The comment stream

Join the Interest community to be a registered commenter so you can:
- Edit your comments
- Avoid the CAPTCHA
- Vote on comments
Register Here

Already registered? log back in here ..

Forgotten your password? No problem! Click here

Finance sector jobs

Manager Operational Effectiveness and Assurance IT
Reporting to the Senior Manager Operational Risk Effectiveness and Assurance, the key focu...more
New Zealand
Financial Controller
Reporting to the Head of Finance - Retail and Business Bank the key focus of this role is ...more
New Zealand
Manager Finance Corporate Core - 12 Month Contract role
This role in consultation with the Financial Controller provides financial, strategic and ...more
New Zealand
IT Audit Manager - Internal Audit - Auckland
If you are motivated by the prospect of seeing the big picture, developing your team and m...more
New Zealand
efinancialcareers.com

Reader poll

Should you fix your mortgage now or stay floating?

Choices

House sales down 23% in June from year ago, Barfoots reports

Posted in News Updated

Auckland's largest real estate agency group, Barfoot and Thompson, has reported house sales volumes fell to 665 and the average price fell to NZ$523,058 in June as uncertainty after the budget and the usual winter slowdown hit volumes.

(Updated with comments from ASB economist Jane Turner about a 15% seasonally adjusted fall in volumes and her outlook for falling house prices)

Volumes were down 23% from 861 in June a year ago and down 16% from May, while the average price was down 3.6% from May and up 0.25% from June a year ago.

The Barfoot and Thompson figures for New Zealand's largest real estate market are the earliest indication of how the market went in June. The next most up to date indications nationally will come from the Real Estate Institute of New Zealand and Quoteable Value.

"While the budget has definitely contributed to lower sales, its impact on prices has not been great, and there is no indication that investors are getting out of the market," said Barfoot and Thompson Chief Executive Wendy Alexander.

“Factors that confirm this are the average price in June is the same as that for June last year, while the number of new listings, at 1194 for the month, is down 12.8% on those for May and the same as for June last year," Alexander said.

“If investors were getting out, listings would be up and prices would be under more pressure than they are. It adds up to a market that is uncertain, and many people are putting off making decisions."

Alexander said the average house price had moved in a band between NZ$505,000 and NZ$545,000 since the start of the year.

"It is unlikely there will be any significant changes in the ‘steady as she goes’ state of the market before the return of the warmer weather in September," she said.

Barfoot & Thompson said it had 5,794 properties on its books at the beginning of July, 229 fewer than on June 1 and 237 more than on July 1, 2009.

Rents rise

Barfoot and Thompson said the average weekly rent had increased NZ$5 to NZ$403 in June from May, which it said was the highest weekly average for eight months and up NZ$15 from the same time a year ago. “Rents are edging up at a time of the year when they tend to trend downwards,” said Alexander.

“Landlords are anticipating they will be facing higher costs, and they are looking to recover some of those increases through higher rents," she said. “At this time last year the average weekly rent was NZ$15 lower.”

Barfoot & Thompson said it rented out 690 properties in June, up 6.3% from May.

ASB economist Jane Turner said the figures showed a 15% fall in seasonally adjusted Auckland house sales in June and a 5% fall in seasonally adjusted listings. She also noted the slight increase in rents.

"Recent anecdotes suggest landlords intend to increase rents in reaction to tax changes in Budget 2010. However, the ability to increase rents may be limited by prospective tenants’ ability to pay given the weakness in wage growth over the past year," she said.

"Housing market activity is likely to remain very weak throughout the remainder of 2010, reflecting waning demand. Tax changes around depreciation rules have reduced the attractiveness of holding investment property at the margin. In addition, slowing net migration and rising interest rates will also reduce support for housing demand over the year," Turner said.

"Given the weakening fundamentals we expect to see house prices decline slightly this year. However, the low level of supply, as indicated by weak consent issuance and the low level of new listings, will limit the degree of downside pressure on house prices."

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment in the box on the right or click on the "'Register" link at the bottom of the comments. Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making these comments.

261 Comments

Another load of RE BS. Now

Another load of RE BS. Now they claim averages are showing things are ok...but sales are down...so a few more higher priced joints get flogged off and the averages look better! What a rort.

TO THE REINZ Regarding your

TO THE REINZ

Regarding your new website. It states the following...

"Expect us to be proactive. Expect us to be a leader, expect us to represent your interests vigorously. Expect us to have the answers you need, and to be the "hub" of our great industry - consistently promoting a positive Institute message."

My take..

A "truly" great industry does not need to call itself great. A truly great industry provides innovation, wealth and benefits to the entire community and the country. Think railroads during the industrial revolution or the pharmaceutical industry during the 20th century.

By this definition the real estate industry can not be great. It simply exists as a service between buyers and sellers of real-estate.

By constantly "up-selling" the state of the housing market, the REINZ starts to do the real-estate industry a dis-service. By upselling the state of the housing market you are being disingenuous to both buyers and sellers. No market price for anything goes up for ever and ever. The REINZ would pretend that this rule doesn't apply to houses in NZ.

I remember the 25% contraction in house prices in 1987. I can also see the enormous falls in real-estate prices around the globe since 2007. I'm also aware that no lift in dollar price effectively means a fall due to the effects of inflation.

Your new web site simply re-enforces the broader perception the REINZ is there to serve it's members even at the expense of it's own credibility.

Regards

Tim Scott
021-377-637

The Man and his mates will

The Man and his mates will put a positive gloss on this. If anyone says the housing market is not building up for a big fall in values they must be on drugs.

This report shows the market

This report shows the market is doing well. No rush to sell, no collapse of prices, more lettings and rising rents.

Bang on Troll..."This report

Bang on Troll..."This report shows"...and the next scene is in act two when another RE lot enter stage left to tell us the King does have his clothes on...
Have a chat to any one of the hundreds of people who have lost their equity and their home in a mortgagee sale Troll...ask them is they agree "the market is doing well"...

Don't moan about the market

Don't moan about the market Wally. Get in there and profit from it.

I am Troll...believe me I am!

I am Troll...believe me I am!

Man Rich PI Troll, i'm

Man Rich PI Troll, i'm getting tired of reading your RI crap talk. I'm sure you are on here just to antagonise. You're probably a mortgage broker with nothing to do.
My partner works for an upmarket real estate firm and Wally is right, its simply the odd top end property being sold that's keeping the averages up. BTW the higher end properties that do eventually sell are well down on vendors asking price. The vendors have realized that there will be no better offers coming if they wait any longer. The crash has begun brother. There are no more fools prepared to buy in.

Spoilsport anon...we all like

Spoilsport anon...we all like to have a gork when the walls fall down.

"While the budget has

"While the budget has definitely contributed to lower sales, its impact on prices has not been great, and there is no indication that investors are getting out of the market,"....well there you have it Mr English..from the horse's mouth so to speak...your budget did squat...back you go to the doodleshop and don't come out without some real policies that end the PI rort...off you go boy.

Rents are up! Any rent charts

Rents are up!

Any rent charts BH?

Here we go. Fresh from the

Here we go. Fresh from the Department of Building and Housing, which are measured from bond lodgings.

These charts show rents have been stable nationally since January 2008.

http://www.interest.co.nz/charts/real-estate/rents-median

cheers
Bernard

Thanks BH Fits in with what

Thanks BH

Fits in with what these guys see...Auckland rents increasing faster than the rest of NZ

http://www.crockers.co.nz/services/research/latest.html

Hmmm I note: "...average

Hmmm I note: "...average price was down 3.6% from May and up 0.25% from June a year ago."

Headline could have been... "12 mths to June 2010 house values remain relatively static even with lower sales numbers"

But no. lets sensationalise to pamper to BH’s personal vendetta against property (& investors).

I agree simpleton.

I agree simpleton.

Including inflation house

Including inflation house prices are well down.

All my rentals are going up

All my rentals are going up buy $20.00 aweek as from the 10th july.

Good for you johnsee..it's

Good for you johnsee..it's the only way to get rid of them tenants.

Jon C's rent increases concur

Jon C's rent increases concur with my rent increases Wally.

So the tenants will have nowhere to go to avoid the increases.

A grow-op in the ceiling, or

A grow-op in the ceiling, or a P-lab in the spare room will more than cover any increase. There may be a certain amount of damage to your walls and chattels, but you're insured, right?

They have options galore

They have options galore Troll as you know...and that don't include a tent in the snow...have a look at what BH just posted on rents! Then go peak at some Trademe listings and go right in to see the same furniture being arranged in the empty ex rentals to try and tart them up as good buys. Lots of accidental landlords out there Troll. Heaps of places to rent.

I just re-let about 1 month

I just re-let about 1 month ago and kept the rent the same as before, as I knew other costs were rising and I would rather have a better pool of tenants to choose from, who are attracted by a 'reasonable' rent, rather than an amount that will only attract the "desparates" ie tenants who have just been chucked out of their accommodation the day before or were running some p-lab.

So troll et al - keep raising those rents and good luck with the quality of tenants you will get. You guys even believe there is capital gain out there too..... you are absolutely deluded and have no business sense. Ignorance is bliss I suppose .....

RichPITroll: Your rent

RichPITroll:

Your rent increases 'concur'?? Learn to speak English

I am affraid it's true, my

I am affraid it's true, my rent has gone up, not much, 10$/week, but for second time in less thean a year. Nowhere to hide.

Click on the price growth

Click on the price growth graph, that cuts through the spin and tells you all you need to know - growth about to go negative again.
Contrary to the bull about trading in a narrow range everything points to sub-$500K prices in the second half.

A weak report, and one which will no-doubt be followd by weak reports from QV and REINZ.

shock horror. Well actual

shock horror. Well actual that chart show growth going backwards no less than 31 times since 01. Wish it went back further...would be an interesting trend to look at.

Good luck keeping your

Good luck keeping your tenants!

Wow I didn't realise that

Wow I didn't realise that landlords had that super-power!!! - i.e the ability to defy laws of supply and demand, thus increasing yeild simply because their costs are rising. Next you're going to tell me they can run their investments at a loss forever without any negative consequences AMAZING!!

Landlords don't drive the

Landlords don't drive the market up.

Supply falls and demand rises. That sees prices rise.

My property manager in Auckland told me last week he has more demand for rentals than supply of rentals. B and T's figures show this.

"Supply falls and demand

"Supply falls and demand rises. That sees prices rise"...bang on again Troll...the best explanation for rising interest rates ever posted to this site...well done Troll.
Don't stop there...carry on and tell us what happens when rates rise much higher...MUCH higher Troll?

I agree Wally... I think

I agree Wally... I think rates will rise much higher.

And i'm ready for it. Long-term property investors are always well positioned for interest rate rises.

Big profit opportunity here Wally. Get yourself positioned to make the most of it.

"And i'm ready for it"...very

"And i'm ready for it"...very unwise statement Troll...but I do agree the cashed up PI is well placed for the 'new normal' over the next twenty years...I'll stick to copper/gold and silver and a sprinkling of fully imputed quality stocks that promise some M&A with any luck. You can have the PI game to yourself.

Wally, anybody who does their

Wally, anybody who does their sums and invests wisely in the longer term should do OK...in any sphere. The long term / pro landlords are just like ppl who buy shares for the long haul...

This time Im not so sure they are right...ie they assume a short business cycle with a U or a V drop and a recovery...this looks like an L now...so its questionable if any investment bar cash in a deposit account is safe enough IMHO....but who knows they maybe right.....

If its an L shaped recovery then there will be no high interest rates, we will see deflation and a depression. Ive stayed floating because this is what I think we will see, especially when peak oil catches up....

regards

One way to profit Wally...buy

One way to profit Wally...buy a house and next year rent it to a rugby fan for thousands over a few weeks.

Can't go wrong. Remember to pay my a commission for putting you onto the idea first!

Now ...where's my shades? And my wide-brimmed hat?

They are all yours

They are all yours Troll...don't ask me to help repair the damage a pissed off mob of rugby supporters leave behind after their national team gets run over by a mob of Black.

Big call Wally. "...run over

Big call Wally. "...run over by a mob of Black".

Are you picking us to win the RWC?

So another piece of advise for you when you buy your house to rent to rugby fans...rent to the likely winners. I'm picking aussie.

Don't you forget my commission now as I've got mallowpuffs to buy.

Troll...you give advice not

Troll...you give advice not advise..you advise but you don't advice!...My advice is buy pna...

Haha yeah you will get rich

Haha yeah you will get rich just like all those guys got rich during the Commonwealth games because every one knows the country will be flooded with rich tourists who will pay any price for any old crap.

Oh no wait they all lost money - I forgot!

So yeah buy a house get a huge mortgage right when the housing market is crashing down then try and rent it out to rugby morons then mail the keys back to the bank and cry in bankruptcy for the next 10-20 years.

TOP PLAN YA LOSER!!!!!!!!

There is no mailing keys back

There is no mailing keys back in Noddy anon...banks have the full protection of the justice system to screw you for the rest of your sodding life and then some. Funny how ppl don't know that.

I was just trying to make a

I was just trying to make a point.

And well made anon.

And well made anon.

There are lots of AmericanCup

There are lots of AmericanCup left overs.

It's not necessarily defying

It's not necessarily defying laws of supply and demand. If a property has $400 rent and no increase in a couple of years, its due $20/week simply to match inflation. I'm just not sure I'd trumpet about it...

The mistake a lot of these

The mistake a lot of these clowns are making is that they see supply-demand as a simple one-to-one equation, without taking into account wider factors such as employment, credit availability, mobility and conflicting demands where resources are finite. If supply-demand was simple, 1980s New York wouldn't have simultaneously had blocks of hundreds of abandoned apartment buildings and a severe housing shortage. Complex pressure and influences are in play.

Heh! -- That's why PIs are

Heh! -- That's why PIs are hoping and praying for a war in the Middle East or a major disaster in the USA which will save their collapsing bubble! LOL!!!!

I would think they are

I would think they are praying for no such thing....anything like that would plunge us into a depression before you could blink...

regards

You must of missed the

You must of missed the comments from last night where the bulls and trolls were saying how interest rates would be stuffed if Israel bombs Iran and PIs will win! Or the posts a few days ago about how the gulf oil spill is going to send millions of rich yanks to godzone and buying up all the property!!! LOLOLOL!!!!

Whilst I think the housing

Whilst I think the housing market is doomed the reason NY had blocks of abandoned apartment buildings in the 80's was because of rent controls making it uneconomic for the landlords.

That was the reason - and if

That was the reason - and if I recall correctly rent control was a result of slumlord profiteering - as far back as the 50s and 60s there were investigations into the dire state of low-income housing, with high rents being charged for rat-infested hellholes. Point is, there are complex opposing forces interacting, and for anyone to characterise the market as a straitforward supply-demand relationship is being simple-minded. Lots of unexpected distortions and consequences are possible.

My mortgage is already set so

My mortgage is already set so any increase in rent goes straight to the bottom line.

I am happy to see rent increases while my mortgage payment remains the same. This happens to me because I am in the property for the long term.

"..my mortgage payment

"..my mortgage payment remains the same. This happens to me because I am in the property for the long term."
Yes and Yes !
Your debt is entrenched; fixed for however long it's loan term is; there is no such entrenchment of rental income, and
You certainly do appear to be in it for the long, long term !

Yep Nicholas...25 years so

Yep Nicholas...25 years so far, and i'm only a schoolboy according to some so I will be bloody rich by the time I get old.

It's mallowpuffs forever for us long-term PI Trolls.

Why wait till you are old,

Why wait till you are old, RPI ! It's much for fun when you are still young and mobile.

Mallowpuffs are a very apt

Mallowpuffs are a very apt metaphor for the current market. The illusion of firmness and solidity on the outside, but the interior is insubstantial, squishy, crumbly and full of bubbles.

But oh so sweet!!! ;D

But oh so sweet!!! ;D

Not much value for the money

Not much value for the money either, especially when compared to the sturdy and utilitarian gingernut. More to the packet, dunkable, no structural problems lurking out of sight.

Kakapo. Gingernuts are like

Kakapo.

Gingernuts are like arrowroot biscuits. Poor people tend to buy them.

I will stick with the mallowpuffs.

Thanks, but I prefer

Thanks, but I prefer something that doesn't disintegrate on exposure to moisture.

Rich PI Troll, I bet my left

Rich PI Troll, I bet my left boot you don't have the significant amount of property you indicate you do.

Therefore your rent increases are but a drop in the ocean, don't think they influence the trend!

Anonymous, you will be

Anonymous, you will be surprised at just how much influence on the market I have.

It is way beyond my years as a schoolboy.

That is the hight of

That is the hight of arrogance

"While the budget has

"While the budget has definitely contributed to lower sales, its impact on prices has not been great, and there is no indication that investors are getting out of the market," said Barfoot and Thompson Chief Executive Wendy Alexander.

“Factors that confirm this are the average price in June is the same as that for June last year, while the number of new listings, at 1194 for the month, is down 12.8% on those for May and the same as for June last year," Alexander said."

What a load of crock...investoprs over leveraged and speculators have had 2 1/2 yrs to sort themselves out...and the last 12 months was they knew very well something was going to happen in the budget and reacted accordingly...counted to 10 slowly then paniced in an orderly manner.
Of cause th budget had no effect...everything happened before it.
And the numbers over the last 2 1/2 yrs show that show that.
How the hell can these commentators be so damn out of touch??

Notice how price growth and sales numbers have steadily returned to pre boom yrs?

And because it's such a long,

And because it's such a long, drawn-out process, with no one 'Black Monday' to pin it on, the slow decline goes almost completely unnoticed by both wishful thinkers and those who haven't been directly affected yet. Change is happening at the margins, and will take a long time to erode inwards to the better-insulated centre of those with longer ownership and more equity.

Yes, it's happening alright,

Yes, it's happening alright, but slowly, although it seems to be gathering pace, and there is a hell of a lot more to come.

Perhaps it'd be better to get it all over and done with via a massive but rapid collapse which hopefully clears out all the starry-eyed dreamers and slobbering greed monsters, allowing the market to recover to some kind of equilibrium with incomes.

Do you think that Wendy is

Do you think that Wendy is Tony's sister? They both seem prone to verbal diarrhoea..........

5% of all residential sales

5% of all residential sales in NZ in April were mortgagee sales.

That's almost certain to

That's almost certain to increase dramatically in the coming months.

don't you mean 0.05%

don't you mean 0.05%

woops - christ you are right

woops - christ you are right 246 out of 5207 total sales= 4.7%

However year to date only 765 out of 20063 total sales = 3.8%

Could it climb to 10% of all sales by year end?

Guys Chill. Some of the rents

Guys Chill. Some of the rents have gone up after years of stagnation. I don't think any of the landlords would risk losing a good tenant these days. My rents haven't gone up in the last 9 months and my landlord assured me that it wont for the next 6 months. He is happy keeping me as a long term tenant.

Sit back and watch the fun as the property prices drop. Till the prices bottom out I am happy to rent and save.

The mortgagee sales in

The mortgagee sales in Auckland in April may well have been up from March - but taking the first 4 months of 2010 in total and comparing to 2009 the figures in Auckland are down 18% - Northland, BOP, Manawatu, Otago and the Waikato are all up significantly - full details on Zoodle
http://www.zoodle.co.nz/cms/blog/latest-data-for-april-mortgagee-sales-s...

http://www.landlords.co.nz/re

http://www.landlords.co.nz/read-article.php?article_id=3765

Something difficult for those in denial to deny.

Yep the PIs in their denial

Yep the PIs in their denial are humming that old REM tune -- "It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!"

And if we take the last 9.63

And if we take the last 9.63 months, what do we see? Let's take a statistical run that suits our arguement!

Thanks Alistair, more good

Thanks Alistair, more good news for the Auckland market, the market that leads NZ'eds property market.

What say the doomsters now?

Crisis...what crisis?

Long term mortgage rates

Long term mortgage rates down. There's the crisis, in one!

Nicholas it's easier to fund

Nicholas it's easier to fund property purchases for first-time buyers so I can't see that as a crisis

You can safely assume that

You can safely assume that Barfoots will have fiddled the figures to make things look slightly less bad.

When Barfoots and savagely bullish property sites such as landlords.co.nz are grudgingly conceding that the residential property (investment) market is falling apart, you know it's in a truly bad way!

Completely misleading article

Completely misleading article - of course the # of sales will be down when the # of listings are down. BS journalism

The NZ property market is

The NZ property market is increasingly tossed about the waves of worldwide events,
making statistics, charts etc. worthless. People, write articles about how we can increase production, rather then constantly and senseless comments about property markets.

WK

Rents rise "Barfoot and

Rents rise
"Barfoot and Thompson said the average weekly rent had increased NZ$5 to NZ$403 in June from May, which it said was the highest weekly average for eight months and up NZ$15 from the same time a year ago. “Rents are edging up at a time of the year when they tend to trend downwards,” said Alexander."

Lets actually look closer at these numbers
NZ$5 to NZ$403 over 1 month thats 1.2%
"heighest in 8 months"

up NZ$15 from the same time a year ago.
thats under 3%
Sure must have renters shaking in there boots and landlords rubbing there hands together reminiscent of Scrooge
Yeah right!
More a case of no news news.
Propaganda BS

I have just sold a house we

I have just sold a house we purchased just under 2 years ago in Three Kings, Auckland. I received just under a 7% increase in the price we paid (paid $519k sold $555k) - no major improvements made. I probably didnt make anything on it when you factor in the cost of money, but it was never meant to be an investment - ie. we lived in it.

An overall summary of this

An overall summary of this report would conclude that the sales market is quiet but activity is ongoing and the housing market is a safe place to invest money.

Rental income is improving.

No wonder the doom, gloom and despondency merchants are firing up on their posts.

I'm off for some mallowpuffs!

Bernard, after all is said

Bernard, after all is said and done , house prices are out of kilter with incomes and a structural adjustment is necessary, either quickly or over time. Contrary to common belief , New Zealand is not short of land to build housing. Just do the Maths ....the UK is roughly the same size as NZ and has housing for 60 million people, NZ has 4 million people.... a building section in Auckland is more expensive in relation to income than a site/ section in a similar sized UK City ...go figure. The new Auckland Unicity/ Supercity will need to get its act together with structure plans to rezone land south, west & north of Auckland to allow for the orderly development of housing and sort out false and unneccesary supply bottlenecks. In the meantime, interest rate increases will dampen the market, there is no reason for NZ to be different to any free market anywhere

There are only 5 reasons to

There are only 5 reasons to sell a home and these are: debt, divorce, death, departure or downsizing. With 245 mortgagee sales in April 2010 ( same as April 2009) there is an indication that debt is a major problem for many folk out there and if interst rates go up it can only get worse.

Wrong - we have recently sold

Wrong - we have recently sold to allow us to upgrade

What about upsizing?

What about upsizing?

Upsizing does not count as it

Upsizing does not count as it does not start with a "D" :-) however Divorice may cover this if one partner gets togther with another and they have a bigger "blended" family :-)

There are only five reasons

There are only five reasons to sell:

Debt, divorce, death, departure, downsizing, or better returns elsewhere.

Okay, so there are only six reasons to sell:

Debt, divorce, death, departure, downsizing, better returns elsewhere, or upsizing / upgrading.

Okay, so there are only seven reasons to sell....

Sounds like someone has been lining the pockets of a seminar spruiker.

Let's hear the '10 reasons to invest in residential property'.

Alan.

Alan.

Barfoots don't benefit from

Barfoots don't benefit from talking the market up and that's why they actually don't do it. Barfoots make money whether the market rises or falls, so they have no interest in manipulating any figures. It just doesn't happen.

Barfoots simply report what's happened, they'd be mad to do otherwise. Predictions of price falls are coming from the economists and the majority of commenters here who think prices will fall for a variety of reasons. Some are valid and may play out.

The ASB economist quoted says interest rates will rise whereas some fixed housing rates fell last week - so does her argument stack up? Not yet. If her guess is correct and rates rise, perhaps prices will fall a tad.

Immigrants are still a stronger force than most of you can comprehend, feeding the Auckland market. Ask any Kiwi families trying to buy a home right now in central Akl if it's easy. They're constantly competing with immigrants and the immigrants win when they choose to compete. Their purchasing power will likely get even better if the Yuan rises as predicted (yes only a prediction - but so are the ASB's and Westpacs recent negative statements).

Rents are rising because many people can't afford buy. Our population is growing every day and supply isn't keeping up with demand. Those of you hoping for 10+% falls in median house prices will be disappointed, but you'll naturally be excited by the prospect of it.

"Barfoots don't benefit from

"Barfoots don't benefit from talking the market up and that's why they actually don't do it."

Is that a JOKE?!

Which bit of their statement

Which bit of their statement today talks the market up smarty pants?

"It is unlikely there will be

"It is unlikely there will be any significant changes in the ‘steady as she goes’ state of the market before the return of the warmer weather in September,"

Clear as day this is saying house prices won't be dropping so it's safe to buy and you better buy now as prices will be rising over summer.

If agents said that they thought that the market would drop then buyers would be scarred away. They would just sit on the sidelines and wait.

Agents will tell vendors privately that the market is dropping. Publicly, it's only ever flattish to onwards and upwards.

It's obvious, based on the

It's obvious, based on the data they have, including listing numbers coming in and sales being made, that they don't think prices are going to fall. If the stats backed it up they'd say it, they have in the past...but for now the stats clearly don't support a statement saying prices will fall. If listings doubled next month and sales halved do you think Barfoots will predict a steady market...come on think man!

"Barfoots don't benefit from

"Barfoots don't benefit from talking the market up and that's why they actually don't do it."

A ridiculous claim.

"Barfoots make money whether the market rises or falls, so they have no interest in manipulating any figures. It just doesn't happen."

And another. Ever heard of commission? Ever heard of marketing?

"Barfoots simply report what's happened, they'd be mad to do otherwise."

Barfoots spin and tweak and do anything but report the facts.

"Predictions of price falls are coming from the economists and the majority of commenters here who think prices will fall for a variety of reasons. Some are valid and may play out."

The predications made were based upon the fundamentals, and as we can see, they were accurate, save for the timeline in some cases. Crazy bank lending delayed the inevitable correction, but it couldn't prevent it.

"The ASB economist quoted says interest rates will rise whereas some fixed housing rates fell last week - so does her argument stack up? Not yet. If her guess is correct and rates rise, perhaps prices will fall a tad."

No matter what is said about interest rates, the property bulls always claim it indicates that property is doing well, or will be doing better "real soon now!" But prices won't be falling "a tad". They fell "a tad" last year. Now they are falling much faster. Soon they will collapse. Why? Because there is nothing else prices can do right now, UNLESS the banks resume the idiot loans, in which case it will delay the crash, AND make it worse.

"Immigrants are still a stronger force than most of you can comprehend, feeding the Auckland market. Ask any Kiwi families trying to buy a home right now in central Akl if it's easy. They're constantly competing with immigrants and the immigrants win when they choose to compete. Their purchasing power will likely get even better if the Yuan rises as predicted (yes only a prediction - but so are the ASB's and Westpacs recent negative statements)."

Fantasy. It always was. The great immigration myth. See below.

"Rents are rising because many people can't afford buy."

Rents are not rising much, if at all. In some places rents have decreased as desperate landlords struggle to retain tenatnts and the almighty yield.

But you're correct about property prices being too high. That was courtesy of greedy PIs and speculators. But prices are falling now, and have a long way to go, because, as already explained, the market cannot sustain high prices. The only thing which kept prices high was the silly bank lending, and the silly bank lending has ended.

"Our population is growing every day and supply isn't keeping up with demand."

Wrong. The population is rapidly aging and the oldies are dying off. At the same time more people are fleeing NZ for greener Australian pastures than are coming in. And most of those who ARE coming to NZ don't have a bean.

"Those of you hoping for 10+% falls in median house prices will be disappointed, but you'll naturally be excited by the prospect of it."

There's no need for hope, because falling prices are guaranteed due to the fact that prices are much too high and people can't and/or won't pay them.

That's the key point that you imbecilic property bulls refuse to acknowledge: when the banks aren't loaning stupidly high mortgages to stupid people to pay for stupidly overpriced houses, not even the stupid can pay the stupid high prices.

When prices are too high, they fall.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fundamental

Still happy I see amalgam.

Still happy I see amalgam.

Good comments Steve, I agree

Good comments Steve, I agree with them.

Under siege in here hey mate!

Under siege in here hey mate!

You will be under siege

You will be under siege steve, but if you own the property you own the money and these guys don't like it so they get bitter and twisted.

Someone was quoting REM...he sounds more like he listens to The Cure or Sisters of Mercy.

Me, I'm a Deep Purple

Me, I'm a Deep Purple fan...hit 'em hard and heavy.

Come to think of it PIs are "Highway Stars" and anything else is just "Smoke on the Water"

NB two purple songs for those not in the know.

You'd think that B&T would

You'd think that B&T would tell the truth about the state of the market. We have been trying to sell a home and income investment property in Albany for 3 months. We have dropped the price from $745,000 to $699,000 and I will let it go for $650,000. Its been a disasterous investment. The yield is negative, its been vacant twice in the past 14 months (for 12 weeks empty we lost nearly $900 per week which had to come from our savings ...now almost depleted )The costs of repairs and maintenance, management fees, insurance, rates are constantly increasing, and now interest rates are set to skyrocket. Frankly residential property is not a good investment, its a dog

"You'd think that B&T would

"You'd think that B&T would tell the truth about the state of the market."

They did! They just didn't tell your story. For every story like yours there are others that are good.

I feel for you but you perhaps you should have done more research before you bought. Research and knowledge is so important when entering into any investment.

You obviously did buy a

You obviously did buy a "Lemon" did you do your homework first. Don't knock property as an investment because you made a mistake!!
You could have put it all into Bridgecorp as well then you wouldn't be happy would you?

Barfoots actually have

Barfoots actually have nothing to gain by talking the market up, they have to be honest with sellers and advise them on pricing. If they dont advise sellers when their properties are overpriced they will not earn a living, its that simple. What we forget is that the NZ property market is very well informed, there is heaps of information avaialbe to both buyers and sellers, and those who take the time to do some research are very well informed

And the best result of

And the best result of investigating all that information, at the moment is ...sell.

That's idiotic! Their entire

That's idiotic!

Their entire business model is based upon perpetually talking-up the market. Their LIVES are based upon it.

RE agents can't even be honest with themselves!

"What we forget is that the NZ property market is very well informed, there is heaps of information avaialbe to both buyers and sellers, and those who take the time to do some research are very well informed"

HAHA!

What you mean is that the NZ property market believes any old good news crap thrown at it but understand nothing, particularly with regard to fundamentals.

Can someone please show me

Can someone please show me the bit in Barfoot's statement that talks the market up? Oh please show me a tiny morsel of questionable integrity in their statement...I'm all ears!

It all about relativity,

It all about relativity, steve.
In a falling market, calling the prices as 'steady' is a defacto call for prices to rise. They are writing against reality.

Nicholas, you're only partly

Nicholas, you're only partly correct. It's all about time frame actually. Prices have risen over more time frames than they have fallen. What was the median price in 1995 versus now?

Affordability. Everyone cites

Affordability. Everyone cites this statistic as average house price divided by the average wage, presumably because the inputs are easily available. The problem is that the numerator does not correspond with the denominator - i.e. houses are generally owned by those on far higher average incomes than the average wage. Its generally accepted that over time, democracies widen the gap between the rich and the poor. This in turn suggests that the "average wage of those that own property" has risen far more quickly than the "average wage of the entire population". Would a re-constituted analysis of this revised definition of affordability over time show that "affordability" is actually not as bad as some think relative to previous decades? Can any economist out there think of a way to complete such an historical analysis of affordability using this revised definition? Bernard perhaps?

Define averages to get your

Define averages to get your answers.

Median income or mean income and prices would easily answer that quaestion. As for the data, I have none, check Bernards graphs.

Is the news not bad enough

Is the news not bad enough for some of you that thought it would be worse.? But all you do is rubbish the people who are in the business. One minute you believe the Bank speakers if it suits you and next minute you don't believe other people in the business!! I have time to spend on this forum because income is constant through my property investments that are positively geared. What is your excuse for having time to debate? Unemployment I would say!! YOU WOULD DO A DAMN SIGHT BETTER IF YOU WOULD CHANGE YOUR WAY OF THINKING AND BE MORE POSITIVE AND GET THE CHIP OFF YOUR SHOULDERS!!!
We know sales numbers would be down, not rocket science but even if prices drop who cares if you are a long term investor rather than speculator.
Have a nice day and smile everyone or maybe take your gloom overseas!!

YES! THINK POSITIVE! THAT

YES!

THINK POSITIVE!

THAT SOLVES EVERYTHING!

POSITIVE THINKING WILL MAKE REALITY DISAPPEAR!

IT WORKED FROM 2003 TO 2007, IT SHOULD CONTINUE TO DO SO!

WHY YES, I AM RETARDED!

Anon at 12.46. Reality is

Anon at 12.46. Reality is exactly that. The negativity you speak continuously will flow on to your family if you have one and the people around you. Couldn't bear to hang around with doomsday merchants like yourself. You think you believe in what you are saying but you actually don't because it is just total jealousy for people that have more than you do. Change your way of thinking on life and you will be better off.

"The negativity you speak

"The negativity you speak continuously will flow on to your family if you have one and the people around you."

Yeah, how terrible! Much better to be positive and go into more debt to buy more houses in a weak market then go bust and see your family out on the street. But if you keep thinking positive I'm sure they'll forgive you.

alan. Are you living on the

alan. Are you living on the street in this country? Al I am saying is if you talk negatively all the time your family will think there is no hope for them and they pass it on and well what a country!!

Who are you the man really.

Who are you the man really. Just an agent I think. Why do you answer every comment that disagrees with your point of view. Are you really that scared you have to try and keep the whole thing going?

Touche!! Well said.

Touche!! Well said.

The Man is correct. Anti PI

The Man is correct. Anti PI posters don't seem to do anything other than put their money in a bank. Well, how unproductive is that?

Except for me, as I can go get it out of the same bank and invest it in property.

Bernard can you block this

Bernard can you block this kid's IP address already?

The screeds of drivel he is posting via his multiple sockpuppets ('The Man', 'Rich PI troll'. 'Lucky Basket', etc) is making it hard to find the worthwhile posts.

Cheers.

The sooner the better BH.

The sooner the better BH.

Might be hard with many

Might be hard with many people using dynamic IPs. A proper login linked to a valid email address would be more useful (then abusive users can be blacklisted).

Agreed. Are you listening

Agreed.

Are you listening Bernard H? :)

To all I try to control my

To all

I try to control my tendencies towards dictatorship and allow a free-flowing discussion for all.

But I also want to foster a friendly community that allows a robust debate without personal abuse and/or inane comments.

What are your (plural) thoughts?

Should we ban 'The Man' and 'Rich PI Troll'?

I'm willing to listen to the community here.

That doesn't mean the majority wins. I'd just like to hear a few different voices.

We don't have a strict policy. But I would prefer comments are considered, not inane, personally abusive or pointless.

Also to 'The Man' and Rich PI Troll. What are your thoughts?

Would you like to stay? Do you think we're asking too much?

cheers
Bernard

What ever happened to Bryan

What ever happened to Bryan and his oversight? Seemed to work ok in the early days. Just like having a Headmaster; "Step out of line, boy and it's the strap for you", kept us on the s&n.

Bernard, don't try to control

Bernard, don't try to control your tendencies towards dictatorship.........

I think the majority is with your intentions as stated above and prefers comments that are considered, not inane and/or abusive/or are just outright silly bragging/ego games/childish.

'The Man' and 'Rich PI

'The Man' and 'Rich PI Troll'

I have not read a single article of the two, so I don't bubble.

WK

Bernard, this is your site

Bernard, this is your site and you should do as you see fit.

The comments attributed to me are not all by me. I am not one to complain about this to you however.

I suspect by your wording of the post you have made a decision and are looking for back-up by others.

My kids have commented to me that the stack of un-read books are building up on my desk, so maybe I should be banned...too much time here perhaps!

Rich PI Troll Many thanks for

Rich PI Troll

Many thanks for the reply, which I appreciate.

I have banned 'The Man', but not yourself.

cheers
Bernard

Ban them Bernard. This forum

Ban them Bernard. This forum should just be for people who want to make negative comments about the property market in particular and New Zealand in general.

Personnally I find comments

Personnally I find comments where people call each other names rather offputting. It doesn't help the argument and is certainly not informative. A good debate does require people with differing points of view. That said if you banned all commenters with a tendency to throw insults just for the sake of it, you might be left with very few comments on your threads going by what's been going on lately.

Anonymous. at 1.03p.m. Which

Anonymous. at 1.03p.m. Which Annon are u. Hard to know. Give us a name so we can relate it to the other garbage from the other Anons or is it all the same. You obviously don't like truth and can't put up with truth. Stay in your sad little world.

Come on Anonymous, we are not

Come on Anonymous, we are not the same people. We have different writing styles, this is obvious.

We are rich,we share a passion for property, and we are positive. That's the main reason we stand out from others.

Do you really think you're

Do you really think you're fooling anyone?

Seriously?

Over the last few days, the

Over the last few days, the level of personal attacks has been getting out of hand. Good debate certainly won;t be the winner on the day. Time to link to email accounts. Mine ends in @harcourts.com (not!)

Actually, no. The RBNZ has,

Actually, no.
The RBNZ has, and is, changing the capital ratios. No longer will it be ' a dollar into the Bank, a multiplied dollar out'.
It will be 'a dollar in; a Govt. Treasury Bond etc. bought' to boost the capital requirements.
The RBNZ is quietly withdawing money from the system.

Kakapo is spot on - the

Kakapo is spot on - the supply / demand balance is highly complex. It is far too implistic to simpley extrlaotae out populaiton growht and compare that to numbers of houses built.

the key, is to be talking about "realisable demand". You've got a whole lot of young people out there who would LIKE to buy a house, but can't for various reasons (student loans, simple lack of affordability of housing, unemployment etc etc). So on PAPER they represent demand but in REALITY they don't.

thats where all these bank economists get it very wrong , they base their assumptions on very crude data and a lack of understanding of the complexities of the social dynamics at play here.

You know you're in a bubble

You know you're in a bubble when people talk like that. Take a chill pill buddy.

Getting a bit tired reading

Getting a bit tired reading these comments, same old same old with some angry tone. Chill out guys and go outside to play with your toys. Or better still, go back to work and make this country a tad more productive!

Spot on, GBM.

Spot on, GBM.

damn, where's that edit

damn, where's that edit function!

That is what people are doing

That is what people are doing The Man. Going overseas and boy is it going to hit the property investors. And the decline is only starting. People will be able to buy again without needing help from their families. Those who have forced up the values by going for it will be in trouble. What a pity.

Anon at 12.49 Don't you like

Anon at 12.49 Don't you like helping your family or are you selfish?

They can do it like I did and

They can do it like I did and they will appreciate it more. And they have degrees and a future so they will be okay especially as the prices continue to drop.

105 comments in 2.5 hours.

105 comments in 2.5 hours. Looks like a lot of fear is creeping and not for those who have shrewdly got out at the top and waiting to pounce with their cash all ready to go. Be very patient though. This is just the start and the news in the last week or so indicates a long way to go down and down and down.

who cares?

who cares?

Hey Wally. You should be

Hey Wally. You should be calling ex.agent the BRAGGING MAN not me!!

Desperate PIs and speccers

Desperate PIs and speccers are trying to mount a last-ditch propaganda campaign in the belief that the market can be talked up once again.

Deep down they know their precious housing market is crumbling but they cannot bring themselves to admit or accept it, so they are fighting to have one last fling.

Who'd be one of those suckers with whopping big mortgages on crappy over-priced houses in a dying market with no buyers and unpleasant phone calls from cold people at the bank?

It's the stuff of nightmares.

That about sums them up.

That about sums them up.

Anon at 12.58p.m. Where is

Anon at 12.58p.m. Where is the proof. Wait till the sun shines in the Spring. Away we go again and it might shut you up perhaps

ex agent (and I know why)

ex agent (and I know why) there is nothing in the B and T figures to indicate what you say will happen.

The postings are busy because the anti PI are pannicking that their doom, gloom and despondency is not coming to fruition.

Here come the End

RPIT. I can feel the fear in

RPIT. I can feel the fear in them that things aren't that bad!! What could they moan about next. Food prices and petrol and ETS. They might leave us alone then. No wouldn't think so.

Thanks The Man. Yep, Wally is

Thanks The Man. Yep, Wally is real edgy today. The B and T report is no where near as bad as he was hoping.

Anonymous has made no sense this morning at all.

Exagent, I have been taking

Exagent, I have been taking note of your comments, as you were in the industry and I was in the industry for 2 years very recently.

I actually agree with you, I know how much "BS" and "spin" is done by RE agents in their daily transactions etc....in fact, if spin and BS is not done, you will lose the sale or listing. I was so glad to get out of the industry, it was full of angry, ego-centric, 100% greed driven, ignorant and self-centered types of people .... I used to call it a "caustic" environment to work in. Anyone with any scruples or decent personal values would end up leaving the industry.

So if 'the man', troll et al think this "bubble" is just going to carry on trucking, without taking into account the fundamentals that are happening here in NZ and overseas .... they are really living in a "dream world" and are totally in denial.... DENIAL IS NOT A RIVER IN AFRICA !

BTW I am sitting on a sizeable deposit and I am not buying yet ... a friend told me many years ago to wait for the bottom of the market, then as soon as you see it turn, buy then ... but until that day comes my deposit will sit in the bank gaining interest, while I add to it, rather than paying some bank a mortgage.

anonny mouse. What is the

anonny mouse. What is the huge interest rate you are receiving on your deposit. Are you sure your money is safe in the Bank. Is it guaranteed? The truth is that the Bank's say you haven't got sufficient deposit to buy. If you wait much longer then you won't own.

"the man" you just prove my

"the man" you just prove my point... you are totally ignorant, as to what I may have in the bank and what shares and property I own, so how can you make such a statement as - "If you wait much longer then you won't own"

BTW I do have a sufficent deposit to buy, way into 6 figures in cash ... in fact if I add my shares and unit trusts and wait long enough for the prices to drop I MAY BE ABLE TO BUY OUTRIGHT without even getting a mortgage to pay to some aussie owned bank !

Then I will have 2 freehold properties... there, thats my plan, so stick it in your pipe and smoke that you ignorant git !

Most properties are freehold.

Most properties are freehold. Don't call me a git. FREEHOLD is a state of tenure not the fact that there is no debt owing. Know your stuff before commenting in future.

You knew what I was refering

You knew what I was refering to, NO DEBT OWING ! ... you probably heard it enough at your drunken BBQ's with all you ignoramous mates, about how they were eventually going to go "FREEHOLD" BLAH, BLAH, BLAH ... you are just being pedantic.

Are things a little "tetchy" out there in PI land ?

With all due respect, I will stop refering to you as a git, when you stop refering to everyone who disagrees with you on this site with a "variety of names", which you have used for various people on this blog.

anonny mouse, if you own

anonny mouse, if you own shares then you will not have enough for a deposit, as shares have collapsed in recent years.

House prices on the other have gone down by...oh...a few %.

Take The man's advice and buy.

I take it from your comments you are a socialist. You hate aussie banks, confuse the word "freehold" and and resort to personal abuse to make your point.

Again RPIT, you are assuming

Again RPIT, you are assuming if I own shares I will not have enough, I ask how do you know how many shares I hold, do you have a crystal ball? ... as I said to "the man", don't assume what people have or may not have. I really don't feel this is a forum for everyone to dispay their personal balance sheet.

Also with shares I bought them all back in 1995 and they have done very nicely overall thank you.

I am not a socialist and know that the word "freehold' has 2 different meanings.

Whilst I do not resort to personal abuse, I find it frustrating communicating with people, who only can see things through one particular angle and who don't expand their knowledge which they could with some of the people that scribe on this site.

Thank you and "the man" for the advice, but I won't be buying as I don't like catching falling knives.

Have a nice day :)

That depends on timing in the

That depends on timing in the market most of the losses in 2007-2008 have already been regained. If you entered the market at the bottom you would have made stellar gains. Instead of I don't know... oh ... loosing a few%

Sorry from what I'm seeing I

Sorry from what I'm seeing I must disagree. The end of 2008 proved a great time to buy when the market came off 5 - 10%, as will the end of 2010 once the neggies really take hold again.

Any gains in 2008 are being

Any gains in 2008 are being destroyed now by the market which is very rapidly turning south. You bought to early successful agent. You should have taken advice off poeple outside your industry who are more objective. A person who advises or represents themself is a fool as they say.

Ex agent and ex holder of

Ex agent and ex holder of excess real estate other than my home because unlike you and others I saw the writing on the wall. Having an education post school certainly helps.As I have said it is my experience that a lot of the PI's I dealt with are not educated and therefore have pretty ordinary jobs and have to have and hold onto property no matter what. They go through life with blinkers on. You cannot miss with property. Property only goes up in value. They need to get their blinkers off. Then they will see the real world and what they are missing out on. A life with no worries and no fear. Remember the 87 crash and the fear then. It is coming now in the world of PI.

ex agent. The property

ex agent. The property investors appreciate your thoughts because it shows us another side of human nature. I am buggered how the hell you sold anything at all with your depressive type of personality. Things must have been really cheap for someone to have bought through you.

The opposite of depressive

The opposite of depressive actually. I have never been so content in all my life. My future looks so positive and exciting. So many of my ex colleagues and friends told me not to sell down and that I was a fool. The news of late is really making them look silly now. I can only see positive things happening from here. I am at least five houses ahead of now if I put my 07/08 proceeds back into property and by the looks of it that will only improve for me. If that is depressive I love to see what happy times are.

ex agent, how can you claim

ex agent, how can you claim to be happy on a miserable 5% plus income from your term deposits?

You are fooling yourself old ex agent, and providing no work or service to the economy whatsoever (save for PIs like me who get your money out of the bank and put it to work)

Look the man or RPI or

Look the man or RPI or whoever you are I get 5 to 6% while your capital is going down by more than that per year and for years to come excluding or including inflation depending on the year. Now who is the fool. Not me. I have locked in a big pile of capital and will maybe buy some of your properties(if you in fact have any) when you start selling.

No ex agent, we are different

No ex agent, we are different people. And you shouldn't go and buy more property as getting in and out and in and out of the market is costing you heaps.

Your 5% plus in the bank is bad enough, now you want to pay transaction costs all over again.

Leave your money in the bank, I will pick it up and put it to use better and more efficiently.

Thank you in advance.

B & T r Jokers I have genuine

B & T r Jokers I have genuine sympathy for your plight. asking Barfoot's to tell the truth about where the market is actually at, is like asking the devil the fastest way to heaven.

To confront it for them would be dissasterous,.. Managers are losing staff and moral is heading south and so for their own purposes the notion of the Market being in, or heading for crisis is not an option.
They will tell you they have been here before and the "good ones" stay in the game for the long term... and there's probably some truth in that,.. however I disagree that they have been "here" before as this hyper-inflated market is not relative on a scale of previous meltdowns.
The vendors have over-committed by eager Bankers only to ready to lend monies almost as risk ventures on property without it seems the knowledge of what is required to support it indefinatley.

I 'll say it again .The notion that something is worth whatever someone is willing to pay for it.... is exactly why the world is where it is today.

Can anyone answer Chagrin's

Can anyone answer Chagrin's (12.42pm) question? It would be fascinating to know.

Seconded.

Seconded.

Jandel, Chagrin raises a good

Jandel, Chagrin raises a good question which I can't answer but if what he/she says is true it would mean a person is clever to buy property early in life rather than leave it 'til later.
That way the person can grow their income at the same rate as the older property-owning group.

Is the answer to " houses are

Is the answer to " houses are generally owned by those on far higher average incomes than the average wage." the reason that house prices are so out of line with the long term average? Those on 'average or below' wages have seen the only salvation for their future, their retirement, as 'borrow and pray' ( subprime in the State, for instance); and that it is excatly beacause 'average and below' have been buying what they can't afford, that the ratio has expanded so much?

You don't buy in a dropping

You don't buy in a dropping market especially if you are borrowing towards it. Basic economics. Did anyone in the PI world get an education.

I don't know why chagrin

I don't know why chagrin believes democracy increases the gap between rich and poor. It seems to me capatilism increases the gap between rich and poor. Democracy, to the extent that it can operate in capatalist society, decreases the gap.

Although you could argue the fact that rich are getting richer means houses are no more unaffordable for the rich than previously, the year on year increase in private debt indicates buying houses at recent prices is unsustainable.

The household economic survey

The household economic survey (on the Stats.govt.nz site) has the data required to work out if there are different household incomes across owners (no mortgage) vs renters vs owners (with mortgate) - from memory that's the ranking of household income, as the owners (no mortgage) is full of retired people.

I look at rents - they have historically tracked wages (and there's no particular reason to expect this would change materially).

So, I guess if the number of renters is expanding its quite possible the ratio of household income to house prices will increase over time ... ***so long as landlords are prepared to see a continued decrease in the rental yield***.

Where I live in central

Where I live in central Wellington there's currently several apartments for sale scattered around the neighbourhood. Each has had for sale signs in its windows/on side of building wall for 2-3 weeks now. As recently as a couple of months ago they would've been taken down after the first weekend as the buyers rushed in. That's all I need to see that things aren't what they've been.

Lots of long-term 'To Let'

Lots of long-term 'To Let' signs too.

"for 2 to 3 weeks"...that's

"for 2 to 3 weeks"...that's not even worth the post Theo...in Picton there are several appartments with front row seats that have been listed here there and everywhere for the best part of four years....4 bloody years!

To much P

To much P

and greed.

and greed.

Well, there's an excellent

Well, there's an excellent likelihood that P was one of the many drivers of the bubble - from the late 90s onwards there were a lot of very unsophisticated 'investors' with hundreds of thousands in drug money that they needed to hide somehow, but with only a rudimentary of effective laundering, and a lot of it went into fancy houses and lifestyle blocks. Which is one reason that the prices in certain areas were re-set ever higher, and why prices got so out of whack with incomes. When unrecorded illicit income is considered, the affordability gap isn't quite so wide.

While we are taking about

While we are taking about Real Estate for 3, 4, 5 hours 144 comments goods of 200 Million NZ$ have been imported. HA HA!

WK

"While we are taking about

"While we are taking about Real Estate for 3, 4, 5 hours 144 comments goods of 200 Million NZ$ have been imported. HA HA!"

WK

That has to be the mother of all weird posts. In the same time goods of over 200 million were exported as NZ is running a sizeable trade surplus.

Yes, and at the same time

Yes, and at the same time Kiwi’s are pushing each other out of the Property Market, increasing prices, making room for rich foreigners.

Yes, and at the same time imports are going to increase in prices and Kiwi’s can’t afford them any longer.

Yes, and at the same time, because we import most everything, we do not have enough jobs, low wages and high crime rates among youths not having job/ education.

Yes, and at the same time Kiwi’s are stuffed – Bravo Property Investors and Property addicts – not caring about production the real economy.

WK

WK - We import stuff, we

WK - We import stuff, we export more. Our terms of trade are the highest they have been for 34 years, ie the stuff we export is buying more of the stuff we import. For the first time ever we have exported over 4 billion dollars worth of stuff in successive months. Seems the productive sector is far from stuffed. It's not full of pathetic whiners obsessed with pouring vitriol upon anyone who looks favourably at property.

Then have a closer look how

Then have a closer look how one-sided our export sector is and what consequences it causes on us and the next generation - long term just not sustainable:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uneconomic_growth

WK

Interest charged by aussie

Interest charged by aussie banks must be our greatest import.

Honestly some of you guys

Honestly some of you guys need to look carefully at your atitudes towards "people" never mind how in the "wrong" you think they are they still desevre respect..some of you are behaving no better than these guys.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/3883612/Passers-by-laughed-at-moto...

Chill

It's Simpleton really! "As

It's Simpleton really!
"As far as possible, without surrender, be on good terms with all persons. Speak your truth quietly and clearly; and listen to others, even to the dull and the ignorant, they too have their story. Avoid loud and aggressive persons, they are vexations to the spirit."

:-) something like that...

:-) something like that... maybe read from "The Message" bible it may be more obvious...:-)

Romans 12:18 (The Message)

17-19Don't hit back; discover beauty in everyone. If you've got it in you, get along with everybody. Don't insist on getting even; that's not for you to do. "I'll do the judging," says God. "I'll take care of it."

It sounded great until the

It sounded great until the imaginary friend quotes

Rents in Auckland increased

Rents in Auckland increased more then 10% month to month. This is scary, Iam lucky to rent in Wellington.
If rents continue to rise and house prices remain flat, soon everyone will be into property bussines.

? I missed that in the

? I missed that in the article. Where abouts is that bit, again, lyal?

Property is probably back

Property is probably back where it was or will get back to levels 4/5 years ago. Take a look at the sharemarket, below levels 5 years ago. Heaps of investments gone bad in Finance Companies over last 3/4 years. Make your own choices and stick with them.
As previous poster said, the lack of respect and putting everyone down who has a different opinion/view adds nothing to this site.

The 3 person bull started it.

The 3 person bull started it.

by Bernard Hickey | 05 Jul

by Bernard Hickey | 05 Jul 10, 2:36pm

"I try to control my tendencies towards dictatorship and allow a free-flowing discussion for all.
But I also want to foster a friendly community that allows a robust debate without personal abuse and/or inane comments.
What are your (plural) thoughts?"

My server calls me God by default
God and a dictatorship are very different
We have 2 basic rules..never insult a member...
1/
you can say "thats a stupid idea" and quailfy it, but never "you are stupid"
2/We used to have 2 warnings, but that for children, adults should only need 1 to pull into line...If they dont they are not adults ...gone, no if s no buts

Over 8yrs, 1500 members, 11,000 posts, banned 3 people.
The rules are part of signing up, which this format doesnt require, and suggest a stand warning below each article, above the "comments" heading or part of it.

I think we should ban Dean

I think we should ban Dean Leftus if he visits!.....

Terralink says there were 246

Terralink says there were 246 registered mortgagee sales in April, which is comparable to 250 for the same month a year ago.
None of these sales are captured by REINZ or QV.
I assume that the reported B&T data include them.
The RE and QV data is highly suspect and therefore unreliable to show anything. Only one or two high priced houses selling can alter the whole RE QV results in a regions / suburb. Whose house recently dropped from $11m to %5.5m or thereabouts? But that $5.5m sale will help show an increase in average / median price. The same distortion can affect B&T results as well.
So it is hard to say what the market is doing based on QV or RE or B&T. The better reports come direct from the participants in the market which as above commentators have stated is highly complex and moves independently in different suburbs and different price stratifications. Some areas especially lower priced investment properties dropped 30% some 18 months ago in some areas. There are however more pressures pushing down now than up.

JWright: On the whole,

JWright: On the whole, democracy = capitalism doesn't it? Which is cause and which is effect?

How many countries are there

How many countries are there that has one and not the other?

Singapore is effectively a

Singapore is effectively a one-party state, is it not? Does that fit democracy=capitalism?

One of those quazi-democratic

One of those quazi-democratic states. You can tick the other box, but then they come around and snap your arms off so you can't work and pay rent in the govt. owned shoe box you live in. Democractic 'cos you get to chose which limb.

" I assume that the reported

" I assume that the reported B&T data includes them (the mortgagee sales)."

I'll bet if we ask nicely, Bernard or Vaughan could ask B&T and get an asnwer for you, Miles.

Chagrin, are you philosopher

Chagrin, are you philosopher or economist? Disrobe I say!

Bernard 188 comments in 4

Bernard 188 comments in 4 hours or so when many should be working. Is this a record? Do you read anything into this reaction.

Anon @ 4.21pm - I knew

Anon @ 4.21pm - I knew someone out there could think their way around the world better than I, hence the 'on the whole' caveat...

Jandel - I presume you are asking me to disrobe metaphorically...? Either way I'll demur for the time being.

Winners dont complain, end of

Winners dont complain, end of story.....

History will repeat because people wont change.

I am very disappointed that

I am very disappointed that Bernard Hickey banned one of the bloggers on this site.
I found The man to be very pro property but he seemed to know what he was talking about and his comments were always amusing and worth reading.
I am sure that interest.co will be the worse for his early demise.
Is Interest.co only for people who agree with you.
You may wish to read the other bloggers on your site to see the abuse that is being directed at people who invest in property.
ARE THEY GOING TO BE BANNED AS WELL?
BRING BACK THE MAN.

Agreed. Will be boring

Agreed. Will be boring without him.

Brent - the vast majority on

Brent - the vast majority on this site are doomers, anyone with a contrary positive view is a troll. Most anti property people here want to see some sort of financial armageddon - maybe they have nothing therefore they have nothing to lose. Obviously not working or productive if they are on here all day.

We've had a 20008/2009 recession, we've had a sharemarket crash in 1987, an Asian crisis, World Wars, 9/11, Aids, Bird Flu, Sars etc, etc yet over the long term the fact remains property is a great investment.

The savvy make money in the down times, the doomers do nothing but a few years down the track wish they had. Nothing different this time around.

When you talk about doomers

When you talk about doomers you are talking about educated thinking people who live in the real world. Take me for example, I went all against the advice of fellow agents and friends and family in 2007/08 and sold everything but the home and locked in some good profits. Many other NZers have done the same. The writing was on the wall then. Interest rates were high and the intensity in the market we saw from say 2003 to 2006/07 was waining. When you talked to people in general and most of them seem to be saying they were developers and property investors it had to be getting over heated. It was one of the best financial decisions I made. No market goes in a straight line for ever. I am just amazed at just how quickly the downturn in the market has accelerated in the last two months or so and in particular the last two weeks. If you think you need to sell sell now as it is not going to improve in the spring just because of better weather. As Westpac said last week this is for at least two years and I am sure they were conservative in their figures.

I suspect that characters

I suspect that characters like "the Man" are just desperate Real Estate industry-related people who are trying to destroy this website, because the industry really is getting desperate now that the reality of low sales and dropping prices is strengthening.
Sad but pathetic.

Its nothing to do with having different viewpoints. A guy called Murray who posted on here was a moderate property bull, but although I often disagreed with what he said, I respected his view and he was reasonable and fair.

Thats why I think Bernard would be justified in banning certain individuals. If he wants to keep this website alive and strong thats what he must do, because clearly certain individuals have a vendetta.

Bernard does seem a fairly

Bernard does seem a fairly tolerant chap (he seems able to deal with me!), but I suspect some of the rather abusive comments of late, are the reason for the ban.

I probably appear a property bull too. However in 2003 I was much more bearish on the boom that occurring (mainly due to its speed being unsustainable rather than its direction), but after looking more closely I realised that the shift was primarily caused by a readjustment of pricing in some markets and more broadly as a reaction to a decade of affordability falling relative to income and replacement costs increasing relative to prices.

So there was obviously good reasons for the gains, but by 2007 my view was the market would plateau, not broadly fall (although I expected sharp falls in some sectors), and that remains my outlook a flat market at least to 2012, possibly longer depending on credit conditions, but definitely price rises beyond that. Quality property will continue to rise regardless. The GST bump will help prices rise too.

"I probably appear a property

"I probably appear a property bull too."

You?! NAAAAAAAAAAHHHH!

:-D

i really don't want to put my

i really don't want to put my rents up, and i know it's not always good for business to have them lower than they could be set at.

i think at the end of the day my tenants know i look after them as best i can without sucking them dry. I have had numerous tenants leave to buy their own home, so my rents don't exactly leave them penniless, so, with regret rents will go up, something i don't usually do to existing tenants as i believe in loyalty

BUT i will have no shortage of letters to get the correct "script" about passing on expenses to the end customer - i just have to look at telecom, mercury energy, property insurance, rates, health insurance, vehicle registration etc and they all want me to pay for their new expenses getting their product to me so the same in theory should apply to a rental.

i will be going 10% more now and another 10 % in the following review to spread the pain - and 20% increase on the rents will look good to, especially in the valuation...

and i am starting to think about exit strategy for year 2023 - about two more cycles away

Get off the grass Pop. 2023

Get off the grass Pop. 2023 two cycles away. One if you are lucky. This property market of ours in NZ is just one sick puppy and it is going to take a long time to fix it. Incomes have to come up in this country to a level where the average person can service an average loan on an average home even in Auckland. And when is that going to happen. When the employers wake up and start paying people a living wage. When will that happen. It will never happen so just watch those houses go down over many years to get back to values that reflect the real world, not the dream world.

Isn't that the point though -

Isn't that the point though - the average person does not own the average property and therefore have to service the average loan. Rather only the richer proportion of society owns property, so affordability should be measured off their incomes rather than the entire property-owning population?

Only the rich can own

Only the rich can own property at present because greed on the part of buyers has forced prices up beyond what would be sensible fundamentals. For example people are now paying to the bank a larger proportion of their incomes to service their property loans than they used to prior to 2002. PI"S really went for it and have bought far more properties than they would have done in the past. This caused house prices to rise as buyers fought to win the purchase. Prices are now easing back and I believe they will continue to do that until the average person can buy again. This can only be a good thing for our society.

Most people with a job in NZ

Most people with a job in NZ used to be able to own property. It was the crazy dream it has now become for most.

That's all thanks to the greedy PIs and speculators who drove prices sky high.

Of course the good news is that property is crashing down hard and prices will sink lower and lower for years to come.

Hopefully that means that non slimebags will finally be able to buy property again, and not just the BB PIs.

Correction: "It WASN'T the

Correction: "It WASN'T the crazy dream it has now become for most."

At the moment I don't think

At the moment I don't think that it really works out that way - reason being that there's a huge block of elderly owners with low to moderate incomes, who bought back when prices were in line with fundamentals. I doubt you'd get any strong richer-than-average/property owner correlation unless you eliminated the paid-off elderly.

Sorry POP, but I agree with

Sorry POP, but I agree with mick, probably only 1 cycle by 2023.
The cycles have historically been around 10 years - we'll probably be emerging from recession early 2020!

yes i know what you mean but

yes i know what you mean but we are already deep into a cycle at the moment, i am talking about two more upward legs of the cycle, and by 2023 it will have had time for two upswings by then - and i will also be wanting to enjoy more retirement lifestyle choices by then so start planning now...

BTW, how did you get a 'user

BTW, how did you get a 'user profile' ?

because i speak my truth and

because i speak my truth and my opinions are of value - so it was a matter of urgent national security to get site access to let people know Bernard is a marvelous man, but that the likes of me totally oppose pretty much everything he has to say regarding a long term decline in property - in fact, asides from the government, he would be next on my list of "who i don't want telling me what to do with my own money list" and there is 100% certainty he would never be my Power of Attorney ... he already would have lost me a small fortune...

and because i was getting spam filtered to death and asked for a solution - and i didn't want the good folk of New Zealand to think i had gone all quiet and to let them know i there is currently no alternative to property for me and so too for many others interested in the return of their money rather than the returns on their money

All that rubbish you just

All that rubbish you just spewed is code for "The residential property market -- My whole world -- is collapsing around me, and I'm in a mental panic as a result, and I look like an utter fool after laughing at all the people at interest.co.nz who warned me I was heading for a fall".

i think you will find i am

i think you will find i am actually quite relaxed and secure, thanks to my interest in property...

Yip, Westpac will definitely

Yip, Westpac will definitely be conservative with their estimates...what would their mortgage loan book be worth? How many billions??? For them to come out and say 2% for this year and next is a big step, I reckon triple those figures...

hahhahaa Barfoots

hahhahaa Barfoots

Bernard you need to get rid

Bernard you need to get rid of Rich PI Troll also as he is the same person as The Man. Do not be falled. This commentator is either an agent or a mortgage broker just trying to keep the PI point of view from collapsing in a world which is getting worse for them by the day.

Bernard, you should ban

Bernard, you should ban Anonymous, Anonymous and Anonymous - I'm pretty sure they're all the same people!

Anon - just because someone likes investing in property doesn't mean they're a Real Estate Agent or a Mortgage Broker! I have investments in property, shares and fixed interest but I'm not a RE agent, a share broker or a bank worker.

Bernard, I think the quality of comments has declined since an email address is no longer required and people can call themselves 'anonymous'. It's your site, but it seems the new system achieves more quantity than quality in the comment stream and I don't read it as often...

Murry, Agree whole

Murry,
Agree whole heartedly.

The old site's comment stream had a few limitations. But the abuse that has arisen since we have gone to this new site is a real turn off.

It seems that a bit of a

It seems that a bit of a fight here, out to the school yard maybe? Anywho, I'll still stand by my prediction of 16% decrease over the next 2 years from the 2007 peak price. It's the average income to average house price ratio... (a 16% increase still won't bring it to a safe level)

This whole issue of housing

This whole issue of housing on this site has become more of a personal issue between bloggers, involving insults, accusations and bragging.

I notice quite a few regular contributors have gone quiet. Perhaps, like me, they find it a little off-putting.

It used to quite stimulating and fun on this site but not anymore.
The literacy standards and educational levels of some New Zealander's are nothing short of embarrassing. I think the "struggle for existence" has lessened us as human beings

I feel for you Bernard, it can't be easy to deal with but you must find a solution for this descent into cliche and insult or you will lose even more contributors.

Goodbye all

.

.

@ PPP i too was getting the

@ PPP

i too was getting the blues on interest.co.nz but i value your style of contribution - please do not go...

In my opinion it was faith

In my opinion it was faith versus fundamentals.

There are certain facts which will be accepted or ignored.

Those who accept them have been deemed "negative" by those who ignore them.

Those who ignore them declare themselves to be "positive".

Any frank discussion of the fundamentals irritates those who prefer to ignore them.

Because the fundamentals cannot be disputed factually, those who dislike the fundamentals resort to ad-hominem attacks upon those who wish to discuss the fundamentals.

Perhaps those who would prefer to not discuss the "negative" fundamentals would be better off elsewhere, someplace more suited to their kind of "positive".

Maybe the Church of Scientology's website?

Too right.

Too right.

Prosperopink Many thanks. We

Prosperopink

Many thanks. We are working very hard on a technical solution to ensure logins, emails and an edit function for commenters.

The level of urgency is very high and I'm a tad frustrated.

We'd love you back once these issues are sorted.

cheers
Bernard

I could not agree with you

I could not agree with you more Prosperopink. The Man and his mates have ruined the site. They never get off it and all they do is brag and belittle. Then the antis come out to fight back. One would have to agree though it is increasingly becoming a strong buyer's market and will become stronger as the year goes on.

Agree with Mick and

Agree with Mick and ProsperoPink, BH.

The signal-to-noise ratio has decayed alarmingly, and while we're on the beefs, Please arrange for common taters' websites to be displayed as t'was in the days of yore.

But really, the whole blather on this rather pathetic thread can be blamed on one factor - the lede is far, far too general. The veteran PI sites like Doctor Housing Bubble have long pointed out the differences in zip codes in terms of affordability (PITI/HH Income). Statistics are local, and mashing them into a city-wide figure, on a self-admitted narrow sales base, is simply asking for the sort of generalised/irrelvant rants, trolls and ad-hom provocations we're seeing here.

So until the registration improves, it's back to an occasional drop-in for me.

Mass exodus, then! Not being

Mass exodus, then! Not being one to be left in the dying paddock by myself,I'll give the site a rest, too.
To those I poked; it was not for any other reason that to make us all think, myself included. Best to all.

You can flee if you want, but

You can flee if you want, but I'm sticking around. A few idiotic trolls can't alter the fact that every other aspect of the site is still excellent.

Banning has noting to dip

Banning has noting to dip with a persons opinion or what side of the fence they sit on ...or if way the hell of beam... bad grammar or spelling
It has to do with basic Westminster standards of debate... common courtesy and respect.
If one cant accept these basic rules of civilised behavour....P off.

Quite. Disagreement fine.

Quite. Disagreement fine. Debate fine. Repetitive mouth-foaming idiocy not fine.

How can the values of NZ

How can the values of NZ housing stay where they are when the economy is in such bad state and we get influential commentators saying the RB should not be putting up interest rates. Logic suggests pricing of houses will have to come back to reflect what the average NZer earns. And that is not much.