In this section
Offers for readers
The comment stream
Recent comments
- 1 of 19105
- ››
Editors choice
- 1 of 276
- ››
Finance sector jobs
Unique opportunity to become an integral member of this highly respected market leading te...more
Australia
Newly created role to manager projects across the Asia Pacific region within a worldwide l...more
Australia
Chief Financial Officer Location flexibleCompetitive Remuneration...more
Australia
An opportunity has become available for an experienced Business Development Manager to joi...more
Australia

The news stream
Latest news
Most commented
- 90 seconds at 9 am with BNZ 116
- Wednesday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 78
- Friday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 28
- Amanda's Take Five for Wednesday 19
- The problems with NZ's energy use 18
- More bank mortgage rate cuts 16
- Govt lifts minimum wage 50 cts to $13.50 an hour 16
- Thursday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 15
- 90 seconds at 9 am with BNZ 14
- Full time jobs fall 13,000 in Dec qtr 14
Most viewed
Interest on Twitter
Big banks grumpy over retail deposit guarantee fee
Further unease from the big banks about the 10 basis point fee they will have to pay for the government's retail deposit guarantee has forced Treasury and the Reserve Bank back to the drawing board to hammer out the details of how the fee is calculated.
Banking sources have told interest.co.nz some of the banks were last week reconsidering opting in to the scheme quickly because of concerns about the fee, which is being charged at 10 basis points for total guaranteed deposits above a NZ$5 billion threshold.
The big banks see the fee, which is not paid by smaller and lower rated institutions on their existing deposits, as a subsidy for weaker competitors. They are also concerned the government has already banked and spent the proceeds in a series of election campaign announcements.
Treasury Deputy Secretary Peter Bushnell said Treasury was working with the big banks to iron out the details of the scheme, particularly around how the NZ$5 billion is calculated.
"The complication for them is they have to estimate exactly how much they're liable for. They know their deposits, but the complicating thing for them is how many people fall over the NZ$1 million limit," Bushnell told Radio New Zealand.
"That estimate they make has a square up at the end of say five and a half months. What we want to do is get a common approach with them so it's similar for all the banks," he said.
Later a spokeswoman quoted him via email as saying:
"We are conscious that the big 4 banks are exposed to the largest dollar value of fees under the retail scheme, and therefore have agreed to work with them to develop a common methodology for estimating the fee liability. Such agreement will prevent materially different interpretations being taken by different banks," Bushnell said.
Related Topics
"The fee of 10 basis points is charged on the guaranteed amount exceeding NZ$5 billion. As you know, we announced a guarantee cap of NZ$1 million per individual/account "“ so the calculation of the fee that the big 4 banks pay becomes more complicated. We will be working with those banks quickly to develop and agree the common methodology for this calculation."
Meanwhile Westpac lodged its formal application to join the scheme on Monday and BNZ expects to lodge its application on Tuesday. ANZ National and ASB have yet to apply for retail guarantees.
* This article was first published exclusively yesterday in our daily subscription newsletter for the banking and finance industries. The email costs NZ$365 per annum and carries exclusive news and analysis for New Zealand banking and finance industry executives, regulators and investors. Sign up for a free trial here.
2 Comments
This bit made me chuckle
This bit made me chuckle -''They are also concerned the government has already banked and spent the proceeds in a series of election campaign announcements''.
But then judging by the way the govt books are plunging into the red the banks maybe on to something!
http://www.stuff.co.nz/4749560a13.html
Considering banks do not respond
Considering banks do not respond to customers concerns over the obscene level of their bank fees why are those customers ie the representatives of the tax payer responding to the banks concern over the fees the tax payer intends charging them for the service they are providing.
Perhaps the tax payers representatives should be stipulating they will work with the banks in agreeing fee's providing in return the banks work with consumer groups in agreeing to the fees the banks charge customers.