Offers for readers

The comment stream

Recent comments

Join the Interest community to be a registered commenter so you can:
- Edit your comments
- Avoid the CAPTCHA
- Vote on comments
Register Here

Already registered? log back in here ..

Forgotten your password? No problem! Click here

Finance sector jobs

Corporate Recovery Senior – Australia, Audit experience welcomed
Successful applicants will have the opportunity to work with this leading Australian Advis...more
Australia
Transaction Services Assistant Manager/ Manager – Melbourne
Think Global Recruitment is working with this exceptionally respected Australian Boutique ...more
Australia
Audit Senior - Australia
Sought after opportunity to move to one of the most beautiful westernised countries in the...more
Australia
Research & Master Trust Relationship Manager
Strategic and Senior Appointment...more
Australia
efinancialcareers.com

Reader poll

Who do you think should be appointed Reserve Bank Governor to replace Alan Bollard when he retires in September?

Choices

Steve Joyce: $1 billion expenditure required to make Kiwirail work

Posted in News

9. DAVID BENNETT (National"”Hamilton East) to the Minister of Transport: What recent valuations has he seen of KiwiRail?

Hon STEVEN JOYCE (Minister of Transport) : I have seen a report from PricewaterhouseCoopers valuing KiwiRail's total operations at $388 million. I have seen another report that Treasury has updated that figure to $369 million. Those figures compare unfavourably with what the previous Labour Government spent on KiwiRail, which included $690 million on purchasing the company's operations, $210 million on loans, and $90 million on operational subsidies. It is quite obvious to anybody looking at those transactions that the previous Labour Government significantly overpaid for KiwiRail. Paying that much for KiwiRail has handicapped its future.

David Bennett: What shape was KiwiRail in when it was purchased?

Hon STEVEN JOYCE: The rail company as a whole has a significant backlog of needed expenditure to pull it back into shape. Work done last year by the previous Labour Government's Rail Development Group estimated that it would take approximately $1 billion worth of further expenditure to make the company work properly. That is obviously a very large financial burden, which the public was not told about before the KiwiRail purchase was completed.

Hon Jim Anderton: Would the valuation of KiwiRail be substantially higher if it had not been sold by the previous National Government for less than the value of the wooden railway sleepers and it had not been asset-stripped by Fay Richwhite; if so, can the Minister assure the House that the National Government will not again support the privatisation and disastrous management of New Zealand's public transport infrastructure?

Hon STEVEN JOYCE: I am afraid that for somebody as new to the House as I am, a lot of that is very much ancient history. The second part of Mr Anderton's question is hugely theoretical because, sadly, nobody in their right mind would pay the sort of money for KiwiRail that the previous Labour Government paid.

David Bennett: What financial capacity does KiwiRail have to expand its operations?

Hon STEVEN JOYCE: What is apparent is that, although KiwiRail has a part to play in New Zealand's transport future, it will need more money to do so. Any investments must be made sensibly and with the backing of its key customers. Those who advocate a wholesale shift of freight from road to rail are caught up in some romantic notion of rail's role that bears no resemblance to any sort of financial reality. Our focus must be on making sensible and pragmatic transport decisions that reduce costs overall and help the economy grow.

Hon Darren Hughes: If the Minister is unhappy with the valuation of KiwiRail, and therefore Crown ownership of that operation, does he support the scenario known as "plan B", in which there is no Crown ownership, and many provincial rail lines would have to be closed?

Hon STEVEN JOYCE: Sadly, it is not as simple as that. Just about every line that KiwiRail has does not make a lot of money currently, so to suggest that there is a plan B in that respect is about as valid as the valuation the previous Labour Government placed on KiwiRail before it purchased the company.

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment in the box on the right or click on the "'Register" link at the bottom of the comments. Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making these comments.

It must be remembered that

It must be remembered that if the debt based monetary system had not seen us put into receivership by our foreign lenders in 1984 the rail would never have had to have been sold at firesale prices to Fay, Richwhite, Buffet and co to begin with. It must be remembered that it was them that ran it into the ground to make it look like profits were increasing, thus increasing their share price capital gain esentially no different to the owner of a car who chucks a Banana skin in a rowdy gear box of a car they know is knackerd in order to sell it to some poor sod before it blows up and becomes worth ext to nothing. That is what private - public partnerships have historically proven to do, privatise the profits and socialise the losses. After privatisation destroyed it, it was of course left upto the unsuspecting tax payer to repair, it was at this stage that the Toll vultures saw another opportunity to plunder.
For those of you who want the hard facts without the political banter;
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/403393