In this section
Offers for readers
The comment stream
Recent comments
- 1 of 8673
- ››
Editors choice
- 1 of 47
- ››
The news stream
Latest news
Most commented
- RBNZ hikes, but softens outlook 233
- Wednesday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 92
- Business confidence falls again 82
- Thursday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 66
- 90 seconds at 9 am with BNZ 62
- Dear John: 'Be careful what you wish for' 37
- 90 seconds at 9 am with BNZ 15
- Yellow Pages bidders offered loans 10
- The "Archilles heel" of dairying - effluent control 8
- No quorum for lender's meeting 7
Most viewed
Interest on Twitter
Banks turn off cash tap for South Canterbury; auditor warns about 'going concern' status
Timaru-based South Canterbury Finance (SCF) has released its audited annual report for the year ended June 30, 2009, revealing that its banks had turned off an unused NZ$100 million lending facility to the finance company while it hunted for new capital.
The annual report also included an opinion from SCF's auditors, fellow Timaru firm Woodnorth Myers & Co, that there was a "fundamental uncertainty" about South Canterbury Finance's status as a 'going concern' because of the risk that US lenders may withdraw a NZ$153 million private placement in the wake of South Canterbury's downgrade to a sub-investment grade BB+ credit rating by Standard and Poor's.
SCF, which is controlled by veteran South Island financier Allan Hubbard, said in the annual report it expected to make an announcement about its capital raising plans in mid-October. The release of the audited annual report was delayed because of a peer review by the NZ Institute of Chartered Accountants.
Here is the full comment about South Canterbury's going concern status from Woodnorth Myers.
Fundamental uncertainty - Going concern
In forming our unqualified opinion we have considered the adequacy of the disclosures made in note 2 B concerning the downgrading of South Canterbury Finance's credit rating and the related impact on the USPP funding stated at $153m in note 16.
Future debenture funding also depends on the group successfully registering a new prospectus. As set out in note 2 B, the Directors believe that the group has a range of options available to it, and consider that these matters will be satisfactorily resolved.
The validity of the going concern assumption on which the financial statements are prepared may depend on the successful conclusion of these matters. If the matters were unable to be satisfactorily resolved, this could have a significant impact on the liquidity of the group, and the recoverable amount of certain assets.
The annual report shows SCF made a net loss after tax credits of NZ$49.6 million, which was revised from a previously reported net loss for the year of NZ$67.8 million initially reported at the end of August.
The release of the audited accounts means SCF can now lodge a new prospectus and investment statement so it can start taking in new money again. Following its credit rating downgrade from Standard and Poor's on August 13 from BBB- to BB+, new investments have not been allotted to debentures and have been held in a trust account controlled by Trustees Executors on behalf of investors. This means the funds have not been lent on by SCF.
The credit rating downgrade meant subscribers of a US$100 million bond placement in the US were able to request a repayment of funds. SCF said in the annual report that discussions were ongoing.
The downgrade also meant SCF's NZ$100 million banking facility came under review after it breached interest coverage covenants. "The banking facility has been placed on a stop draw. This facility may be withdrawn if events leading to the review cannot be addressed satisfactorily," SCF said.
"No request has been made of the banking syndicate nor has any commitment to provide ongoing facilities been made by any syndicate member. The Company has not drawn down any funds under these facilities since they were first entered into by the Company," it said.
Here is the full comment from SCF's directors on its 'going concern' status in its annual report.
Going Concern
The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis. The Company has considered its funding and liquidity position, including the following events. Following the credit rating downgrade all new investments and existing depositors reinvestments have been placed in a trust account under the control of Trustees Executors Ltd pending a registration of a Memorandum of Amendments to the registered prospectus which would reflect the above events. On 17 September the company elected to withdraw its prospectus pending registration of a new prospectus incorporating the June 2009 audited accounts. A delay in the registration of the prospectus could have a significant impact on the company's liquidity.
On 13 August 2009 the company's credit rating was downgraded by Standard and Poors to BB+ and on 19 September this was placed on negative watch. The downgrade gives rise of an event of review for both the banking facility and the USPP funding. The banking facility has been placed on a stop draw. This facility may be withdrawn if events leading to the review cannot be addressed satisfactorily. US investors may request repayment of funds and the company is currently in discussion with those investors.
The company is currently looking at a major restructuring. This would see new capital being introduced and the appointment of new independent directors. An announcement is expected in relation to this in mid October.
SCF's total income for the year ended June 30, 2009, was up from its August report by NZ$39.7 million, to NZ$305.7 million, due to the inclusion of NZ$39.7 million of fair value gains on financial assets held for trading.
Meanwhile, expenses were also up by NZ$31.2 million. Bad debts written off were revised from NZ$16.5 million down to NZ$9.8 million (a fall of NZ$6.7 million), although allowance for impairments on advances rose from NZ$49.1 million to NZ$57.7 million (a rise of NZ$8.6 million). Provision for taxation writebacks was also increased by NZ$9.2 million to NZ$13.9 million.
SCF's loss before tax was revised down from NZ$71.9 million in its unaudited accounts to NZ$63.5 million in its audited accounts.
SCF said no related party loans had been written off or forgiven during the year.
However, SCF's impaired and past-due loans rose to NZ$445.9 million or 26% of total gross loans by the end of June, up from NZ$85.2 million or 6% a year earlier.
SCF had NZ$2.1 billion of borrowings at the end of June, including NZ$1.552 billion worth of debentures. Of that, NZ$919 million or 44% of borrowings are due to mature within a year. This is down from 47% due to mature within a year in the last year.
Here is the full media statement from South Canterbury below.
The reduction in the reported loss is mostly due to non-monetary fair value adjustments made under NZ International Financial Reporting Standards. Loan losses and provisions against impaired loans are at a similar level to those included in the Company's preliminary announcement.
Completion of the year end audited financial statements took longer than earlier expected as the Company's auditor was peer-reviewed following a request by the New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants.
South Canterbury Finance's Chairman Allan Hubbard acknowledged that the result for the past year was very disappointing in an extremely challenging market.
"While the group had to take account of significant losses and provisions on loans and investments totaling $122.9 million before tax, we were encouraged that the group made an underlying trading profit* of $32.3 million in the year to 30 June."
Following the completion of the audit of its financial statements, the Company is required to give notice pursuant to the notes issued in its US$100 million private placement that it is in breach of certain covenants under the notes. As a consequence, noteholders now have the right by majority vote to require repayment of the notes immediately.
South Canterbury Finance is in discussions with the noteholders seeking a favorable resolution to the position and will make an announcement upon resolution.
As announced earlier, South Canterbury Finance's owner, Southbury Group has appointed Forsyth Barr and Harmos Horton Lusk as advisors to assist in the restructuring of the group and recapitalisation of South Canterbury Finance.
"Completion of the audited financial statements has been a key step in our restructuring plans. We look forward to announcing details of our plans and the appointment of new independent directors as soon as we are able to," Mr Hubbard said.
* Underlying trading profit equals net profit before tax excluding impairments on loan advances, gains and losses on investments and intangible assets, and excluding foreign exchange gains and losses.
Here is the full annual report below. We welcome any further insights or comments from readers below. We will update with more as we see it.
26 Comments
Ladies and Gentlemen. This is
Ladies and Gentlemen. This is Captain Hubbard speaking. Please man the lifeboats on deck CC- Negative. Women and children at the front of the line please. HMS John Key is steaming to the rescue but arrival time is unknown and may not get here in time. Good luck and God Bless.
At least Bernard managed to
At least Bernard managed to hold his tongue and not call for the summary execution of Allan Hubbard at dawn. For now anyway.
I think this paragraph says
I think this paragraph says it all...
"However, SCF's impaired and past-due loans rose to NZ$445.9 million or 26% of total gross loans by the end of June, up from NZ$85.2 million or 6% a year earlier."
No wonder that 'negotiations' are continuing...
Statement of cashflows makes for
Statement of cashflows makes for interesting reading :-)
So; Those bondholders that started
So; Those bondholders that started selling off their holdings a couple of months ago at a discount really did know what they were doing! I wonder who they were ?
speckles: are you meaning the
speckles: are you meaning the bit "cash was applied to"? Can you translate it for me please?
Re;SCF and the government guarantee.
Re;SCF and the government guarantee.
At one level one can state with a high degree of certainty that the government guarantee has 'worked' in the case of SCF. Had it not been in place I think we can be almost certain that SCF would have collapsed into receivership or moratorium by now as debenture investments would have dried up ages ago, after the losses etc revealed thusfar.
Whether the guarantee is still seen to be 'working' if SCF collapses anyway is the next point of interest.
Andy They have just shifted
Andy
They have just shifted risk to the tax payer. They looked at the books before giving them the guarantee whats different now compared to then. The risk must have been known earlier when the books were checked for suitability. Someone in the State sector has some explaining to do.
Very true Andrew - a
Very true Andrew - a $1billion plus of taxpayers money is hanging by a thread.
Page 17, and associated companies
Page 17, and associated companies tells much. Why would anyone in the last 12 months make $88 million of investments into businesses that lost $70 million for the year, and whose liabilities almost certainly exceed their assets?
But it does provide a great insight in to a large corporate dairy farm: production of perhaps 10 million Kg of milk solids, book value of assets about $66 per Kg of milk solids, debt about $40 per Kg, and making a loss of between $6 and $7 per kg of milk solids.
PeterR I think as Taxpayers
PeterR
I think as Taxpayers we are entitled to an explanation from SCF regarding page 17.
Debt is some one else's
Debt is some one else's worry...I bet they got their own holdings down.
Now the onus is on the NZ TAXPAYER. Who would have thought that?.
Still what can I say...only that it seems par for the course, investing in New Zealand.
I wonder if the money currently pouring into NZ is being used to support any more of these entities?????...HMMMM...let me think.
As to CRAFAR Farms debt and their current problems, people keep saying they are a 200 million entity.....That is mostly if not all DEBT too...
Would you BAIL them out to the tune of 200 million. A farm is only worth what the NEXT man can and will pay. Based on income....real or imagined.
Personally..... I don't think so.
Seems like a continuing SAGA.
Actually, I believe there could
Actually, I believe there could have been Fonterra directors on both sides of SCF's Dairy Holdings deal.
And with liabilities of $408 million Dairy Holdings Ltd has more debt than Crafar Farms who probably didn't lose as much as $66 million for the year.
I wonder if financial stress has led to any animal welfare issues at Dairy Holdings Ltd?
PeterR ,can you explain more
PeterR ,can you explain more on 'The directors on both sides' comment.
A while ago we found out that SCF had second mortgages as security on some of the inter-party loans, I take it these are some of the impaired loans. I think ASB was one bank with the first mortgage and was not prepared to lend the final amount to complete conversion so SCF stepped up with a second mortgage there were several entities and conversions involved then.
So the impaired and past
So the impaired and past due loans are almost exactly the same % of book as Marac declared months ago (and predicted here by your truely) .... there is no doubt that SCF knew (or should have known) of this position many months ago .. possibly bringing into question its GG eligibility ? .. Youch! Chip
Interesting point Chip, skinny operating
Interesting point Chip, skinny operating cash flow not just this year but also last. This I suspect has been developing over a longer time period than the recent GG timeline.
We appear to have on
We appear to have on this thread evidence of two dairy farming groups with between them over $600 million of debt. The Crafar's - the less indebted of the two groups - problems are now well known and possibly being addressed.
It appears both groups each contribute between half and one percent of NZ's total dairy production - possibly making them the two biggest milk producers in the country. Both appear to have lost serious money in the 2008-2009 year and high debt will have been a major contributor to those losses.
Unfortunately problems remain with the dairy industry's ongoing denial of its issues with debt - as evidenced in this article:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/waikato-times/farming/2527694/DairyNZ-says-analys...
The article by DairyNZ strategy and investment leaders is potentially misleading farmers, investors, the public, government and funding providers by minimising the seriousness of dairy industry debt - while in the process misrepresenting a number of facts.
As an article it does though provide a good example of wider systemic failure through the dairy industry.
No wonder Johno hopped on
No wonder Johno hopped on a 'plane and paid a call on Alan. I wonder if he got a good look at the books?
There is certainly a large
There is certainly a large volume of bonds changing hands at ever higher yields:
http://www.nzx.com/markets/nzdx/SCF010/price-history
Unsustainable debt levels, funding unsustainable
Unsustainable debt levels, funding unsustainable farming practices....>
http://blog.greens.org.nz/2009/10/01/ets-is-sure-to-spur-growth-but-what...
Peter - yes I have
Peter - yes I have been watching the bonds. Some folk have steel cojones........
Predictably those expiring before the govt guarantee date are not moving:
http://www.nzx.com/markets/nzdx/SCF030
Hey Bernard, what is with
Hey Bernard,
what is with this scribd report using up all my bandwidth?
Some of us poor retired guys are on mobile broadband and cant be so extravagant with their internet use.
I wont be able to antifoul the yacht now:)
Won't be back to this page for an answer either:) It will put me over the limit with telecom!
Sore-loser, Did you know recent
Sore-loser, Did you know recent due diligence done on the Crafar farms for the Chinese valued the entity at $130m.......... did you also know the Chinese didn't want to pay the balance of the bill for the dd provided. Ain't current business practices grand.
I had believed this finance
I had believed this finance company was better than the rest. I had supported two organisations with which I am involved having at one stage over $1 million invested. We are now down to $250k with fingers crossed.
The inevitability of losses on the development loans that finance companies were seduced into backing, because of the enhanced margins, was plain for all with any knowledge of the sector, to see. Mr Hubbard needs to ask what financial incentives were given to management to write this high risk business.
My major red flag can from the disclosure of the loan to PGG Wrightson for $26 m to prop up the near dead SSF. Oops, Hubbard had an interest in both. And there is governance disconnected from management! Yeah, right.
It would be intetresting as to Mr Hubbard's net worth now under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). I suspect that the rating agencies had already told us that! His pledge to ensure no investor losses may be impossible to deliver upon.
I suspect that all the principles upon which SCF established itself in the market-place have been abandoned in the hype of the property boom.
We certainly will never go there again, neither will any other analytical investor. It's very sad. In Maori terms, if the Kaupapa had been adhered to, SCF would still be the icon many of us believed it was. Kia ora.
Remember when they said we
Remember when they said we are sweet, we hold 18% in capital reserve, more than anyone else. Remember when I said that is still $100 dollars of created credit for every $18 of capital.
My understanding is if SCF
My understanding is if SCF does fail (receivership)and GG kicks in before Oct 2010, then all secured listed bonds are covered by GG. If they survive to Oct 2010, then much would of needed to happen and probability is the worst for SCF would be over. Am I right about GG applying to all listed secure bonds if they fail before Oct 2010?
Post new comment