Kiwis who holiday in Australia can't help but notice their home loan interest rates.
The carded rates are lower than ours and seem like a bargain.
Commenters on interest.co.nz have noticed as well.
Some have drawn the conclusion that "those Aussie banks are ripping off us Kiwis" (or words to that effect).
The assumption is that the banks are the same on either side of the ditch, and that they are essentially wholesale funded from cheap offshore money.
But is that true?
Firstly, lets look at the home loan interest rates.
Based on carded rates, mortgages cost about 100 basis points more in New Zealand than in Australia.
This table uses today's rates, sourced from each bank's website.
The data is as at 4pm, Wednesday, September 3, 2014.
So, if you are a borrower, it seems pretty clear you would save money if you actually were able to buy an equivalent house in Australia, all other things being equal.
But it turns out the reverse is true if you are a saver.
Here is the same type of table using the same sources for term deposits.
Savers in New Zealand get 1.26% p.a. more that those in Australia.
To save you the trouble, we have averaged the difference over both tables, over all terms, and New Zealanders get 0.26% more in term deposit benefits than we pay in extra mortgage costs.
The reasons are varied however.
Firstly, even though the same bank brands operate in both countries, and are owned by the same bank holding companies, they are regulated by different central banks.
Each imposes different standards.
The RBNZ imposes on locally incorporated banks a core funding ratio, forcing them to source most of their funding domestically. They do not have unfettered freedom to borrow offshore, nor even access 'cheaper' funds from their parent companies.
Secondly, they are credit rated independently and the ratings agencies look at them closely as stand-alone businesses.
Thirdly, as independent businesses, they pay their own credit spreads.
Fourthly, Australia has deposit insurance and for that benefit there are costs, costs that savers 'pay'.
And finally they operate in different markets with quite separate drivers of supply and demand. The credit cycle differs, and credit demand is generally rising in New Zealand at this time, and stable or shrinking in Australia.
But overall, it is clear, Kiwis are coming out ahead at present.
And by the same analysis, banks are making 0.26% less in New Zealand than Australia.
I am making no claim that this is anything more than a comparison based on carded interest rates today.
Readers who have other insight should use the comment section below. (Please stay on the subject, please add insight. Please don't rant.)




We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.