In this section
Offers for readers
The comment stream
Recent comments
- 1 of 19105
- ››
Editors choice
- 1 of 276
- ››
Finance sector jobs
Successful applicants will have the opportunity to work with this leading Australian Advis...more
Australia
Think Global Recruitment is working with this exceptionally respected Australian Boutique ...more
Australia
Sought after opportunity to move to one of the most beautiful westernised countries in the...more
Australia

The news stream
Latest news
Most commented
- 90 seconds at 9 am with BNZ 116
- Wednesday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 78
- Friday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 28
- Amanda's Take Five for Wednesday 19
- The problems with NZ's energy use 18
- More bank mortgage rate cuts 16
- Govt lifts minimum wage 50 cts to $13.50 an hour 16
- Thursday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 15
- 90 seconds at 9 am with BNZ 14
- Full time jobs fall 13,000 in Dec qtr 14
Most viewed
Interest on Twitter
Joyce: Greens need to get perspective on public transport
Dr Russel Norman: Does the Minister agree with former Minister of Transport the Hon Maurice Williamson, who said ... its also important to realise that throwing dollars at the problem of roads is not the answer. Experience in the United Kingdom, the United States and Auckland shows us this. Building more and more roads in congested areas on many occasions results in more congestion"”more traffic jams, more time and money wasted and more pollution. If he does not agree with Mr Williamson, where is the evidence he has to show that Mr Williamson was wrong?
Hon STEVEN JOYCE: The member does not seem to understand that there is no argument at all on this side of the House that a multimodal passenger solution for Auckland is what is required. There is a need for roads because, at the end of the day, 84 percent of New Zealanders travel to and from work each day via the road, but there is also a need for public transport, particularly in our larger cities.
Dr Russel Norman: Has the Minister not seen the numbers with regard to the ways that people travel to work, including the dramatic increase in the number of Aucklanders catching the train, which was up by 18 percent in 2008, and the number of Aucklanders catching the bus, which was up by 7 percent in 2008"”proving that Aucklanders would choose to use public transport if this Government, which will become a Government of gridlock if the Minister does not take action, would allow the Auckland Regional Transport Authority to get on and build the public transport we need?
Hon STEVEN JOYCE: As I said before, we do support passenger transport in Auckland, but we need to keep some sense of perspective. The number of passengers travelling to and from work by public transport in Auckland has been around 6 percent, and it is moving steadily towards 8 percent. Therefore, we have to still invest in other modes to get people to and from work safely.
Stick to your guns, Steven
Stick to your guns, Steven Joyce.
Public Transport is a political fraud. It does not achieve the objectives that are advanced as the reasons for subsidies of it, and it is a severe burden on the economy in the process. We would actually meet every objective better by not having subsidies or government involvement at all, and using cost-benefit analysis to build adequate, congestion-eliminating roads.
80% plus people use cars already. Building roads to eliminate congestion would cost only a fraction of the cost of doubling public transport infrastructure, which would probably break the public budget and reduce car use by only a small percentage.
I have posted a much lengthier discussion on this subject before, and will do so again in the event that someone starts trotting out all the myths and lies that are used to justify the heinous wastage of public money that is public transport subsidies.
http://www.interest.co.nz/ratesblog/index.php/2009/03/17/opinion-this-au...