In this section
Offers for readers
Follow the news from interest
The comment stream
Recent comments
- 1 of 20818
- ››
Editors choice
- 1 of 295
- ››
Finance sector jobs
Lead from the front utilising your strategic, technical and leadership qualities within th...more
New Zealand
Lead from the front utilising your technical expertise in this highly attractive senior li...more
New Zealand
Customer focus, high performance, exceeding client expectations and achieving profitable g...more
New Zealand
Key leadership position in the bank. Be a part of one of the fastest growing banks in New ...more
New Zealand

The news stream
Latest news
Most commented
- Fonterra to tighten TAF rules 67
- Govt eyes NZ$1.4b revenue grab 58
- English defends current account blowout 56
- 90 seconds at 9 am 51
- BNZ cuts most fixed mortgage rates 48
- 90 seconds at 9 am 43
- Thursday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 38
- Budget 2012 reactions 36
- Budget tax moves to target high income NZers 29
- Wednesday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 24
Most viewed
Top 10 at 10: Allan Hawkins' advice; China's resources grab; Japanese wages fall 7.1%; Dilbert
Here's my Top 10 links from around the Internet at 10am. I welcome your additions in the comments below or please send me your suggestions by email to bernard.hickey@interest.co.nz We don't flail around in futility at interest.co.nz...
1. Oh the irony. Former 1980s high flier and convicted fraudster Allan Hawkins now owns a finance company called Cynotech. He warns here in this half year report that other finance companies are vulnerable once the deposit guarantee expires.
A number of other finance companies have had to provide substantially higher bad debt provisions in the latest reporting periods. It is apparent that there are still massive difficulties to be overcome in the finance sector and in some cases if some of those finance companies were to aggressively provision against their property development and property speculation loans then they could be in serious breach of their covenants.
We simply believe that the arithmetic does not work out in some cases and this will likely lead to the non-fulfilment of conditions in some finance companies which are under a debenture holders' moratorium. This will have a continuing negative impact on the public perception of the finance industry and we, as a group, have to deal with this and ensure that we are not caught up in this negativity.
2. Here's another commodity market that is rapidly heating up: aluminium. This is good news for Rio Tinto and the people at Bluff, although it may help keep the pressure up on power prices. The FT has a nice piece here explaining why aluminium prices have risen 30% this year. However, the fundamentals are not brilliant and people are wondering if it's another speculative driven squeeze up. Something tells me a vampire squid is making money out of this. HT Troy via email.
But while there have been sharp falls in demand in the recession-hit aerospace and construction industries, aluminium prices at the London Metal Exchange have surged beyond the $2,000 a tonne mark "“ and last week hit $2,115, the highest level since November.
One explanation for the seeming riddle lies in the opaque world of aluminium inventories.
Related Topics
In recent months, aluminium stocks have accumulated in the LME's warehouses, with inventory levels almost doubling this year to a record of nearly 4.6m tonnes. That is sufficient for about 48 days of global consumption of the metal. But about 75 per cent of the LME's stock could be tied up in warehouses or financing deals, according to industry estimate. That means it cannot be used, reducing available supply to about 1m tonnes "“ or a mere 10 days of consumption.
3. Our banks have begun getting rid of dishonor fees and late bill payment fees, both here and in Australia. Only ANZ National and ASB have yet to follow the trends set by BNZ, Westpac and CBA. But in America the banks there are making a killing out of their fees. Overdrafts are strictly verboten in the land of the free. Here's the FT report.
US banks stand to collect a record US$38.5bn in fees for customer overdrafts this year, with the bulk of the revenue coming from the most financially stretched consumers amid the deepest recession since the 1930s, according to research. The fees are nearly double those reported in 2000.
The finding is likely to increase public hostility towards the financial sector, which has been under political pressure to ease the burden on consumers by increasing credit availability and lending more fairly after being bailed out by taxpayers.
4. The Chinese hunt for commodity producing assets offshore is on in earnest as China strives to avoid putting more of its foreign exchange treasure trove into wobbly US Treasuries. China's state-owned CNPC and Cnooc plan to pay US$17 billion to Repsol for all its stake in Argentina's main oil exploration and supply company YPF, the WSJ reported.
The potential deal, which could be the biggest overseas investment by China, highlights the country's growing thirst for energy resources globally and its willingness to offer big money for access. It also underlines the ambition of CNPC to build up its presence in South America and elsewhere.
A deal would be another example of how Chinese companies are now working together to buy foreign energy assets after years of working alone.
5. Ever wondered what a deflationary spiral looks like? Japan sets the agenda again with news that its wages, salaries and bonuses fell (yes fell) a whopping 7.1% in the June quarter from a year ago. That's the biggest fall on record, the FT reported. This is what happens when you have an ageing workforce, an ossified economy with weak politicians and a massive debt overhang from a property bubble. By the way, the property bubble burst 20 years ago so Japan has now lost 2 decades and it's getting worse.
"This kind of drop in bonuses would be unthinkable in normal times," said Naoki Murakami, chief economist at Monex Securities. Overtime hours worked continued to fall by double digits, with overtime in the manufacturing sector declining 40 per cent year-on-year. Overtime pay fell 17.7 percent in June from a year earlier.
6. A new survey of private US economists has found most expect the worst US recession since the depression to end in the current 3rd quarter of 2009, Reuters reported.
7. American corporates are hoarding cash because they fear another financial market freeze, according to Bloomberg.
Cash and short-term investments accounted for about $1.98 trillion, or 8.2 percent, of assets at the end of the second quarter for companies in theStandard & Poor's 500 index, up from about $1.6 trillion, or 6.4 percent, a year earlier, Bloomberg data show. Cash reached a record $2 trillion in the first quarter, 8.3 percent of assets.
"Cash is king," said Paul Kasriel, the chief economist at Northern Trust Corp. in Chicago. "Businesses are in survival mode right now."
While companies sold a record $837.9 billion of bonds this year and raised $109.8 billion in stock offerings, the increase in cash shows they are following the lead of consumers, who pushed the U.S. savings rate to a 14-year high of 6.2 percent in May.
"There's going to be a generational psychology shift as to how you and I and the rest of the world think about finance," said Jonathan Fine, a managing director on the investment-grade syndicate desk at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. in New York. "People will keep cash on hand so long as what happened in the last two years remains so visible in the rearview mirror."
8. The biggest spectator sport in the financial markets at the moment is watching how well US Treasury bond auctions go. They will be the flashpoint for any shocks in September and October. Bond yields have been rising relatively fast in the last week, which is having its own fallout on our markets with longer term mortgage rates nudging higher.
The next big thing to watch is the record US$75 billion of bonds for sale this week, Bloomberg reported
Ten-year yields surged 37 basis points last week, the most since March 2003, as better-than-estimated employment, home- sales and manufacturing data boosted confidence that the U.S. economy is recovering from its worst slump since the Great Depression.
President Barack Obama has pushed the nation's marketable debt to an unprecedented $6.78 trillion in an effort to spur economic growth and support the financial system. The budget shortfall will reach $1.85 trillion in the year ending Sept. 30, equivalent to 13 percent of the nation's economy, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
The difference between two- and 10-year yields was 2.54 percentage points, up from 2.45 percentage points a week ago, suggesting investors are demanding higher yields for longer maturities because of the threat inflation will pick up as the economy starts growing.
9. Here's proof if it's needed that American consumers have changed their ways. Remember, consumption drives 70% of the world's biggest economy. This will fall out on everyone. HT Rolfe Winkler

10. Former Goldman Sachs chief Henry Paulson, who was Treasury Secretary during the darkest days of the crisis in September last year, professes to have severed his ties with the Vampire Squid, yet sought waivers to ethics rules so he could talk closely with Goldman in the depths of the crisis. Paulson pushed for the bailout of AIG, that eventually saw billions washed through AIG to its main counterparties, including Goldman Sachs. The New York Times has the smoking gun on just how deeply Paulson was talking to Goldman's CEO Lloyd Blankfein. HT Rolfe Winkler
While Mr. Paulson spoke to many Wall Street executives during that period, he was in very frequent contact with Lloyd C. Blankfein, Goldman's chief executive, according to a copy of Mr. Paulson's calendars acquired by The New York Times through a Freedom of Information Act request.
During the week of the A.I.G. bailout alone, Mr. Paulson and Mr. Blankfein spoke two dozen times, the calendars show, far more frequently than Mr. Paulson did with other Wall Street executives.
On Sept. 17, the day Mr. Paulson secured his waivers, he and Mr. Blankfein spoke five times. Two of the calls occurred before Mr. Paulson's waivers were granted.

And not wanting to miss
And not wanting to miss an opportunity to fleece the public, the insulation subsidy is leading to a price rise rort in Noddyland. They wouldn't do such a thing would they? Too bloody right they will.
It would be helpful if
It would be helpful if someone could provide a guideline on how high US long Ts will rise and maybe factor in the BoE QE splurge, so we can at least get a handle on how far into the teens the mortgage rates are set rush. Yes they might rise into the twenties! One would assume the NZ Treasury are doing this and not playing ping pong. That Beijing has woken up to the need to buy up commodity producers is no shock. Why waste an investment on US toilet paper when you can buy a copper producer at current prices before the US$ tanks.
Speaking of deleveraging Cassander over
Speaking of deleveraging Cassander over at debtdeflation has a great article on deleveraging. They have a chart showing both 4% and 8$ deleveraging and how long it would take. It's specific to OZ but very interesting.
http://www.debtdeflation.com/blogs/2009/07/27/rudds-essay-is-on-the-money/
The Market Ticker has some
The Market Ticker has some views on no 3, especially the sneaky lengths that some banks will go to hit consumers with dishonour fees Bribed Regulators - Another Example
For example, apparently some US banks unilaterally reorder the timing of transactions, so they can charge multiple dishonour fees.
And he takes real issue with their practice of allowing customers to overdraw their accounts without authorisation -
somehow or other the fact
somehow or other the fact that the world is deleveraging and infometrics forecast of a 24% rise in property prices in 3 years just do not connect.
It would be interesting to see how prices can still go up with mortgage interest rates hitting double digits soon. (Yes I still believe that we will see 10% by year end)....either we suddenly become very productive or starve ourselves to pay the banks ?
@Nikki I can that dealing
@Nikki
I can that dealing with US Banks is worse the going to the mafia. I know friends that got caught in the death spiral of fees. They had to take out payday loans just to keep their bank accounts current such that they can cash their paychecks with direct deposit. And that started another finical spiral all its own. You open an account and the bank will do everything in their power to drain that account. It was a real cat and mouse game. The real problem is that a majority of American's live paycheck-to-paycheck so you can only imagine how these fees can really eat into the purchasing power and add to an invisible cost of living tax.
Talking about dishonour fees Nikki
Talking about dishonour fees Nikki is right....it should be called "dishonest fee". The banks are being dishonest in every turn of the dial.
My daughter has a KIWISAVER account with ASB Bank as a self employed and a minimum of $100 contribution per month to be taken from her account with the same bank. On one occassion, there was insufficient balance in the account for the $100 contribution. (because she forgot to transfer from her other account) So the bank gave her an "unarranged overdraft" of $100 and charged her a dishonour fee of $20. !!
On the same day when she used her bank card for an Epthos payment it was declined for lack of funds.
If this is not dishonest behavior by the bank....I can't describe what else is !! Paying themselves for the privilege of taking your money !!
Funny,almost every one on this
Funny,almost every one on this blog has a negative opinion about banks in general except the man who owns this blog.
nomad : I don't have
nomad : I don't have a negative opinion of banks.......That's " one " vote against your theory.........Start counting ! ( are you suggesting that the initials " BH " mean " Bankers' Ho " ? )
I have a negative opinion
I have a negative opinion of banks. But I dont count it as another vote for your theory noamd; fractionally my one 'vote against' became 5... since you lent it out 4 times as 'votes for'... so you dont have to have an opinion yourself.(Assumptions:
1. 'votes for' have a greater value to you than 'votes against'
2. Opinion for you = real job for bank owner)
You win either way.
Look, I understand the frustration
Look, I understand the frustration that a lot of people have with banks, particularly when it comes to "debt spirals", but there is also such a thing as personal responsibility. It's not good enough to purely blame the banks for individual's financial strife.
If you don't live within your means there are consequences. If you spend more than you earn one month, not only is there an immediate cost associated with that, but the next month you have to spend less than you earn just to break even. It's simple.
And yet people moan about overdraft fees and high interest rates and complain that the banks are being dishonest etc...
No they're not. They are in the business of making money out of money - or money out of nothing if you understand fractional reserve banking. I'm fairly sure that they all clearly advertise themselves in that way, so where's the dishonesty? Some of their fees are probably overblown, but that's free-market capitalism for you. Charge what you can get away with, pretty much everyone does the same.
Honestly, it's like an obese person blaming McDonalds for making them fat whilst they choose to dine out there for breakfast, lunch and dinner and "go large" at every opportunity.
If you don't like overdraft fees or interest payments, get a budget together and learn to spend less than you earn every single month. Simple.
This kind of budgeting exercise is not much fun for people on minimum wage, but it's critical and ultimately would save a lot of heartache longer term. I think they should probably teach basic family budgeting at school. Who knows, perhaps they do now!
@Mozart For the most part
@Mozart
For the most part I would concur with your assessment; however, the predatory fee practices by banks seem to be only allocated towards a very small segment of the population (12%) that can't afford them in the firsts place. So your argument is a bit like spitting in the in the wind. You're effectively blaming poor people for being broke. They are broke for a reason. Poor people haven't exactly made the most fiscally responsible choices in life. And expecting them to start doing so now is very naive. And assessing a hidden tax against people who are broke is a bit cold.
@Mozart "Simple". Go solve the
@Mozart
"Simple". Go solve the problem then! Oh no wait, if everyone was well off then you wouldnt have such a warm sense of self satisfaction from being a good saver. How could people differentiate themselves if they couldnt show off their wealth to others who have less? Its a social issue, not a saving issue that you can just teach at school and everything will be okay. I bet you were a fan of NCEA! Weren't you Mozart? Its okay, you can say it.
Although banks are made up of people just making a living like the rest of us etc etc... when it comes down to it, as organisations are and always will be the 'vampire squid with a blood funnel'. Fact. You said it yourself "money out of nothing". The typical hard working member of society will never appreciate the profits
Hey, I don't agree that
Hey, I don't agree that our current banking system is a sound one, it clearly isn't. Personally, I think our current monetary system is unsustainable in the long term, but don't ask me to suggest what we should replace it with because I've got no idea.
And yes, I agree that some banking/finance practices are predatory - easy loans and credit to low socio-economic groups with poor income and cash flow just gets that group into debt and keeps them there. They do it with flashy advertising and clever marketing, leveraging the consumer driven society we all live in. I certainly wouldn't object to some legislation forcing banks to be much more transparent about all their charges and the ways that they apply them. It should also be much easier to choose to avoid these charges if desired.
Troy, I'm not "blaming poor people for being broke", I'm just pointing out that if people were a little bit better at budgeting (and resisting temptation!) many would automatically find themselves better off.
Anybody who has find themselves in financial strife and then had to budget to get themselves out of it will testify to the fact that the process of creating one is not difficult, although sticking to it certainly can be. It doesn't actually matter how much or little money you have (and I've been on the breadline so am speaking from experience), the simple principle of ensuring that less goes out than comes in is a helpful one.
Obviously most people who are in financial trouble won't do this - I agree Luke, it isn't going to happen. With the current world organisations and systems in place, there will always be the poor amongst us, there will always be those who are heavily indebted and there will always be those at the top who feel the need to stand atop the rest of humanity. It's a fact of life in this world and I feel truly sorry for those who end up in that situation through no fault of their own.
But when people who are indebted for no other reason than simple over-expenditure and living beyond their means moan about banks being dishonest, charging too much interest for finance, getting them into a right mess etc... well I'm sorry, but there's a degree of personal responsibility there too.
Vampire Squid's and their blood funnels are bad, I'll grant you, but too many people queue up to become voluntary donors.
Like your style, Mozart. No
Like your style, Mozart. No bank jabs a gun into your ribs and forces you to take out a loan. Same as McDonalds, who don't cosh people in the street, and drag them into the restaurants.........You got free choice, people. Ain't the banks' fault if you choose unwisely.
And is the "Vampire Squid" any different to MacQ. Bank in Oz. It is just a very profitable business model. It's not illegal !
If folk want further regulation to limit banks' powers, effectively they are saying they want nanny-state to hold their hand for them. In which case, why did the previous nanny-government get booted out so comprehensively ?
Roger said...................It is just a
Roger said...................It is just a very profitable business model. It's not illegal !
No it's not Roger and the lawmakers see to that!..... but do not draw the conclusion it's not moraly reprehensible and predatory by nature. because ..................it is.
As to the" cosh you in the street statement re big Donalds", ..no they don't ,they employ the same tactics as all the well oiled machines...... they get you through the media... kids are convinced thier lives are not complete without the wholesome visit to mac's and will apply the neccessary pressure to thier parents fear of failure.
The cosh as you put it Roger is all around you.... "if you don't have it or want it now !YOU are failing" that is the message behind all sucessfull marketing.
By the by ,I do agree with you sentiment of personal responsibility and I do not care for the Nanny State mentality, but that does not mean the corporate run State cannot broaden thier charter to include some moral responsibilty.
It's an interesting discussion. Is
It's an interesting discussion. Is it really possible to achieve a state of balanced nirvana, whereby all businesses are operated on a strict moral basis and yet are still able to effectively promote and market their products? It would be difficult.
I mean, take McDonalds for example. They've done a number of things to promote healthier eating choices in their outlets (I can't bring myself to call them restaurants) after a wave of people publicly blamed them for making them fat and unhealthy. And yet still people rock up to McDonalds every day and eat the same old junk they always used to. Many still even take their kids every weekend as a treat. The "healthy" food now on the menu has just attracted a new type of customer, who would have eaten healthily anyway but may not have visited McDonalds previously.
Ultimately, people do what people want to do. The weak-minded (rich or poor) demand instant gratification and will pay, it seems, almost any price for it. I'm hungry - eat a burger, because it's the fastest way to satisfy the craving despite the knowledge that it's bad for you. I'm stressed - smoke a cigarette because it's the easiest thing to do, despite the knowledge that it's actually killing you. I want to feel good about myself - go shopping on the credit card and spend money you haven't got because it's easy and instant and you get Fly-Buys, despite the knowledge that you haven't got the money and will have to pay 20% interest as well.
What's McDonald's supposed to do? Adopting the same policy as bars and clubs - "Sorry sir, you've clearly had enough - step away from the Boss Burger." - is never going to fly.
The moral dilemma is complex even when talking about something as basic as a fast-food outlet. Banking becomes even more complex, because it's an essential service. Everyone has a bank account with somebody and has to manage their money and income to some degree or another. That means that banks DO have a clear responsibility to the public in terms of service, stability and transparency, however the public also have a responsibility to themselves.
This is why I advocated better financial education to the young. Luke seemed to scoff at that idea on the basis that our problems are social and behavioral. However, to my mind we at least owe our children a basic understanding of finance and home budgeting. Most will ignore it, but at least everyone would move into the adult world armed with the facts and perhaps a little less likely to be suckered in to a vortex of debt.
Interestingly this is not a debate about "poor people". Many people who have alarmingly high salaries are even more alarmingly saddled with debt, despite the fact that they actually should be financially secure. Conversely, many on extremely restricted incomes successfully budget what they have and provide for their families admirably.