In this section
Offers for readers
Follow the news from interest
The comment stream
Recent comments
- 1 of 20791
- ››
Editors choice
- 1 of 295
- ››
Finance sector jobs
Lead from the front utilising your strategic, technical and leadership qualities within th...more
New Zealand
Lead from the front utilising your technical expertise in this highly attractive senior li...more
New Zealand
Customer focus, high performance, exceeding client expectations and achieving profitable g...more
New Zealand
Reporting to the Senior Manager Operational Risk Effectiveness and Assurance, the key focu...more
New Zealand

The news stream
Latest news
Most commented
- BNZ cuts most fixed mortgage rates 48
- 90 seconds at 9 am 43
- Fonterra to tighten TAF rules 37
- Thursday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 33
- Govt eyes NZ$1.4b revenue grab 31
- English wants more house builds 30
- Fonterra cuts payout forecast 30
- Budget tax moves to target high income NZers 29
- Wednesday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 24
- Amanda's Take Five for Wednesday 23
Most viewed
Over half our MPs have interests in trusts
The use of family and other trusts to minimise payment of the new 39% tax rate has boomed over the last 7 years, as have investments in rental properties where losses can be claimed against personal income tax. So we thought it would be interesting to see how many parliamentarians and government ministers had arranged their financial affairs using trusts or had invested in rental properties.
We found that over half of the current 121 members of parliament declared interests in family and other trusts, while 9 declared ownership in investment or rental properties, although it is possible the family trusts owned rental properties in their own right that did not have to be declared.
Both Prime Minister Helen Clark and Opposition Leader John Key use family trusts, while Clark also owns 5 houses, including at least one investment property. Key owns commercial property directly and also has shares in a property firm. National MPs are heavier users of trusts than Labour MPs, but both are significant investors in residential property.
From 2006, Members of Parliament have had to register their pecuniary interests at the beginning of each year. It was believed that the register would help to highlight and avoid conflicts of interest between the public duties and private lives of MPs. Although the introduction of the register went some way to opening up MPs' interests to the public, there are still a number of ways MPs can cloak certain interests such as property ownership.
For example, if a member's spouse owns the property, then it doesn't have to be listed that the MP has an interest in it, said Liz Walcott of the Registrar of Pecuniary Interests of Members of Parliament. MPs don't have to list property if the property is owned by a trust.
This was highlighted in July when the Herald ran a story on National leader John Key's property ownership. Key's properties in Hawaii, London and New Zealand did not have to be listed on the register as they were owned by his family trust. Helen Clark, who listed two family trusts, seperately listed five properties, including an investment property in Rodney and a house in the UK.
More than half of New Zealand's MPs declared that they had beneficial interests in trusts according to the 2008 Register of Pecuniary Interests of Members of Parliament. Of the 67 MPs with interests in trusts, there were 37 from National, 20 from Labour, five from New Zealand First, two from the Maori Party, and one each from United Future, ACT and the Greens.
There were 42 MPs who declared that they had interests in family trusts: 24 of National's 48 MPs, 13 from Labour's 49, three from New Zealand First's seven, and one each from United Future (2) and ACT (2).
Related Topics
A total of 53 MPs listed that they had interests in two or more categories of real property (Labour: 23, National: 19, Greens: 3, NZ First: 3, Maori: 2, Independent: 2, United Future: 1).
MPs decide individually on how to categorise a property on the register as there are no set definitions of what constitutes certain properties, such as 'investment property'. "There are no specific definitions of how to list a real property," Walcott said. "It's up to the individual to decide."
Nine MPs listed that they have interests in 'investment' or 'rental' properties under the real property section of the register.
There were 26 MPs who did not list any property interests, but did list that they had interests in trusts. Of these, 18 were National MPs, six were from Labour, and there was one each from NZ First and ACT.
The register also asked MPs to list whether they had company directorships and controlling interests, or interests (such as shares and bonds) in companies and business entities. There were 27 that listed companies associated with property investment or investment in general: 17 were National MPs and six were from Labour. There was one each from NZ First, the Greens, ACT and independent MP Taito Philip Field.
Here are a few examples of listings on the register - (1) represents company directorships and controlling interests, (2) represents interests (such as shares and bonds) in companies and business entities, (4) represents interests in trusts, (6) represents interests in real property.
David Carter (National, List) (2): Alliance Group limited - licensed meat exporters; Doone Partnership "“ farming operation; Guinness Peat Group p/c "“ public company; NZ Wool Services International Ltd. "“ wool exporters; Primary Producers Cooperative Society Ltd. "“ licensed meat exporters; Ravensdown Fertiliser Co-op Ltd. "“ fertiliser company; Hauraki Private Entity No.2 Fund "“ public investment; Wool Equities Ltd. "“ public company; CBS Canterbury "“ building society; Collateral Mezzanine (NZ) Fund 05 "“ public investment. (4): David Carter Family Trust; Doone Trust; Maurice Carter Family Trust. (6): Farm property, Banks Peninsula; Farm property, North Canterbury; House, Marlborough Sounds; Apartment, Wellington.
Helen Clark (Labour, Mt Albert) (4): Burke Family Trust; FG Clark Family Trust. (6): House, Auckland; Town House, Wellington; Apartment, Christchurch; Investment property, Rodney; House, UK.
Michael Cullen (Labour, List) (6): Family Home (jointly owned), Napier.
Taito Phillip Field, (Independent, Mangere) (1): T.P. Field Developments Ltd. "“ investments. (6): Family home, Mangere, Auckland; Apartment, Wellington Central; Rental house, Mangere, Auckland; Rental units, Mangere, Auckland x2; Rental house, Manukau, Auckland; Family home, 1 acre (jointly owned), Afiamalu, Samoa; Half acre of land (jointly owned), Viatele, Samoa; Two acres of land (jointly owned), Aleisa, Samoa; Half acre of land (jointly owned), Letongo, Samoa.
Jeanette Fitzsimons (Green, List) (1): Aeolian Property Company Limited "“ property management. (2): Fletcher Building Limited; Cavalier Corporation Limited; Fisher & Paykel Appliances Holdings Limited; Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Corporation Limited; Scott Technology Limited. (6): Family home (jointly owned), Kauaeranga Valley, Thames; One-fifth share in relative's home near Kawhia.
Shane Jones (Labour, List) (2): Castle-Rigg Limited "“ property investment; Victoria & Benecia Limited "“ property investment; Kamo Properties "“ property investment; JONDAC Limited "“ property investment. (4): Te Puna o Te Anaru Trust; Castlerigg Trust. (6): Property, Springs Flat, Whangarei; Property, Maimaru, Awanui, SH10, Tai Tokerau.
John Key (National, Helensville) (1): Earl of Auckland "“ commercial property. (2): Little Nell "“ property investment; Merrill Lynch "“ investment banking; Jackson Mining "“ gold mine. (4): JP & BI Key Family Trust.
Winston Peters (NZ First, List) (4): WRP Family Trust. (6): Land, Whananaki South; Property, Rawhiti, Bay of Islands.
Lindsay Tisch (National, Piako) (1): WL and LM Tisch Limited (not trading); Heritage 653 Limited "“ property investment; Tisch Properties Limited "“ property investment. (2): Paladin Limited "“ property investment; Tower Limited "“ insurance. (6): Family home, Matamata (presently being constructed); Apartment, Wellington; Apartment, Mt Maunganui; Interest in property, Mission Bay; Interest in property, Lake Rotoiti.
Chris Tremain (National, Napier) (1) Tremain Holdings Limited "“ investment; Tremain Real Estate Limited "“ real estate sales; Tremain Developments Limited "“ real estate development; MSC Limited, formerly called Wine Country Homes Limited trading as Jennian Homes (HB) "“ new home building; Waipatiki Developments Limited "“ land development. (2) Sunset Investment Partnership "“ retirement investment in shares, commercial and residential property; The Provincial Club Limited "“ investment in shares and fixed interest deposits. (4) The Estate of KR Tremain; The KR Tremain Family Trust; CJ and AK Tremain Family Trust; CJ Tremain Development Trust. (6) Investment property (jointly owned), Hastings.
What are your views? Should New Zealand's MP's be placed under further scrutiny by having to list what they own in trusts? What if a member's spouse owns property or has controlling interests in a company? Do most of our politicians have a conflict of interest in any debate about the use of trusts to minimise tax or the current regime encouraging investment in rental properties to reduce personal tax?
9 Comments
Maybe what is more relevant
Maybe what is more relevant is more transparency as to how they set priorities (what pushes the issue button) and how much lobbyists etc affect their decisions.
Very interesting Alex. I guess
Very interesting Alex.
I guess there are going to be some much poorer MPs soon.
I wonder whether you can do the same thing for journalists, so we can see if that explains why so few were warning about the house price bubble. After all, very few people with investment properties would want to think about the realities, let alone write about it.
Very interesting reading The most
Very interesting reading
The most telling thing to me is that it clearly shows that Cullen, who has slowly destroyed this country, doesn't have a business sense in his head.
At least Helen has had the sense to invest somewhere- whether rightly or wrongly she chose to invest in some property.
She also has the sense to protect that property through a Trust.
Cullen has declared neither assets nor protection of the family home(through a trust) , & the country has trusted him to look after the economy - no wonder we are in such a mess.
What does he do with his 300k + PA salary - squirrel it away in Kiwibank ? He obviously doesn't invest it in the "Productive Sector" in the form of Shares or Bonds etc.
The use of trusts does not indicate "Abuse of the Tax system" because a trust cannot offset losses against trustees or beneficiaries incomes.
It is more likely to indicate any properties owned by the trusts are profit making "“ remember- that thing that NZ used to make on its exports many years ago.
I for one want Businessmen in Parliament, not ideological idiots playing monopoly with our incomes.
Keith, Don't worry mate, this
Keith,
Don't worry mate, this country is run by businessmen alright, businessmen who control the economically illiterate and completely reliant on second hand advise Labour Party Executive, by puppet strings. Swap to the National Party Central Banker Controlled Executive and you get them back in the drivers seat. As for the many that have gone in that big house with the most honourable of intentions, only to realise just how far from the levers of power they will ever be, they simply give up and climb on board systems of privilege that hide underneath the exterior of this supposedly equitable democracy. Under Labour we get to run our own jail, under National the screws move back in.
Study the history of trusts, you find out they were created as part of a deal in the handing over of power from the European aristocracy to elected parliaments, basically allowing the aristocracy to keep much of their previously plundered wealth in secret from the masses, who at the time wanted to put them all to death, let alone see them hold onto any of their ill gotten gains. I put it to you that by a very cunning financial web of deceit, they have certainly got it all back and some.
Whats productive about Bonds, they are the greatest cause of our perpetual balance of payments that there is. Central Banks lending us money they create out of freshair, which is then contracted by a Bond to be paid back out of the future taxes of the nation with interest, come on mate.
Cheers
Iain
As far as I can
As far as I can see there are three main reasons to set up and operate a Family Trust:
1. You want to avoid paying all of the tax that you are liable for;
2. You want taxpayers, (as opposed to the beneficiaries of your estate) to pay for your 'keep' once you become old and infirm;
3. Before you become old and infirm, you want to be able to take risks in business and not suffer any personal financial consequences should those businesses you own fail and end up owing other people money.
Have I got that right? Did I miss anything?
Hi Kate, You summed that
Hi Kate,
You summed that up beautifully if you ask me, just ask smiling Jim Bolger. If you study much of history you begin to realise most things financial have not changed a lot, thats why the slave-minded conservatives favourite saying is "We must look forward, not back", I would love a dollar for everytime Don Brash said that, I would be able to start my own ethical lending bank.
Cheers
Iain
Thanks Iain. Which, if I
Thanks Iain. Which, if I did get that right, leads to a question that's been bothering me for ages. Apparently, from the advice I've received, you are not supposed to set up a trust for any of those above reasons . So I just wonder - what did all the other folks like me tell their legal advisors was the reason they were establishing a trust?
A question for anyone, The
A question for anyone,
The common folks can't crack open the trusts of those that deceive and pilfer their savings, what I want to know is, do Banks have the power to crack open the trusts of anyone who owes them?
Cheers
Iain
I would be more interested
I would be more interested in how much tax they pay,tax losses are ring-fenced in the trust but the losses on their numerous properties wouldnt be.