HOT TOPICS:   Election 2014  |  Dairy prices   | Housing affordability                                 RESOURCES:    Economic calendar   |  Median multiples

The comment stream

Reader poll

What's the most likely election outcome?

Choices

Join the Interest community to be a registered commenter so you can:
- Edit your comments
- Avoid the CAPTCHA
- Vote on comments
Register Here

Already registered? log back in here ..

Forgotten your password? No problem! Click here

BusinessDesk: Silver lining for Northport in Auckland port’s woes

Posted in News

 Northport, the Marsden Point wharf operator, is well-placed to win a greater share of North Island trade from Ports of Auckland and Port of Tauranga, which are both its owners and rivals.

Auckland, which has tried to sack stevedores if they don’t accept its cost-cutting regime, is hemmed in by the city’s CBD, has had wharf extension into the harbour rejected, and increasingly directs freight from an ‘inland port’. Port of Tauranga has 184 hectares of what it calls strategic land holdings, of which 44 hectares is available for development.

Ports of Auckland owns 19.9 percent of Northland Port Corp alongside Northland Regional Council, which in turn owns about 54 percent of Northport. Northport’s other investor is Port of Tauranga, who claim dominance in North Island trade handling similar bulk cargoes to Marsden Point, such as logs.

Northport also has about 180 hectares of land, owned by Northland Port, which is currently only at 50 percent capacity.

“We own just as much land as Tauranga but theirs is full and ours is empty,” Northland Regional Council chairman Craig Brown told BusinessDesk. “There is land galore at Northport. I think the owners of these ports have to come together and look at the future.”

Ports of Auckland and Port of Tauranga have been unable to forge a direct alliance as they compete for freight but both see strategic value in their partnership at Marsden Point.

The two are also linked through North Tugz, a venture between Northport and Auckland’s port that provides services to Northport and NZ Refining. The JV is indicative of an industry where most players have tie-ups with others in freight and logistics, including KiwiRail.

“Ports of Auckland and Port of Tauranga will be at capacity - this may lead to further port developments in Northland,” said Tony Gibson, the Auckland port’s chief executive. “Ports of Auckland’s investment in Northland is so that we can have input in this.”

Northport’s council ownership has caused trouble in the past. Former chairman of Northland Port Corp, Mike Daniel, quit in 2009 saying the port faced challenges that “need to be addressed courageously and commercially in partnership with our major shareholder the Northland Regional Council.”

“Regrettably, I’ve reached the conclusion in recent times that our major shareholder does not share my view,” Daniel, who retains an interest in about 3 percent of the company’s stock, said at the time.

Daniel said this week that Auckland’s wharves should be shut down, sold and trade moved north. He is pushing for Northland to be included as part of Auckland Council’s review of port operations following protests that expansion plans will disfigure the city’s harbour.

“I am talking about shooting down Auckland,” Daniel said. An extension of the relationship between the two rivals “needs to be considered, as it is a logical, economic step. The de facto merger between the two ports already is really helpful – I don’t think that it would be a major problem.”

Port of Tauranga chief executive, Mark Cairns said all three ports in the North Island need to remain open to keep up with growing demand.

“It is not realistic to assume that Auckland can be shut down,” Cairns said. “We think it is a great idea but not realistic in the short term. Our view is that it will be a wee way off.”

Port of Auckland’s Gibson said the port has no plans to review its holdings in Northland Port Corp, “currently seeing it as a long term investment.”

Auckland’s Northport holding is just below the 20 percent threshold that would trigger a takeover, but has no board representation.

Earlier this month, Ports of Auckland said it would make 292 workers redundant and outsourced its stevedoring services in a bid to catch up with the productivity of Tauranga. That plan has been put on hold today pending last minute talks with the union.

The port has said existing labour contracts eroded its competitiveness and caused it to lose business. The dispute has cost it contracts with shipping line Maersk and dairy exporter Fonterra Cooperative Group, who have shifted some services to Port of Tauranga and Port of Napier.

Stevedoring at Northport is a combination of in-house wharfies, outside firms under contract to exporters, importers and shipping companies, while Port Tauranga offers stevedoring, marshalling companies and shipping and customs agents, and works with several stevedore companies.

Shares in the Port of Tauranga rose to an all time high of $11.94 cents in February after it posted a record first-half profit of $34.6 million. The stock is currently trading at $10.85.

Northland Port shares have gained 16.6 percent this year and are currently unchanged on $1.75. It posted a 51 percent gain in first-half profit to $3.2 million for the six months ended Dec. 31 as the wharves bulged with logs bound for export markets. Sales increased 35 percent to $4.8 million.

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment in the box on the right or click on the "'Register" link at the bottom of the comments.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current Comment policy is here.

6 Comments

This inter-NZ 'infrastructure

This inter-NZ 'infrastructure competition' - be it ports, tertiary education, electricity supply, local government council's with their economic development projects ... is 'as it should be' in terms of the neoliberal ideological way. 
 
 

People of the same trade

People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices.
Adam Smith - 1776.
My how things don't change.

As A South Islander--I cannot

As A South Islander--I cannot see that Auckland people travelling on the Main Road between Marsden Point and Auckland are going to be too pleased at the  INCREASED LEVEL OF TRUCK NUMBERS that would be on the road transporting the containers back to Auckland, for distribution to the rest of New Zealand.
Auckland lives somewhat on the Distribution of Goods for the rest of New Zealand.
To have many containers coming into Marsden Point, would just increase the distribution cost of the goods to consumers.  Not to mention the increased loadings on the Auckland Harbour Bridge. But Maybe they could put the containers on Rail.  Yere right !!!
The Business's that receive most of the incoming  Goods (in Containers)  from Overseas are Based In Auckland, or they also have their Head Offices in Auckland.

Marsden Point is only a goer

Marsden Point is only a goer if there is a major major upgrade to the rial line and a line connecting the port constructed.  The resource consents for the conecting line are granted already.

There is a pipeline between

There is a pipeline between Marsden point and Auckland. (Wiri).
Thank you Mr Muldoon, and Think Big!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/bus

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/economics-blog/2012/feb/07/baltic-dry-shipping-index-25-year-low
 
http://www.odt.co.nz/opinion/opinion/201547/brace-crash-chinas-economy
 
www.chinafta.govt.nz/1-The.../3.../National-interest-analysis.pdf
 
On the back of that, I'd say that the expectation of 'China's exports (to NZ) rising 10.9% in the first year, and NZ's (to China) rising 39%, mighta gone aft aglee. I long ago reckoned that we needed fewer, bigger ports, and that the deeper-channel/bigger ships thing was a bridge too far. Just like the Space Shuttle, Concorde, a too-big throw in the face of peak energy. This competing nonsense just hurts the country as a whole.
 
Time we addressed the future, not the past.