Top 10 at 10: Euro house prices falling; ‘Not enough pain’; Shrinking revolvers; Dilbert
July 8th, 2009Here’s my Top 10 links from around the Internet at 10am. I welcome your additions in the comments below or send any suggestions for tomorrow’s Top 10 at 10 to bernard.hickey@interest.co.nz. Our victories feel much better than winning a government contract.
1. The Goldman Black Box heist story gets juicier and juicier. Now Goldman’s lawyer is worried that someone might take the box’s programming and manipulate the market. Woops. So Goldman is now admitting the Black Box can be used to manipulate the market? Tyler Durden from Zero Hedge is onto it, as is Bloomberg
At a court appearance July 4 in Manhattan, Assistant U.S. Attorney Joseph Facciponti told a federal judge that Aleynikov’s alleged theft poses a risk to U.S. markets. Aleynikov transferred the code, which is worth millions of dollars, to a computer server in Germany, and others may have had access to it, Facciponti said, adding that New York-based Goldman Sachs may be harmed if the software is disseminated.
“The bank has raised the possibility that there is a danger that somebody who knew how to use this program could use it to manipulate markets in unfair ways,” Facciponti said, according to a recording of the hearing made public today. “The copy in Germany is still out there, and we at this time do not know who else has access to it.”
2. William Pesek at Bloomberg argues it would be a big mistake for America to assume that Asia will keep picking up the tab for all the debt issuance that Barack Obama is doing.
It’s become the world’s biggest Ponzi scheme, really. The dollar isn’t crashing because those invested in it are propping it up and adding to their holdings. After all, the magnitude of Asia’s foreign-exchange holdings means it can’t dump the dollar without shooting its economies in the foot.
Asia should indeed be plotting how to reduce its dollar holdings. Those trillions of dollars would be better used in Asia to pay for better roads, bridges, airports and power grids and improved education and health care.
Until then, the U.S. needs to reassure Asians they won’t suffer massive losses on their dollar holdings. It can start by circulating a credible exit strategy from today’s massive stimulus efforts. The White House also needs to convince Asia that devaluing the dollar at some point to boost U.S. exports isn’t on the table. Obama and Geithner should plan to increase financial diplomacy efforts, traveling to Asia often.
Asia has a $4.5 trillion dollar decision to make, and it’s up to the U.S. to help the region make the right one. Taking Asia’s money for granted would be a disastrous way to go.
3. European house prices fell even faster in the first quarter of 2009 than in the disastrous December quarter of 2008, FT.com’s European house price index shows.
Annual price declines averaged 3.5 per cent in the eurozone, compared with a drop of 0.8 per cent the quarter before, while decreases in all of Europe hit 5.1 per cent, more than double the rate of 2.3 per cent seen at the end of 2008.
Countries such as the UK or Spain, which have high home-ownership rates and a US-style housing market, once again fared worse than countries like Germany, where renting is still more popular than buying a house or flat.
Economists warned that falling house prices could still slow construction investment, dent private consumption in some countries, and burden banks – just as the eurozone, at least, showed signs of shaking off recession.
“The two Achilles heels of the eurozone economy – the banks and private consumption – will be hit at a time when many are hoping for first signs of recovery,” said Marco Annunziata, an economist at Unicredit. “Some countries – Spain or Ireland – do have markets that are closer to the US model, and do show a link between consumption and house prices,” he said, cautioning national trends could hamper any regional recovery.
4. Matt Nolan from TVHE points to Infometrics’ view that consumers haven’t hurt enough in this recession and New Zealand’s economy hasn’t made the structural changes necessary to avoid some calamity at a later date.
Matt’s own view is more nuanced than the one apparently reported on in this stuff article on Gareth Kiernan’s comments.
Infometrics seems to be of the opinion that once the crisis is over, fundamental imbalances in the domestic and global economies will drive us back to high current account deficits and a worse net debt position.
Once this happens, a global economy that has recently been stung by risk loving behaviour will punish us – forcing us to take on an adjustment that we didn’t complete during the current crisis.
Now I buy that reasoning. But my only question (which isn’t covered in the newspaper article) is, what are the structural factors in the New Zealand/global economy causing this imbalance. Is it our artificially high exchange rate (against fixed Asian currencies), is it artificially low interest rates, is it no capital gains tax, is it poor financial education, is it an inherent bias towards housing as an investment vehicle, is it poor investment decisions by firms, is it uncertainty surrounding policy?
Without an answer to this question, how are we supposed to know what New Zealand is supposed “to learn”?
I’m sure Matt has his tongue firmly in his cheek. He works for Infometrics.
5. Liam Halligan at The Daily Telegraph makes a compelling case that the Bank of England’s quantitative easing is not working to free up bank lending and is instead just filling the black holes inside toxic bank balance sheets. HT Barry Ritholz
Over the past three months, the Bank has spent £106bn of QE funny money. By the end of July, it will have purchased the £125bn of assets it has so far been authorised to buy. At this week’s meeting of the Monetary Policy Committee, interest rates will be held at 0.5pc. But, with the original QE “pot” almost gone, the Treasury and Bank could well signal there’s more to come.
I accept the start of QE caused share prices to rally and business sentiment to improve. But that sugar rush has gone. The harsh reality is that despite the huge inflationary dangers posed by QE, the credit crunch is getting worse.
The Bank of England has more than doubled the monetary base since March, yet mortgage approvals remained at 43,000 in May – consistent with house prices falling at double-digit annual rates. Lending to non-financial companies contracted 3pc last month.
Banks are keeping the QE cash on reserve or lending it to their own off-balance sheet vehicles (the ones stuffed with sub-prime toxic waste). So rather than helping solvent firms and households access credit, QE is re-capitalizing, by the back door, banks that are otherwise insolvent and should be going bust. Gilt yields haven’t come down either. The 10-year yield remains where it was before QE began, having been much higher in the interim.
Around a third of the Bank’s QE purchases are, anyway, from overseas investors – doing nothing to ease credit in the UK. Such sales by foreigners reflect mounting concerns about the UK’s wildly expansionary policy stance and sterling’s related medium-term fragility.
As someone who spends a lot of time talking to overseas asset-managers, I can’t tell you how often I’m asked: “Liam, why this money-printing? Have your politicians gone mad?” I can only reply that I ask myself the same thing.
There is, in extremis, an argument for QE, but only to buy commercial paper, not sovereign debt. When used to re-purchase gilts, QE allows governments to carry on borrowing like crazy, rather than facing up to the reality the country must balance its books.
When QE was announced, the emphasis was on the commercial debt purchases the authorities would make. In the event, gilts have accounted for a staggering 99pc of the total. That’s why QE will inevitably lead to high inflation – whatever nonsense is spouted about “withdrawing the monetary stimulus”.
6. There’s a new movie documentary coming out called American Casino that talks about the housing bust. Here’s the trailer. Worth watching for the vibe.
American Casino movie trailer from Leslie and Andrew Cockburn on Vimeo.
7. Matt Taibi’s scream of an article at Goldman Sachs (“a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money”) is beginning to resonate. Here’s Robert Johnston, a former Soros fund manager who is now a director of the Roosevelt Institute. He essentially says Americans are not angry enough about what has just happened and Taibi is helping fill that void.
Such evocative imagery will surely be discounted by some as hysterical or exaggerated, particularly by those whose senses are deadened by the business press or CNBC-style babble. Rather than engage in a dissection of the details, I would like to explore why Taibbi is screaming and ask why he is screaming for all of us in a way we are not seeing elsewhere in the media. In addition to screaming for us, I wonder whether he is also screaming at us. One thing is certain: he is screaming in a way that a healthy press would do in a hysterical time. Goldman Sachs’ uncontested success blurring the boundaries between market and state is symbolic of a tremendous malfunction in finance, politics and civil society. That the firm is well-managed by all measures and that some fine, well-meaning individuals work there is beside the point. Taibbi is telling us that the rules are rigged. That we are being abused.
This is a time for vivid outrage.
Taibbi’s rage is filling an emotional void. It is a reaction to what is missing after this profound speculative episode that the IMF suggests will cost over US$4 trillion in losses on balance sheets and untold trillions in lost output. It is fury over a crisis that is, by any measure, the most profoundly damaging episode since the 1930s (and the Bank for International Settlements Annual Report released this week strongly suggests that the burden on stockholders is far from over).
Taibi has in interesting video here talking about the story. Apologies but I can’t embed it.
8. Morgan Stanley’s chief US economist Richard Berner describes America’s Fiscal Train Wreck in this piece.
Some are concerned that our reckless fiscal policy will trigger a downgrade of the US sovereign debt rating, making the financing of our burgeoning deficits more difficult. While worries that the US will default on its debt are illogical, global investors and officials are concerned about the credibility and the sustainability of our fiscal policies. So am I. They fear that we will adopt policies that will undermine the dollar and the domestic value of dollar-denominated assets through a combination of risk premiums and inflation. I worry about that too, although such policies probably would be accidental rather than deliberate. As a result, interest rates may have to rise significantly to compensate investors, including reserve portfolio managers and sovereign wealth funds, for such dangers. While the dollar will for now retain its reserve-currency status, such concerns put it at risk.
9. Revolving lines of credit for American companies are being wound back at an alarming rate, Vincent Ryan at CFO.com points out. This is very important for any New Zealand company supplying or exporting to an American company. Has that company just had its ‘revolver’ cut? HT Yves Smith at Naked Capitalism.
Why are changes to revolvers so important? The refinancing issues with revolvers affect more than just banking relationships, says Pam Krank, president of The Credit Department. For one thing, when a bank reduces or revokes a line of credit, “it’s a trigger” for aggressive action on the part of unsecured trade creditors, Krank says. “If bank availability goes down, it makes the unsecureds very nervous.” As a result, they cut the amount of trade credit granted a customer or put the customer on hold altogether, she says. “It has a huge impact.”
10. Ed Harrison at Naked Capitalism explains what the recent Swedish move to an OCR at minus (yes minus) 0.25% means.
Here’s the problem. I take a fairly Austrian School tack here. Punishing savers by lowering interest rates to zero and printing money is not going to solve the problem. The problem was low interest rate and easy money to begin with (and a lack of regulatory oversight never hurts too). This created a binge of reckless lending. We are now seeing the result of that lending worldwide, Sweden included.
What Sweden needs is more capital in its banking system. Remember the whole song and dance about the Swedish solution? Supposedly, the Swedes were brave enough in the early 1990s to bite the bullet and nationalize insolvent banks in order to re-capitalise the banking system and get lending going again. Everyone and his sister was sayingthis is what America needed to do (including me). I still say this is what needs to be done: punish reckless lenders by liquidating zombie undercapitalized banks but provide enough liquidity at normal interest rates to keep the system intact. And, I am sure taxpayers would be a lot more willing to pony up under these circumstances than under the present policy of giving the reckless lenders free handouts. If you want to prevent systemic collapse, it is the banking system, not the banks, which is important.
But, apparently, everyone just wants easy money and no one wants the Swedish solution – not the Americans and certainly not the Swedes.
Tags: Liam Halligan, Top 10 at 10
You may also like to read:





July 8th, 2009 at 9:40 am
“interest rates may have to rise significantly to compensate investors, including reserve portfolio managers and sovereign wealth funds, for such dangers.”
” gilts have accounted for a staggering 99pc of the total. That’s why QE will inevitably lead to high inflation – whatever nonsense is spouted about “withdrawing the monetary stimulus”.
HERE IT COMES.
Are you ready? NO. Hard bloody luck.
July 8th, 2009 at 10:14 am
Further to item no 2 – in this analysis of US debt The Solution… is the Problem, Sprott Asset Management show why it will be almost impossible for the US to rely on traditional lenders to finance its projected budget deficit, forcing the Federal Reserve to resort to more Quantitative Easing (aka money printing). Which in turn will only make it even more difficult for the US to rely on traditional lenders…
The authors conclude:
(H/T Davos at Chris Martenson’s site.)
July 8th, 2009 at 10:14 am
No. 11.
Fran O’Sullivan: Transtasman gap haunts Key
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10583068&pnum=0
“But just as with the team that was set up to review the foreshore and seabed legislation, the makeup of the membership will be critical to outcomes.”
No, Fran – what is critical to outcomes is the terms of reference (tor). If it precludes disturbing the ’status quo’ it will be nothing more than a wonk. That is, precluding introduction of asset taxation to broaden, flatten and lower income and corp tax; modifiying monetary policy with a, robust, money/credit volume control; tax credits for ‘winning behaviours’ in productive enterprises; strategies to build national capital and regain economic sovereignty.
“He pointed to the fact that the non-tradeables sector, which focuses on producing goods and services for domestic consumption, has grown 18 per cent in the past five years – overshadowing the performance of the tradeables (exporting industries and those competing with imports) which had contracted by 5 per cent over the same period.”
Some have been pointing this out for sometime – it’s not as though it’s not obvious, but with a tor constrained by failed, redundant idealogies and vested interests in maintenance of the status quo – standby for quite familar approaches to dealing with the structure of the deficit, as opposed to dealing with the structural imbalances in the economy.
“Even policies – such as using tax to incentivise more investment – have yet to get over the line.”
And when some did…..R&D tax credit…..look what happened.
Les Rudd
Invited Member
NZMEA
July 8th, 2009 at 10:52 am
Then the 2 year old made the big bad world go away by covering his face with both little hands. “Oh gosh, why didn’t I think of doing that” said Mr Key as he turned to his sidekick Bill English and added ” see Bill, you put your hands up here and the big bad disfunctional economy just goes away, try it Bill, it really works”!
July 8th, 2009 at 11:10 am
Here’s a link well worth watching. Commentary from David Rosenberg “On The 40% Dead Cat Bounce” in the US equity markets, and his case for a long recession from CNBC.
Linked from Zero Hedge;
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/rosenberg-40-dead-cat-bounce
July 8th, 2009 at 11:48 am
A leetle Shakespeare seems appropriate for the ‘Continuing Stoo-oo-oo-ry’ over at GS:
“Plate sin with gold,
And the strong lance of justice hurtless breaks;
Arm it in rags,
a pygmy’s straw does pierce it.”
The Tragedy of King Lear, IV, vi
July 8th, 2009 at 12:02 pm
Ha, here we go:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/jul/07/banking-regulation-mortgages-pensions
Alistair Darling will sketch out plans tomorrow for a health warning system for financial products as the government seeks to show that consumers will benefit from the Treasury’s wide-ranging revamp of the banking industry.
In a much-anticipated response to the financial crisis of the past two years, the chancellor will look at ways of extending the highly visible risk alerts for tobacco and fatty foods to include mortgage and pension products.
What’s he going to put on them?
This mortgage may harm your unborn child; This pension plan may lead to impotence.
July 8th, 2009 at 12:10 pm
“New Zealand’s economy hasn’t made the structural changes necessary to avoid some calamity at a later date.”
The structural problem is our love for debt, esp foreign….that’s why we have such a huge current/capital account deficit….To finance this we need to borrow more and more….and this cost us more and more in interest rate charged for the loan (that’s why interest rate is going up)…this in turn cause our exchange rate to go up….(foreign buy more NZ$ to lend to us, while taking exchange risk)….this cause our exporters to die from lower returns to finance their loans (most are up to their eyeballs, that’s another story)….this cause them to borrow more to finance their shortfall….and the story goes on…
The solution? Tell them a devalueation story…if foreign lenders thinks or believe they will get less at the end of the day, they either lend less or charge more….we price ourselves out of the market for credit.
A lower exchange rate will help our exporters repay our foreign debt but higher cost will also cause them to borrow less….the economy can then limp (yes limp) into balance after a long and slow drag…
Meantime the goverment can use the slow GDP growth to cut spending and reduce goverment and transfer payments.
Get real New Zealanders, we are poor…stop borrowing to pretend you are rich !
“So rather than helping solvent firms and households access credit, QE is re-capitalizing, by the back door, banks that are otherwise insolvent and should be going bust.”
Query : Is this also the reason why we are seeing lending to Farm sector rising ??
July 8th, 2009 at 12:13 pm
Alex, check out Barclays home page which carries (quite prominently) the warning:
“Your home may be repossessed if you do not keep up repayments on your mortgage.”
Gunther, great link. Re (in/de)flation, it seems like a no-brainer that a massive increase in the base money supply will cause massive inflation, all things being equal, which they are not. The massive debt overhang first has to be either written off or worked out of (which could take years) before that will happen.
Gold bugs might start getting impatient with it having not made a new high in USD terms since March 2008.
Of course, we may have inflation in this country a lot sooner, if we have NZDUSD in the 40s (which seems quite possible).
July 8th, 2009 at 4:29 pm
http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/business/2575889/Dirty-secrets-of-financial-planners
Who can blame Ma and Pa prop. investors…
July 8th, 2009 at 6:45 pm
Wally – We would all be better off if the government stayed out of the economy. The public sector cannot out-smart private enterprise – EVER. Government needs to CUT its spending! Not doing anything hurts. That is the sacrifice, the hard decision, the realization of limits. Writing cheques against my pension is “covering his face with both little hands”.
History for some:
http://amconmag.com/article/2009/may/04/00024/
July 8th, 2009 at 11:40 pm
Les – those that like us nice and dependent upon our rented money supply of their created credit dont like to see us invest to heavily in research and development because we might discover how to make our own medicines, which would remove another of their shackles should we decide to push reinstate our economic sovereignty.
Argentina suffered terribly from a shortage of drugs when they were unable to repay their debts in 2001 as the bankers once again put the debt contract ahead of the social contract;
A severe economic crisis in Argentina in 2001 led to drug shortages that prompted the government to import 21,000 doses of HIV drugs to be distributed in hospitals as an emergency measure, along with insulin from Brazil and over-the-counter drugs from Spain and Italy. At the same time, World Bank loans intended to support health sector reform were diverted to procure vaccines so that the country could maintain its immunization program. Health insurance and social security schemes faced severe financial difficulties while many bank accounts were frozen, leaving people with limited access to cash.
And the 1997 Asian currency crisis, which caused severe economic damage across much of East and Southeast Asia, had a negative impact on public health in Indonesia. Data from the World Health Organization show an almost 25 percent decline in immunization coverage rates between 1995 and 1999, the reduction being most striking in 1997-98. Expenditures by individuals on primary care from 1996/97 to 1999/2000 were reduced by 20 percent, and government spending was cut by 25 percent. Between 1997 and 1999, the use of health care services by poor children dropped by about 17 percent, compared with 8 percent in children from wealthier settings.4
http://www.globalhealthmagazine.com/top_stories/what_does_the_financial_crisis_mean_for_global_health/