sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Our readers' poll finds a majority support the Government's asset sales programme

Our readers' poll finds a majority support the Government's asset sales programme

Well, Prime Minister John Key is in no doubt the public at large is set to give the Government's asset sales programme a big thumbs down in the current referendum.

But he has got some support from Interest.co.nz readers.

The citizens-initiated referendum on the asset sales programme is due to close next week (December 12).

And while it has become a largely academic exercise, given that of the assets listed in the question, only Genesis has not yet been sold, there's reasonable interest in the outcome.

Key has already got in early, saying: "'It'll go against us, everybody knows that. The question is what will the turn out look like."

We asked readers what they thought, specifically whether they were for asset sales, against them, or thought they would not vote as it was "a waste of time and taxpayers money".

Given the Prime Minister's pessimistic view of how the Kiwi public will view the programme, the results were mildly surprising.

Of the 840 respondents to our poll, 46.7% supported asset sales, 40.7% were against and perhaps a surprisingly low number, 12.6% said they were not voting as they thought the referendum was a waste of time and taxpayers' money.

Perhaps readers were mindful of what has happened to the prices of the assets since they were sold.

At time of writing the Mighty River Power shares were changing hands for $1.98.5, versus an issue price of $2.50, while the Meridian Energy instalment receipts were at 92.5c ($1 issue price) and Air New Zealand were on $162.5 (against a Government sale price of $1.65).

On that basis you could say the Government got a good price.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

8 Comments

Foreign fund manager says no:

 

An overseas fund manager has branded New Zealand as risky as Pakistan after losing money on investments in Chorus, Meridian and Mighty River Power.

 

Jason Pidcock, manager of the London-based $8.7 billion Newton Asian Income Fund, was quoted in investment newsletter Citywire overnight saying New Zealand's political environment was a disincentive to investment.

 

"We are not going to invest any more money in New Zealand for the foreseeable future," he said.

 

"We have to rank it up with places like Pakistan in terms of political risk. This is a shame because it ought to be a developed and stable country."

 

Pidcock's fund lost 7.2 per cent since the end of October and the performance was mostly attributed to its New Zealand investments. Read more

 

 

Up
0

Air NZ?

Zanzayne, if an opposition is opposed to what a government is doing it is only right and proper they declare what THEY will do about it, you could, like plenty of us blame the govt for selling the assets and our laws in the first place

 

 

Up
0

The job of the opposition is just that to expose the inept, weak and morally corrupt Govn.

regards

Up
0

Hang about steven: new zealand is the least "corrupt" country in the world

Can you give 2 or 3 specific examples of corruption in nz (in the past 2 years) instead of generalisations

Up
0

I said morally corrupt and not corrupt as in graft.  In terms of graft NZ is regarded as pretty good.....oh wait Lenny boy getting some woman a job because she was his mistress?  kind of stinks a little dont you think?

 

regards

Up
0

So he bought at least the last 2 expecting that they would be winners and teh first expecting a hand out.

Good riddance.

regards

Up
0

Although there are a few dissenting voices on these pages, it is no surprise that people who read this website should largely support asset sales, but shall we say that 47% is most definitely not a majority, eh

Up
0

Given the right wing bias in here its surprising its so low.

regards

Up
0