sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

National miles ahead of Labour despite support falling; Australia's residential construction boom peaking; Strong consumer spending in US gives Fed ammunition; UST 10yr yield at 1.59%; oil down, gold stable; NZ$1 = 72.6 US¢, TWI-5 = 75.9

National miles ahead of Labour despite support falling; Australia's residential construction boom peaking; Strong consumer spending in US gives Fed ammunition; UST 10yr yield at 1.59%; oil down, gold stable; NZ$1 = 72.6 US¢, TWI-5 = 75.9

Here's my summary of the key events from overnight, with news National is continuing to hold a comfortable lead over the Opposition, despite its support falling 7% in August.

The latest Roy Morgan poll shows support for National has dropped to 46%, having spiked in July following the announcement of a $1 billion housing infrastructure policy. It's still well ahead of a potential Labour/Greens alliance, which has 40% support. 

Labour has yet again failed to get any traction, with its support levels stagnant at 25.5%. Support for the Green Party is up 3% to 14.5%, while potential king-maker, NZ First is up 2.5% to 9.5%. Despite people's discontent around issues like housing affordability and low wage growth, 58% of voters say New Zealand is heading in the right direction. 

There are signs Australia's residential construction boom has peaked. While 2016 will be a record year for new home construction, the Housing Industry Association expects "sharper falls" in 2017 and 2018. Its call comes further to its new home sales slumping nearly 10% in July, off the back of a jump in June. 

Over to the US, consumer spending increased as expected, for the fourth month in a row, in July. The 0.3% increase was boosted by strong demand for cars. Personal income growth also rose 0.4%, pointing to a pickup in economic growth.

Yet with inflation remaining low, there are question marks over whether this gives the Federal Reserve enough ammunition to hike interest rates next month. 

In other news, China's top 500 enterprises reported their first annual decline in combined revenues in 15 years, last year. While their revenues still totalled nearly US$9 trillion, they slid 0.07%.

The China Daily says the decline largely represented the overcapacity-plagued coal, steel, oil and chemicals industries. The service sector contributed 41% of the revenues, outperforming the manufacturing sector, at 39%, for the first time.

In New York, the UST 10yr yield has eased back overnight to 1.59%.

The oil price is down fractionally. The US benchmark price is at US$47 a barrel, while the Brent benchmark is at US$49 a barrel.

The gold price is stable at US$1,323/oz.

The New Zealand dollar is recouping some of the losses it suffered further to the Fed's Chair on Saturday (NZ time) saying the case for a rate hike had strengthened. It’s at 72.6 US¢, 95.8 AU¢ and 64.9 euro cents. The TWI index is up to 75.9.

If you want to catch up with all the local changes from yesterday, we have an update here.

The easiest place to stay up with event risk today is by following our Economic Calendar here ».

Daily exchange rates

Select chart tabs

Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
End of day UTC
Source: CoinDesk

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

72 Comments

“58% of New Zealanders think the country is heading in the right direction”......speechless

Up
0

Not surprising as its a reflection of the continuing support for ponzi scheme pumped capital gains. I've said this numerous times no one will be voting for negative equity.....willingly

Up
0

and Unwillingly too , ... no pressure !

Up
0

you wont have a choice when the time comes

Up
0

Well when a significant % of people are not suffering and in fact "think" they are doing better and fear the changes on their "lifestyle" Labour (and the Green's) would force the result is hardly surprising.

Up
0

Clearly those 58% are not asthmatics.

"Common medications such as a steroid inhaler for asthma costs over $300 (US) a month in the U.S., compared to about $35 (US) in France. Insulin, a life-saving medication for diabetics, is about eight times more expensive here".
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/us-drug-prices-remain-high-generic-competi…

Brought directly to your door by the friendly folks of TPP.

Up
0

The Roy Morgan polls are already suspect if not discredited by wild fluctuations.
It beats me why they get any traction over others on this website.

Up
0

Because they are the ones who best support the narrative.

Up
0

I was wondering the same thing Basel. I get phoned up from time to time to do a survey but we are one of the dwindling number of households with a conventional land line. Heaps of people (younger, poorer?) only have cell phones, many don't bother with email. A lot of households don't even have a house!
So how is this (Aussie) outfit polling people that represent a broad spectrum of society? I couldn't find out on their website, perhaps they go door to door and car to car?

Up
0

National spent more of your money bailing out their mates at South Canterbury Finance that they've put towards fixing the mess they've created in Auckland.

Up
0

Xeinaga the only people this government baled out of South Canterbury Finance we the mum & dad depositors who had there deposits guaranteed by labour Goverment of the day .
But why let the truth get in the way of a good story !

Up
0

Westminster,

Could you spell out the terms of the guarantee? I wasn't aware of one and would like to know more about it. Did it apply only to SCF,or were other companies included? Was it unlimited or capped?

Up
0

Linklater
All finance houses and banks were given the same opportunity to have there depositors guaranteed by the Crown, some faulted like SCF and the crown paid out to the mum and dads .
These were turbulent times during the GFC and stabilising finance markets was a key driver for govt
Don't have the detail , but there were rigorous hurdles imposed by govt to comply with rules

Up
0

Mums and Dads, and the rest...

Up
0

mainly the Alan Hubbard congregation believers

Up
0

not all finance companies in the scheme had all 100% paid out. for some strange reason SCF was a different case

Up
0

SCF had some very suspect goings on and only just managed to qualify for the guarantee scheme, and, in retrospect, shouldn't have.

Up
0

Thanks for that. I had retired to live in NZ just a few years before the GFC,but fortunately didn't get involved with any of the finance companies,as I have always been a stockmarket investor.
I know that many people lost a great deal of money in finance companies. Why were companies like Hanover not in the scheme? Did they not apply or did they apply and were turned down?

Up
0

participants in the scheme had to pay a fee or levy - some did, some didn't, some couldnt

Up
0

Why did the National government extend the SCF guarantee when the original Labour effort lapsed? A due diligence investigation by Treasury would have exposed all sorts of skullduggery that would have prohibited such largesse. Read more

Up
0

indeed - how quickly history gets forgotten or rewritten

Up
0

History is rewritten by the spin meisters for the winners of elections to prepare for the next one.

Up
0

DP

Up
0

yes did not government departments at the time warn the government about south Canterbury but national still extended the coverage, whilst letting other finance companies go to the wall.
strange why was that?
as I always say follow the money

Up
0

Enlighten us all where did the money go ?

Up
0

NZ First will top 12% in the general election. screen cap this

Up
0

Undecided_Voter,

If you are right,from whom will the votes come? If Winston can't get them from National supporters,then National,with Dunne,ACT and Maori would presumably sail on to another term with a wafer-thin majority.

Up
0

National has just as many if not more 'floaty' voters as all of the other parties put together.
Once some of them come out of their somnambulance anything could happen.
;o)

Up
0

Well ,, you are right ... for example: every time Mr. Phil Twyford opens his trap and starts crying and whinging on TV to save the homeless with twisted numbers like he did this weekend ..more and more "floating"voters will sway towards the Right camp ....
Does anyone wants him to be the future Housing minister - I don't think so, but don't take my word for it ..ask around !!

What 58% approval means is that regardless of the party driving the politics in the country , 58% of people are satisfied with the current outcome and think that we are moving ahead --- the Left forgets ( or ignores) the fact that the opposition has a great roll in shaping policy and certainly 58% are not all Nat supporters !! .. but Labour and the Left are tired of being the underdogs for 9 years so they just want the helm .. even if by defining my son living with his parents as HOMELESS - go figure!!

Up
0

Baby boomer National voters who see the cancer that is taking hold of this country

Up
0

Count this baby boomer in plus all my whanua. Get out the vote, spread the word to those who often find it hard to vote but are most affected by national's do nothing.

9 years of doing nothing but let the cancer metastise from Akl to the rest of NZ. If someone hasn't performed its time to get rid of the deadwood and give the other team a go. That way government evolves - see New Labour in the UK.

Up
0

The baby boomers will all start becoming NZ First voters (irrespective of what party they usually support). NZ Frist has targetted elderly voters with bribes (Gold card anyone) and memories of the good old days (before the yellow peril invaded)...

Winston will sell that narrative and attract more and more elderly to his party. That is why National cannot even discuss increasing the retirement age as the stream of elderly National voters moving to NZ First would become a Tsunami.

I expect NZ First to promise a "plantanium card" to over 65s in the next election giving them free power and discounted Air NZ flights (and a pint of toddler's blood;). Let the bidding begin.

Up
0

HeavyG

Perhaps you are right,but I.m not so sure.I am in that demographic and I wouldn't touch NZ First with the proverbial barge pole and I am pretty sure that many of those I know are confirmed Nats. I'm a Greenie,though if the Air NZ flights were heavily discounted,well,we all have our price!!

Up
0

Winnie P will get the votes from the normally don't voters. The people who see him as about the only chance to fix immigration, which has been on a suicidal acceleration in the past few years.

58% isn't much, in fact it is downright gloomy. Most people will say yes even when they mean no, it's called optimism bias, and it's a good thing ;)

Up
0

I'm not surprised by this at all. It is certainly the feeling I get on the street as it were. What you disappointed people need is an overtly Nationalist party that is supported by the emerging alt-Right however most here could fairly be described as classic left so there is very little chance of a victory over National. NZ's culture and demographics have moved too far for there to be any radical change....which may turn out to be a good thing. It makes for fairly dull politics though.

Up
0

While you are all, left and right, asleep thinking things are wonderful, they are kept wonderful by a slide towards fascism as corporations other assets are purchased using printed money.

Up
0

not trying to boost national but...it was not them that set up the deposit guarantee scheme. Labour set that up and was one of the most ridiculous ill conceived things they did. open slather for really really bad lending practices

Up
0

Not trying to boost Labour but they set up the NZ Super Fund and Kiwisaver, both examples of good govt and now gutted by JK to pay for his silly tax cuts to give more money to his rich mates.

Up
0

How was KS good governance exactly? Making saving an institution hi-jacked by finance company fees and controlled by IRD essentially making it overly bureaucratic when they simply could of enhanced personal saving habits by removing RWT? Then to add to the stupidity, not offering a government deposit guarantee in conjunction with it. KS was just an election bribe like any other

Up
0

kiwisaver is the first step along towards privatizing super on mass, it will be interesting to see in twenty years those that have not saved for their retirement if there will be a form of public super and what level that might be

Up
0

but nowhere near as good for the rich as Accommodation supplements and WFF have been -both Labour polices that only benefited Landlords

Up
0

Both terrible polices that distort, as for WFF whilst I can see the premise, the mechanism for delivery is inefficient.
in my mind any distribution of wealth through government is very inefficient, for every dollar they take off me how much of it arrives at the end user and how much is eaten away in administration costs

Up
0

Is McDermott giving a speech today ? .Talk about zero rate , monetary policy still working well, and inflation will meet target naturally over time, coming over wires.

Up
0

Nothing on RBNZ website alluding to McDermott speech. He delivered one on behalf of Wheeler last week which was well covered.

Up
0

A lot may happen between now and the election.

Up
0

58% approval.

What a stupid little vassal state this is.

Up
0

What are current homeowner rates in this country? Any correlation.....

Up
0

Labours alliance with the Greens is hurting them. My impression is that people would rather vote National just to keep the Greens out. Might be different if the Greens stuck to environment issues and left social policy up to Labour.

Up
0

I agree with this. If we had a Green party that was sensible and as concerned with protecting NZ's human heritage as it was with its natural heritage then it would attract a lot more people.

Up
0

On the contrary, the Greens are equally deluded into thinking you can support natural heritage & human/economic growth.... We are way in overshoot - the planet will kick back regardless of what politicians do or say

The ONLY solution is way less humans, and its not a vote winner.

Up
0

As Winston Churchill might have said, had he been a voter in NZ about now, "National is the worst party we have, except for all the others"

Up
0

If your family has 2 incomes ,haven't bred to often and own you're own house then you are doing ok.

Up
0

"58% of us think we're moving in the right direction"

Must be hard to accept for all the whingers, whiners and J K haters on this site

Up
0

I guess so.
What is really worrying is that Dear Leader & Co will now be fully convinced they have a divine right to rule, the people love them and they can do what the hell they like: sell us out to multinational corporations from hell and Asian gangsters and flood the country with desperate third world labour.
Lovely!

Up
0

not everyone is happy new indian/asian party now started will be interesting to see which main party they take votes from

The constitution also has a clear focus on immigration, stating it wants to develop immigration policies to allow international students, migrants and refugees to settle sooner into a comfortable life in New Zealand and crack down on crime, including assaults and exploitation of students.

But Mr Nauhria says there'll be policies for everyone.

"Initially we will be talking about our Asian people and Indian people

http://www.newshub.co.nz/politics/nzs-first-political-party-dedicated-t…

Up
0

So he's a racist and this is a racist party

Up
0

Really? Maori,Mana parties focused on Maori issues. NZ First party with issues mostly directed towards old people & has a record of negative views towards Asians.

Yet this new Political Party is instantly judged as racist? I think this is a good thing for Asian New Zealanders who finally has a party that represents their community & voice who don't get much representation in the NZ Parliament despite being 13% of the New Zealand population.

Up
0

it is racist because it will be based o the needs of certain races to the exclusion of others, exactly the same as the mana and maori parties.
as for NZ first I have not heard them spouting policies over any particular NZ ethnic group. they do target immigration and the benefits to NZ which have just as many negative outcomes if the volume and skillset are set to high.
the same point labour is now making ironically
as for national they just see the money flow in with high immigration as a good thing, but now services are stretched police, hospitals , schools the expenditure also needs to rise, and where is the money going to come from to pay for it, what have we got left to sell. debt is 100 billion and still growing
as for the greens please they don't know what they want

Up
0

There is a subtle difference, Maori was the original society here, and in incorporating Maori tikanga means it will be kept alive, this is, after all, the only country it exists.

Up
0

They don't think they have a divine right to rule, or that they can do what the hell they like.

They think that they have been elected to Government , which gives them a right and indeed a mandate to govern; and they know that in governing, they need to take account of the electorate's wishes and welfare if they want to remain in Government after the next election.

Please give an example of the Government selling us out to a multinational corporation from hell?

Up
0

Not really - it just confirms the inherent weakness in democracy - that you follow the will of the deluded masses.

The delusion is that the brighter future is just a train coming down the tunnel.

Up
0

Let's give socialism at try! " VENEZUELA’S MAN-MADE humanitarian crisis is deepening. AP reports that the typical resident of Caracas, the capital, spends 35 hours a month waiting in line to buy food, and 9 in 10 say they can’t find enough . After the government of Nicolás Maduro opened six border crossings to neighboring Colombia on Aug. 13, about 380,000 Venezuelans poured across in the first eight days, desperately seeking supplies. Sackings of food warehouses by hungry mobs have been reported; 50 animals in the Caracas zoo are said to have starved to death. Meanwhile, Mr. Maduro refuses to allow aid shipments into the country, contending they are unneeded. "

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/venezuelas-hung…

Up
0

I reckon we look more to Scandinavia, you don't have to bring out the cot cases to disparage socialism, then again, maybe I could use somewhere like Somalia to illustrate how rotten capitalism and a lack of regulation is.

Up
0

The countries you mention are all democratic. Hamo doesn't like democracy. Somali a bastion of capitalism and light regulation? You would be the first to descibe as such.

Up
0

Scandinavia is Capitalist you fool with a system called the "Nordic model".

Scandinavia is not Socialist. Somalia is a country destroyed by war nothing to do with capitalism.

Anybody who ties socialism to Scandinavia is a idiot.

Up
0

Norway has strong social policies such as high taxation, with all your education hospitals etc provided. The trouble with the silly all or nothingers like yourself is that in order to justify not using parts of both capitalism and socialism, you choose the worst examples of things to justify your stance. There IS such a thing as middle ground you know!!
And as for countries that prevent foreigners buying houses, a better example for you to use might have been Switzerland than what you did use.
The world is changing and continuing as we are is going to continue disenfranchising and dispossessing people as technology takes over what we have always thought of as work.
Some form of collectivism is going to be necessary is some parts of society in order for it to survive without violence and for the human race to live with falling populations.
Have you ever bothered to ask WHY Venezuela turned to socialism in the first place?? It appears it would have done well to look to the like of Norway and its policy of sovereign wealth where their oil was concerned. It already was a basket case before it turned to socialism!!

Up
0

A result of prolonged low oil prices bankrupting producers.....ring a bell re dairy?

Up
0

So why haven't all the other oil producing states started eating their zoo animals?

Up
0

How many of the 58% are recent immigrants? They make up a big portion of the population these days, 2% per year soon adds up to a big part of the population, 10% in just 5 years, and how many of them share our values? How many are whingeing poms come over here just in time to get our pension?

Up
0

So what if they are recent immigrants? perhaps its because National is pro-immigrant & not solely blaming immigrants for every social problem in New Zealand like Labour,NZ First has been doing.

Even the Greens accused Labour of "crude racial profiling" back in July last year.

New Zealanders are the unhappiest migrant group in Australia despite being the only migrant group to get (SCV), eligible for student loans & medicare yet still very unhappy.

Anti-immigrant sentiment is generally connected to the right so Labor is going more to the right with its negative views on immigration.

Up
0

not surprised kiwis are not happy in aussie they treat us badly, if this was an aussie baby here he would have been treated. I feel sorry for the parents
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11702029

Up
0

Maybe it is the difference between immigration and mass immigration. I imagine, like me, most NZers do not want our population increased by a great number.

Up
0