sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Tax consultant Terry Baucher describes the Government's BEPS move as the tax equivalent of a pre-election law and order policy announcement 

Business
Tax consultant Terry Baucher describes the Government's BEPS move as the tax equivalent of a pre-election law and order policy announcement 

Tax consultant Terry Baucher says the Government’s plans to raise more tax revenue from multinationals is “more show than dough”.

Finance Minister Steven Joyce and Revenue Minister Judith Collins have announced finalised proposals to address base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS).

They have doubled their estimate of the amount of additional tax revenue they expect the measures to raise from $100 million, as forecasted in the Budget, to $200 million a year.

Collins believes loopholes in the system are seeing New Zealand miss out on $300 million a year, but recognises it’s hard to put an exact figure on the problem.

Put in context, the Government received $12.5 billion of company tax in the year to May.

While Baucher, of Baucher Consulting, admits “every bit counts”, he says the measures finalised today are “good politics”.

He maintains the announcement is the tax equivalent of a law and order type of announcement before an election. Multinational corporations aren’t the ones voting in the September election.

The measures will be included in a tax bill, expected to be enactment by July 2018. Together they will:

  • Stop foreign parents charging their New Zealand subsidiaries high interest rates to reduce their taxable profits in New Zealand.
  • Stop multinationals using artificial arrangements to avoid having a taxable presence in New Zealand.
  • Ensure multinationals are taxed in accordance with the economic substance of their activities in New Zealand.
  • Counter strategies that multinationals have used to exploit gaps and mismatches in different countries’ domestic tax rules to avoid paying tax anywhere in the world.
  • Make it easier for Inland Revenue to investigate uncooperative multinational companies.

Joyce says: “It is very important that every company operating in New Zealand pays their fair share of tax.

“While most multi-national companies follow the rules there are some that attempt to minimise or eliminate their New Zealand tax obligations. The proposals target these multinationals.

“I’m confident that the policy decisions we’ve made will tackle these BEPS activities without reducing the general attractiveness of New Zealand as an investment destination.”

Baucher agrees most multinationals are complying with the rules. He maintains tech companies like Google and Facebook will be hit hardest by the tax clamp down.

Yet being at the end of the value chain, he believes there isn’t a lot of additional revenue for New Zealand to squeeze out of multinationals under the existing system.

He would like to see the Inland Revenue release more data around its corporate tax take.

Yet like the Labour Party, Baucher questions how the IRD will enforce the new measures when the Government is planning to slash 1500 jobs at the department.

Labour would also like to see a diverted profits tax introduced, which would tax any profit a multinational has avoided reporting for income tax purposes.

Its Revenue Spokesperson Michael Wood says: “After nine years in government, five years after the issue of multinational tax avoidance was placed on the IRD’s work programme, and two weeks after Labour’s own detailed proposal was released, the Government is to be congratulated on their relatively quick response.

“It’s good to know that things can be achieved with an election looming.”

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

1 Comments

Such alacrity

"five years after multinational tax avoidance was placed on the IRD’s work programme, and two weeks after Labour’s own detailed proposal was released, the Government is to be congratulated on their quick response"

Up
0