In this section
Offers for readers
Follow the news from interest
The comment stream
Recent comments
- 1 of 20832
- ››
Editors choice
- 1 of 295
- ››
Finance sector jobs
Lead from the front utilising your strategic, technical and leadership qualities within th...more
New Zealand
Lead from the front utilising your technical expertise in this highly attractive senior li...more
New Zealand
Customer focus, high performance, exceeding client expectations and achieving profitable g...more
New Zealand
Key leadership position in the bank. Be a part of one of the fastest growing banks in New ...more
New Zealand

The news stream
Latest news
Most commented
- Govt eyes NZ$1.4b revenue grab 63
- English defends current account blowout 61
- 90 seconds at 9 am 51
- Budget 2012 reactions 48
- Friday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 43
- Thursday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 38
- 'Next 5-10 years make or break for NZ' 33
- What covered bonds mean for ma and pa 33
- Westpac and ASB change rates down 26
- 90 seconds at 9 am 22
Most viewed
NZ home loan affordability steady in February’s ‘Mexican Standoff’
New Zealand home loan affordability was steady in February from January as house prices and interest rates were broadly unchanged, Interest.co.nz’s Home Loan Affordability report shows.
The housing market remains stuck in a ‘Mexican Standoff’ between buyers and sellers who are both wary of possible tax changes in the May 20 budget and future interest rate rises.
Affordability was mostly unchanged in the major cities, although house price rises in Nelson/Marlborough and around Queenstown worsened affordability in those areas.
Affordability is better than its worst levels hit in early 2007 near the peak of the housing boom and interest rates, but has deteriorated in the last six months as house prices rebounded in the wake of interest rate cuts, the monthly measure calculated by Interest.co.nz found.
“There is a Mexican Standoff in the housing market where some buyers are holding off until after the May 20 Budget and sellers are reluctant to accept price reductions after the rebound in late 2009,” said Interest.co.nz Editor Bernard Hickey.
“However, the pressure is mounting for price falls as swathes of new listings have hit the market in February and March and many buyers are preparing for higher variable mortgage rates later in 2010,” Hickey said.
The Home Loan Affordability measure for all of New Zealand showed the proportion of a single median after tax income needed to service an 80% mortgage on a median house was unchanged at 62.1%.
The median house price as measured by REINZ was steady in February at NZ$350,000, just off a record high NZ$360,000 hit in December and 7.7% above its January 2009 trough of NZ$325,000. The average 2 year fixed mortgage rate, which has been among the most popular with borrowers in recent years, was basically unchanged at 7.26% over the month and is up from an average 5.92% in February last year.
Related Topics
Variable mortgage rates, meanwhile, nudged lower to an average 5.86% in February from 5.95% in January and are now at their lowest level in at least 7 years, meaning some borrowers may choose to go variable rather than fixed to improve their immediate affordability.
Affordability hit its worst level of 83.4% in March 2008 just after house prices peaked and 2 year mortgage rates were close to 10%. Many home buyers jumped in March, April and May of 2009 to take advantage of lower interest rates and look for bargains, which improved the number of houses sold and boosted prices. But short term mortgage interest rates flattened out in late March and longer term mortgage rates began to rise in line with rises on wholesale markets and higher local term deposit rates.
House sales volumes flattened off in the last three months of 2009 and early 2010 as first home buyers and rental investors stayed away, leaving most of the activity at the top end for owner-occupiers using equity stored up during the 2002-07 boom, or trading down to reduce debt. Volumes slumped in January and February sales were their lowest since REINZ records began in 1992.
Affordability is now often out of reach for most home buyers in the big cities on a single income. The threshold proportion of after tax income considered prudent to sustainably own a house is around 40%. Anything above that is starting to become unaffordable.
Affordability for the typical first-home-buyer improved slightly in February from January. The proportion of a single after tax pay needed to buy a first quartile house fell to 53.8% from 55%. The first quartile house price fell to NZ$250,275 from NZ$255,000 in January. This measure is for a median income earner aged 25-29 buying a first quartile home. Interest.co.nz thinks the ‘affordable' threshold is 40% for such a home buyer.
Meanwhile, affordability for households with more than one income was steady at levels last seen at the end of 2008. This measure of a ‘standard typical household' found the proportion of after tax income needed to service the mortgage on a median house was steady at 40.8%. This measure assumes one median male income, half a median female income aged 30-35 and a 5 year old child that receives Working-for-Families benefits.
This remains near the worst level of standard household affordability since November last year and significantly above the 35% trough seen in January, February and March, when buyer demand returned to the housing market. Any level over 40% is considered unaffordable for a household.
Our measure of a ‘standard first-home-buyer household' found the proportion of after tax income needed to service the mortgage on a first quartile home rose was 25.5% in February, down from 26.1% in January because of the fall in the lower quartile house price.
It has worsened from its best levels of 22% in February and March when some first-home-buyers returned to the market. This measure peaked at 35% in June 2007. This measure assumes a first home buyer household includes a median male income and a median female income aged 25-29 with no children. Any level over 30% is considered unaffordable in the longer term for such a household.
Southland remains the most affordable region for home buyers with a standard affordability measure of 36.4%, while the Central Otago Lakes (Wanaka and Queenstown) is the least affordable on 83.1%. Auckland worsened marginally in February to 75.6% from 75.1%, while Wellington worsened the most of the big cities to 64.4% from 61.6% in January. Christchurch affordability improved slightly to 55.7% from 58.4%.

42 Comments
"Finance Minister Bill English has
"Finance Minister Bill English has spoken in parliament about how as many as 10,000 households on high incomes have been able to significantly reduce their taxable incomes and how the government’s budget on May 20 aims to remove the loopholes to make the system fairer."
May's going to be interesting!
How many of these households
How many of these households are over extended and relying on these tax breaks to meet there mortgage reypayments
thats when its going to get interesting
The Kiwisaver withdrawal available from
The Kiwisaver withdrawal available from July 1 will prop up the first home buyers <300k price range, same as happened in Australia
Could be, Faifax, unless that
Could be, Faifax, unless that gets the chop in May as well.
...That subsidy has to get
...That subsidy has to get the chop frankly the more I think about it. Sorry Matt in Auckland.
The ability to withdraw your contribution may keep demand up though.
I am preparing a bottle
I am preparing a bottle of plonk ready for the day when B&T finally use the words........."bubble collapse"......we know it's gotta happen...we know prices are 40% higher than they ought to be....we know demand is drying up.....that credit is to be more and more expensive....that the recession is here to stay like the mother in law from hell..she aint about to leave.....we know about the 20 billion dollars in rotting homes Elephant....that council rates always rise as are power bills and insurance and a host of govt charges...and the pipe dream that primary exports will lead to rural wealth spreading into the urban regions.....bollocks.
A measure of the collapse is best gained by counting the adverts on tv from the banks desperate to suck in borrowers.
Fairfax - sorry I don't
Fairfax - sorry I don't understand why you are sorry to me!!!????
I am looking in the 450-500K price range, way over the 300K limit!
Nicholas - the Govt is certainly talking the right language, and with each statement affirming tax changes, greater fear will be etched into the minds of the property investors shaking in their boots
Wally : ............. " preparing
Wally : ............. " preparing a bottle of plonk " .............. not fermenting up the garden surplus for a turnip & tomato champagne , are you ? The mind boggles !!! ............. " Wally Wine " , a humourous little blend of beetroot , pea-pods , and sump-oil ; filtered delicately thru grannie's old bloomers , and loving aged for a week in the tub .
The dreamers still dream. Howick
The dreamers still dream.
Howick property asking $689k with cv $530k 09/2008
Yes I know the cv can be that far out.
Or can it really?
The $189k difference is for a buyer to claim because the bank doesn't give discoumts on its share.
Wally you almost right, except
Wally you almost right, except for the part where banks are sucking in more borrowers. On the contrary, they are slowly backing away from residential, commercial and rural, hoping like hell the whole thing doesn't collapse on them, and that the whole market will slowly defuse itself over the next decade.
The last thing the banks want is a property market collapse, it would take all of them out. None of the NZ banks would be able to withstand a wholesale crash.
Logical Dave - indeed! I
Logical Dave - indeed!
I guess they are free to dream, and if someone is willing to pay a stupid price then thats their choice!
It won't be me though!
I think I have a good handle of what fair values are in the current market, and won't be prepared to pay higher than that
You know what, Matt S?
You know what, Matt S? I reckon it's all a ruse, and they could. So they end up with out of the money collateral on their balance sheets for a while. And.....?
"said Interest.co.nz Editor Bernard Hickey."
"said Interest .co.nz Editor Bernard Hickey."
Bernard - did you interview yourself for that story ?
Nicholas, all hypothetical of course,
Nicholas, all hypothetical of course, but depends on the level of a 'crash'. The bank I work for would not be able to sustain a large (say >40% across the board) write-down of its loan book IMHO, and that is why I believe that it is not in the interests of the banks to make the situation any worse than it is. Banks are stepping away .. when was the last time you saw the "unbeatable" campaign for example?
But they could, depending upon
But they could, depending upon who your boss is (unbeatable you say!), send it off to add to the stuff that Thodey is looking after in the UK? What's it's nominal value? $18 bill... Shovel any bad debts into a bad bank, and let's get on with it. But I'd agree; its the thing to do, to do a bit of pulling back at the moment. Cheers. ( Is it that time already.....)
Consolidated loan adverts were the
Consolidated loan adverts were the pre-cursor to the last crash in the UK!!
zedy Says: "How many of
zedy Says:
"How many of these households are over extended and relying on these tax breaks to meet there mortgage reypayments
thats when its going to get interesting"
Yep..or put another way, they are living beyond their true means.. more homes up for sale/auction another small rectification back to true long term ave price, and affordabily.
Read a sob story in the herald thing it was, Oh brought with a 120 000 deposit with a 250000 mortgage, cant afford the mortgage and no life style...
Really? didnt cross their minds their egos got in the way for a flash new home?
Wounder why they dont have a 120K deposit and 200K mortgage..
Stupid people and stupid reporters who wrote the sob story and couldn't see this.
i'm starting to wonder whether
i'm starting to wonder whether wally and roger thompson live together or are at least close neighbours..they seem to bounce off each other ( no implication intended) with their posts?
man, i can hear it echoing across those marlborough grapevines late at night:
"good night wally"
"g'night roger..can i have a gummy bear if i'm good?"
been looking for a family
been looking for a family home in central auckland for a fair while, the expectations of vendors has changed hugely since the end of last year.
Property press is twice as big now and it seems most vendors would be very happy with current GV where as they were going for 50k plus late 2009.
There has been a big change in market sentiment, not many buyers scared of missing out anymore.... quite the opposite
Sid - well put. My
Sid - well put. My sentiment exactly mirrors the sentiment you refer to "not many buyers scared of missing out anymore"
I will buy if the right property comes along at the right price, but only at the RIGHT PRICE
I suspect many buyers share this view and it is going to drive median prices down
It does seem that the
It does seem that the NZ Herald reports when house prices are going up due to increased demand putting fear into the regular Joe. When it's the other way around, nothing. Huge supply exists at the moment but little mention of it.
Sellers are being stubborn at the moment, hence the large over priced supply. I don't know how long that's going to last. When they do drop, it'll be interesting to watch and maybe read that article in the NZ Herald. I think some home owners / sellers are in for quite a shock. Three bedroom bungalow for sale in Mt Albert for $749k? (see trademe) take off 10, 20 + % ??
Housing affordability should improve as
Housing affordability should improve as the interest rates continue to drop.
With regard to Govt tax
With regard to Govt tax changes the market will find it's own level again once the fuss has died down.
But there sure has been a lot of people out there enjoying seeing landlords squirm
Why does everybody bag landlords?
If being a Landlord was so good, why haven't most people done it?
It's just typical to see people taking pleasure in the hardship of landlords.
The assumption is that we have all got incredibly rich - by extorting money from our tenants, and now apparently robbing the Government of tax.
Here's the common reality: Average people working hard to get ahead and provide for themselves in retirement. Sacrificing weekends and evenings to renovate houses - taking risks. Putting up with tenants ripping them off and wrecking their homes.
Many of my tenants are earning more than me in their day jobs. They choose to spend their money - I choose to invest it.
Ten busy years later, I'm better off.
People shouldn't bag anyone with the courage to work hard and take calculated financial risks.
I've been looking central Auckland
I've been looking central Auckland for a house for the last 10 months, for some illogical reason. Anyway I've noticed that a lot of the people are selling to move offshore, mainly Oz.. Maybe they are the smarts ones! Not many new buyers to the Auckland market at the moment. Quite a few people trading sideways also.. Open homes are well down... Clock is ticking.....
i posted this elsewhere but
i posted this elsewhere but worth repeating here imho...
there is also the phenomenon of negative latent demand. the loose credit of the last few years sucked demand from future years by drawing in to the market people who normally would have waited a few more years before buying a property. it’s something that has been well noted here in california and adds weight to the question – where is all the new demand for houses going to come from?
@tagrossbilly: Just look to OZ
@tagrossbilly: Just look to OZ for that....the Govn grant has brought forward future buyers and with re-leverage has caused a huge property bubble....its waiting to burst and apart from Steve Keen everyone else seems to be illogically bullish....that's the sign of a bad crash from what Ive read on past bubbles...So what going to cause the burst? one possibility is just how long can the Govn keep up that grant and keep making it bigger? once it stops then property isnt going to sell....so stagnate....then a bad event and hmmmm a slide down to where ppl can afford that first home....its a ponzi scheme it has to implode at some point.
@Geoff: I for one dont bag professional landlords....I will bag property gamblers....the difference is for me a professional landlord is someone who has a positive income off the property and isnt there for primarily the capital gain....the gamb;er is and then rorts the tax system...So its sound business model v ponzi scheme....
regards
@The BM: but interest rates
@The BM: but interest rates will (marginally) rise going forward I suspect....the OCR might drop....be interesting to see what happens in the next few months to prices, days to sell and inventory keeps rising how long can that continue....if the May budget is where I suspect it will be (rorts etc stopped) its dip time....even if you are a gambler on capital gain I cant see how that's a dead cert for a few years...
@curtissd: the drop via fundimentals would dictate a large drop to the 3:1 price to wages ratio....so say 2.5:1 worst case allowing for an over-shoot....but if deflation / depression hits then wages will drop, making houses even more over-valued.
regards
BH says The median house
BH says The median house price as measured by REINZ was steady in February at NZ$350,000, just off a record high NZ$360,000
Using false statistics about house prices supplied by arch manipulator REINZ is about as sensible as asking your dog for house price advice.
To explain:.... the lower end investor houses fell 30% about 12 to 18 months ago. Gradually the financial stress is bearing hard on the higher salary folk who got large debt to show off on. When higher priced houses sell on the market the median goes up. That is so even if those higher priced properties are being dumped at near half price e.g. $2.4m down to $1.4m in the last three weeks. Get it straight. REINZ median prices say nothing truthful or meaningful about house prices. It is all about mixing zones and price strata. REINZ CEO misleads when he says their new system 'is similar' to the Reserve Bank criteria. RBNZ say both price strata and zoning is required. REINZ use only zoning. The RBNZ source is downloadable off their website if you have time to read 40 pages of technical stuff. Like Teresa Gattung's famous comment, REINZ gladly allow consumers follow:......confusion is a marketing tool. I think it could well be worse but have not checked the legal position.
Values are all over the
Values are all over the place, agents say my 5 bed home in birkenhead is worth less than the 530k cv yet my neighbour with a half size property brought 3 months ago for 310 and a gv of 355 has put in on the market for low - mid 500,s after doing a quick reno.
The Bank Manager Says: March
The Bank Manager Says:
March 23rd, 2010 at 11:02 pm
Housing affordability should improve as the interest rates continue to drop.
Really? We all get the impression rates are all up from here.
It is price adjustment that will drive affordability because I think most people believe that there is no leverage from lower interest and in fact is more likely to be driven against buyers until sellers cave in.
We'll get lower interest rates
We'll get lower interest rates only if:
- NZ's economic performance gets significantly worse, causing the RBNZ to further drop the OCR to try and stimulate the economy; and
- through some sort of magic, this economic performance not only doesn't make NZ a more risky place for foreign funds (to fund our debt), but it in fact makes us LESS risky, so the NZ risk premium reduced.
Then we might see lower rates - sound likely?
An old and very small
An old and very small kit-set house on a full section in my street was advertised for auction. CV of 370k (land) + 100k (improvements) = 470k. Owners were happy to accept this. I was waiting for the auction, but the property got snapped up for 512k(!) well before the auction date!
So who's the smart one
So who's the smart one there, OS. The buyer or the seller?
Both!
Both!
Good answer. But I'll reserve
Good answer. But I'll reserve my opinion until May 20th.
@Ian Ryan at last someone
@Ian Ryan
at last someone else who actually sees the light and why..thu I think you are out on the "the lower end investor houses fell 30% about 12 to 18 months ago."
Around 18 to 22% is more realistic, but hey we are just splitting hairs on that part
Property sells for about 10-20%
Property sells for about 10-20% above 2009 GV out our way.
I fail to see what
I fail to see what GV or RV or whatever it's called in different places, has to do with house prices. A coucil needs to raise X amount of rates, and divides that amount between a variety of property related components to raise that money. The lower a "V" rating, the better for the houseowner, as that means they pay less rates. So if you live in an efficient council area it makes sense that house price sales values will be above the "V" value?
It shouldn't have any relevance,
It shouldn't have any relevance, but there does seem to be a correlation at the moment. We live in smaller wealthier area of Manukau- so what you say is probably true.
Agree with Nicholas - CV,
Agree with Nicholas - CV, GV - In a simpler time you just offered 10% above.
All part of a cycle that needs to be better understood.
In the absence of any other way of 'priciing' (as opposed to valuing) a house, we still cling to it.
Just a rating mechanism - part of a perverse 'feelgood factor', (my house has gone up, I can get more from the bank).
'Housing dollars' - unlike the stuff you have to buy food with.
Suits everyone except those entering the market!
Nice to see some have
Nice to see some have their heads screwed on.
But we actually need to look at "land" values, not "house prices". The relatively stable "house price" is masking the true extent of the real "bubble" we have. Take the house values out of your graphs and then see what the slopes look like.
Steve Keen is right about the Aussie Govt throwing "grants" at first home buyers. All this did was inflate the bubble a bit more and a bit longer. It has to blow, and it will be bigger when it does.
REINZ are part of the problem. People often suggest there should be penalties for financial advisors on Wall Street who made money out of selling investments that collapsed in value. Why not do the same for Real Estate Agents, they're just as guilty. If they knew they were going to be liable after the bust, they might be a bit more careful firstly about doing their own analysis and secondly, about how much bubble cheerleading they do.
When we bought things were
When we bought things were selling for 10% under GV.