In this section
Offers for readers
The comment stream
Recent comments
- 1 of 19105
- ››
Editors choice
- 1 of 276
- ››
Finance sector jobs
Successful applicants will have the opportunity to work with this leading Australian Advis...more
Australia
Think Global Recruitment is working with this exceptionally respected Australian Boutique ...more
Australia
Sought after opportunity to move to one of the most beautiful westernised countries in the...more
Australia

The news stream
Latest news
Most commented
- 90 seconds at 9 am with BNZ 116
- Wednesday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 78
- Friday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 28
- The problems with NZ's energy use 20
- Amanda's Take Five for Wednesday 19
- More bank mortgage rate cuts 16
- Govt lifts minimum wage 50 cts to $13.50 an hour 16
- Thursday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 15
- 90 seconds at 9 am with BNZ 14
- Full time jobs fall 13,000 in Dec qtr 14
Most viewed
Interest on Twitter
Economy worse than December downside scenario, Treasury says
Treasury has said that New Zealand's economy is currently weaker than forecast in its December update downside scenario and that economic growth in 2009 and 2010 is expected to be lower than the downside forecasts. The comments came before the latest NZIER Quarterly Survey of Business Opinion was released, which indicated a bigger contraction in March quarter GDP than the 0.9% seen in the December quarter.
Treasury's downside scenario forecast in December was for GDP to shrink 0.2% in 2009 and 0.3% in 2010. Treasury forecast in its downside scenario that unemployment would rise to 7.2% in 2010. Treasury also said in early March that economic indicators such as growth and unemployment would be worse than those in its December downside scenario.
This will increase the pressure on Finance Minister Bill English to find cost reductions as he finalises his budget for release on May 28 and scrambles to keep New Zealand's AA+ credit rating. Late yesterday it emerged English had asked various government departments to freeze pay packages this year.
In its Monthly Economic Indicators series for March, Treasury said that deteriorating conditions in the international outlook, and uncertainty surrounding both domestic and international conditions meant that there was a wide range of possible outcomes for growth at this time.
"Looking ahead, weakness in construction and manufacturing as well as weak business capital expenditure are expected to put downward pressure on the economy," Treasury said. "On the positive side, monetary and fiscal stimuli in place, a competitive exchange rate and an improvement in the net inflow of migrants are expected to contribute positively to economic growth."
The New Zealand dollar reached an 11 week high on Monday, but fell overnight and on Tuesday following a fall in global equities and the release of the NZIER survey (NZD/USD was around 0.5800 at time of publishing, down from the high of 0.5978.)
"Developments in the global economy will continue to be critical for New Zealand, especially through their effects on access to credit, the value of the New Zealand dollar and the demand for exports," Treasury said.
"One important factor that will affect the performance of the external sector and the New Zealand economy as a whole in 2009 will be world demand. March Consensus Forecasts showed the economic activity of New Zealand's trading partners is forecast to contract by 1.8% in the 2009 calendar year. This is a big revision from the forecasts for trading partner growth in February of -0.9% for 2009."
Related Topics
Treasury said that talks with businesses over March, mainly large firms, supported its view that growth would be weaker than the December downside scenario.
"In general, firms are responding to the weak conditions by cutting costs, reducing investment and generally being more conservative in their business decisions."
However, Treasury said that from the talks, it seemed liked access to credit was not a constraint on firms' activities.
"On the whole, access to credit has not been restricted. However, tax practitioners' comments and some small and medium-sized enterprises noted increased difficulty accessing short-term funding for working capital at a reasonable price. However, borrowing costs have decreased for most as lower benchmark rates have more than offset higher spreads on bank lending and higher facility fees."
Sorry, I've said this before,
Sorry, I've said this before, but.....
NZ should have been in recession back in 2003, and cutting waste in government spending and ensuring private sector efficiency by reducing regulatory burdens and reducing taxation. But instead we had our economy pumped up by consumers spending their increased house "equity", which was not related to our earnings at all. We need to realise this; our economy has been inflated and even people living within their means have been earning an artificially high amount. Worst of all, the government enjoyed artificially high tax revenue, and while posturing about how fiscally responsible they were, sought and found new ways to spend the windfall gains.
EVERY measure that Labour 1999-2008 introduced that carried an economic COST, but was assumed to be "affordable" by a booming economy, was NOT affordable under the conditions of reality that were obscured by this artificial boom. This artificial boom was aptly described in the UK situation by Fred Harrison way back in 2005, as Keynesian "stimulus" with households carrying the burden of debt instead of the government. No-one listened to him in the UK and almost no-one is listening to sense in NZ right to today.
Not only are WFF, student loan subsidies, 4 weeks annual leave, Kiwisaver , maternity leave, the boosted RMA,nationalised ACC, "asset" buybacks, and a whole lot of other stuff not affordable under the true 2000-on economy, a whole lot of additional belt tightening was necessary at that time and remains so.
Of course the unemployment benefit will get drawn on more heavily as the recession bites. Here are some more of the whammies we have not even started to consider:
Kids will be removed from Private schools and placed in public ones by parents who can no longer afford the fees.
People with health insurance will cancel, and there will be more demand on public hospital operating facilities. People on waiting lists who gave up and paid their own way through home equity withdrawals will no longer be able to do so.
Workers on WFF who work shorter hours and generally earn less will qualify for top-ups from WFF.
I am only scratching the surface.
Lefty, nanny statists who salivate at the prospect of so many people losing their financial independence and becoming increasingly reliant on the state now, need to rethink. Their model is about to die a death of plain, simple, unsustainability. That also goes for the Democrats plans for the USA and every other first world nation down from that.
And this..... I honestly believe
And this.....
I honestly believe that our economies in the Western world will not recover this time unless we completely rehash our whole approach to the utilisation of resources.
ALL real wealth has been created through the utilisation of resources. Think about this. Any wealth that we are redistributing or spending on non-productive items, was created only through resources being utilised somewhere further back along the chain of economic activity.
The efficient utilisation of resources is one part of this question. Free markets must be allowed to operate. The other part of this question is utilising the resources at all in the first place.
We need to wind our political clocks back to the era of our grandparents when the utilisation of resources was regarded as a positive good in its own right, not something to be balanced against quality of life issues that carried economic costs that we could not afford in those days. We are now back to those days: we have been living beyond our means for at least a decade and payback of debt will require facing economic reality. We THOUGHT that that debt was secured against asset values. Actually, it hardly matters whether it is or is not, when those assets are not productive and we are eroding away our ratio of productive to non productive assets.
Philbest - great postings I
Philbest - great postings
I totally agree with you that the recent boom times were an absolute illusion.
I would suggest that in real terms the structure of the NZ economy has not progressed one bit over the last 10 years -
When in power Labour were claiming all the credit for the economy - it had nothing to do with them and EVERYTHING to do with an explosive, temporary and ultimately disastrous property rollercoaster
Interest rates need to be
Interest rates need to be decided by the interaction between the willingness of people to save and the demand for productive capital.
The interference with this that results from housing bubbles (and any other speculative bubbles) is what is destroying modern economies today, even leaving aside the issue of whether the central banks can get the OCR's right.
A bubble develops through expectation of returns. Those expectations cannot be dampened by interest rates. Interest rates that would dampen a housing bubble, would kill productive business off in the process. That is why Reserve Banks are "pushing on a string" as long as housing issues are unresolved.
It looks like there are
It looks like there are still lot of foriegn fund manager fools out there who speculate our dollar and keep it higher than it is worth. So no wonder many of us feel 'richer' but still cant afford decent housing etc.