Offers for readers

The comment stream

Recent comments

Join the Interest community to be a registered commenter so you can:
- Edit your comments
- Avoid the CAPTCHA
- Vote on comments
Register Here

Already registered? log back in here ..

Forgotten your password? No problem! Click here

Finance sector jobs

Senior Legal Counsel
At NAB, it's all about our people reaching their full potential. And that means we drive t...more
Australia
Senior Financial Planner (Business) - Bondi - NSW - NAB
Senior Financial Planning professional to join our Business Banking team in Bondi....more
Australia
Senior Manager, Operational Risk & Monitoring
At NAB, it's all about our people reaching their full potential. And in MLC and NAB Wealth...more
Australia
Corporate Recovery Senior – Australia, Audit experience welcomed
Successful applicants will have the opportunity to work with this leading Australian Advis...more
Australia
efinancialcareers.com

Reader poll

Who do you think should be appointed Reserve Bank Governor to replace Alan Bollard when he retires in September?

Choices

Govt eyes second Auckland harbour crossing in National Infrastructure plan

Posted in News

Finance Minister Bill English has unveiled a National Infrastructure Plan that has identified the need for a second Auckland harbour crossing within the next 10 to 20 years. It did not detail immediately what form the crossing would take (either a bridge or tunnel) or how much it would cost.

"The existing Auckland Harbour Bridge is being strengthened to ensure it remains a strong, safe and viable link long into the future. However, building an additional harbour crossing is an important priority as the city grows, and it is a key component of the government's infrastructure plans for Auckland," the Plan said.

English said the first National Infrastructure Plan covered a 20 year horizon and had identified NZ$6 billion in government spending a year on physical assets, and that the government held NZ$110 billion worth of infrastructure assets. The plan provided a snapshot of public and private infrastructure, planned investment and the government's priorities.

"It gives infrastructure providers greater certainty about the Government's plans and ensures that planners and stakeholders have a clear sense of what is happening across a range of sectors," English said in a speech to the Trans Tasman Business Council.

I am reporting from this speech and will update with more details through the afternoon below.

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment in the box on the right or click on the "'Register" link at the bottom of the comments. Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making these comments.

4 Comments

What a joke! I am

What a joke! I am a Civil Engineer in Christchurch and both the City Council and Environment Canterbury have a large programme of proposed highway improvements that have been planned for decades now. In reality bugger all gets built, what actually happens is the construction dates get moved further out into the future. However it does keep a small number of people at the two above organisations plus others at the NZ Transport Agency in employment doing sod all except changing the dates and the proposed costs. Nice work if you can stand the boredom.

We need Option 3, no

We need Option 3, no question. The other 2 are a waste of time (which wont be apparent till they've built it of course).
http://www.arta.co.nz/publications-projects/projects/waitemata-harbour-c...

In addition to Option 3, they need to make the Britomart station a through station, get rid of the current in/out.

Wouldn't it be better for

Wouldn't it be better for NZ, to encourage people out of Auckland, and distributed throughout the rest of NZ.

I agree this is a

I agree this is a joke. Although longevity is a concern, it is not the major issue right now. The main problem is that it doesn't have the capacity for the amount of traffic that travels over it everyday NOW. It can't wait another 10 years for an alternative solution. I would be out of my car in an instant if there was pedestrian access. 25 minutes on a bike vs 75 minutes in a car to cover 10km - no contest.