this scenario (oops inflation).
Does any one else, apart
Does any one else, apart from me, not give a monkey's bum about the housing market ? When is the new Gumnut gonna formulate some sensible policy to help the agriculture/tourism/manufacturing sectors of our economy. Them what produce summit wot earns our way thru life ? Dr Bollocks isn't the primary focus to getting us out of the mire. Interest rates ain't the issue. Productive endeavour is. We gotta come up with stuff that the rest of the world wants. Food, holidays/adventure. It isn't rocket science. Why not encourage them that does these things. Savaging the company tax rate would be a good start. Re-introduciing Labour's R&D allowance would be another. I am the third man in "Dumb & Dumber", someone else come up with some stuff.
Andy, maybe not "re-inflate" the
Andy, maybe not "re-inflate" the housing market, but certainly to avoid a crash in an effort to protect the banks would be my guess of his agenda. Also he would appear desperate to keep the NZD$ as low as possible for as long as possible, but I agree with Rodney that this may very likely backfire..
Roger - if your'e the
Roger - if your'e the third man, beware, MI6 will come after you!
Perhaps the reason people are not so keen to blog around this topic is because it gets so dizzying going around and around the same bouy, and especially in a forum that is primarily focused on housing and interest rates, as per a preso of Bernard's I saw a week or so back in relation to the advertising deal with Trademe, I think.
As you know a few folk, like myself, have described ideas that address the How2's as I call them. That is, practical policy changes that would work for productive firms - people making anything from wool, wood, whey, widgets, washing-machines, wirelesses and websites. In varying degrees these ideas address the Whats. The real problem seems to be WHY WE WON'T implement, or even discuss in a rational way, their merits, maybe to a point that modified ideas are at least implemented in a first steps scenario.
So my question at this point is, WHY NOT?
Anyone?
Am happy to be the fourth man, for just a while longer...
Cheers, Les. The "why not"
Cheers, Les. The "why not" appears to be political expediency. Politicians view the prize of re-election, infinitely more than they do the correction of imbalances in our productive economy. More votes in houses, than in businesses, sadly. And yet, the measures we need are so simple, that even a slow coach such as moi, can see them with crystal clarity. And, at a time such as this, a full blown economic shamozzle, a pollie worth his oats could do the "Roger Douglas" and give us a dose of the medicine we don't want, but desperately need.
Sadly, as pathetic as the Nat's were in opposition from 1999-2008, they are proving to be nearly as hopeless in power.
"The irony is that the
"The irony is that the more the RBNZ cuts the OCR to fuel the recovery, the more the NZD is likely to appreciate"
Um, I politely disagree. In fact, the exact oppposite was happening until last year. In an attempt to deflate the housing bubble, Bollard raised rates attracting more offshore investment (seeking the high yield in a seemingly risk-less world) which was pumped via the banks into the housing market.
Post credit crunch, the cycle has been thrown into reverse. There is less offshore hot money flowing into NZ which is lowering the exchange rate (with the last few weeks an exception) and there is less credit available to our banks to lend to borrowers who are less interested to take it on. This is depressing the housing market and the economy and further scaring off foreign investment.
Don't kid yourself. There is nothing special about the NZD rally in the last few weeks. It doesn't reflect any special optimism about our economy. It is just part of a broader rally in risk assets from a temporarily extreme over-sold condition. I wouldn't be labelling Bollard or anyone else "dumb" for expecting a prolonged and deep economic contraction.
Those that still think this is a typical recession, the causes and resolutions of which will be similar to anything we've seen in the past 20 years have failed to fully comprehend what has happened.
DC, how differently we view
DC, how differently we view the world. Last year Bollard wasn't trying to attempt to deflate the housing bubble, he was trying to avoid a property crash USA style. He reduced the OCR, banks reduced mortgage lending rates and wolla! houses have only dropped 12% (including mortgage payment savings), from the peak.
The $NZD returns for overseas' investors in our banks have diminished and with large sums currently invested due to mature, they are propping up the $NZ value.
Also, and lets face it, with the American Reserve Bank printing money hand over fist, how can any countries $ fail to go up in value.
DC, agree with you ,
DC, agree with you , and as I have stated so many times...the magnitude of the worldwide deletion of it$ virtual reality money and the ensuing regression is not yet fully comprehended
.... my analogy is ... it is only the condition of denial rather than spa$m$ and utterances of fal$e confidence holding up the 'NZ Road Runner' as he is chased and $u$pended in time out over the precipice! ...in the meantime I hold my yen ( pronounced 'en' in JP).
DC, it is not similar to anything we have seen in the past 20years... Rodney...are there historical precedents to align with the current financial phenomena with the deletion of virtual reality financing and values in an almost viral global context? Has such a massive deletion ever been experienced or analysed before...NO !! Dr Bollard like everyone else can only watch the disintegration and prod with a bony finger while keeping one hand with crossed fingers behind his back!!!!....
Aarron, I think I said:
Aarron, I think I said: "until last year."
Tonz (Japan), I think we are pretty much on the same page. The FED's virtual money printing to date fails to outstrip the wealth destruction in asset prices. Eventually it will, but Bernanke will have to get in his helicopter first...
http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/hotproperty/bernanke-helicopter.jpg
...in the meantime, inflation fears are misplaced (although I suppose we might see inflation in NZ if we get downgraded and our currency gets dumped).
A conspiracy theory (just a
A conspiracy theory (just a joke). All these actions are to bring Winston back to the limelight of politics. :)
"Green shoots" - more like
"Green shoots" - more like weeds.
It will be twice as bad as we predicted, says Brussels
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/may/04/europe-economy-revised-fo...
All I see is things getting worse
Rodney, (anyone) How might things
Rodney, (anyone)
How might things be if RBNZ used a different, more effective way to control inflation? For example:
1) A Singaporean style compulsory national 'Interest Linked Saving Scheme', as advocated by the late Phil Verry.
2) Varying fuel excise duty, as being suggested by Don Brash.
3) Variable contributions to personal savings/'reserve capital accounts' associated with any loan, as I have suggested here at Number 6:
http://www.interest.co.nz/ratesblog/index.php/2009/04/15/opinion-how-tou...
How would things be if the NZD was not traded on the fx markets at approx. 140 times our GDP? (As it was in 2007, with by comparison the AUD at approx. 64 times their GDP.)
How would it be if our currency traded more reflecting tradeable goods and service flows, rather than speculative money flows, over and above that required to fund required credit deficit?
Les Rudd
Invited Member
NZMEA
Gosh Les, you're almost suggesting
Gosh Les, you're almost suggesting that money could be used to facilitate the exchange of goods and services !
Oh hang on, that's what it is supposed to be for :)
I suggest the solutions can be found here:
White Paper on All the Options for Managing a Systemic Bank Crisis by Bernard Lietaer
http://www.lietaer.com/images/White_Paper_on_Systemic_Banking_Crises_fin...
Steve
Ross Norman (Greens Co-Leader) wants
Ross Norman (Greens Co-Leader) wants us to adopt a water tax ! There's a ripper way to screw more money out of the farming industry. Would stop Uncle Mort from pouring heaps of it onto his lawn, too............And since I've discovered the joys of single malt whisky, I don't need the stuff any more !
Steve Netwriter - thanks. Makes
Steve Netwriter - thanks. Makes you think...
From:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WIR_Bank
"The WIR bank is a not for profit bank. It serves the interest of the clients, not the bank itself. It is a very stable system, not prone to failure as the current banking system is. It remains fully operational even in times of general economic crisis. WIR may have contributed to the remarkable stability of the Swiss economy, as it dampens downturns in the business cycle."
Whether it is a way that would suit NZ, who knows. The point is however, as you, I and others have pointed out, there are a variety of fixes and alternatives that are worthy of discussion, so simply retaining the 'status quo' on the premise that there are not is less and less credible as an argument against change.
Anyone else?
Roger - like your style on the malts, keep up the good work. MacCallan is a cracker, but doesn't go well with cold broccoli water!