If this firm is on the lowest rating to get into the new scheme, but is on a negative watch, how prudent, within the rules of the deposit guarantee scheme, is it to grant them further coverage this far out from October?

If they are re-rated downward, does the continuation still apply?

Is Treasury working on a self fulfilling prophesy basis of grant them the scheme continuation and they won't be re-rated because they now have all of my taxpayer money to fall back on?

Do Treasury issue the criteria publicly by which they have allowed this continuation,, and will bureaucratic heads roll should this be shown to have been imprudent, and my money wasted on another unmandated government foible?

Haaaaaaaaaaarhahaha...Treasury too frightened to pull the bailout plug because they will have to bailout the failure guaranteed to happen before October this year.....What a friggin joke.

You awake to this Bill...BILL....bugger's asleep!

This'll have mark spitting beaurocrats at the pollies!

I'm on sys 7 too Wally and find the edit is hit and miss with it ..... You are not alone..........

Insurance is a form of contract whereby periodic payments (also known as insurance premiums) are made to an insurance company, in order to provide an individual or business compensation in the event of property loss or damage. My bad if this is too offtopic.