In this section
Offers for readers
The comment stream
Recent comments
- 1 of 9739
- ››
Editors choice
- 1 of 79
- ››
The news stream
Latest news
Most commented
- 'Housing showing few signs of life' 251
- 'Dear Allan: Say sorry and thanks' 155
- 90 seconds at 9 am with BNZ 83
- 'A fish stinks from the head' 69
- 'Will we regret getting what we wished for?' 46
- Thursday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 44
- Should the RBNZ hold the Official Cash Rate at 3% until December 9 as many economists and the markets are now forecating? 17
- Taxpayer dives into the red 16
- NZ$ world's 10th most traded currency 13
- Alloway to step down as Allied CEO 10
Most viewed
Interest on Twitter
90 seconds at 9am: Sheppard calls for statutory manager for Hanover; 'NZ$67 bln of oil offshore'; Weak US housing starts
Watch video on YouTube here. Watch video on our video page here. Bernard Hickey details the key news overnight in 90 seconds at 9am in association with ASB, including reaction to Allied Farmer's deal to buy Hanover. The deal means Hanover investors would swap their debt for 900 million shares in Allied Farmers. If the share price stayed up it might be worth NZ$400 mln, but the history on these debt for equity swaps is not good. Just ask Geneva Finance shareholders who took shares said to be worth 36 cents for 15% of their debt and now have share worth less than 9 cents and difficult to sell in an illiquid market. Meanwhile, Bruce Sheppard is calling on the government to put a statutory manager inside Hanover Finance because he says bond holders are 'too dumb' to do the right thing. Brian Gaynor is also sceptical in this report from the NZHerald. Meanwhile, GNS Sciences is estimating New Zealand has NZ$67 billion of undiscovered oil sitting under ground off our coast, Stuff reported. In the United States overnight there was news that housing starts were weaker than expected in October and and the Dow fell, Reuters reported.
46 Comments
That article on Stuff about
That article on Stuff about the Oil is not well written. 1. How can $60 billion of oil generate $30 billion per year of income? 2. $30 billion of (gross) oil income is unlikely to generate $10 billion of (net) tax receipts. 3. 6.5 billion barrels of oil at a current price of 80USD/barrel is more like $650 billion NZD.
Re: the offshore oil potential.
Re: the offshore oil potential. As I was banging on a few weeks ago - NZ should urgently form its own national oil company. We must avoid at all costs a UK North Sea scenario - where the oil revenues have been squandered - our model should be the Norwegian one.
"False Economy" by Alan Beattie
"False Economy" by Alan Beattie has a good chapter on the woes of natural resources.
But <b>andy</b> , we need
But andy , we need the royalties to fund the monster welfare state that Helen and Michael bequeathed us . We can't pare it down , that'll bring the wrath of Sir Humphrey Appleby upon us . In the civil service we rest . Amen .
I have been an investor
I have been an investor in New Zealand's oil sector but I have a terrible sense of foreboding about what Gerry Brownlee is proposing - that is why I have been getting out! Decades ago I remember British Parliamentarian Enoch Powell telling us in Britain that North Sea oil was a 'curse' that would overvalue our currency and destroy our productive base. Of course, even those who thought highly of Enoch laughed, but they are not laughing now! Most of the oil is gone and what do have to show for it? - a dependancy culture that brings tears to the eyes. North Sea oil has been the economic ruin of Britain!
Roger Thompson is right, we have created a welfare monster that must now be fed and Kiwis risk losing their lifestyle to pay for it.
Granted the potential risks of
Granted the potential risks of the NZ$ becoming a petrocurrency need to be managed. However as I re-iterated above we should follow the Norwegian model NOT the UK one.
The Norwegian model is based around the formation of Statoil (the State oil company) in the 1970's - see here:
http://www.statoil.com/en/about/history/Pages/default3.aspx
Most significantly the Norwegians created a national fund into which oil royalty money has flowed.
http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2008/POL070908A.htm
The second article is a 'must read' on how to do this sort of thing correctly.
x2 for following the Norweigan
x2 for following the Norweigan model. Get our pollies on a plane to Oslo asap.
Well Yippieeeeeeeeeeee...calls for another rant,
Well Yippieeeeeeeeeeee...calls for another rant, in case they forget they are the PROBLEM, not the SOLUTION.
The finding of OIL (maybe)...will enable Rodney, Hone-y and Peter, and Winston and John and David and....and ...and ..the rest of the WASTRELS to keep FLYING around the world achieving nothing, but having a great time at our expense,well into RETIREMENT.
I hope they find OIL fast and get it out of the ground, as the rest of us are getting sick and tired of their ACT-ions, allegedly in the NATIONAL interest, THOUGH....at OUR LABOURED.....cost...TAXPAYERS.
The millions of HANGERS ON...must be rubbing their hands in GLEE at the thought of being able to SPEND more than they actually PRODUCE, over the next few years.
Just like they have for the past 30 years... I know about.
The billions we have to OVER borrow in the meanwhile...in the perhaps VAIN hope that there may be OIL, will no doubt evaporate into the POLLIES & BANKS pockets via TAX rorts and TAX evasion.
Blatant theft is still a CRIME in my book, no matter WHO perpetrates it.
Just like HANDOVER and ALLIED alliance, Just like a certain WELL KNOWN entertainer who gets away with sex crimes, there appears to be one rule for the (maybe)...RICH manipulative MISCREANTS and another for the SUCKERS paying TAXES who keep these idiots in POWER and their GREEDY ways.
They forget we KNOW who they are. So should everyone in the WORLD, so they can never do the same again.
When will the perpetrators of these CRIMES be held up to REAL JUSTICE.
Seems we are not alone with this problem...Someone else has been milking the system, besides FONTERRA and the CRAFARS.
http://www.sphere.com/2009/11/18/a-california-town-reels-in-wake-of-crea...
Wakey Wakey ...NZ.
TAXPAYERS & VOTERS UNITE...we need a new SHEPHERD, not the OLD FLOCK of liars and cheats.
Andy - you have my
Andy - you have my vote. The Norwegians have shown us the way.
The Norwegians are actually in
The Norwegians are actually in the post-peak phase too. No amount of stored wealth, buys you energy in a depleting market, for any length of time.
She is actually a classic example (soon) as Indonesia is (now) of the exporting country-becomes-importing country syndrome.
It goes like this: You find oil under your soil. You produce it. You export it, and you use more and more of it internally. When you internal supply-rate peaks (see: Cantarell) then the amount you can export is not only reduced by the supply depletion rate, but also by your continued increase of internal consumption.
That weasel pops too, just a little later than the UK model.
Maybe speculation that keeps the
Maybe speculation that keeps the kiwi$ high is a punt on a major oil find here.
Andy Hamilton, You are damn
Andy Hamilton,
You are damn right! ... but then, you'd need politicians with a very long term horizon coupled with corresponding political will, and even more importantly the general public asking for them and voting them into power. Can anyone here see that happen? Sadly, I can't right now, unless there is a major change in many people's thinking.
Before any of this would likely happen, someone would need to invent a Spin-O-Meter filter apparatus, which will be distributed to every home in the country free of charge. Then we may be able to start having a real debate in this country about the things that really matter, and we may have a chance again to make NZ a truly world leading country, one day...
PK - you won't find
PK - you won't find me denying the reality of the Norwegian (or global) oil peak - but the point I am making is that there is a UK way of managing such windfalls and there is a Norwegian way, and I know which one SHOULD be followed.
The UK is a broken economy in debt up to its eyeballs which has squandered 20 years of oil and gas production.
Norway remains one of the richest nations in the world with vast financial assets accrued off the back of its O+G industry with which to invest in a post oil future.
There is a big difference.
Our similarities to Norway stand out anyway - a small population with the emphasis of primary industries (pre-the oil boom)
I wonder if our politicians,
I wonder if our politicians, and system ,are really that bad?
http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2009/cpi...
Does anyone seriously think that
Does anyone seriously think that New Zealand's political elite would use massive oil revenues wisely. In everything, they seem to do what Britain effectively commands and, I have no doubt, that they would squander huge windfalls in a similar wasteful fashion in order to perpetuate themselves in power.
The one resource New Zealand should be exploiting is gold. Why, because gold is money - money in exile admittedly - but at some point it will be re-monetized. A wise country would be extracting and storing it for the day when all paper money finally meets its nemesis. Then we will be in the highly advantageous position of having real 'capital' to invest for the future.
Andy H - true. I'd
Andy H - true. I'd prefer us to use the remaining oil-lubed time to put our ship on a sustainable course though. It's sooooooo do-able, and yet we waste time.
Seems to me that history won't record our current leaders as the new wave, so much as the last triumphant whimper of an intellectually-impaired epoch.
I guess we outlived the Inquisition, McCarthy and Spongebob Squarepants.
Maybe we'll outlive this lot too. :)
ps Malcolm: don't worry, it will all pan out!
rc - "x2 for following
rc - "x2 for following the Norweigan model. Get our pollies on a plane to Oslo asap."
Make that x3, and then fly them back via Sumborough for a few pints of '80/-' then down to Guernsey and back home via North Dakota:
http://www.interest.co.nz/ratesblog/index.php/2009/11/18/opinion-how-the...
Oh, for the gentle freshening North North Sea breeze - and the H2S! Bring it on...
If NZ dug up the
If NZ dug up the oil, sold it, kept 20% of takings to put in place and develop alternative energy technologies and paid off the national debt with the rest, wouldn't we all end up better off? I guess that's too simple.
Put me down for the
Put me down for the StatOil solution to any potential Oil/Hydrocarbons income streams
The UK blew it's North Sea wealth. The Norwegians haven't.
If the value is as much as they say - we really do need to have a NOC and not just get to clip the ticket from IOC's
The valuation that they have put forward is based on lease/concession model.
In agreement with Andy Hamilton's thoughts.
We invest in energy, oil and gold companies - and it would be nice if there were better opportunities to do so in NZ. But at the moment it's the ASX that gets our attention. Maybe that will change - especially in the servicing sector - because most of those potential plays are all offshore and that is a great chance for the servicing sector.
Hi Blair Love your website.
Hi Blair
Love your website. Good for you for setting up such a venture, I am sure you will do very well.
Between the Norse with StatOil
Between the Norse with StatOil and the Danes with their high rate of renewable energy and associated export income it would seem we have much to learn from the Scandanavians eh?
Dumb question time: where did StatOil get their capital from? Did average norwegians buy shares or did the Govt stump up the cash on their behalf?
Also, are the Nats too ideologically committed to neoliberal ideals to go for this commonsense option?
"Today I am announcing the
"Today I am announcing the end of the consensus around the policy targets and tools of the Reserve Bank. Labour wants to see a step change in our export performance." Goff (Herald)
Haaaarhaaahaaha...what next from those fools. They had 9 years to do something positive and what did we get?..a bloody expensive trainset and a bloated state sector producing bugger all but red tape and more stupidity. Go away Goff. Labour are failures. Time to give National a chance to prove they too can make a spectacular ballsup of running the property ponzi scheme.
Greg - I think this
Greg - I think this is a little harsh, "Also, are the Nats too ideologically committed to neoliberal ideals to go for this commonsense option?" The Nats don't actually follow classic Neo.lib'ism, they, like previous governments, follow what I think of as an 'amusing' version of Neo.wotsit, that includes land and propery investment subsidies, via the tax system, which yields an unbalanced, biased system, certainly somthing that is not broad, flat, fair and without subsidy inclusion. So I don't think you can read too much into them following classic Neo.lib ideals, the more likely problem will be a lack of commonsense, as I reckon, you rightly question.
Wally - maybe getting the sack can help change behaviour? At this point, what is there to help National change their behaviour?
Only thing I can think
Only thing I can think of Les is a drop in the polls. You have to wait for the poodle media to wake up and start with the education of the masses on what "good govt" really means. Given the average reading age out there is 12yrs...this will take some time. Key is all into polls. If he smells risk in Nov 2011, expect instant action and some new spin being spun by the spinners will take place.
Cheers Les, yeah I agree
Cheers Les, yeah I agree that the Nats (and Key in particular) are poll-chasers.
I do wonder if there will be any tension between, say Bill English preferring a StatOil-ish solution to enrich NZ and Mr Brownlee being happy to allow the big foreign players to come in and give us pennies on the dollar because they bought him a nice lunch.
Yes, to the vote for
Yes, to the vote for the Norwegian example - and yes, if they called for New Zealanders to invest capital in the venture, I'd be in it boots and all.
I've been looking for a decent place to park some capital which has a long-term outlook that benefits my grandchildren and has the potential to keep them Kiwis for the rest of their lives.
Don't count on the media
Don't count on the media - you can cound the number of good investigative journo's in this country on the fingers of one hand.
Some are good wordsmiths, some are smart, but few indeed are unbiased truth-seekers.
And the ones that are, run the risk of being sacked, or their contributions ending up binned.
Editorial bravery is the key - always has been - and is a scarce commodity currently. At the end of the day, news is (was) run as a business, so it's objectivity when addressing the business model, cannot be counted on....
Good interview (yesterday, Nine-to-Noon, Nat Radio) of the Wastington Post geezer - we meed a hundred like him.
@Les, Wally, Greg, they, like
@Les, Wally, Greg, they, like the lot before them, are all tossers, don't get your hopes up.
Re Statoil and how it
Re Statoil and how it was established - it a while since I looked at this but as I recall:
The Norge govt gave Statoil 50% ownership of all producing fields - to get the fields through exploration and into developement Statoil's exploration costs were carried by the other partners in any particular development. Statoil was responsible also for selling off the oil on behalf of the Norwegian state.
From that you can see that there was little downside exposure to the Norwegian taxpayer.
Subsequently Statoil's profile changed - they began to take on a much more active role in exploration etc, taking a much greater risk profile. The company has been subject to extensive re-organization/merger since.
Its worth noting that there were already overseas companies involved in the Norwegian North Sea before Statoil was set up (just as there are here at the moment in NZ) - they continued to operate as before.
Now overseas companies will no doubt whine on about - the NZ oil province is not big enough to have such a state run operation restricting their profits, too far away etc.
However these are peakoil days - the overseas companies WILL come if the oil is here (the have to, their horizons are continually shrinking), and under terms we can dictate
Anyway - cross your fingers
Anyway - cross your fingers for a good drilling season in offshore Taranaki in the next 6 months. There is a lot of drilling but keep your eyes on Albacore (to be spudded imminently - operated by Westech/NZOG) and Hoki (spudded Jan/Feb 2010 AWE/NZOG/Others). Either might be a 100m plus barrel oilfield - both are wildcats. If either came in things would start to look very exciting - particurly since the 100m barrel Maari field is just on stream.
Time for cuppa tea...and valium
Time for cuppa tea...and valium http://www.nzherald.co.nz/economy/news/article.cfm?c_id=34&objectid=1061...
Read and laugh.
+ 1 Andy .. great
+ 1 Andy .. great links and info as usual !!
Hey Andy H do you
Hey Andy H do you want Geree brownlee's job? I bet a trail of sausages on the ground would lure him out of his office and in you go.....
Good stuff about the oil
Good stuff about the oil prospects eh.
The comparison with Norway is striking, they are now sitting on a truly impressive sovereign wealth fund and lets not forget that a lot of this was achieved at a time of very low oil prices. $100 oil is now baked in the cake IMO,
What's the betting Labour's already working out how to piss the proceeds away a la Gordon Brown and the Nats'll want to flog it off to big foreign business for pennies in the dollar, what time horizon do these fools work to? Meantime the greens will say leave it in the ground...Shakes head
We need to start ringing the bell on this, FOLLOW THE NORWEGIAN MODEL
Malcolm, This only happens if
Malcolm,
This only happens if we collectively let them!!
The fact NZ is a
The fact NZ is a sunken continent indicates that we should be sitting on a lot of oil and Nat gas.
What nobody talks about is the cost. The Southern basin is not the North Sea its a very difficult enviroment to get oil out of. While there is lots of oil in the southern basin thats not the problem the problem is getting that oil out of the southern basin and onto tankers.
Thank you David Cook for
Thank you David Cook for pointing out the screamingly obvious. How on earth is NZ going to nationalize the oil industry without the funding to develop the means to extract it? Even the talk of it is mere uninformed pep talk at this stage.
No-one is talking about nationalising
No-one is talking about nationalising the oil industry - and thats NOT what Norway did - please re-read again how Statoil was originally set up.
Crown minerals are already providing the seed data - they make seismic data available directly to companies at low/no cost.
I have no doubt you will hear a lot of the 'we can't go down this route, the oil campanies won't get involved' (strangely enough a lot of that will come from the sponsors of said companies).
Fine. Well leave the oil in situ then. Its an appreciating asset in a peakoil world. The oil companies WILL come around to it as their prospects elsewhere recede.
Hell 20 years ago (when some of the earliest discoveries were made) the oil companies were under no pressure to exploit our fields so nothing happened. Now this year is the busiest season yet for offshore drilling. What changed in the previous 20 years? A great deal of easy to obtain oil disappeared from elsewhere.
Move forward 5 years into the future and the liklihood is the pressure on the oil companies will be even more intense. NZ may be a difficult physical environment for the oil companies to work in, but we are a much 'safer' country to run an investment in than 3/4s of the OPEC nations for example.
Its a discussion we need to be having NOW, not when and if (here is hoping) one of the exploration wells turns up an elephant field.
As for the Southern Basin being difficult - sure, but then so are the latest discoveries off the coast of Brazil - jeez there each well costs $US200 to drill and they are going through 2000m of molten salt underneath 3000m of rock and under 3000m of water!
Edit - that should be
Edit - that should be $US200m
And right on cue -
And right on cue - we have a proposal from AWE to target a 500m barrel prospect:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/3077658/Wanted-partners-to-ta...
AND I am delighted to read in this report -
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/3076602/60b-of-oil-off-New-Zeal...
THAT:
'Another report to the Government by private sector analysts McDouall Stuart recommends setting up a national oil company, owned by the Crown, to manage the potentially enormous resource.
Other options suggested include the Crown underwriting oil drilling equipment and infrastructure, directing state-owned energy companies such as Genesis or Solid Energy into oil exploration, and requiring the Superannuation Fund or ACC to invest in oil futures.'
Hooray, now someone is thinking ahead.
As I said above - if one of these drills hits a elephant there will be a rush to NZ - and we MUST set out terms to the oil companies that maximise the benefit to NZ.
Thanks Andy, you seem to
Thanks Andy, you seem to have a good handle on this.
What I've heard is that the Northland basin (west coast up to Cape Reinga) is a prime prospect and certainly more accessible than the deep south. They found oil seeps and an onshore exploration well was tried at Waimamaku back in the sixties. No commercial quantities but it was a bit of a half arse effort as I understand it.
Quite agree regarding getting held to ransom by the oil companies, further, this is an area our super fund etc should be looking at getting involved with, the Shell gas station investment is dumb, dumb, dumb.
They'll claim that oil exploration is too risky yet they've got most of our money in the Wall St Casino/looting operation. Go figure.
The Cargo Cult is alive
The Cargo Cult is alive and well in New Zealand.
No Oil Well is going to save New Zealand from its much deserved fate. :lol:
"The fact NZ is a
"The fact NZ is a sunken continent "...say what!
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/3081649/Five-Mile-ven
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/3081649/Five-Mile-venture-sol...
Don't the investors have a right to know what it sold for and the terms of the deal?
Here we go again -
Here we go again - another fabulous rorting of investors funds:
Paul Duffy and Alastair Hasell, DNZ directors, will get $43 million for selling the management contract of their business. The initial public offering of DNZ Property Fund, listing on NZX next month, will see the two paid a third of the $130 million being raised. According to DNZ's prospectus, they will get $21.5 million each, a sum that has left some institutional investors reeling.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/property/news/article.cfm?c_id=8&objectid=1061...
DNZ, which owns properties valued at $730 million, is raising $130 million to pay out the directors and slice back its high-borrowing ratio, above 40 per cent.
DNZ's share offer opens next
DNZ's share offer opens next Monday, with listing expected on December 17.
This is a share offer that may be best avoided!
Post new comment