sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Plenty of buyers at the latest Auckland apartment auctions but they were cautious on price

Property
Plenty of buyers at the latest Auckland apartment auctions but they were cautious on price

There was a good selection of units on offer at this week's main Auckland apartment auctions, and there were plenty of potential buyers willing to place bids, although not everything sold under the hammer.

In general buyers are remaining a bit cautious. If bidding doesn't reach the reserve they are inclined to keep their hands in their pockets, which keeps the auctioneers and their sales staff fit as they shuttle back and forth between the highest bidders and the vendors to try and close gap between the vendor's price expectations and the price buyers are prepared to pay.

As a result, extended negotiations in between lots are becoming an increasingly common feature in the auction rooms. This is increasing the average time per lot, so if you intend staying for the whole event it may pay to bring a cushion and a picnic lunch.

At City Sales' auction six apartments were offered this week and all attracted bids, four of them attracting quite competitive bidding, but all were passed for sale by negotiation.

The apartments on offer included a 92 square metre, two bedroom apartment with two bathrooms, two car parks and a 24 square metre deck in The Point complex on the waterfront at Viaduct Harbour.

It was on a leasehold title with total outgoings of $27,269 a year, and attracted strong bidding from several interested parties, but was passed in with a top bid of $910,000.

At the other end of the price spectrum, a 34 square metre leasehold unit in the Grand Central complex, (the historic former Auckland Central Railway Station building) was passed in with a top bid of $49,000.

At Barfoot & Thompson's apartment auction two units were offered, one at Eden Crescent on the CBD fringe, and the other out at Stonefields.

Both attracted multiple bids and the Eden Crescent unit was sold under the hammer, while the Stonefields unit was passed in for sale by negotiation.

At Ray White City Apartments' auction, four units were offered, with the three that were in the CBD attracting multiple bids and selling under the hammer. The fourth, a unit on Don Croot St in Kingsland, attracted just a single bid and was passed in

The prices ranged from $125,000 for a leasehold unit in the Q Central complex just off the top of Queen St, to $1.325 million for an apartment in the Precinct Residences building on Lorne St.

Check out the individual results on our Auction Results page.

You can receive all of our property articles automatically by subscribing to our free email Property Newsletter. This will deliver all of our property-related articles, including auction results and interest rate updates, directly to your in-box 3-5 times a week. We don't share your details with third parties and you can unsubscribe at any time. To subscribe just click on this link, scroll down to "Property email newsletter"and enter your email address.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

16 Comments

Thank you for this fine reporting, Greg. It is good to read about the actual selling environment as these are vital information not available just by reading the numbers.

In any case, it appears that auctions are no longer as hot as they were a few months ago given the low clearance rates (75% of a low number is not a good indication) and the accompanying anecdote of longer negotiations (thus needing cushions and picnic lunches).

Again, thank you for this insightful analysis, Mr Greg Ninness

Up
0

There is also clearly a gap between vendor and buyer expectations.

Up
0

Yes agreed, the top end foreign buyers are gone now it's a case of how long vendors will realize that they have to drop their prices to realistically meet the market. Remember the average Auckland resident can only afford around $500 to $600k. And god help them if they've got more than one child (The banks are very restrictive).

Up
0

this is true. many people that now own 1.5...2.0m properties actually bought it for 500-600k few years back. this is what they can service. The rest is a capital gain or 'free money' that came out of nowhere and they will be still servicing 500-600k mortgage

Up
0

It will be interesting to see how these paper millionaires will cope when new CV's come out in July, increase council rates + increase mortgage rates = it all adds up

Up
0

Also interesting in a psychological sense if properties routinely start selling below their new CVs later this year.

Up
0

CV's can go down though. People think that house prices can never drop, but they are really not much different from company shares. eg houses are only worth as much as someone is prepared to pay for it. It is the same with other forms of investment too. Thing can easily halve in value on paper.

Up
0

The leaseholds could be good for money laundering.

Up
0

Yeah, but how many more of China's Most Wanted list still remain to move to NZ?

Up
0

A fair number of them are probably already here.

Up
0

I dont understand why anyone would buy an apartment , the levy's, fees, special levy's, unforeseen maintanance costs for things like lifts and mechanical equipment and just cleaning ( not to mention painting ) , BC rules, regulations and hassle-factor is not worth the candle .

Up
0

you might add also: dealing with the smart ass building manager, being bombarded by wifis from all sides so that you can't get a decent channel, not having places to hang clothes (can't put them in balconies or close to windows) sucks

Up
0

For heaven's sake. The word is levies,WITHOUT an apostrophe. The word denotes the plural,ie more than one levy.

Up
0

I thought Levis were jeans.

Up
0

CV's can go down though. People think that house prices can never drop, but they are really not much different from company shares. eg houses are only worth as much as someone is prepared to pay for it. It is the same with other forms of investment too. Thing can easily halve in value on paper.

Up
0

Capital Values are totally irrelevant as to a property's value.
It is pure and simple for rating purposes.
Irrelevant until you are wanting to sell and buyers want to buy under the CV when they think they are getting a good buy.
If buying I would prefer a lower CV because then the sellers don't expect to get as much if it had a higher CV!

Up
0