In this section
Offers for readers
Follow the news from interest
The comment stream
Recent comments
- 1 of 20720
- ››
Editors choice
- 1 of 294
- ››
Finance sector jobs
Western Union Business Solutions, a Global Fortune 500 Company, is seeking a highly experi...more
New Zealand
If you are motivated by the prospect of seeing the big picture, developing your team and m...more
New Zealand
If you are motivated by the prospect of seeing the big picture, developing your team and m...more
New Zealand
Reporting to the Senior Manager Operational Risk Effectiveness and Assurance, the key focu...more
New Zealand

The news stream
Latest news
Most commented
- Record exodus to Australia in last year 70
- 'Don't sell SOE shares; Borrow from Kiwis' 37
- 'Councils should look at asset sales' 34
- 90 seconds at 9 am: No G8 deal 20
- NZ to borrow more if crisis worsens-Key 19
- Beware of the creeping taxman 19
- Thousands get lower rates; what now? 16
- Monday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 12
- Euro-mess won't change Key on Super 8
- Pastoral Dairy Investments cans public offer 7
Most viewed
NZ sharemarket's size relative to GDP collapses to just 24% versus Australia's 98%
Foreign ownership of the sharemarket is now 40%, down on where it was just 13 years ago, and the market’s size relative to the country’s GDP has almost halved over the same period.
These are among the key findings of Goldman Sachs’ annual survey of sharemarket ownership, where Goldman strategist Bernard Doyle advocates sales of state owned assets and the introduction of compulsory KiwiSaver as ways of boosting the flagging sharemarket.
Total foreign ownership of the sharemarket now sits at 36.2%, according to Doyle, down from 38.1% last year and way down on the 60.3% peak recorded in Goldman’s first survey back in 1997. Doyle says the fall this year was largely through the selling of several offshore owned strategic stakes in local companies.
Included in this was the Infratil and New Zealand Superannuation Fund purchase of Shell’s New Zealand distribution business which included a 17% holding in the listed New Zealand Refining Company, and the sale on-market of a 13.8% stake in Ryman Healthcare by Canada’s Garlow Management.
At 36.2%, Doyle says foreign ownership of the New Zealand sharemarket is below the 41% offshore ownership of Australia’s sharemarket, but well ahead of the likes of the United States and Japan.
Sharemarket to GDP ratio collapses
However, the size of our equity market relative to the country’s Gross Domestic Product compared to Australia, makes for grim reading. According to Doyle, at the end of 1997 New Zealand had a market capitalisation to GDP ratio of 52%. Although not especially high, this wasn’t too far behind Australia’s rate then of 65%. By this year the gap had widened massively, with New Zealand’s sharemarket capitalisation shrinking to just 24% of GDP versus Australia’s 98%.
Doyle notes that a number of factors have prevented a strong and well functioning capital market in New Zealand. These include a lack of new listings, the under representation of financial and agricultural sector exposures, the skew of tax incentives to property investment and concentration of state owned assets. Goldman Sachs’ findings echo comments from long time market watcher and commentator Brian Gaynor. Gaynor told interest.co.nz last month the New Zealand sharemarket was the quietest he had seen it in 35 years.
Related Topics
Doyle says recent developments leave him “cautiously optimistic” for a capital markets turn-around. These include the Government’s partial removal of a tax-induced bias towards residential property investment after depreciation rules on residential investment property were tightened, changes at Fonterra that will enable investors to tap into the dairy co-operative, and positive regulatory steps including the Government’s establishment of the Financial Markets Authority.
“That said, there remain prohibitive barriers to the development of capital markets within New Zealand,” Doyle says.
“In particular, (these include) the proportion of assets held by the Government that would normally reside in the private sector.”
These assets feature electricity generators such as Genesis Energy, Mighty River Power and Meridian Energy, Air New Zealand and Solid Energy.
'Make KiwiSaver compulsory'
Doyle suggests New Zealand’s legacy of poor savings and its tax regime requires further public policy attention.
“An element of compulsion in KiwiSaver would be a straight-forward way of addressing this.”
At 19.8%, this year’s survey shows KiwiSaver money has already lifted New Zealand managed funds ownership of the equity market to its highest level in the survey’s history. Nonetheless, Doyle estimates only about 13% of the NZ$5.7 billion invested by more than one million people through KiwiSaver as of June 30 was managed within local equities.
Goldman’s overall break-up of sharemarket ownership shows;
Local managed funds holding 19.8%, up 0.7% year-on-year.
New Zealand retail investors holding 23.3%, up 1.6% year-on-year but well down on the 28.4% peak in March 2007 just before the onset of the Global Financial Crisis.
New Zealand strategic stakes down 0.4% year-on-year to 20.7%.
Total foreign ownership down 1.9% year-on-year to 36.2%. This is split between 13.1% held via overseas strategic stakes, down from 15.2% last year, and 23.1% held by “other” offshore owners, up from 22.9%.
A total of 51 stocks were included in Goldman Sachs’ survey, up one from last year.
* This article was first published in our email for paid subscribers earlier today. See here for more details and to subscribe.
17 Comments
The main reason is the
The main reason is the pathetic corporate governance.
You are better simply writing a cheque to your local corporate raider than investing in the local exchange.
Corporate governance coupled
Corporate governance coupled with govt interferance have been the prime reasons people don't want to invest in the sharemarket. How many companies have you seen go under or have their shareprice savaged inthe last 5 years alone? Check out the lists of companies on the bourse from 20 years ago, and look at the numner of those trading today. Its kinda frightening but over 70% aren't there anymore. Yes some have been privatised but that doesn't account for them all.
Its hardly surprising that someone who earns a crust from the dealings of the sharemarket comes out with a call for enforced kiwisaver subsidisation of fund managers', stockbrokers' and analysts lifestyles. The fact that he wants SoEs sold through the local bourse overlooks the failures of the market itself, due primarily to government interfernece. There is no reason other than legislative obstruction which prevents new companies forming and running in competition to the SoEs. Take for example electricity. If the share market is such a be all and end all panacea, why haven't new companies been floated with the intent to garner funds to create new generation, after all isn't the country facing electricity shortages?
If property was such a bad investment for the country, why are we not seeing the call for the liberated $2b from the recent earthquake invested elsewhere? Isn't it just a case of good money after bad? Or are the arguments made by the tax working group hollow and malfounded? The reality is that each home that is in existence in NZ represents at least $60k+ as an economic profile. Productive workers need shelter or they aren't productive for long. These facts were accounted for in the TWG's findings.
The truth is property was not advantaged by the taxation regime, the difference is the leverage capabilities. Yes there was depreciation allowances, but companies also have and retain depreciation allowances for the assets they use to generate income. Due to the relative instability of companies on the sharemarket (whats the likelihood the company will still be trading in 20yrs?), banks won't lend more than 30-50% of a stocks' value, whereas at the height of the property boom some institutions were lending 100+%. It is this difference that allowed a rental property as a trading entity to generate loses which could be passed on. A sharetrader would never be allowed to borrow 300k on the basis of $20k dividends, unless ironically they secured that against their property.
typo should have said these
typo should have said these facts WEREN'T account for by the TWG
Time to privatise Genesis
Time to privatise Genesis Energy, Mighty River Power, Meridian Energy, Solid Energy and all Secondary and Tertiary Institutions.
Thus proving that private
Thus proving that private enterprise is un-self-supporting/
Too late. Been done.
Yes Privatise it so Aussies
Yes Privatise it so Aussies can buy it up with their compulsory super funds , and have the dividends go off to Sydney , putting more pressure on our Balance of Payments . We have to have Kiwi Compulsory Pension saving, we are the only OECD country that does not have it and we risk falling into a Third world poverty trap where we all work for foreign investors
But unless we force Kiwisaver
But unless we force Kiwisaver on all New Zealanders and create a massive centralisation of wealth that the average New Zealander cares nothing about until they're 65.. certainly not enough to actually vote at shareholder meetings, how are the upper level corporates going to be able to award themselves millions in bonuses? Ferrari dealerships everywhere need this!
Gareth , I received the
Gareth , I received the Government Gazette from the Beehive this morning . Its astonishing that 55 Companies went into liquidation ( hade liquidaotrs appointed) last week , almost all insolvent . These numbers were last this high at the end of 2008. they did drop during 2010 to around 30 a week but have been going up since June . To put this into perspective about 10 Companies went bust each day last week , and with an 8 hour day , its about one Company going bust every 45 minutes or so. That was before the earthquake . The domino effect of the natrual disaster and man made disasters (SCF) are going to be with our little population for some time . Its time for strong leadership , clear thinking and a well defined strategy (and some clear scenario planning) to ensure we avoid the melee we are facing
Why privatise when the
Why privatise when the shambles eminating from USA is a result of private enterprise running amok, and too belately government trying to regulate now.
The low dollar mantra is not
The low dollar mantra is not appealing.
i don't know if pensioner
i don't know if pensioner funds are invested in the NZ Market and how deeply, but those funds should be the strength of NZ's Market. because they are a permanent source of funding. And not just the market but they should be deeply involved in the ownership of NZ firms.
The low value of our
The low value of our sharemarket is an indication of how difficult it is to predict future earnings in this country combined with low productivity.
FYI, NZX's trading statistics
FYI, NZX's trading statistics for August are out with big falls across the board - http://file.nzx.com/000/197/4103197.pdf
The American idea of "Build
The American idea of "Build it and they will come" could, with some modification, be applied to our own share market. "Develop growing profitable companies that reward shareholders and the people will invest".
The problem in NZ is that we simply don't have enough companies that are like that. Middle and senior management in this country is of extremely poor quality, and by and large they run modest to mediocre companies - no surprises there. But boy, do they still expect to be paid for it! Corporate governance is poor, profits modest, strategies for growth weak, R&D pathetic, and an international outlook and street-smarts non-existent.(Australia is not international). Shareholder returns are often low, or not uncommonly, negative.
I have been investing in the NZ share market since the 1970s, and as far as I'm concerned our market has never ever really recovered from the 1987 share market crash. Quite frankly, in comparison to other forms of investment and other markets around the world it has has been a dog of an investment ever since, individual exceptions not withstanding of course. So I’m not in the slightest bit surprised that our share market has declined relative to GDP to the extent it has. I wouldn’t have expected it otherwise.
Doesn't this tell us
Doesn't this tell us something? That whatever we have or make, just can't compete because our wages structure is too high ( ..and don't they expect to be paid for it" ..comment by David B). Until we understand that we need to lower our false standard of living expectations, and actually do some work ` as opposed to gambling on property or finance companies ( same thing) etc. ~ then we will, stagger on until the global marketplace does the work for us, and massively devalues our currency ( by implication, our wages). That will make life domestically tough as our exports come into back into vogue, and whatever we import has a crippling price tag. Then, and only then, will our emergent companies become a worthwhile local and international investment.
Hard work and a content
Hard work and a content lifestyle... seems so unappealing hahahaha
Some very interesting
Some very interesting comments here, cheers.