sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Latest KPMG Financial Institutions Performance Survey shows the second highest number of first home buyers ever in the June quarter - but with fewer borrowing on high LVRs

Property
Latest KPMG Financial Institutions Performance Survey shows the second highest number of first home buyers ever in the June quarter - but with fewer borrowing on high LVRs

The first home buyers have continued to buy up large - but proportionately fewer of them have been borrowing very high levels of debt, according to KPMG's Financial Institutions Performance Survey for the June quarter.

KPMG says 9000 FHBs made their way on to the housing ladder in the quarter, which was the second highest number ever after the December 2020 quarter.

But significantly, fewer of the latest batch of FHBs were borrowing on high loan to value ratios - IE above 80% of the value of the property.

A third (34%) of FHBs in the June quarter borrowed over 80% of their loan-to- value ratio (LVR). This was  down from about half in the two previous quarters (54% in December 2020 and 46% in March 2021).

"This is a sign that the Reserve Bank of New Zealand’s (RBNZ’s) tightening of mortgage lending standards and the general feeling of discomfort with the heat in the residential property market could be having an impact on bank lending appetite for higher LVR loans," KPMG said.

The banking sector had a strong quarter, reporting a combined Net Profit After Tax (NPAT) of $1,451.9 million. This was a slight dip (of 11.63%) when compared to the previous quarter ($1,642.9 million) which was a record result; however, it was still one of the strongest quarters ever and almost twice that of the same period last year - which was lockdown affected.

And the strong latest result was largely driven by the continued growth in mortgage lending.

Lending overall increased by 2.20% (to over $473.5 million) compared to the previous quarter, but mortgage lending rose by 6%, KPMG said.

"While March 2021 retains the record for the largest amount of mortgage lending in one month, each month in the quarter ended June 2021 saw over $8 billion of new residential mortgage lending."

In fact that trend, according to the RBNZ's monthly figures, continued into the September quarter as well, and for the 12 months to the end of July there was just over $100 billion of new mortgages advanced.

KPMG said the composition of the banking sector lending portfolio has seen a steady increase in housing lending and a decrease in consumer, business and agriculture lending.

"While house prices, and with them the levels of mortgage lending, overall continue to rise, the number of investors taking out new mortgages has dropped. The lending growth is largely driven by owner occupiers and first-time buyers."

KPMG said this could be the beginning of the impact of the recently introduced tax changes deterring highly leveraged investors "or the achievable yields from renting starting to look unattractive at such high purchase prices".

The RBNZ is currently consulting on the further reduction of the amount of high LVR lending that banks can do, with the intention to implement any new settings from 1 October 2012.

Following this, the RBNZ intends to consult on potentially implementing Debt-to-Income (DTI) restrictions.

*This article was first published in our email for paying subscribers. See here for more details and how to subscribe.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

52 Comments

What is making up FHBs deposits - genuine savings or gifting from the bank of Mum & Dad? I suspect those that have family support are buying...not exactly a level playing field for those that don't.

Up
8

The deposit money must be coming from the bank of Mum and Dad based on sucking it back out from the rapid equity gains of the last 12 months. Your simply never going to get the required deposit together on your average NZ salary.

Up
10

They just need to give up their avocado toast and they'll save a deposit in no time

Up
6

You reckon? And they'll be able to buy a Ferrari too if they give up coffee.

Up
1

A Ferrari would cost considerably less.

Not that the bank would finance one.

Up
3

Indeed. That's driven a bunch of our young educated to head to Aussie and historically the UK, which is clearly a poor outcome for tax generation in NZ. It seems a lot of them are trying to get back at the moment with MIQ well over subscribed.

One wonders why those stuck here paying all the tax for to prop up the ever increasing tax takers have not entered the leverage property game to rinse their income tax position to a more neutral one. Oh wait...they have, including a lot of politicians...how many rentals does Helen have again. That is just making the situation worse by driving rents and mortgages ever higher (in the name of less tax), thus driving future tax creators offshore (no tax), and driving employers to have to pay higher and higher wages to retain an ever decreasing talent pool (those with skill who actually want to work). This in turn makes businesses less profitable and thus... generate less tax.

Its a circular argument that's leading us down the drain financially. Young tax payers leaving, more tax payers retiring into tax takers, those at the bottom are always tax takers, and those in the middle increasingly becoming tax takers. It doesn't take advanced education to see that the math outcome is becoming more and more out of balance.

At least the banks got a greater and greater debt noose around NZ and all of its assets...tui.

Up
9

Not sure if you've read 'Tipping Point' by Malcolm Gladwell...but your comment above reminds me of his theory. You do wonder where the inflection point will be, in terms of what has been great for a large number of people, suddenly becomes unbearable for enough in order for significant change to occur. It may surprise people when it happens and appear to come from nowhere, yet if you have been looking close enough, you can see all the signs are/were there for it to happen.

From my perspective, there are more and more people I talk to saying things like;

- 'I've done really well for myself by I worry about how this is going to impact my kids'

- 'things really need to change to give our children a decent shot at life'

- 'why is my house selling for so much, and why is the one I want to buy so expense, this is actually ridiculous'

- 'this can't be sustainable'

- 'has the world gone mad'

- 'my house is worth a lot of money but I don't have much in the way of savings, and what I'm receiving in interest is negligible, will I have to downsize my house sooner in order to free up cash to live from in retirement?'

- 'young people should leave and go overseas because they have much better opportunities there'

- 'do central banks really have societies best interests in mind?'

- 'NZ is %#@#%%, I'm going overseas'

- 'even thinking about saving for a house is so depressing and its making my mental health so bad'

- 'it must be tough for young people, but how do I change things to make life easier for them?'

The list could go on, but these have been the points of discussion the last 12-24 months with a number of different people across different age groups. Change may arrive sooner rather than later, but if it doesn't, the near future doesn't look stable - socially or economically. We need change in order to bring about economic and social stability.

The question is who is going to deliver it politically and what does it look like?

Up
7

The fact that its a global thing, and that no one in power seems to be willing to do anything about it is very perplexing. The longer this goes on, and its been going on long enough, the worse it will be for everyone. Warranted or not, I would like to have seen interest rates rise well before now, for that same reason.

I recall back in the 70's and 80's literally a full plane load of kiwis were moving to Australia every single day - for better work options. Will we now see the same for 'affordable housing' ? You can still buy a house in the regions there for under $300k

Up
0

Yes I suspect Bank of Mum and Dad is a very significant factor.

Up
1

Are overseas returning more cashed-up NZers skewing the FHB data?

Up
0

Many will be using kiwisaver. I am doing this after years of saving. If people are in a couple, then that amount may double too.

Up
0

Wow the housing market in NZ just continues to surprise me. No idea where people are finding the deposits from it was hard enough for me to scrape up $17,500 that made up half the deposit back in 2003.

Up
4

Can't blame FHBs for getting a footing on the property ladder pronto.......

An alternative is to wait until 65 years of age and cash in one's KiwiSaver to fund the deposit on a first home - then use the pension to pay off the mortgage.

Anyone for the latter?

TTP

Up
4

Damn it.  If by "house" you mean garage in wop wops then you have revealed my cunning plan.

Up
0

Imagine a Japan like scenario where house prices fall for the next 30 years....which isn't impossible given the insane price appreciation we've witnessed the last 40 years - completely out of line historical trends when you look in real terms over the past 100+ years.

So its possible that a person might be able to buy 5 houses with their kiwisaver at the age of 65 if that outcome eventuates. House prices keep falling, and you keep adding to kiwisaver...

i.e. the cycle reverses....you'll say impossible, but its in your personal/financial interest to disagree with that possibility.

Up
4

Why wait 30 years, Independent_Observer?

Go buy yourself a house in Japan today - unless, of course, you don't believe in yourself......

TTP

Up
1

What they do in countries that have their shit together, is cash in SOME of their investment funds nearer to retirement to purchase freehold their home, and use their remaining investment funds and pension to have an enjoyable retirement.

Up
0

"First home buyers borrowing in big numbers - but not stretching themselves as far financially"

In Auckland where median house price is 1.3 Million and FHB buying without stretching than FHB in Auckland should be very rich community to not borrow in extreme and easily afford to buy a house alternatively many are buying pigeon hole for million under FOMO and data will reflect otherwise.

If FHB are not borrowing in extreme that why the hesitation to bring in DTI.

Above data/headline could be to mislead reserve bank or give opportunity to Mr Orr to use it to justify for not implementing DTI and as Mr Orr is reluctant will grab this reason by both hand.

Above headline, now when RBNZ is about to announce DTI raises doubt over its intent - would be interesting to know David's view on this

Up
7

Stuart

What has "Auckland where median house price is 1.3 Million" to do with FHB?

FHB have in the main always bought in the lower quartile . . . . . that has been that way for the past 50 years. Due to an affordability compromise my first home was in a lower socio-economic area of Auckland way back in 1980. 

Yes its currently tough, but you are not in touch with reality if FHB expectations are a median priced Auckland house . . . it never has been. 

Up
5

Even as recently as the mid 90s first home buyers were all over suburbs like Kingsland, Pt Chev and even Grey Lynn - anywhere further west ... well lets face it you dont go there

Up
1

An even more important difference is the median age of FHB's. I was a kid in the 90s so I'm relying on anecdotes here, but it seems that people were buying their first home in their early 20s back then. How many under 25's do you see at auctions nowadays?

Up
3

Only those with a "Chinese sounding name"

Up
3

Who Flung Dung?

Up
0

Boss even pigeon holes are selling million dollar plus.

So how come last year houses for $850000 and units for $650000 which were e unaffordable are affordable today at 1.3 million and million dollar. What is happening not only in housing  but also in stock market is manipulation by reserve bank and government - worst time ahead, when hard to say as everyone printing and throwing money therby pushing the can......

Up
0

The emergency low interest rates allowed people to be able to service larger mortgages. Although different banks apparently stress test people between 5-7%, I wonder how many people will really be able to service those mortgages when interest rates go up to those sorts of levels, without affecting their life. Especially with inflation rising. House prices in my area have essentially doubled in the last 3-4 years. The question is, will house prices be allowed to fall back in price.

Up
0

I sense an opportunity:

Me:  I hear you could lend more to high LVRs but don't need to because FHBs are somehow finding deposits, and that the RB might be going to tighten up on high LVR lending, thereby closing off a potential market for you

Bank: Kinda

Me: OK, I'm thinking of taking out a massive mortgage to buy a shitbox

Bank: What you got?

Me: Next to nothing

Bank:  ...we could be interested

Up
6

20% is a big ask but still achievable for couples with decent jobs and who have been saving for a few years. 20% deposit on 1.3m = $260k. Saving $500 per week p/p would take 5 years to save that. The 34% using less than 20% could reduce that time to a few years, or purchase at the lower end of the Akl market. Plenty of properties going for under a mil out of the CBD.

Up
1

Remember a significant number of  FHBs will be buying new build townhouses, 2 beds for circa 700-750.

So that's say 140-150k.

Up
6

Exactly.

Up
1

Yea totally achievable for those numerous couples out there saving $1000 per week after paying all their bills. Wow, you just solved the housing crisis thinktank, great stuff!

Up
9

Saving $500 per week p/p

You make it sound so easy...
Nurses, police(wo)men, teachers etc.: Hear that? Just save 500 per week and you have a house, easy as! It's only 50% of your net income! Get in quick!
Wait, what's that? Rent is another 30+% of your salary? Come on, don't be such a p***y... just eat rice for the next 5 years and you're good.

5 years later: average Auckland house price is now $2 million. Oops, Sowwwwy.... Just need to save another 140k. Hmm I guess you could eat half portions for the next 3 years? You know rice is a luxury in some African countries!

Up
11

Sorry team I thought the sarcasm was obvious.

Up
1

I've been reading these comment sections long enough to know that there are people who'd actually say the same thing unironically.

Up
7

We don't need Nurses, police(wo)men, teachers, front line workers & council support.

It is advised to them, please leave NZ or be renter for your whole life.

Who need education, medical assistance & security these things are less important in comparison to property increase in NZ. Labour is doing right thing the prices should increase more.

 

Up
5

And if they go to Australia that can get a house without needing to worry about a cheesy scroll, work, wife, or money.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=die5eWFp2Gc 

 

Up
2

Good one and you can literally buy house that easy in Aus (other than Sydney). 

NZ is overly priced just because politicians are morally corrupt (benefiting one section of society), there is no other reason period.

 

Up
3

Is it just the politicians or the average human? It's the majority of human's buying into the mess that continue to exacerbate it. 

Stop buying into it and it stops. Stop feeding the beast.

Up
2

I wonder if migration patterns are having an effect.

Although net migration is pretty much zero, there has been a net gain of around 14k NZ citizens.

I wonder if we've had quite a few kiwis coming back from the likes of the UK with plenty of pound stirling in tow.

Just a theory  which could be wrong.

Up
1

The problem they have is that the pound is only worth about 2 dollars these days and that UK house prices haven't gone up at the same rate as ours. So effectively they've gone backwards relatively.

Plus, didn't real wages decline in the uk over the past decade or so? While taxes went up? The ftse is at the same level it was in 2016!

Up
0

For sure, the pound doesn't go as far as it used to. 

But even still, if some couples have been based over there for say 5 years, on good paying jobs, they could easily return with 50k in pound Stirling, equals 100k NZ dollar

Up
0

House prices in the UK look cheap these days (probably excluding London areas), and you can get so much more for your money. Building also seems so much cheaper. Suburbs of London don't look too bad either when converted to NZD.

Up
0

Second biggest quarter ever? How far back does the data go with KPMG?

Up
0

YHL

I expect that KPMG probably rely on RBNZ mortgage data. RBNZ monthly data (hc31) goes back to August 2014. 

For the past year the actual number of FHB mortgages has been highest over that period. 

Surprisingly despite the common perception, over the past year more FHB have been purchasing properties than over the past seven years. You may want to note that compared to the period 2014 to 2015, the current monthly number of FHB mortgages are around 40% to 120% higher in number than back then. 

Refer column U in the data file spreadsheet https://www.rbnz.govt.nz/statistics/c31 

Up
0

Those FHB numbers will start dropping away big time. 

Up
0

I would be interested to know what the FHB numbers (not %) were in the December quarter. The report doesn't say, as far as I can see.

Up
0

HM

Refer column U in the data file spreadsheet https://www.rbnz.govt.nz/statistics/c31 

 

Up
0

Thx

Up
0

I think to put this in context we need to compare the data with the Australia.

Throughout the world, house prices are rising due to increasing people working and staying at home due to lock downs and stimulatory support.

The trend is expected continue for some time and action taken to dampen the lending will eventually lead to a flow on effect on cost of production, malaise economic activity and escalating consumer prices.

Up
0

House prices keep rising because central banks keep dropping interest rates and because retail banks favour lending to residential property than to real businesses.

Up
0

Keep an eye out for an overshoot of good quality rental properties as a flood of tenants become FHB.  

Up
0

Good point, *especially* with net migration being so minimal.

There will be only a brief window though, as FHBs drop away and migration opens up again.

Might be a sweet spot this summer / autumn.

Up
0

Wonder what the average size of FHB Mortgages are for a) Aucklanders and b) rest of nz? 
Excluding topups etc.   
 

$700k?  

Up
0