In this section
Offers for readers
The comment stream
Recent comments
- 1 of 19105
- ››
Editors choice
- 1 of 276
- ››
Finance sector jobs
Successful applicants will have the opportunity to work with this leading Australian Advis...more
Australia
Think Global Recruitment is working with this exceptionally respected Australian Boutique ...more
Australia
Sought after opportunity to move to one of the most beautiful westernised countries in the...more
Australia

The news stream
Latest news
Most commented
- 90 seconds at 9 am with BNZ 116
- Wednesday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 78
- Friday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 28
- The problems with NZ's energy use 19
- Amanda's Take Five for Wednesday 19
- More bank mortgage rate cuts 16
- Govt lifts minimum wage 50 cts to $13.50 an hour 16
- Thursday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 15
- 90 seconds at 9 am with BNZ 14
- Full time jobs fall 13,000 in Dec qtr 14
Most viewed
Interest on Twitter
Opinion: Why government pumping money into the economy won't work
By Infometrics Economist Geoff Simmons Lots of people are saying that this recession is "different". But why? Our national income is a bit like a river. We can usually measure the amount of water (i.e. money) in it by looking at how high the water comes up the riverbank. When times are good and the rivers are full, we can ease the pressure by letting some water out. The Government does the same thing with the economy - when it is growing too fast, the Government takes money out. They do this indirectly through the Reserve Bank raising interest rates (which means we all pay more for mortgages) or directly by taxing more than they spend "“ i.e. saving money. When the river gets low, we put more water in. Before all the farmers out there get too excited we can't usually do that with a river, but we can with the economy. The Reserve Bank drops interest rates and Government spends more than it taxes (i.e. runs deficits). So surely the answer to our current dilemma is simple. We have a recession, i.e. the water levels have dropped. We need to measure how far the water has fallen, and get Government to pump more water in to equal what we have lost. Right? The only problem is this isn't working, and it probably won't.
There is more going on beneath the surface of the water in this recession. You can't always measure the amount of water in the river by looking at the height of the river. The speed of the flow of the water also matters. A lot. And actually the economy works like this too. How much income we all have is partly determined by how quickly money flows around the economy. In recent years this flow accelerated, and commercial banks played a big part in this. Banks make loans, which people spend or invest, and most of the money ends up deposited in someone else's bank account. Banks can then loan this money again. In the past however, banks made sure that a bit of that money was set aside for every bit deposited or lent out. They made sure you had a deposit to buy a house, and they kept a portion of all deposits on hand in cash. This meant that every time the bank made a loan, it got less of the money back, and in turn could lend out less of the money to the next person. It was a bit like the banks made little reservoirs along the riverbank. This slowed the flow of water down the river, but made sure there was enough water set aside for times of drought. In the last boom however, banks relaxed these restrictions. They reduced the deposit needed for a house. They sold off their loans to investors so they could make more loans. One by one, banks emptied the reservoirs they had made along the river bank. This happened here, but even more so overseas. The river flowed faster and faster, and we all felt richer. We went white water rafting on the international rapids of cash. We didn't need deposits for a house, and interest rates were low, so we paid higher prices for houses. House prices rose, we all felt rich and so we took money out of our house and bought a new car. Now the white water ride is over. Banks have realised they needed those little reservoirs along the riverbank, and they are trying to fill them up again. Households are also realising they need a reservoir too "“ a house is no longer enough because they are losing value. So banks and households are refilling their money reservoirs. This is reducing the water levels in the river, and slowing the river down. Governments around the world are furiously trying to pump water to raise the river levels, but this is getting absorbed by the reservoirs. No matter how much money the Government pumps out, the money river will never flow as fast as it did in the past. It was unsustainable, a man-made flash flood. That is why the current recession hurts so bad, we got addicted to a speed of money flow that cannot be repeated. And as we all know by now, the faster you flow, the bigger the mess. ___________ * This piece first appeared in the Dominion Post on March 14, 2009. Infometrics is an economic information and forecasting company based in Wellington. To find out more, see its website here.
6 Comments
Sorry to lob this in
Sorry to lob this in here out of context a little, but this site moves that fast these days I am quite unsure if those I wished to continue debate with even saw it when I posted it. It is very relavent to this thread anyway;
Vibena - you are so right about different rates of interest encouraging hedging and other detrimental game playing to occur, thus I have added this to my solution;
All registered deposit taking institutions would be regulated to be unable to charge administration fees and interest exceeding 1% Any entity proven to be issuing loans regularly enough to be deemed commercial and in excess of 1% will be charged with loan sharking. Which would attract penalties in line with tax evation.
Full version here;
http://socialcreditorbust.blog.co.nz/credit%20reform/
Andrew - if the shop keeper loans out more credit at compounding interest than he knows the borrowers are going to be able to get goods from him or there are insufficient resources to ever convert to saleable goods to cover his lending , he is ripping them off and gaining the interest on even unspent credit for nothing. You appear not to grasp the fact that the planets resources are finite.
For all of you who blame government deregulation for the credit crisis and not the fact that masters of money have infiltrated and now subversively run most governments, with their locally recruited co-operatives, from behind the diplomatic curtain, I give you the last three articles here to provoke some thought;
http://socialcreditorbust.blog.co.nz/
Jill Wellington - if you are still out there, in the above mentioned articles there are a number of names you might be interested in learning some more about.
And this that reminds us that the Privatisation Blitzkreig we are about to have rammed up us by the Bankers favourite son Johny Key, has Douglas's strategies written all over it. Douglas and Keys good cop bad cop routine doesn't fool me, they are working toward the same end, for the same people ;
http://www.reason.com/news/show/30260.html
excerpt from above website-
But New Zealand's transformation cannot be properly understood without understanding the people who made it happen. Perhaps no two people were more instrumental than Roger Douglas, the Labour government's finance minister (from whom "Rogernomics" was to take its name), and Ruth Richardson, the finance minister when the National Party took back power in 1991. Their vision, persistence, stubbornness, and drive were indispensable in bringing about reform.
In the late 1970s and early '80s, while most of New Zealand's Labour Party was preoccupied with left-wing social and cultural issues (remember their anti-nuke policy?), Douglas, a businessman from a political family, was left alone to fashion much of Labour's economic policies. When Labour took office in 1984, he had brought a number of key party leaders around to his market-oriented views.
At the time, New Zealand looked remarkably similar to the interest-group-dominated state described by Mancur Olson. "New Zealand had been the acme of a lobbying, rent-seeking society," remembers Roger Kerr, the director of the New Zealand Business Roundtable. "If you look in Olson's book, you see two or three pages on New Zealand. The country conformed precisely with his hypothesis."
While recognizing the power of interest groups to block reform, Douglas didn't believe their existence necessitated compromise or retreat. Instead he designed strategies to buy out or overwhelm interest group opposition. One tactic was to apply the reforms on a broad front in order to spread the burden and enhance the legitimacy of the program.
What we need is an
What we need is an engineering maestro like Ben Bernanke who possesses miraculous powers that can 'create' water to fill everyone's reservoirs.
Yes, the ability to 'create' instant wealth will provide an endless avenue of riches for all.
Unemployment will be a distant memory because everyone will be rich enough to enjoy whatever their heart desires, without ever having to work for it.
What a genius !
Having created wealth, Mr Bernanke will now use his powers to create luxury foods, McMansions and designer clothes for everyone.
Lets go shopping !
Iain I answered your original
Iain
I answered your original comment that i then bookmarked by:
1. Clicking on the blue date and time at the top of each post made in the comments.
2. Saving that link to my favourites
If you do the same you will be able to continue your conversations.
http://www.interest.co.nz/news/opinion-why-huge-budget-deficits-are-inte...
Thanks
Bernard you have hit the
Bernard you have hit the nail on the head, the speed at which the river was drained was exceptionally fast and the baby boomers greed for wealth accelerated that. Wonder how wealthy some of them are now.
Ian Parker you talk a load of dribble, your social credit policies are about as old as Bruce Betham, which didn't do him any good you should change your views befor you get left behind, or is it to late.
Geoff Simmons: great article !!
Geoff Simmons: great article !! Thanks !
Great article, but one crucial
Great article, but one crucial thing needs to be added to your "river" analogy: where the water that the government "pumps in", comes from. Because they can't create real-value money out of nothing any more than they can create water.
And Kiwis need a more brutal analogy than this, to describe the insanity that is our housing bubble and cashed-out-equity driven consumption spending. This needs to be distinguished in everyone's mind, from REAL wealth, that is created by work and production and earnings and profits. The "rising river" analogy misses this crucial difference. That is two things it misses: fake wealth "created" by nationwide asset Ponzi schemes; and fake wealth "created" by government.
Maybe it needs a series of "locks" in the river that raise the level artificially, and an explanation that the water being pumped in by government is actually being taken out somewhere else, perhaps from the level further downstream where our kids and grandkids will be doing the paddling?