In this section
Offers for readers
The comment stream
Recent comments
- 1 of 19015
- ››
Editors choice
- 1 of 274
- ››
The news stream
Latest news
Most commented
- A plan for Auckland's housing crisis 80
- Thursday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 48
- Bank CEO defends bank profits 37
- 90 seconds at 9 am with BNZ 33
- Wednesday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 28
- 90 seconds at 9 am with BNZ 23
- Floating mortgage share hits record 61% 19
- Barfoots says strongest Jan in 4 yrs 17
- Why Labour is fine with some foreign buyers 11
- Govt courts Chinese investment 7
Most viewed
Interest on Twitter
Opinion: Why moving the OCR to 5% won't hurt our economic recovery

By Roger J Kerr
Borrowers and investors wondering about the track of 90-day wholesale interest rates over the next 12 months would be well advised not to listen to either media commentators or bank economists.
Too many media types have a misplaced view that the Reserve Bank should not be “tightening” monetary policy as the economy is too weak right now.
Firstly, the RBNZ is not tightening monetary policy at all, as Governor Bollard has stated on numerous occasions he is just removing the emergency loose monetary policy settings he put in place when the world economy almost stopped 15 months ago.
At that time the RBNZ slashed the OCR from 5.0% to 2.5%. The increases from 2.5% back to 5.0% over the next 9-12 months are merely the withdrawing of that special stimulus for that special occasion.
So this is not a tightening of policy, merely a simple and staged return of monetary policy to neutral at 5.0%.
The RBNZ is totally justified in taking this mechanical and stepped approach with both GDP growth and inflation forecast to be higher in 12 to 18 months time. They are not setting monetary policy for today’s economic conditions; they are being set for the forecast conditions in 12 months time.
Several bank economists are boldly forecasting that the RBNZ will increase the OCR to 3.50% by Christmas and then “pause” to see the impact of that increase in interest rates.
Related Topics
They too completely misunderstand, or choose to challenge, the clearly signalled RBNZ intention to take monetary settings back to neutral. The local and global economic outlook would have to change dramatically over coming months to justify a “pause” at Christmas.
I see the probability of a pause as very low; the far more likely scenario is 0.25% increases in the OCR at every review date and MPS date until we get back to 5.00%.
Such an increase will not have a detrimental impact on our economic recovery.
The recovery is coming from the export sector and only an unexpected strengthening in the Kiwi dollar will upset that growth.
I do not see these increases in short-term interest rates having mush of an impact on the domestic economy either. Variable rate home mortgage lending rates may move from the current 6.00% levels to 7.25% (+1.25%) over the next 12 months, whereas 90-day wholesale interest rates will move up by 2.00% from 3.00% to 5.00%.
The banks are already paying 5.00% for their domestic retail deposits and longer term offshore wholesale funds, so there is not much change or impact on the bank’s cost of funds from the OCR or 90-day wholesale rates increasing.
The RBNZ of course know all this, and that is why they are correct to ignore the media commentators and bank economists about when and how short-term interest rates increase.
The recent weaker local economic data in terms of retail sales, consumer confidence, immigration, housing activity and inflation are not sufficient to change the RBNZ’s medium term economic outlook.
In five or six months time Governor Bollard will be forecasting 4.00% GDP growth for 2011 and the annual headline inflation rate will be at 5.00%.
He cannot afford to be complacent or listen to the naysayers.
--------------------
* Roger J Kerr runs Asia Pacific Risk Management. He specialises in fixed interest securities and is a commentator on economics and markets. More commentary and useful information on fixed interest investing can be found at rogeradvice.com
62 Comments
"would be well advised not to
"would be well advised not to listen to either media commentators or bank economists - does this include your piece as well?
"The recovery is coming from the export sector and only an unexpected strengthening in the Kiwi dollar will upset that growth" - so an expected strengthening that will happen because our interest rates are higher is OK?
Yes an export led recovery is needed, but it will end very quickly if our x-rate reaches 80c again.
Pardon me if I'm stating the
Pardon me if I'm stating the obvious. But it's not correct to say this isn't a tightening - it is! The OCR is increasing. RBNZ and most analysts seem to be fixated on the idea that there is a normal "equilibrium" level that the OCR has to return to, but that seems a gross over-simplification and potentially a disastrously misleading analysis. The OCR is currently at 2.75%. How it got there is irrelevant. Surely the only question that should be asked is "What is the correct thing to do with the OCR given our current and forecast economic position?". It might well be that the answer to that question is to raise it steadily over the next 12-24 months, but to make that decision by following the dogma of having to return to some mythical normal rate is idiotic.
Its relative, a "normal" OCR
Its relative, a "normal" OCR is 5% so we have half that to combat the first dip in our recession....So we are loose, we are returning to neutral....at 5%....tighening is above 5%... Someone based on a calculation has determined that 5% is the new normal/neutral maybe its a guidence thing...I suppose that 5% OCR corresponds to the mid point of the desired inflation band...Irrelevent? no, we are in the biggest economic downturn since the Great Depression....it cant and should not be ignored.
Also the RB sets policy to meet its mandated target, if the Pollies set a to loose policy elsewhere it has to compensate...
Then again what Roger is ignoring is the second dip....so the OCR will have to stay loose or get looser, this dip will be worse....it may not happen....but Ithink the odds are greater than 50/50
Roger is also ignoring? or discounting the deflationary aspect of imports....its carnage out there in manufacturer land...so a 4% inflation? hmm well that suggets an OCR over 5%.
If Roger is right and inflation is >3% then the OCR at >5% seems correct / prudent.
"but to make that decision by following the dogma of having to return to some mythical normal rate is idiotic."
Im not aware this is the case...
regards
Up she goes Bolly....hurry up
Up she goes Bolly....hurry up mate....the horse is heading for the gate.
"In five or six months time
"In five or six months time Governor Bollard will be forecasting 4.00% GDP growth for 2011"
That's a very respectable growth for times like this. No wonder property prices are not declining.
I'll take your advice Roger
I'll take your advice Roger that people "would be well advised not to listen to media commentators" and since you are commenting in the media, not listen to you.
"Weaker local economic data in terms of retail sales, consumer confidence, immigration, housing activity and inflation are not sufficient to change the RBNZ’s medium term economic outlook". Translation: Alan Bollard should continue to completely ignore reality like he did so abhorently in 2003 and 2008.
With Bernanke holding policies so loose, our dollar will move skyward, crushing export revenues snuffing out any last hint of recovery and sending our economy into a multi decade depression all for the want of bureaucrats intent on maintaining policies that history has proven don't work.
Exclude tax increases (ACC, ETS, GST) and inflation is likely to be below the 1% lower bound in the medium term unless some magical recovery apprears in the very near term, any justification for having normal interests rates is entirely illogical.
Real GDP over the 3 years to March 2010 was just 0.2%PA. That compares to 3.5%pa over the previous 6 years. How is does that justify having normal interest rates when most indicators point to the economy deteriorating further in the near term?
Quite right CJ...now if you
Quite right CJ...now if you want some really good advice...buy copper shares NOW.
Wally I agree with you about
Wally I agree with you about the greedy PI's but why do you have to comment so often. Do you have a life or family or some other interest?
Wally owns copper shares and
Wally owns copper shares and so is always shilling for copper. Lately he's been ramping-up the pro-copper rhetoric...it makes me suspicious that he is worried about his money and wants to offload his copper liability onto some sucker quick smart.
Why are you always reading my
Why are you always reading my posts anon...is your boss aware of your behaviour...?
I am self employed and keep
I am self employed and keep an eye on this site. I think you ruin it as so often your comments are inane and childish. I am anti-pi's but I think you give us a bad name. A new topic comes up on the site and you are nearly always the first in with a pathetic comment. As I said have you got a life,a family or any other interests.
Well don't read them
Well don't read them anon...it's that simple. My other interest involves investing in metals anon.
I rest my case. Commenting on
I rest my case. Commenting on this site and metal. You are pathetically boring. How can I avoid reading you when you seem to be either every second comment or sometimes nearly every comment on a site.
Gosh a fan! ....so pleased to
Gosh a fan! ....so pleased to know you will be paying my pension with your taxes... .haaaaahaha
Well well well Wally...we now
Well well well Wally...we now know you are so poor you will need to draw a pension.
Perhaps you should do less commentating and more work so you wont be a bludger on the tax-payer.
You can't be a very sucessful investor/speculator if you are planning to take the pension can you.
"You can't be a very
"You can't be a very sucessful investor/speculator if you are planning to take the pension can you."
But it's fine for wealthy property investors to gorge at the WFF trough?
Why do you assume anon who
Why do you assume anon who commented about a poor Wally is a PI?
No...I'm a failure
No...I'm a failure anon...only made $20ooo today on pna...alrhough it could still get to 58 and that would make it $24ooo today...a poor result really...and yes I ought to go back to working for a living..but gee it's been 7 years since I gave the govt job the toss...how'd you do today anon?
You are boring everyone
You are boring everyone Wally.
You aren't what you make out to be.
Now tell us how much you made in the last 5 minutes? 3-5K
Ha.
Tell you what anon, I should
Tell you what anon, I should not have sent that post...sometimes it's better to keep quiet but if you wish I'll send an email to Bernard with a wee bit of what the Judge calls evidence and you can ask Bernard...ok with you?.
He he he. Me thinks you
He he he. Me thinks you protest a lot. And quickly
Hey Anonymous, do you also
Hey Anonymous, do you also notice how Wally seems to be posting anytime in the day and night?
How can he be making so much money trading and posting on here at the same time?
I agree with you. I'm very suspicious now.
.58 now....$24ooo!
.58 now....$24ooo!
Don't forget tax.
Don't forget tax.
All paid.
All paid.
So Wally's finacial plan is
So Wally's finacial plan is to rely on the taxpayer for his pension.
Haw Haw
No no no Haw Haw..I'm going
No no no Haw Haw..I'm going to use it to play the share market....jolly good fun and when I'm done and being turned to ash...a good many others will get the cash.
You seem to be into something
You seem to be into something more mental, rather than metal
jeez I hate haters and even
jeez I hate haters and even worse I hate people who are too useless to come up with a nom de plume - leave Wally alone
Why, Wally is a clearly a
Why, Wally is a clearly a fucking idiot.
and that makes you?
and that makes you?
I agree....the one off hikes
I agree....the one off hikes will act like OCR increases, they wont be inflationary, in fact deflationary, ie they take money away from people IMHO so less to spend on food, petrol and "desirabble" goods....so I think it maybe counter-intuitive. Also we see ppl saving and not spending this means less money sloshing about the high street, inflationary? I dont see it.
Its only inflationary when ppl have more to spend, they wont, they have less....
regards
Just had to check my calander
Just had to check my calander - nope its not April Fools Day. Granted this is an opinion piece and good to share the love.
How can you think we're in the midst of an export led recovery? Sure we might be exporting whole logs to China, a bit of oil, and a whole lot of milk powder ... but that falls well short of "recovery." Any money flowing into these industries is simply going into debt repayment or is going back offshore so hardly supports the notion of recovery.
I agree with Anon above that you guys need to drop this mythical notion of neutral. Neutral is whatever the economy can support.
Given the housing market is going nowhere, retail sales are subdued and employment is not yet an issue - you have not given one good reason why the OCR needs to be to 5%? Personally I don't see much economic growth of the horizon. But even if it did exist, economic growth is not itself a problem.
What problem are you trying to solve by increasing rates? Non government policy based inflation? Yeah right!
Kiwis spending the equity growth in their properties is over, and the big deleverage is starting. Last time around consumers simply borrowed to sustain their unsustainable spending habits. This time round will be different as that won't / cannot occur. Bollard does not need to scare homeowners - they are already frekin out.
Property price correction will happen now off its own bat. It doesn't need to the OCR to give it much of a nudge at all.
In my mind high OCR = high unemployment, property market collapse, and a massive impact on Agri and Business. Gee I'm sure the Government will like that!
The figure to watch is
The figure to watch is credit/debt/money growth - and it's going nowhere, very close to contraction in fact. The govt are borrowing money like it's going out of fashion (?) to keep the economy from collapsing. Shouldn't Bill and Bollard have a bit of a chat and get themselves on the same page?
So what can Bollard, or anyone, see here to indicate the economy can withstand a tightening to 5%?
Get out and about and talk to folk and see what's really going on, this economy is very sick.
M3, its contracting in many,
M3, its contracting in many, (most? all?) parts of the world...NZers are living in la la land if they think the effects of that wont land here...
regards
Steven...what odds do you
Steven...what odds do you give that Ben and Merv will QE and feed the loot into the small bus sectors?
I agree with Kiwidave re the
I agree with Kiwidave re the sick economy. The pressure on the govt books is now manifesting itself in govt depts banding together to form procurement clusters. Basically awarding bulk contracts to single suppliers - likely to be multinationals - to save money in the short term. Medium to long term the prices will go up and the smaller local players will be long gone. This will be a growing problem, especially around Wellington
i think the 2.75% is the new
i think the 2.75% is the new norm as has been down for 3 years, like house prices the agents will say our low prices are the new average. i dont think its a reasonable assumption to assume 5.0 is absolutely the neutral point as it is a variable instrument. when rates get back to retail circa 8%ish floating do we all breath a sigh and say, welcome back normal trading enviroment as for a mnay people where we are now is their normal and my parents will say retail rates of 16-21% were normal so seasons in the sun i think.
"Such an increase will not
"Such an increase will not have a detrimental impact on our economic recovery.
The recovery is coming from the export sector and only an unexpected strengthening in the Kiwi dollar will upset that growth."
Um am I missing something here?? If our OCR goes up they way you say the NZD would bounce so much it would upset growth. Have you not noticed the strength it's gained from just 25bps?
Roger says only an unexpected
Roger says only an unexpected strengthening of the NZD will hurt our outlook. Hmmm...what increases the NZD? Gee...hmmm...how about rapidly rising interest rates? Duh. And who said 5% is neutral? Boy if life was so easy that just one number could be your normal, through the cycle, number. And 5% is way higher than everywhere else in the world. To use a line from the property haters, this time it (or we) are different, right?
Has Roger not recognised the
Has Roger not recognised the fundamental changes that have occurred in recent times. Liquidity ratios/stable funding ratios for the Banks - lower LVRs for housing lending, Positive sloping yield curves due to a lack of Uradashi flows and collapsing credit growth even at these low rates, suggest that the neutral OCR may well prove to be nearer to 4% than 5-6% pre GFC
I think we will see OCR to 3% this week followed by a pause that will turn out to extend into the first quater of 2011
Well,the OCR may go up as
Well,the OCR may go up as Roger says but the logic he gives is absolute rubbish. have people forgotten what the unintended consequences of high OCR.
Well,the OCR may go up as
Well,the OCR may go up as Roger says but the logic he gives is absolute rubbish. have people forgotten what the unintended consequences of high OCR.
the ocr is a wealth
the ocr is a wealth distribution mechanism
ask cullen and clark
and now key
Personally I can't disagree
Personally I can't disagree with any aspect of Roger's article - barring a major shock offshore (always possible not predicable otherwise its not a shock), the OCR is headed to 5% well before the end of next year. Yes things can happen, but short of such a shock NZ's GDP will be above 3% over the next couple of years and ultimately that will put pressure on inflation 12-18 months out where monetary policy has to look - I wary of the inane bloggers who always think they know more than the people who's job it is, and who have a wider view and resources to get most decision right ! Yes they get some wrong, but the bloggers get way more wrong than them
If things change, the RBNZ can cut, but until then they will act as the data tells them. He will hike on Thursday, acknowledge some weakness in the past 6 weeks, then all other things being equal, will hike again at least once, possibly twice more before Christmas.
The TAB should run a book!!
The TAB should run a book!!
Roger.... with respect have
Roger.... with respect have you given any thought to what would happen if the NZD dropped to say 57 which incidentally is about its true value...what do you think it would do to oil prices and the on-flow effect throughout the precarious economy.
well I'd like you to do just that and write another piece about the probability of just what Bolly is up to .. which is exactly what he is told to do.
Keep that foreign investment coming as long as humanly possible or the whole f%*$king thing goes to hell in a hand basket.
Personally I have had a gutfull of commentators and their risk appetite rhetoric... the NZD is little more than a dag hanging from the anus of the AUD and an ideal spot to launder some dirty forex monies in a soft location that will do anything to prop it's overvalued currency and thus maintain the status quo whereby lazy jap forex traders can play ping pip clip with the fluctuations they themselves have generated.
We are in control of our own currency ...........my ass
we are in control of N.Z. monetary policy ........my ass
We have become desperate little ass licking serfs begging for a bowl of rice as trade for what have you.
have a nice day
.V.
^
on the money Christov - we
on the money Christov - we are just a pawn on the freely manipulated market selling ourselves short. The only long game in town is pimping our asse(t)s to a wet dream of making it to the other side of the board.
if it did drop to US57c our
if it did drop to US57c our exporters would be quite happy, and it would be quite likely that even more of our assets would be targeted for overseas investment albeit witha NZ? company in tow
Can't argue that RJ but
Can't argue that RJ but that's not a new scenario, followed by bring em in and nobble em by regulation.
as to we exporters are doing just fine thank you..! well matey let's take an accurate poll on that one......... because a lot of established export markets are getting hammered into oblivion...others have taken to playing the hedge fund market to survive long enough and await the bounce.............well it's a dead cat bounce.
Well ain't THAT the truth
Well ain't THAT the truth Christov!
agree with steven 100% and
agree with steven 100% and while I generally am in agreement with your comments and enjoy your commentary roger I am left wondering how on earth you came to the conclusions you have in your post.
bollard may well increase by 0.25% this week but it will just prove what a short sighted fool he is. increasing will not help the economic situation we find ourselves in and will only see kiwis spend even less and that wion't help the export driven economic recovery you think is happenning.
our comment on neutral is nonsense also because it is based on what used to be - we are in a new ball game and the new normal is not going to be an OCR of 5% - again agree with steven that we are in the biggest economic downturn since the Great Depression.... and if you are saying we aren't you are delusional.
so at the end of the day you article looks more like an expression of your own gut and the ideology / dogma you follow as it isn't based on anything substantive - its just your bent and is a really disappointing piece.
so NZs spending on what?
so NZs spending on what? helps the economy cbs. Surely you are not suggesting Real Estate. The longer the economy is restrained the better at the moment surely? We exporters are doing just fine thankyou
Buying houses of each other
Buying houses of each other at ever increasing prices makes much more sense than saving money or investing it in something productive!
Now if only the banks would once-again start tossing funny-munny mortgages to the peasantry from helicopters and hot-air balloons, we can get this bubble right back up there where it belongs!
Anyone wanna buy some houses from me?
Going cheap at only twice what I paid for them in 2007!
All you need to do is get a 105%-no-deposit+car-&-holiday!!!!!' mortgage and you're in business!
YA CAN'T LOSE WITH PROPERTY, MAAAAAATE!
cbs - think about it. We've
cbs - think about it. We've gone through one of our biggest recessions in decades, and NZ's inflation rate only got slightly below the mid-point of the RBNZ's 1-3% inflation range. Low growth ain't great, but low growth and high inflation is a killer, particulary for savers who we need to encourage in this country at the moment, more than borrowers (check out our private debt levels)
You and Steven need to understand that interest rates are driven by inflation, not growth, and there times in NZ (70's & 80's) where we have periods of low growth and high inflation. NZ has a high sensitivity to inflation for whatever reason, and despite a very fragile and slow recovery, inflation is forecast to be very tight over the next couple of years, and that's with the modest OCR increases that the RBNZ is forecasting and needing to iniate now. Like it or not, its a choice of what is the greater evil, but frankly, the RBNZ has little option but to take the foot off the accerator now, which is all he is doing.
For some businesses that will put added pressure on no doubt, particularly for those reliant upon the NZ consumer, but that is one of the costs we are now having to pay for at least a couple of decades of borrow and spend mentality - the consumer is tapped out, knows he/she is, and is repaying debt. Many businsses need to understand the long-term change, and those who were reliant upon that old consumer model will need to get more productive or die - easier said than done for many businesses I admit
PS - calling Bollard a fool says alot about you rather than him by the way
Agreed cbs but I think you
Agreed cbs but I think you will look back in twenty years when the govt releases the true figures and see that the recession started in 07 and did not finish for TEN whole years.
oh and as for the post - umm
oh and as for the post - umm upward movement is tightening - downward is loosening - neutral is err, neutral. In this case an arbitrary figure which is not equal to anything unless we're talking on a fixed scale like pH which I believe the OCR is not unless 10 is the upper limit which AFAIK is NOT the case.
So what's it to be then Roger
So what's it to be then Roger unexpected...?expected..? will it hurt the recovery..? or not..? the question beckons..and please spare me the Mike Jones style soliloquy just hang yourself out there and say is it going well or badly....you can do it Roger.
I think the strange notion of
I think the strange notion of a fixed “neutral” rate has been pretty much dealt to on this thread.
Taking an overview might be worth a minute. Yes we need to resist inflation, yes we need a currency that reflects trade performance for any persistent economic rebalancing – the OCR simply cannot deliver that outcome: one or the other but not both.
Headline inflation has been restrained by the OCR at the cost of decimating the external sector, domestic inflation remained outside the policy band up to the point when most recognised the global financial crisis was in full swing, only at that point did the domestic inflationary pressure fall.
The OCR alone is not up to the task – that is clearly the new normal. More policy options are necessary.
Lots of discussion goes on here on what those options might be but those in power need to get on to the case – there is not much time.
www.johnwalley.co.nz
Well that about covers it
Well that about covers it John L W. The position of these commentators (if ) they were to find a position on the matter, could only be to seek to capitalise through fluctuation and volatility.
There is no stable position afoot ( I believe) and so gives weight to my earlier post that WE are no longer in control of our own currency and have not been for quite some time.
The tethered cork syndrome I like to call it and we are the cork.
Policy options needed to be installed with the RBNZ would be counter productive to the current administration's need to be seen to have things under control until re-election is assured.....I feel their tack has been one of deferral/ avoidance/ wait and see,maybe it wont go bang /China will save us /refusal to face the inevitable.
you want a policy for the RBNZ...give the man a gun and a licence to use it.... but that wont happen any time soon because gutless is now what we do best.
Christov - are we mean't to
Christov - are we mean't to understand your 9.32pm posting ? Are you saying the NZD should be different to other currencies ? No country has ever had "control" of a floating rate currency - at the moment we're at the total control of the markets perception of risk - try mapping the NZD over a chart of the S&P (and I can tell you that the NZD does not drive the S&P). All countries have things that influence their currencies that Govts/central banks at times have little direct control over, especially in the short term.
Grant there's influence and
Grant there's influence and there's out of control.