In this section
Columnists
Offers for readers
Personal finance tools
The comment stream
Recent comments
- 1 of 25844
- ››
Editors choice
- 1 of 364
- ››
Personal finance news stream
Latest news
- Amanda's Take Five for Thursday 6
- How the RBNZ's OBR might work 34
- Amanda's Take Five for Tuesday 1
- NZ Super Fund bars Barrick 2
- SFO puts $1.1m price tag on Hanover probe 5
- Amanda's Take Five for Friday
- Amanda's Take Five for Wednesday 1
- Amanda's Take Five for Monday 5
- Treasury outlines deposit guarantee lessons 67
- Kiwibank customers prominent in class action 2
Most commented
- Treasury outlines deposit guarantee lessons 67
- How the RBNZ's OBR might work 34
- New insurance basis 8
- 'SFO decision no surprise' - Eric Watson 7
- Amanda's Take Five for Thursday 6
- Amanda's Take Five for Friday 6
- SFO puts $1.1m price tag on Hanover probe 5
- Amanda's Take Five for Monday 5
- NZ Super Fund bars Barrick 2
- Kiwibank customers prominent in class action 2
Most viewed
- Amanda's Take Five for Thursday 6
- SFO puts $1.1m price tag on Hanover probe 5
- Amanda's Take Five for Monday 5
- Treasury outlines deposit guarantee lessons 67
- New insurance basis 8
- Amanda's Take Five for Tuesday 2
- NZ Super Fund bars Barrick 2
- Amanda's Take Five for Friday
- Amanda's Take Five for Wednesday 1
- Child support redux and a $2.6 bln headache
$650 billion under-insurance gap; Finance the world you want; The anti-Jones; Late savings bloomers; It's a family affair

1) Under insurance extreme
The Financial Services Council (FSC) released a rather shocking insurance report this morning. According to a two-year long research project studying insurance cover across a range of categories, New Zealanders are under-insured by around $650 billion.
This is how it broke down in terms of levels of under-insurance.
- $195 bln life
- $58 bln for trauma
- $351 bln permanent disability
- $2.9 bln for income protection, or $44.b for average 15 month serious illness
Peter Neilson, the chief executive of the FSC said the research painted a serious financial risk for New Zealanders and their families should either the main or secondary income earners or both have their earnings impaired.
For the first time in years, my life insurer has been in touch seeking a "review" of my circumstances. I will report back to you after that conversation as I'm curious to know how it will go.
2) Financing the world you want
Several studies have found that women make great investors (they're more conservative, they take time to understand what they are investing in and establish a level of trust first before blindly handing their money over to a manager) and yet the majority are painted as shoe loving fools who are going to be poor in retirement because their knowledge of money doesn't not go beyond the domestic level.
This is an issue I have tackled in my book as well. I guess I know a lot of clever gals because most of the ones I know are excellent money managers and not just at budgeting for the household.
Related Topics
The Harvard Business Review has some interesting insights and stats on this topic and some solid advice about conquering fears in finance to achieve your dreams and goals.
3) The anti-Jones
You've all heard of it before I'm sure: The Keeping Up with the Jone's Syndrome, a financially debilitating consumer disease that has so many people bent over a barrel with their money because they keep buying stuff their neighbour does to satisfy the ego and create the illusion of wealth. It's also been called Affluenza.
Funny enough, I have this friend who has developed a rather acute case of what I have diagnosed as the Anti-Jones syndrome. While they have all the trappings of wealth, they have become completely disillusioned by them. I've been thinking of a way to capture the virus and create a minor epidemic.
A blogger by the name of beatingbroke contemplates a cure to the disease in a more sensible fashion.
4) Never too late to save
Early savers will have a major advantage over their late saving counterparts because of the magic of compound interest. For those late bloomers, it can be hard to know where to start particularly if you've left it until your 40s. The key is just starting. Here's some thoughts from FinanciallyPoor.com. (Note I do not necessarily endorse the views and recommendations contained in some of these blogs. Just food for thought to get you thinking about your own personal circumstances.)
5) A family affair
For several people I know 2013 is a year of new beginnings. New relationships, rebuilds, new businesses, new jobs, goals. For those start-ups out there, this one is for you. Inc.com looks at the importance of treating your employees as a family for optimal productivity, and profit.
To read other Take Fives by Amanda Morrall click here. You can also follow Amanda on Twitter @amandamorrall or at www.amandamorrall.com












22 Comments
Stupid bloody timeout editor.
Stupid bloody timeout editor. 30minutes editing and get "unauthorised to post". F! F! F!
#1 & #3. why do they need all that stuff in the first place. They have to pay extra to "store" it in their house... why pay even more to an insurance company for the privilege of buying it in the first place!
#5 No.
Nope.
No way.
There are many reasons for professional distance between staff, especially between layers.
All the examples they used are positive ones.
What about when money is tight, do the staff need the stress? What about if a project is legally questionable, should details be shared? Or if it's hitting the fan, should people be told of issues before the data is in - even if that means the media will run with it before the facts are in? Or if a deal is commercially sensitive and the competition would love some insight into whats happening.
And the new staff member who doesn't know the difference better "open door/communications" and trying to tell the boss how to run their company. Even (especially) if he has "higher" education.
Then there's discipline matters.
Dealing with staff who think "family" means the employer is mum&dad giving them an allowance.
Or all those resources and effort made building a "family" environment, and having to ask staff to stuff they don't want to.
And then there's things like public works - OMG. where to start.
If the company can afford to pay their people to do such things, then they can drop their shelf price - or get better computers - or pay staff better instead. When I worked with places doing that, it was insanity - I had deadlines to meet, what the hell was I doing picking up trash!! I also had home projects demanding my time (eg painting the house) why spend time @ work painting a school shed when I didn't even have the energy to paint my own stuff at home!!!!
And then there's the drama princess. Who always has an issue or ten. Who never has time for work to be on time or complete, but has time for a million excuses why it's not her fault. How much "family time" is you company managers supposed to give these people. And why are the other staff members suppose to put up with the managers unavailability to do their job. Or the drunk who just won't get their life together, how much "family" time should they be allowed?
Note: none of the above complaints are grounds for dismissal in NZ!
Professional _courtesy_ yes. "Family" no.
Agree. I think of it as a
Agree. I think of it as a team rather than a family. A coach can bench you or even dump you, but that can't really happen in a well functioning family.
I'm even very wary about
I'm even very wary about using "Team".
Most of the people using "team" fall into two categories:
(1) You do the work, I'll do the smoozing - we'll share the glory (and I'll point the finger when you drop the ball)
or,
(2) We're all on the same team.... except I'm the Captain (/coach) and you'll do what I say.
I expect more from individuals than case (1). And while there's an essence of truth in (2) as someone owners or is in charge, in that case don't pretend we're equals.
Hence the professionalism courtesy - tell me what you want/can do. Tell me what you want/need and by when, allow for delays as nothing ever goes perfectly smoothly every time. We'll identifiy the real goals and issues, and we'll try to keep the predictable obstacles to a minimum. And then I expect/will perform to that level - providing you're willing to pay for that level of work. No BS, No con, No trying to get "one-up" by welching out on parts of the deal. (don't open the package, don't change the deal....)
LOL.....yes. 1) I'll add that
LOL.....yes.
1) I'll add that the "smoochers" get to go to technical conferences, yet are clueless techically. Come back having spent $100k+ on a black box(s) and hand it to you expecting it to be setup and running inside a month, but wont pay for training, even an online course. The number of times we have found the black box fixes a problem we dont have or simply doesnt fix a problem we do have isnt funny. Oh and then the finger pointing starts as the vendor and/or manager blame you for not knowing how to do it properly (re-visit your request for training that never happened). Usually after some considerable further effort the $100k black box gets quietly dumped in a draw somewhere and forgotten about because it actually doesnt work...just in time for the next year's technical conference to come around again, rinse and repeat.....doh.
2) The "Dont bring me problems bring me solutions" reply is the other over abused classic. Frankly I go to the beloved leader(s) when I have a problem I cannot solve, or its a political decision outside my remit. If I have the solution I do it and maybe bother telling them later...but really as the eyes glaze over I dont bother any more. Its like the dummy steering wheel you give your 5 year old in the car, they think they are driving, while you do, so everyone is happy.
;]
Last para, very well said, I wish....
regards
Totally get where you're
Totally get where you're coming from with the first one - especially when one magic black box which is supposed to fixed the problem either (a) isn't stocked in this country (b) is well out of budget (c) actually provides the back-end functionality for the system... argh!
#2 I'm a bit more sympathetic to. I've worked with people who buy pick and mix budget bits, and expect a turn-key solution results - yet everytime something goes wrong (like they can't login to a PC) they trip down to IT, and it turns out it's caps lock on.
Or someone wanting a part but they have no idea what model they've got (when it's written across the front).
Or the guy whose been asked to a provide "top three market projects/plans" for a small company to present to the customer as part of increasing business.... and that guy asks the customer what he's going to do to increase his business..... we pay this guy WHY!?
Under
Under insured....humbug...sodding insurance outfits out to boost profits again.
My guess is ppl are opting out of property insurance too...the costs are now too much for too many...
Insurance is a bit like paying for shoes...for your size 8s you pay the same as a Hobbit does for size 16s...Insure your 100 year old wreck of a house for $300,000 and pay the same premium as the owner of a brand new house...yet the wiring in your wreck is a fire about to happen..the plumbing is stuffed...the water tank is rotten...the chimney stack leaks fire into the ceiling space..and a small quake will be the straw to break the back of the rotten piles beams and joists....
Let's ask Peter Neilson to explain why his insurance friends fail to match premiums with risk!
Surely to some degree thay
Surely to some degree thay are talking their own book up. By what measure is someone's life under insured?
....... Daddy Gummy had life
....... Daddy Gummy had life insurance ..... but it didn't stop him from dying !
Waste of munny , really ......
I'm not sure Mr Beating Broke
I'm not sure Mr Beating Broke has quite nailed it there, reducing all the reasons for the trend to one - the need for acceptance and fear of it's loss. Whilst everyone is somewhat different in this regard, missing are whole classes of things such as jealousy, envy, pride and lust.
On top of that the solution is just to give up doing it and change your social circle.
We are waiting for Peter
We are waiting for Peter Neilson to explain why his insurance friends fail to match premiums with risk.
Because they match premiums
Because they match premiums to profit.
It's a crock of shite AJ....
It's a crock of shite AJ....
A big one too. Its one of my
A big one too.
Its one of my pet hates. I think of my father payiing into a scheme that was 10% of his wages in the 50's and cashing in 30k 45 years later, while AMP sat on property protected from inflation making a fortune off the working man. Bastards
My dad did the same but with
My dad did the same but with T&G.
There he was waiting for a reasonable payout but alas he would have got more sticking it in the bank himself and allowing for compounding interest.
His great travel plans were quickly shelved.
Likewise my father. 50k was
Likewise my father. 50k was a fortune when he started his 30 years before. When he hit the payout date for the investment portfolio, he gave the kids 10k each and kept 20k for him and mum. couldn't even get a decent car for that (10k) or a house deposit (50k) now.
Just processing payroll today - Notice how much ECST knocks out of your Kiwisaver plan!?
At 3% of gross income. Perhaps Amanda can calculate what the 30-33% tax out of the Employers Contribution means in losses at the end of the investment period. I think with that and agency fees, Kiwisavers are probably better to just bank it.
My dad did the same but with
My dad did the same but with T&G.
There he was waiting for a reasonable payout but alas he would have got more sticking it in the bank himself and allowing for compounding interest.
His great travel plans were quickly shelved.
Wally, Read the death of a
Wally,
Read the death of a hero link, I posted on 10@10.
Why did the USA do so much damage to harmless people in Iraq?
To answer that AJ..pays to
To answer that AJ..pays to realise the infrastructure was part of Saddam's systems and as such a target. Ppl tend to forget all too quickly what Saddam did to Kuwait and many ppl there, as well as to plenty of Kurds in the north of Iraq with the chemical weapons.
IMO the only blot on the American book, is the way they helped put that slob into power.
Wolly, seriously - this is
Wolly, seriously - this is the most sophisticated military in the world. You have to be absolutely brainwashed if you think they cannot achieve regime change without that kind of civilian disruption and carnage.
We pay so much in taxes to
We pay so much in taxes to the all encompassing welfare Nanny State , why do we need to pay extra for frigging trauma insurance , or permanent disability insurance ?
..... if the behaviour of the insurance companies in the aftermath of the Christchurch earthquake is anything to go by , Kiwis are very sensible in " flipping the bird " to the industry's lessor known insurance products
"Funny enough, I have this
"Funny enough, I have this friend who has developed a rather acute case of what I have diagnosed as the Anti-Jones syndrome."
Makes 2 of us...(at least).
Somehow many ppl seem to be buying what the want and not what they need, or looking after what they need...that needs to be turned around.
regards
I think these income
I think these income protection policies are a scam personally.
regards