Offers for readers

The comment stream

Recent comments

Join the Interest community to be a registered commenter so you can:
- Edit your comments
- Avoid the CAPTCHA
- Vote on comments
Register Here

Already registered? log back in here ..

Forgotten your password? No problem! Click here

Finance sector jobs

Corporate Recovery Senior – Australia, Audit experience welcomed
Successful applicants will have the opportunity to work with this leading Australian Advis...more
Australia
Transaction Services Assistant Manager/ Manager – Melbourne
Think Global Recruitment is working with this exceptionally respected Australian Boutique ...more
Australia
Audit Senior - Australia
Sought after opportunity to move to one of the most beautiful westernised countries in the...more
Australia
Research & Master Trust Relationship Manager
Strategic and Senior Appointment...more
Australia
efinancialcareers.com

Reader poll

Who do you think should be appointed Reserve Bank Governor to replace Alan Bollard when he retires in September?

Choices

ING proposes guaranteed payout in 5 years for frozen funds

Posted in News

ING has announced a new proposal to investors with NZ$520 million in its frozen Diversified Yield Fund (DYF) and Regular Income Fund (RIF), saying they can opt for a guaranteed payout of 83 cents in the dollar in five years for the DYF fund and 86 cents for the RIF fund, or they can 'cash out' of their funds now with 60 cents and 62 cents respectively. The proposal replaces an earlier plan to wind up the funds and to pay NZ$100 million in cash immediately to investors. ANZ owns 49% of ING. Both of these funds were heavily exposed to the Collateralised Debt Obligations (CDOs) that have collapsed during the Credit Crunch. ANZ has been criticised for encouraging bank customers to invest in the funds.

Here is the full statement from ING below. 

ING (NZ) Limited today announced that investors in the ING Diversified Yield Fund (DYF) and ING Regular Income Fund (RIF) will be receiving a proposal in which they can choose to be guaranteed a minimum price in five years time for their units. The five-year price for the DYF is 83 cents per unit and 86 cents per unit for the RIF. This will see most investors receiving the bulk of their investment returned. The five-year price is based on the amount of money that current investors put in, subtracting their total gross distributions, and dividing that total by the number of units held. Alternatively, investors who would like access to their money sooner can opt to "cash out" their units for a lower amount equivalent to the guaranteed amount in today's dollar terms, which is 60 cents per unit for the DYF and 62 cents per unit for the RIF. The cash out option is based on a net present value calculation of the five-year price, and delivers liquidity to investors who choose this option. Helen Troup, Chief Executive Officer of ING NZ, said: "Unprecedented market conditions have created this unique situation in which these Funds have been suspended for almost a year. We are now giving investors certainty, choice and equality regardless of how markets perform over the next five years". ING NZ believes the proposal recognises that not all investors have the same needs. Investors who can wait for five years will receive the bulk of their initial investment back. Investors who require cash sooner can opt to sell their units for the equivalent amount in today's dollars. "We acknowledge there is anxiety among advisers and investors, have listened to the feedback, and believe that this offer underscores our commitment to ensuring the final proposal incorporated their comments," Ms Troup continued. ING NZ's shareholders have committed to underwriting this offer to ensure that most investors will receive the bulk of their initial investment regardless of how markets perform over the next five years. The shareholders will shoulder the market risk, but if markets recover more than anticipated, then the investors will benefit from the upside. The Funds were suspended as a result of the global credit crisis, which generated a situation where the underlying assets of the Funds could not be accurately priced after the market for structured credit assets virtually disappeared. Over the past year, ING NZ has sought to find an outcome that recognises not only investors' expectations, but also the reality of the extreme market conditions. This has been complex to achieve as markets have continued to deteriorate and remain difficult. The proposal, which is subject to Trustee consideration and approval, will require investors to approve changes to the Trust Deed. The formal proposal will be sent to investors and their advisers in mid-May and a unitholder meeting is currently scheduled for the week commencing 15 June 2009. To ensure investors are able to ask questions directly of ING NZ as the Funds' manager about the choices being offered, ING NZ will be holding briefings in the main centres for advisers and investors in advance of the unitholder meeting. Additionally, ING NZ is making arrangements to engage an independent third party who will be available for any investor who wants assistance to assess their options. "This proposal is a positive step forward, ending a difficult twelve months for investors and their advisers," Ms Troup commented.

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment in the box on the right or click on the "'Register" link at the bottom of the comments. Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making these comments.

Take the money and run

Take the money and run .........................

It might be the thing

It might be the thing to do rdee, but then what? Put it into a term deposit with the ANZ?! I don't think so.........

100% plus interest is what

100% plus interest is what they should be paying. They were trading on their good name and brand , so their owners should fully stand behind their product. Many investors have been misled, as many though it was a very conservative fund, not a high risk fund.
They are obviously worried about how this is damaging their brand.

Hey, rdee, You'd have to

Hey, rdee,
You'd have to be able to get a minimum return of 4% AFTER-tax return compounded at least ONCE a year to beat the offered 5 year outcome, who you gonna call?
Yeah, I know they're bastards - but............
Now how about helping me out with Babcock and Brown? Sigh......

What about a Judge Corp/Babcock

What about a Judge Corp/Babcock swap, Terry? Hang on, let me just do the sums on the Gaussian Copula function.......

Thanks Janet, never mind the

Thanks Janet, never mind the GC function, with B&B now offering a handsome $10 for your previous $10,000 bond, I know a zero sum outcome when I see it.
I'll have a go at putting them into administration - more fun for $10 than Lotto.
Onward Christian Soldiers..............

Why would you give them

Why would you give them a second chance to either lose or freeze your funds again. They've proven to all that they only look after themselves. Burn them ...

The 83 cents is guaranteed.

The 83 cents is guaranteed.

"... they can choose to be guaranteed a minimum price in five years time for their units. The five-year price for the DYF is 83 cents per unit and 86 cents per unit for the RIF."

($0.83/$0.60) - 1 = 6.70%pa

($0.83/$0.60) - 1 = 6.70%pa before tax

The current 5 year term deposit is 4.50%

I am not saying if anyone should leave their money in or take it out, but there are many issues to consider.

Kimble - highly unlikely however

Kimble - highly unlikely however that term deposit rates will remain that low over the 5 year period. Take the money and run.....!

Well said, Kimble - my

Well said, Kimble - my point exactly, but as rdee and Kate point out - still rock-and-a-hard-place-time..........

That is probably true, Kate,

That is probably true, Kate, interest rates are at record lows and a term deposit isnt the most appropriate comparison :)

I was just saying that there are more things to consider, like reinvestment, and other things as well. For instance, the 83 cents is a minimum, and the final value cannot go down, but it can go up (whatever the chance of that is). They aren't just giving investors the minimum amount and keeping the rest for themselves, which would be a real kick in the teeth.

My point is that deciding which option to take, like most financial decisions, shouldn't be a knee-jerk reaction. Consider all the angles, think about it with a cool head, and end up making the decision that works best for you.

Kimble, "The 83 cents is

Kimble,

"The 83 cents is guaranteed."

And who will guarantee you that ING will exist in 5 years time to ensure their guarantee is actually worth anything???

Thats a very good point,

Thats a very good point, ctnz, and highliights another issue that should be considered.