The comment stream

Join the Interest community to be a registered commenter so you can:
- Edit your comments
- Avoid the CAPTCHA
- Vote on comments
Register Here

Already registered? log back in here ..

Forgotten your password? No problem! Click here

Finance sector jobs

Senior Liability Underwriting Manager
Lead from the front utilising your strategic, technical and leadership qualities within th...more
New Zealand
Senior Liability Product Underwriter - Product Management
Lead from the front utilising your technical expertise in this highly attractive senior li...more
New Zealand
High Performing Senior Liability UnderwriterHigh Performing Senior Liability Underwriter
Customer focus, high performance, exceeding client expectations and achieving profitable g...more
New Zealand
Manager Operational Effectiveness and Assurance IT
Reporting to the Senior Manager Operational Risk Effectiveness and Assurance, the key focu...more
New Zealand
efinancialcareers.com

Reader poll

Should you fix your mortgage now or stay floating?

Choices

Opinion: More flowers and chocolates under new tax scheme

Posted in News

Of all the recession-ending revisions the new government made to New Zealand's tax laws last week, one stood out: the threshold for fringe benefit tax (FBT) paid on minor benefits that can be given to employees such as flowers and chocolates.

"The value of minor fringe benefits (such as chocolates and flowers) that can be provided to employees without attracting FBT will be raised to NZ$300 per quarter per employee and NZ$22,500 a year per employer. This will mean fewer businesses will be required to return FBT on certain minor benefits provided to employees," the fact sheet accompanying the announcement said.

Although businesses are likely to cut back spending on more needless items (such as pretty presents to employees who should count themselves lucky just to have kept their job during a recession), this revision to the FBT law may come as some relief to business owners who were worried about how they would afford to keep giving gifts to employees.

You can just imagine stressed business owners laying awake at night worried about workers refusing to work or even threatening to quit because they didn't receive flowers on their birthday (I didn't), or chocolates when their boyfriend/girlfriend left them.

In fact, on a slightly serious note, this tax revision may even be needed in order to keep up staff morale during the hard times, when layoffs might mean less staff with bigger workloads. A (non-taxable) bouquet of daffodils or box of sweets may take one's mind off the fact that they're being exploited by one's boss.

But would these gifts be needed at all? After all, with the big, bad R-word hovering above everybody's heads, employees are faced by the fact that if they quit, there's possibly nowhere else for them to go.

At least John Key won't be paying as much tax when he hands out Cabinet Easter eggs and Christmas pressies.

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment in the box on the right or click on the "'Register" link at the bottom of the comments. Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making these comments.

2 Comments

I'll be eating the chocolates

I'll be eating the chocolates we were about to give you then...cheers/bernard

I'm sure plenty of ladies

I'm sure plenty of ladies will be very happy to receive tax-efficient flowers and chocs!