In this section
Offers for readers
Follow the news from interest
The comment stream
- 1 of 32145
- 1 of 439
The news stream
- 90 seconds at 9 am: Now the Greek creditors turn 46
- Govt to sell up to 2,000 houses 34
- Little focuses on small business jobs 28
- The problem with lifestyle blocks 24
- Calls for OCR to remain at 3.5% 22
- 90 seconds at 9 am: Yellen's 'patient' message 19
- Bernard's Top 10 18
- Property investment; Why bother? 18
- 90 seconds at 9 am: On the move 13
- How many govt departments does it take to build a counter? 6
Security issues around govt's broadband roll-out have been raised, govt dealt with them, Communications and IT Minister Adams says
By Alex Tarrant
Security issues have been raised in the process of awarding government contracts for the roll-out of ultra-fast broadband in New Zealand, Communications and Information Technology Minister Amy Adams says.
But Adams would not say whether these issues involved Chinese company Huawei, which this week was banned by the Australian government from its national broadband network roll-out due to security concerns.
When answering questions on why the Australian government had blocked Huawei, a spokesman for Australian Attorney-General Nicola Roxon said: ''as a strategic and significant government investment, we have a responsibility to do our utmost to protect [NBN's] integrity and that of the information carried on it."
Huawei is involved in contracts to help roll out the New Zealand government's ultra-fast broadband package in parts of New Zealand.
Speaking to media in Parliament Buildings this morning, Adams said she was aware of the Australian government's decision, but she would not comment on specific vendors in New Zealand or say what sort of due diligence was carried out on bidders.
"We take security of the network very seriously, but we’ve obviously responded to the threats that we’re aware of and put in place steps to deal with that, and we’re comfortable with where we’re at," Adams said.
“We have had security issues raised in the process of doing the contract, but I’m confident that we’ve responded to the matter quickly,” she said.
She would not go into specifics, or say who made them aware of potential threats. Adams said she was not aware whether any bidders were cut out because of concerns raised.
“We can be confident that we take good advice on security issues, that we treat them very seriously, and that we respond appropriately,” she said.
Adams had not asked Australian authorities why they took the move they did.
“I’ll discuss that with my colleagues in due course, but at this stage I haven’t asked that question. I’m aware of the action that they’ve taken and I’ll discuss that with my colleagues going forward. But I’m confident we have treated this matter seriously in New Zealand, and we’ve responded appropriately,” she said.
Greens want investigation
Meanwhile, the Green Party has requested Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee investigate Huawei following the developments in Australia.
“Huawei has been blocked in both Australia and the United States over security concerns and it’s hard to believe our security agencies know something about Huawei that Australia and the United States don’t,” Green Party ICT spokesperson Gareth Hughes said.
“Cyber warfare is a major security concern and the Government needs to ensure that it is protecting the interests of New Zealanders and New Zealand Companies. The New Zealand taxpayer will be purchasing hundreds of millions of dollars worth of equipment and services off Huawei, and the Government needs to demonstrate that this doesn’t have any strings attached that will harm our cyber security," Hughes said.
“The Government needs to investigate, and it would not be in New Zealand’s national security interests to ignore these concerns for fear of offending the Chinese Government,” he said.
'Glad we used a US firm'
The Pacific Fibre, a New Zealand company looking to build an undersea fibre cable linking New Zealand, the US and Australia, said the developments highlighted the ongoing security concerns of US and Australian authorities with Chinese submarine cable technology suppliers.
"The United States has previously expressed concerns about Huawei and other Chinese submarine cable suppliers fearing security breaches (e.g. interception of sensitive data)," CEO Mark Rushworth said in a media statement.
"The issues raised by the US and Australian authorities’ concerns with Chinese suppliers further validate our decision last year to appoint TE SubCom, a US company and industry pioneer in undersea communications technology, to build the subsea portion of the Pacific Fibre cable," Rushworth said.
Having a US vendor on board reduced the risk of Pacific Fibre facing the same concerns from regulatory authorities in relation to security breaches on its cable system.
"Last month we announced the completion of our Californian and Australian landings desktop study and Californian permitting study in conjunction with TE SubCom. With initial approvals obtained from Californian permitting authorities, the project is now set to move forward with the marine route study," Rushworth said.
"We are confident that we will secure all permits and licences required to land the Pacific Fibre cable in the United States, Australia and New Zealand," he said.
"Where this leaves the proposed Huawei Marine built trans-Tasman cable, is another question."
'Govt needs to come clean'
Labour's ICT spokeswoman Clare Curran said the government's "stonewalling" on what it knew about Huawei’s involvement in the roll-out of New Zealand's ultra-fast broadband raised more questions about cyber security and the integrity of New Zealand’s network than it answered.
“The Government is refusing to explain why it has taken a different decision to the Australian Government when it comes to security matters relating to Huawei’s involvement in broadband projects," Curran said.
“While the Australian Government has banned Huawei from tendering for any contracts attached to its A$36 billion broadband scheme, our Prime Minister blithely says he is ‘comfortable with checks done’ over the security of the New Zealand network," she said.
“The Australians are considered to be a partner in terms of our security and intelligence relationships. If they are concerned enough to ban Huawei from bidding for the broadband contract, why has New Zealand allowed three taxpayer-funded contracts to go ahead without a more robust probe into the implications for the integrity of our network?
“How long have John Key and other ministers known about the extent of Australia’s security concerns and what are they going to do about it? Just saying trust us, it’ll be okay, isn’t good enough," Curran said.
“Acting Prime Minister Gerry Brownlee is refusing to say whether John Key has been briefed on the reasons for the Australian government’s ban on Huawei for the broadband contracts. He’s also refusing to offer any guarantees about the security of our new broadband network," she said.
“Essentially our government is looking the other way and refusing to take a second look at the contracts that have been given to Huawei despite the intense public interest in this matter. The Prime Minister must reassure New Zealanders he is taking this matter seriously. Our international reputation is at stake.”