The comment stream

Recent comments

Reader poll

Should you fix your mortgage now or stay floating?

Choices

Supermarket contract points to the future

Posted in Rural News

It appears the seed of the Primary Growth Partnership could very well have been sown by the Rissington/SFF/Marks and Spencer contract that has existed for 5 years.

However the worrying aspect to this plan is the premium, once firmly established in this contract, has been removed.

While the farmer involved believes he gets a premium for other aspects to the scheme, are supermarkets getting their cake and eating it too?

Changing to a system such as this, requires a huge comittment for all the farmers involved, and they should be compensated accordingly.

A few months back, Sam and Hannah Morrah got up early  to sit in an office and talk to the people who buy their meat on the other side of the world reports The Dom Post. It is with the agriculture manager and meat buyer for British supermarket chain Marks & Spencer, the supply chain manager for NZ meat processor and exporter SFF, and other farmers in the North and South islands. This close connection between farmer and retailer is unique to just 46 farmers in New Zealand, part of a special contract that aims to deliver year-round supplies of chilled lamb to Marks & Spencer's stores.

The contract was launched by Hawke's Bay-based livestock genetics company Rissington Breedline four years ago, and the farmers all use Rissington breeds that produce a big, fast-growing, meaty lamb. Under the contract, the Morrahs' lambs have to meet strict quality specifications of weight and fat cover and the promised numbers have to be delivered at contracted times.

For Mr Morrah, who is entering his second season as a Marks & Spencer supplier, the frankness of the discussions at their first meeting was refreshing in an industry noted for its distrust. The Marks & Spencer managers also passed on customer feedback from lamb promotions. It is an example of the dedication that contributed to the couple winning Marks & Spencer's Future of Farming Award for its top food supplier this year. The company asks its suppliers to abide by its sustainability principles, what it calls Plan A, and the Morrahs were able to show how they deal with drought, and that they apply fertiliser using a nutrient budget, recycle plastic waste, have fenced off native bush and waterways, go to great lengths to ensure the animals are well cared for and look after their staff.

The Mark & Spencer contract specifies lamb carcass weights from 17.4kg to 20.9kg and the Morrahs have had to plant special forage crops to get those weights. Although more money was the main reason for the change, he was also attracted by being in the vanguard of innovation."This is the way the industry should be going. In Rissington, we have one of the better genetic companies and we believe Silver Fern is on the right track by getting closer to the customer."

Someone has to make the commitment and it may as well be the farmer. That's what we did, signed up to supply set numbers at set times of the year. "If another 150 or even 250 could do that, ride it out for a couple of seasons while the high- paying markets are found, then the industry might be on its way back to profitability." He adds wistfully: "Still, it would be quite nice to be acknowledged for your commitment to the processor with a competitive price, plus a top-up at the end of the season so you don't come out worse off than the spot supplier."

 

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment in the box on the right or click on the "'Register" link at the bottom of the comments. Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making these comments.

17 Comments

To be frank I dont see what

To be frank I dont see what they are doing is particularily special apart from the fact that they know exactly where their product ends up and they are jumping through more hoops. Its esentially a marketing gimmick to encourage use of Rissington genetics. If theirs no price premium wheres their advantage over anyone else who are essentially running the same system but maybe useing different(possibly superior) genetics

Spot on Shagger. Can anyone

Spot on Shagger.
Can anyone explain how this model is designed to improve returns to the farmer?
They remain locked in 'perfect' competition where marginal price tends to marginal cost.

Maybe they, SFF etc, are

Maybe they, SFF etc, are trying to take abit of  power back from the supermarket(perhaps in vain), but nothing

ventured nothing gained.We farmers will deceide our own fate.If you are happy with the satus quo then do

nothing, if not ,be bold and alighn yourself with those who you think will help drive the industry forward.

I think in the future the end customer will deceide the breed/type of animal, be it deer,sheep or beef that will

be raised on nz farms.The genetic companies/ram breeders are only a rung in the ladder.You will

still have a choice as to who you use. 

Annon, I completely agree

Annon, I completely agree with you. The model described above is exactly the way things are going. My main point though is the only actual winners in the above model are Rissington whos genetics are to be used but no premium is returned to the farmer. Thats not a win win. Changing the meat industry is incredibly simple. Financially incentivise a certain model and we will fall over ourselves to supply.

I fail to see how the

I fail to see how the procurement and marketing components of that model can be based on anything other than some form of 100% farmer owned cooperative. With the best will in the world it is not possible to involve non-farming shareholders in these components and expect a result other than price received by farmers tending to cost of production.

As your,re aware chipper we

As your,re aware chipper we have two sizeable farmer owned co ops now. Now that SFF have reduced their debt I could see no reason for them not joining up with Alliance. This would simplify processing space reduction, gain some market clout. Then it will be up to us to give it our support and therefore a chance at making some real progress. The real danger looming I believe is a big international player like JBS coming in for a slice of the lamb action , inflating prices in the short term to buy some business. This might work in our favour in the short term but would weaken our co ops so that long term we are at the multinationals behest. Lets get our house in order first and avoid being picked off.

Sorry Shagger, not totally au

Sorry Shagger, not totally au fait with the capital structures of these firms - I'm not a NZ farmer but please bear with me. I did have a quick look at the SFF balance sheet though and there is significant ordinary equity it seems.  I'm not sure if they remain 100% farmer controlled despite this . Can you comment on that?

What I am getting at is unless the sole reason the management of SFF / Alliance get out of bed in the morning is to enrich their suppliers, it won't happen.

OK chipper, heres the oil.

OK chipper, heres the oil. SFF and Alliance are 100% farmer owned co operatives. Both are headquartered based in the south of NZ but have a national footprint. Alliance is the biggest exporter of sheepmeat in the world and SFF is number two( I think). Together they represent about 55%of total NZ kill. They operate many plants in proximity to one another which operate at less than peak capacity much of the time, they sell to  much the same supermarket clients, many of their shareholders hold shares in both, many supply both and they both agree on the market led philosophy etc etc. A couple of years ago there was a movement aimed at a merger but it failed supposedly because of SFF carrying to much debt at the time primarily. Frustratingly underlying this is a history of intense rivalry and farmer politics and tribalism. As  a business model this seems to make no sense to me especially now SFF has dramatically reduced its debt.

Thanks Shagger. Taking all

Thanks Shagger. Taking all that at face value then: NZ has a similar clout in sheep meat as in dairy in terms of the balance of world supply. Do you see the Fonterra structure as one the sheep meat industry should aspire to?

No not exactly. It has been

No not exactly. It has been mooted and attempts a couple of years back failed. There are two other significant players Affco and CMP which are privately owned as well as a number of small operations. The dairy boys had the advantage of it being totally farmer owned and marketing through the dairy board so the creation of fonterra was a logical progression of that. The meat thing is alot more complicated but the merger of Alliance and SFF would seem a logical first step to me.

A good example of how the

A good example of how the sheep industry has been shagged!!  Its not about structure.  Its about inferior product.

The perpetrators are in denial.  Another experiment upon farmers that has failed!!  I need top quality product to meet my clients specification.  Immediately!!

Bought shoulder shops at

Bought shoulder shops at Countdown last week. The pong when I cooked them told me it was ram. What the hell are we doing to our product when we allow this to happen. I gave it to the dog.

Because all of NZ's stuff

Because all of NZ's stuff worth eating is exported.

When I was living on the Coromandel Peninsular back in the 1980s, any unsold export-grade kiwifruit was given to pigs on local farms.

The pickers, sorters and packers were forbidden to take any of it.

Only the "non export-quality" (ie rubbish) kiwifruit was sold within NZ.

You could buy NZ-grown kiwifruit in NYC for less than you paid for the reject fruit in NZ supermarkets.

G O D Z O N E

This because NZ does have an

This because NZ does have an artificial farm subsidy. We all pay international prices for local agricultural products. 

Do not believe it!  Some of

Do not believe it!  Some of the stuff that we export is also not worth eating.  Fact!!  Great for NZ incorporated.

So it is sold or traded.