sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

The Spinoff's Toby Manhire asks whether ex-Labour MP Shane Jones’ reinvention with Winston Peters & NZ First is a brilliant idea or a disaster in the making

The Spinoff's Toby Manhire asks whether ex-Labour MP Shane Jones’ reinvention with Winston Peters & NZ First is a brilliant idea or a disaster in the making

By Toby Manhire*

The interminable prelude to Phil Goff’s announcement that he would stand for the Auckland mayoralty last year was memorably described by RNZ’s Guyon Espiner as “the longest striptease in New Zealand political history”. No more. Shane Jones has, let’s say, outstripped that record, culminating in his announcement last Friday at the Pure Bar & Grill, Whangarei. 

“The song goes like this,” Winston Peters told the NZ First faithful. “The whole town’s talking about the Jones boy.” 

Jones chose a different tune in his deeply Jonesian speech on “the worst kept secret” in NZ politics. 

“I was coming here this morning and a mate of mine put on a song, ‘There’s Something in the Air’. And you know as well as I do, there’s something in the air. It’s been sensed by voters in America. It’s been sensed by voters in Australia. Voters in the EU. Voters all around the world. Our friends from National, they deny that there’s something in the air. They’re too deep in corporate clover. They’ve ended up being the upper crust of politics whilst they expect our regions, Whangarei and the broader North, to survive on a few economic crumbs. Those days are over.” 

And a deferential nod: “Of course what it is that’s in the air has been sensed by the silver fox of New Zealand politics, Winston.”

(SHANE JONES CONGRATULATES WINSTON PETERS ON HIS NORTHLAND BYELECTION WIN IN 2015. PHOTO BY HANNAH PETERS/GETTY IMAGES).

Jones first fluttered a veil in NZ First’s direction more than three years ago, in March 2014, in the form of an NBR column by Matthew Hooton. Jones, who had contested unsuccessfully the Labour leadership race won by David Cunliffe, was on the brink of leaping into Winston’s waka, Hooton wrote. “Mr Jones believes that what he calls ‘two Māori boys from the North’ – himself and Winston Peters – have the potential to barnstorm the nation over the next six months and secure 10% of the vote.” 

That didn’t come to pass. Instead, Jones took up foreign minister Murray McCully’s generous offer of a new life as Ambassador for Pacific Economic Development. Jones swapped the Labour caucus room, causing them a brief flush of embarrassment as he left, for the swim-up bars – and diplomatic grind, obviously – of the islands. 

The rumours that he’d in time wind up by Winston’s side persisted, and over the last year became accepted beltway wisdom. All that was needed was for him to formally conclude his role as an independent New Zealand emissary, and then to get the official endorsement of the Whangarei branch of New Zealand First. 

Glancing back at that Hooton line, however, most striking of all is the notion that barnstorming the nation could lead to 10% of the vote. That was 2014 and this is now. The latest RNZ poll of polls puts New Zealand First at 9.4%; in May 2014 it was 5.1%, which grew into an election result of 8.7%. In the three months to come, the barnstorming Peters-Jones double-act is designed to lift the party’s vote to unscaled heights, beyond even the 1996 record of 13.5% – leaving the Green Party in their wake. Closing in, even, on the Labour Party. 

That’s their dream scenario. (The full-on hallucinogenic scenario sees the numbers climb to the point that Winston can make serious claim to the prime ministership, but let’s agree to put that to one side until NZ First hits 15% in the polls.) 

But it comes with hazards, too. 

NZ First has had heaven-sent political weather in 2017. Electoral tumult in Europe and America illustrate that something-in-the air that Jones was singing about today – and for anyone not keeping up, Jones layered it on by sporting a cap wearing “New Zealand First Again”. 

The foregrounding of the immigration debate, and the ongoing foreign investor questions play to their hand. Who was there on RNZ to denounce the granting of citizenship to 12-days-in-New-Zealand Peter Thiel? It was Winston. Something in the air singalong or not, throwing Shane Jones – a Harvard scholar, a known trade advocate, a globalist, and someone on a markedly different philosophical plane when it comes to Māori rights – into that mix risks muddying the message. 

The media will be on alert for inconsistencies between the party’s new twin talismans. Jones will be tested on party policy. He has cut a controversial figure through his political career, and the ACT Party is already throwing shade on his ambassadorial expenses claims. He’s been accused of laziness. There is a group within the membership opposed to the Jones elevation, but with just over a couple of hundred likes, Never Shane hardly seems a huge grassroots rebellion – and Jones is renowned for his ability to charm people on a personal level.

(WINSTON PETERS AND SHANE JONES WITH A RUSSIAN BOXER IN PARLIAMENT, BECAUSE WHY NOT, IN 2013. PHOTO BY HAGEN HOPKINS/GETTY).

Within caucus, meanwhile, the question will be around the leadership. While it may seem impudent to suggest that Winston Peters is subject to the usual laws of time and mortality, he is 72. For all that the campaign trail delivers a burst of adrenaline, it’s hard to see even Winston Peters going another round in 2020. The doctor is about to regenerate. And 57-year-old youngster Jones arrives, unavoidably, as the heir apparent. 

How does that sit with Ron Mark, who only recently was installed as Peters’ deputy, with Tracey Martin squeezed out? Will there be resentment at the sight of a big-talking ego being parachuted in? In many ways, the succession was always going to be a major hazard for the direction of NZ First, simply because it has never had a succession before. Since its inception the party has been synonymous with Peters. Apart from anything else the arrival of Jones makes it a live subject. 

The nightmare scenario? A falling out between charismatic fount of colourful grandiloquence Winston and charismatic fount of colourful grandiloquence Shane; tension between populism and principle; personalities frayed; internal party divisions made public; public confidence plummets. Unlikely, yes, but possible: just look at what happened to UKIP. 

The potential windfall for New Zealand First, however, trumps any risk. Jones is not everyone’s cup of tea, but people genuinely enjoy his company, he knows how to work a crowd, and he has political experience. Some in Labour were happy to see the back of him; more were sorry to watch him go. Some in Labour have already been pointing out that he represents a potential bridgehead for a Labour-NZ-First coalition. 

With Jones standing in Whangarei and Peters as incumbent in Northland, the party will establish itself as the champion of regional New Zealand. Peters has been as busy as ever getting the message to the regions – there was a call for a GST rebate, and Jones’s announcement slotted neatly into a “Campaign for the Regions Tour”

In his speech announcing Jones, Peters underscored the point (as well as serving up for collectors the Winstonism “cinderellarise”): 

That every town matters. That every business matters. That every workforce wherever they might be matter. That every province matters. That every region matters. We are not going to let vested interests marginalise and cinderellarise the very heart of our country. 

Focus on Northland will be presented as an example of what can be done for New Zealand’s other neglected corners. Specific improvement for Northland – the port and rail, for example – are likely to play high in any post-election negotiations.

(A BUS WITH A TRACTOR ON IT. PHOTO: WINSTON’S TWITTER).

Could Jones even win Whangarei? It’s would take a hell of a swing for Shane J to take it off National’s incumbent Shane, Mr Reti. In 2014 he won 55% of the vote, with National taking 50% of the party vote. NZ First candidate Pita Paraone won 8%, and his party 13.5%. That’s a safe seat. But, then – and yes I know there were all sorts of peculiar circumstances – Winston Peters won the Northland byelection in 2015 despite his party having recorded less than 13% of the party vote in 2014 (they didn’t then stand a candidate). 

And while NZ First would delight in a Whangarei victory for Jones (who has never won an electorate, his three terms in parliament have all come via the Labour list) and the establishment of regional command, National wouldn’t exactly flip out – not as long as they stayed strong in the party vote, on the assumption that there’d be a likely strategic split of electorate and party ticks. Even running the other Shane close would be a kind of triumph for NZ First. They don’t need it for the coat-tails: the party is now far above the point of fretting, as they have had to in elections past, about proximity to the 5% threshold. 

The NZ First bus will be tallying up many a mile across the north in the next three months. And to play amateur bookmaker for a moment, how about this: Shane Jones gets, after Winston Peters, the second shortest odds to be a cabinet minister at Christmas. 

Oh, and pray can we have this campaign song?

*Toby Manhire is politics editor of The Spinoff. This article was first published at The Spinoff here and is used with permission.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

19 Comments

The question asking of Whangarei is why not Shane Jones ?
Together with Winston they are doubly stronger to fight the willy wonker Billy English & Little who is National Lite. & The Greens who don't care for leadership of NZ anyway
It's long overdue to deal to profligate immigration.
Id like my country of birth to deal with its open door immigration policy & its overloaded infrastructure & inability to build enough housing

Up
0

Agreed and what is a fact is that Peters & Jones will be one heck a lot more charismatic & headline grabbing than all the other candidates put together. That means votes regardless of whether or not their policies or statements etc are credible. Ask Trump about how that works.

Up
0

" brilliant idea or a disaster"???????
At least for the next term, there cant be a bigger disaster if the Current clowns are reinstated!!!!!

Up
0

I guess in a Labour led govt one could be Minister of Porn, the other Minister Of Populist Paranoia (as well as racing and whisky and foreign affairs and baubles)

Up
0

Minister of Porn a bit of an exaggeration... the current government has a Minister indulging in criminal offenses!!!! who has had to stand down and the Prime Minister who cannot get his facts straight on the issue

Up
0

SNAFU

Up
0

it's a jack up job!

Up
0

Yes true, but after McCully & now and even more so Brownlie, all the foreign office baubles will be well & truly consumed, probably in fact well & truly in the red and gone to bed.

Up
0

Kiwichas We are all human unless you're talking National
Honestly Shane Jones has talent to burn. Let's not forget we had a habitual fetish ridden PM for many years & National was happy to have him continue his fetish until it became a worldwide embarrassment appearing on comedy shows like John Oliver up here and even in India newspapers!! That's true degrading of the Prime Ministerial post.
They tell me he's with AirCongo now ? Stewardesses must be warned no ponytails Ill bet

Up
0

You could be right, it's easy to diss people you've never met

Up
0

Who have you met kiwichas ? I actually have met them all

Up
0

If you applied the "would I have a beer with this politician" metric, I'd definitely have one with Shane Jones and in fact I'd have a few followed by a couple of bourbons while watching an All Blacks test match.

Just a likable down to earth Kiwi bloke which is probably why he wasn't a good fit for Labour.

Up
0

So long as he left the DVDs at home

Up
0

I'm sure a search of your internet use would be enlightening kiwichas
Anyone using that handle here is suspect !

Up
0

The problem with NZF is the very shallow talent pool of MPs outside the top 3. They need competent representatives to be a genuine part of a government and avoid scandal.

Best case for them is they cause a schism within Labour and end up poaching some of the good Labour MPs like Nash.

Up
0

A party in dire need of a 'visible immigrant' explaining their immigration policy.

Up
0

"shallow" is the word

Up
0

There is little doubt that these guys are going to get a lot of votes at the next election but is it because they are "Good" or just that people are now voting for change for change sake. I suspect the final outcome will have them going with National unless they want to sit on the back benches again. National will be hoping like hell they don't need them at all. The worst possible election outcome would be Labour, the Greens and NZ First cobbled together to form a government so think hard before you vote.

Up
0

I believe John Key stood down because he realized the damage there high flow immigration policy has done. GDP growth is worthless unless its per person.
I think National will be happy to share power with NZ First and have an excuse to change some of their policies. Nationals core voters are the ones gaining benefit from high population growth. National won't lose these voters but will gain some flexibility.
A National NZ first coalition works for me.
I would like to know is there a party that will stop supporting USA global aggression? They are a rogue state and we support them. The Greens taking more refugees is hypocrisy when we support the country making the refugees.

Up
0