The comment stream

Recent comments

Join the Interest community to be a registered commenter so you can:
- Edit your comments
- Avoid the CAPTCHA
- Vote on comments
Register Here

Already registered? log back in here ..

Forgotten your password? No problem! Click here

Finance sector jobs

Temporarily unavailable, please try again later

Reader poll

Should you fix your mortgage now or stay floating?

Choices

After dumping guarantee, Asset Finance bounces back into the black

Posted in News

Asset Finance, which withdrew from the Crown Retail Deposit Guarantee Scheme last November, has seen its fourtunes bounce back to the tune of NZ$1 million enabling the Whakatane based consumer and small business lender to record an annual pre-tax profit.

The company said its pre-tax profit for the year to March 31 was NZ$659,408 compared to a loss of NZ$367,299 in the year to March 2009. Asset Finance said the 2009 loss stemmed from loan write-offs, impairment provisions and reduced loan income as it ran its loan book down to match reduced depositor funding.

"As economic conditions have improved during the 2010 financial year Asset Finance has seen gradual growth in both its depositor funding and its lending book leading to increased loan income while, at the same time, the company has achieved a significant reduction in loan write offs and impairment provisions," Asset Finance said.

Major restructuring had also lifted profitablity through a significant reduction in overhead costs.

Founded by Clive George and headquartered in Whakatane, Asset Finance also has operations in Auckland, Hamilton, Rotorua, Tauranga, Tokoroa, Hawera, New Plymouth, Palmerston North, Wanganui, Masterton and Wellington.

"In November 2009 Asset Finance announced that it was withdrawing from the Crown (Retail) Deposit Guarantee Scheme and despite the fact that it is now not able to offer a Crown Guarantee the Company has continued to receive deposit funds at a level comfortably sufficient to sustain current and projected lending growth."

Asset Finance has no loan exposure to the property development sector.

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment in the box on the right or click on the "'Register" link at the bottom of the comments. Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making these comments.

17 Comments

What a great story! This

What a great story! This should be shouted from the rooftops!

The crucual line is the last one . . . "Asset Finance has no loan exposure to the property development sector." I think the "property development sector" is a misnomer; it should be called the "property speculation sector" - nothing more and nothing less.

NB the company is run by a

NB the company is run by a guy from Whakatane that actually has more skill and nouse than most of the AK property spec /finance company morons put together. Bernard a story on Mr George,his ethos and the companies history would be great.

Small companies making loans

Small companies making loans in the $250-$5000 range should do very well for the forseeable future as folk struggle to make ends meet. They'll be able to charge pretty high rates to cover the inevitable bad loans that crop up. This and pawnbroking will be pretty good businesses to set up.

Yup, micro-lending is good

Yup, micro-lending is good business when you can charge 350% annualised interest rates with default rates about the same as the average credit card. As long as you don't mind being called a loan shark by the very people you're helping. Eh.

pawnbroker for trophy wives

pawnbroker for trophy wives

Could Clive be contracted to

Could Clive be contracted to Allied Farmers for a short while to show them how it is done?

Lend wide, lend low, is a

Lend wide, lend low, is a business model that works very well for other finanace companies as well. Its not rocket science and easily explained to investors like me. The team at Asset understand you can't loan what havent got and adjust their loan book to suite. Its called "realistic trading".
Well done guys.

I work for Asset Finance and

I work for Asset Finance and wouldn't usually comment, but I would like to throw a few facts into the mix here: Asset Finance has been around since 1997. We are not a micro lender - our average loan is around $6500 and average term around 18 Months.

We do pay our investors more than most and we have been doing so for the past 13 years. And when you are paying 10 or 11% p.a. for funds, obviously you can't lend money as cheaply as a bank, but I can assure you our annualised weighted average return is a small fraction of the 350% p.a. micro lenders (apparently?) get. If we were getting anywhere near that, we would be able to pay investors even more than we do. But in reality if you divided the 350 by 10 you would be getting closer.

Thanks for that Blair. Mind

Thanks for that Blair.

Mind me asking what a) your default rate is and b) how stable that rate is c) why dont you offer investment rates shorter than 9 months?

Careful what you say Blair, I

Careful what you say Blair, I presume you don't want to be 'advertising' under the Securities Act :-)

Blair - does  your company

Blair - does  your company use computers or drive VW Beetles ?  Just  trying to work out how success comes

Crafty Clive....  sticks to

Crafty Clive....  sticks to his niche and has a solid group of loyal depositors....  good on him...

In relation to my

In relation to my comments:
In case someone has construed them as an advertisement or been tempted to subscribe for securities as a result, you should call us on 0800 657 800 or email blair@assetfinance.co.nz for a free copy of our investment statement and prospectus (thanks Jandel).

Short term deposits:
Our strategy has always been to borrow long lend short and this has held us in good stead so far. We believe 9 month money doesn't really let us develop and grow our business in a way that can be sustained, so we offer rates to attract funds for 18 months to 3 years.

(We could give you a 6 month rate, it just wouldn't be that good because we don't really want money for such a short term)

Default rates:
This is probably a post in itself.

goNZ:
We do use computers, without them we wouldn't be able to provide our service fast enough. Some of our branch managers have signwritten honda jazz's... but I don't think that's the secret! :)
 

Default rate: It's a hard

Default rate:

It's a hard question to answer these days. You can refer to notes 5 ("Impairment") and 26 ("Asset Quality) of our audited accounts for details. Email for a copy of this along with our investment statement.

From an accounting point of view, any loan 1 day or more in arrears is classified as in default (2 or 3 years ago it was about 90+ days past due, but that is no longer the case). We have a fairly large number of loans (3500) and the majority of them have fairly small weekly or fortnightly P&I payments (usually between $40 and $80 a week).

People of course miss payments. Rather than immediately act upon our security, we use our common sense and let them make up on the missed payment by paying a little extra each week. This does mean we always have a large number of accounts in default, however the majority of these people are short term defaulters and they pay given the time they need (in note 26, these are 'past due but not impaired assets'). The key is to keep on top of them and not let things get out of hand.

In terms of loans that are not specifically impaired, note 26 shows we had $398,821 worth of loans more than 120 days in arrears as at 31 March 2010.

If you look at loan write offs and movements in specific and collective bad debt allowances, the profit for 2010 included impairment charges of $1.2 million. This figure is very high when compared with most of our history, but it only works out to 4.9% of total assets (although I would tend to measure it against another metric, say income - it's 14.62% of total income)

In relation to stability - we are in a cyclical business and the general economy has an impact on defaults. We expect that as the economy improves, so to should the level of our impairment charges, as well as the level of our specifically impaired and restructured accounts.

Also note that thge $1.2 million figure above doesn't factor in money we have collected from prior year write offs ($168,938 in the 2010 financial year).

Please call 0800 657 800 for a copy of our investment statement or Prospectus.

Thanks for taking the time to

Thanks for taking the time to provide that information Blair.

No problem. Also in terms of

No problem.

Also in terms of the Securities Act I should have mentioned a few more things in case my posts are seen as advertisements:

1. The minimum investment amount we accept is $500.

2. Asset Finance has a long term counterparty credit rating of ‘B’ / Outlook Negative, issued by Standard & Poor’s (Australia) Pty Limited (“S&P”). This is an issuer rating and is based on local currency (ie New Zealand dollar).

S&P is a ratings agency approved by the Reserve Bank under section 157J of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act 1989.

3. As at 31 March 2010, Asset Finance had total assets of $25.06 million and total liabilities (excluding shareholder funds) of $22.39 million.

As previously mention, more information is available in the investment statement and prospectus, these are freely available by contacting 0800 657 800 or emailing invest@assetfinance.co.nz

Actually Blair the most

Actually Blair the most recent registered prospectus shows quite a high % level of impaired loans compared with the total loan book. There's also related party loans involved with this company. The current S&P rating is "B - outlook negative". While the company's most recent annual financial results are of interest, for any intending investor it is the integrity of the loan book that matters, and (in this case) the junk bond rating of "B" with the possibility (one in five) of a further downgrade.