The comment stream

Join the Interest community to be a registered commenter so you can:
- Edit your comments
- Avoid the CAPTCHA
- Vote on comments
Register Here

Already registered? log back in here ..

Forgotten your password? No problem! Click here

Finance sector jobs

Senior Liability Underwriting Manager
Lead from the front utilising your strategic, technical and leadership qualities within th...more
New Zealand
Senior Liability Product Underwriter - Product Management
Lead from the front utilising your technical expertise in this highly attractive senior li...more
New Zealand
High Performing Senior Liability UnderwriterHigh Performing Senior Liability Underwriter
Customer focus, high performance, exceeding client expectations and achieving profitable g...more
New Zealand
Manager Operational Effectiveness and Assurance IT
Reporting to the Senior Manager Operational Risk Effectiveness and Assurance, the key focu...more
New Zealand
efinancialcareers.com

Reader poll

Should you fix your mortgage now or stay floating?

Choices

Joyce: Public transport initiatives must make economic sense

Posted in News

"8. Hon DARREN HUGHES (Labour) to the Minister of Transport: Does he support measures that are alternatives to roading? Hon STEVEN JOYCE (Minister of Transport) : Yes, I support transport infrastructure investments that make at least some sort of economic sense"”which I appreciate might be too narrow a range of possibilities for the member opposite.

Hon Dr Michael Cullen: I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. I saw you thinking slightly there, and I think I know what you were thinking. The question was actually very simple and straightforward, and we got a slightly spinnyanswer back. It was a political whack, and you are taking rather a hard line on political whacks where there is not an invitation for one in the first place. I totally agree that when a member leads with a political nose, he or she can expect one to come straight back. In this case, the question did not seek that kind of response. Mr SPEAKER: I invite the Minister to offer the House an answer to the question that the member asked. Hon STEVEN JOYCE: As I said, I support transport infrastructure investments that make at least some sort of economic sense." - Parliament TV

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment in the box on the right or click on the "'Register" link at the bottom of the comments. Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making these comments.

Stick to your guns, Steven

Stick to your guns, Steven Joyce.

Public Transport is a political fraud. It does not achieve the objectives that are advanced as the reasons for subsidies of it, and it is a severe burden on the economy in the process. We would actually meet every objective better by not having subsidies or government involvement at all, and using cost-benefit analysis to build adequate, congestion-eliminating roads.

80% plus people use cars already. Building roads to eliminate congestion would cost only a fraction of the cost of doubling public transport infrastructure, which would probably break the public budget and reduce car use by only a small percentage.

I have posted a much lengthier discussion on this subject before, and will do so again in the event that someone starts trotting out all the myths and lies that are used to justify the heinous wastage of public money that is public transport subsidies.

http://www.interest.co.nz/ratesblog/index.php/2009/03/17/opinion-this-au...