Offers for readers

The comment stream

Recent comments

Join the Interest community to be a registered commenter so you can:
- Edit your comments
- Avoid the CAPTCHA
- Vote on comments
Register Here

Already registered? log back in here ..

Forgotten your password? No problem! Click here

Finance sector jobs

Senior Legal Counsel
At NAB, it's all about our people reaching their full potential. And that means we drive t...more
Australia
Senior Financial Planner (Business) - Bondi - NSW - NAB
Senior Financial Planning professional to join our Business Banking team in Bondi....more
Australia
Senior Manager, Operational Risk & Monitoring
At NAB, it's all about our people reaching their full potential. And in MLC and NAB Wealth...more
Australia
Corporate Recovery Senior – Australia, Audit experience welcomed
Successful applicants will have the opportunity to work with this leading Australian Advis...more
Australia
efinancialcareers.com

Reader poll

Who do you think should be appointed Reserve Bank Governor to replace Alan Bollard when he retires in September?

Choices

Westpac half year profit falls after bad debts triple, but net interest margin up slightly

Posted in News

Westpac reported on Wednesday its net profit fell 15% to NZ$202 million in the six months to March 31, due largely to a tripling of bad debt charges and only moderate lending growth in a recessed economy. But in contrast with the two other Australian-owned banks to report for the March half, Westpac said its net interest margin increased to 225 basis points in the six months to March 31 from 216 basis points in the six months to the end of September. In the same period a year ago Westpac's net interest margin was 217 basis points. Westpac's new CEO George Frazis told interest.co.nz credit risk had been underpriced in previous years and was now being priced more accurately. He added that wholesale funding costs on international markets had risen from 14-20 basis points over swaps to 120-150 basis points over swaps since the Credit Crunch. Last week BNZ said its net interet margin fell 12 basis points to 2.23% in the first half of the fiscal 2009 year to March 31 from 2.35% in the previous half year and 2.49% in the same half a year ago. BNZ CEO Andrew Thorburn told interest.co.nz in an interview that margin pressure was focused mostly on the deposit margins, where banks were competing hard for domestic deposits. The cost of the retail deposit guarantee scheme also squeezed margins slightly. Also last week, ANZ National reported its net interest margin for its New Zealand businesses fell 24 basis points to 210 basis points in the six months to March 31 from the same period a year ago. It was down 9 basis points from the September half.

Frazis said the half year result reflected an unprecedented set of external circumstances and economic conditions would continue to be challenging for some time. Westpac's bad debt charges tripled to NZ$184 million in the six months while housing delinquencies rose to 82 basis points from 47 basis points. Westpac's lending growth slowed to an annualised rate of 3% in the half year from 6% in the September half and 11% in the same half a year ago. Business lending growth fell to 3% in the March half from 14% in the September half and 15% in the same half a year ago. Frazis said there was little indication that wholesale funding costs were easing from their current high levels and the cost for retail deposits was increasing. Westpac has been the only bank to cut any rate since the April 30 cut by the Reserve Bank in the Official Cash Rate. It cut its 6 month rate by 40 basis points to 5.39%, but held its other rates. The "severe stresses of the financial crisis" had now stabilised and the dominant impact on Westpac would be the size and duration of the recession, Westpac said. Slower loan growth was expected because of lower consumer borrowing and lower business investment. Consumers and businesses were also expected to "de-leverage their balance sheets," it said. "We are seeing more pressure across our business customers and expect consumer stress to grow as unemployment rises. As a result we do expect impairment charges to remain at a high level throughout Second Half 2009 and into 2010," Frazis said. Meanwhile, Westpac said the Reserve Bank of New Zealand had indicated to Westpac that an independent review of its status in New Zealand as a locally incorporated subsidiary, rather than the branch status it had until 2006. "We anticipate that any consequent operating model and governance changes will be appropriately outlined in WNZL's General Disclosure Statement for the year ending 30 September 2009." The full PDF with Westpac's result is available here (pages 80-82).

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment in the box on the right or click on the "'Register" link at the bottom of the comments. Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making these comments.

Okay, since every body has

Okay, since every body has packed up and gone home I'm going to hijack this post.

I am heartily sick of those who have set up camp on this blog and of Journos who have not half a braincell between them.

Last nite on the news they had members of Grey power whinging about low interest rates, and i strangely can never remember same said individuals whinging about high interest rates that they benefited from (do recall however a number of self satisfied grins)

Similarly we have posts saying Bollard is a retard for dropping interest rates as though he is singularly responsible for the boom in house prices. Lets consider this, the government is acting in a way you would expect it to act when the economy is in correction mode, none of us complained when the market was on the way up (to many self satisfied grins I presume) They are trying to pull up rather than crash land and this is a rational response, strangely society does not enjoy radical change (no matter how much the masochists around here yearn for it).

It is a cruel truth that those who have debt and income in the next few years will prosper, as my father apocryphally told me "never borrow more than you can pay the interest on" (he was quoting Onassis) and those who don't fit this model (those in credit/savers, those with no income) will suffer

Neven

http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/neoliberalism-is-dead-as-people-re

http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/neoliberalism-is-dead-as-people-realise-ma...

"Around the world, conservatives have declared the neo-liberal experiment dead. Richard Posner is a professor at the home of neo-liberal economics, the University of Chicago. His recent book is called A Failure Of Capitalism (imagine the furore if a Labor politician used that sort of title). In it, he wrote: "We need a more active and intelligent government to keep our model of a capitalist economy from running off the rails. The movement to deregulate the financial industry went too far by exaggerating the resilience - the self-healing powers - of laissez-faire capitalism"."

Around the world - except

Around the world - except in New Zealand! You're right Neven911, society doesn't enjoy radical change - but that didn't stop Roger Douglas and his Treasury crew radically adopting the neo-liberal agenda in the rapid manner they did, followed by Bolger's subsequent government. And to this day we still have what seems to be a whole lot of NZers who continue to "believe" as if neo-liberalism was a religion, as opposed to the "experiment" that it was.

We still have all that legislation of the 1980s-1990s firmly in place here - and as Les Rudd points out, so far there seems little push for change.

As Gibber's link points out - it's because the neo-liberal camp hasn't yet worked out the new paradigm to re-define it. The other thing here is that most of our senior policy personnel were schooled/indoctrinated in Public Choice Theory and (in my opinion) they really don't have the mental/psychological muscle to make the paradigm shift.

Kate - yes, forget slavish

Kate - yes, forget slavish adherence to 'the religion' (as you've termed it), let's try to make some practical changes that have a good probability of sucess in our context, as per the policy changes I've described elsewhere. For anyone elses information, here:

http://www.interest.co.nz/ratesblog/index.php/2009/04/15/opinion-how-tou...

Just practical common sense stuff that would work for productive enterprises and in particular exporters.

In referring to a comment by 'Gibber' you say:

"The other thing here is that most of our senior policy personnel were schooled/indoctrinated in Public Choice Theory.."

And as far as most would be concerned, choice is no bad thing. However, we we need to know is, what are our options and what are relative costs and benefits of the options, which is something that is being attempted here by Matt Nolan I think:

http://www.interest.co.nz/ratesblog/index.php/2009/05/05/opinion-how-nat...

This change stuff ain't easy...

Neven 911- ok so we

Neven 911- ok so we borrow now when rates are low at what we can pay the interest on (like you dad suggested) and in 12-24 months if rates go up for that borrowed money quite a bit, who do you think will suffer then. I thought the whole reason to drop rates was so these people could survive not prosper!!!, to avoid the damage that the powerhouse of the economy would suffer (namely the banks) as I don't yet see any proof they are the ones prospering, or have I missed something here.