In this section
Offers for readers
Follow the news from interest
The comment stream
Recent comments
- 1 of 20817
- ››
Editors choice
- 1 of 295
- ››
Finance sector jobs
Lead from the front utilising your strategic, technical and leadership qualities within th...more
New Zealand
Lead from the front utilising your technical expertise in this highly attractive senior li...more
New Zealand
Customer focus, high performance, exceeding client expectations and achieving profitable g...more
New Zealand
Key leadership position in the bank. Be a part of one of the fastest growing banks in New ...more
New Zealand

The news stream
Latest news
Most commented
- Fonterra to tighten TAF rules 67
- Govt eyes NZ$1.4b revenue grab 58
- English defends current account blowout 56
- 90 seconds at 9 am 51
- BNZ cuts most fixed mortgage rates 48
- 90 seconds at 9 am 43
- Thursday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 38
- Budget 2012 reactions 36
- Budget tax moves to target high income NZers 29
- Wednesday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 24
Most viewed
Have your say: Should the NZ Super Fund underwrite a Queenstown property deal?
Greg Ninness at The Sunday Star Times reported the New Zealand Superannuation Fund was in talks to underwrite an ambitious NZ$1 billion Queenstown property development.
The deal could make the Super Fund the buyer of last resort for parts of a project at Kawarau Falls Station which remained unsold when it was finished. Neither the Super Fund nor Kawarau Falls' developer Nigel McKenna were prepared to comment on the proposal, but sources close to the parties have told the Sunday Star-Times that the Super Fund has indicated it would be willing to underwrite the project, but the parties have not been able to agree on the terms and negotiations are continuing. If they agree on terms and the proposal proceeds, it would be the first time the Super Fund has entered into a property development underwriting arrangement. That the Super Fund would even consider such a deal is causing concern in investment circles, because of the likely risks involved.
Gareth Morgan told the SST the plan was unbelievable and showed how incompetent the NZ Super Fund was. Here's the most interesting detail.
The Kawarau Falls project covers 6.5ha on the shores of Lake Wakatipu. It is being developed by McKenna's company Melview Developments, which also developed the Beaumont Quarter and Lighter Quay projects at Auckland. Construction of the first stage of the project, which will include two international hotels and an extensive upmarket housing component, is well under way. This is being financed by Bank of Scotland International (BOS), which has a first mortgage securing up to $513m, and Hanover Finance which has a second mortgage securing up to $150m, although it is not known how much these financiers may actually be owed. Funding for a second stage is to be provided by Fortress Credit Corp with Hanover as second mortgagee. Most of the funds used for the project so far are likely to have come from Hanover, but the requirement for an underwrite agreement probably came from BOS as its funding lines started to be drawn down.
What I think If this is true it is astonishing. The New Zealand Superannuation fund is effectively bailing out Hanover Finance and Nigel McKenna with public money on a bunch of luxury holiday houses in Queenstown. Is this how our fund is investing money? Is this the level of risk our fund is taking?
I'm beginning to think it might be a good idea to convert the NZ Super Fund into a fund that only owns New Zealand government bonds. The budget this week will announce the government needs to borrow almost NZ$50 billion over the next 5 years. Why on earth would we be investing that money in speculative Queenstown property rather than government bonds that would otherwise have to be sold overseas? Your view. We welcome your comments below
seems to me they're boradening
seems to me they're boradening the nzsf portfolio way beyond anything that could be justified by a rational diversification strategy
would be interesting to investigate if there any ties between those running the nzsf, and those involved in this scheme
No freaking way! Perhaps some
No freaking way!
Perhaps some research into the background of those running/managing the Super fund and who they have been associated with/worked for in the past would be warranted here. Who is doing who a favour here?
There is no future for all this development in the Southern Districts - who is going to buy all this land and holiday homes? The Super Fund/NZ Govt will be left carrying the can if they proceed down this track!
This news has to be one of the most scandalous things I have heard of in the last 18 months - I wonder what Bruce Shephard would think of it?
Be interested to see if anyone else is concerned about these developments.
From this article http://tvnz.co.nz/view/page/425823/1901508 "Th
From this article http://tvnz.co.nz/view/page/425823/1901508
"The Fortress Credit Corporation is regarded by many as a lender of last resort, and has lent money to several New Zealand finance companies struggling to survive the industry downturn."
I don't know, perhaps it
I don't know, perhaps it is bailing out Hanover a bit, however ultimately bailing our hanover, is just helping out those mum and dad investors who were ripped off. If Hanover had waited a few weeks, they would have been covered by the government guarrantee, and they would have had to have been bailed out anyway by the government.
This seems to be pretty
This seems to be pretty breathtaking. Earlier in the year the head of the fund made some comments about how the government needs to continue putting money into the fund to buy equities through the trough of the cycle. This seemed pretty bullish and optimistic to me, and quite out of line with the type of comments you would expect from a professional fund manager.
To have the fund buy only government bonds to me seems a pointless 'loop' why not just have the money in the bank and allow the government to draw it down as required? But I agree in principle that the money might as well be used to fund the governments own debt. As an individual, it doesn't make sense to go investing in the stockmarket in a big way when you still have a big mortgage. I dont see why it should be any different for the government.
If we are going to continue with this fund I would argue we are better off farming it out to professional fund managers, with the understanding that the funds will be moved around between the competing funds on the basis of performance and cost of manangement fees. Call me cynical but I bet the super fund is less efficiently run in terms of staffing etc than the private players.
firstly, restricting the Fund to
firstly, restricting the Fund to government bonds will not benefit anyone. Matthews comment re extending the Fund to other managers is the best course. Establish a "fund-of-funds" component, which adds diversity and can be very successul. CALPERS as an example. The catch being there are very few quality funds in NZ.
McKennas project was highly leveraged from day one. Which is coming back to bite. He would not even contemplate introducing the Fund unless there was more to this story. I suspect there is.
I disagree with The Bank Managers comment re no future for these developments in the southern lakes. The Queenstown region doesn't have capacity to support population growth. And internationally NZ is only now becoming recognized as a destination, let alone country worth visiting. Although I never supported the project, because it was to be situated immediately adjoining an expanding airport, and was destined to fail, Queenstown was reliant on 5 Mile to help sustain its population growth. This projects demise makes Jacks Point an even more valuable undertaking. Kawarau Falls is a self cotained hotel and conference destination, which is much needed. This project will show up the mediocre standard of accommodation that exists in Queenstown.
Should the Fund underwrite or invest in Kawarau Falls.. it depends on the terms agreed. If they are mandated to invest a portion of capital in higher risk investments, then again contingent on terms, this may be the right project. It certainly couldn't be a better time to take advantage. In saying this if the capital invested is not guaranteed - at an LTV level (30-40c on $1) there are better more risk adverse options out there.
Use public money to once
Use public money to once again bailout financial fraudsters, bugger off.
Why should we be surprised when the likes of Doug Grahame on the Super Fund Guardians, Doug was on another board of directors in recent times, that being Lombards Finance, and what did they get upto.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=1050...
The people of NZ are under threat from many in our supposed public service who wear two hats and come and go at will.
Iain.. Why is McKenna a
Iain.. Why is McKenna a financial fraudster? Big call that you need to back up.
There's a lot of talk concerning fraud, back handers, people doing favors. Based on what? An article based on speculation with little to no substance.
As the bank manager says
As the bank manager says - focus on the links between those running the fund and those involved in the scheme - there will no doubt be a story to be told there.
It is idiocy for the fund to get involved in this sort of project - if they want high returns then get them to invet in energy/precious metals producers. Short, medium and long term the tourist industry will be one of the great disasters for investment.
Why are you all so
Why are you all so shocked? Isn't the gameplan all about securing party donations leading into the 2011 elections! I mean come on, give the swine a fair go at porking the system why don't you.
The RBNZ is propping up bankers bonuses and fat profits with state guarantees and cash for crappy mortgage paper swaps, so what's the big difference if the super fund helps out a property developer or three in making millions and millions ?
OK Wally maybe you are
OK Wally maybe you are right - probably best to fling billions at the property developers and finance company owners. After all they have multi million dollar personal residences to fund, yachts to keep afloat and fleets of supercars that need maintaining - LOL!
Rob - You really think helping out Hanover will see a true advantage for the elderly investors who have agreed to their money tied up for years?
Re the conference market - the future for conferences is bleak with the advent of high speed broadband and video conferencing etc.
In case you hadn't noticed punters are now deleveraging en-masse out of hoilday and lifestyle homes not just in Queenstown/Lakes district but at all lifestyle/coastal areas. In Ohakune its like half the town is for sale and on the Coromandel over 2,000 for sale.
There are 1,374 properties on the market in Queenstown Lakes district but very little selling so why fund even more of this unwanted stock. It's the equivalent of building another 3,000 Auckland apartments when the market is already flooded with them.
Surely the Super fund is better to average out and buy more shares in NZX companies while they are low and dividends are high.
They would be better to
They would be better to use the super fund money to pay for the completion of the motorway projects. At least the money would remain in NZ and would not have to be borrowed from overseas.
It is a scandal that they would consider loaning to Watson and co. The super fund has lost so much already, at one point it was minus 25%.
It is difficult to have much faith in the concept of saving for the future, if this money had been invested in infrastructure instead of shares we would have all been better off.
Why should we be surprised
Why should we be surprised at people for distrusting ideas like a national compulsory super scheme and resisting asset taxes while striving to look after themselves with individual property investment portfolios?
http://www.interest.co.nz/ratesblog/index.php/2009/05/20/have-your-say-m...
Follow it through to the 'trust and legitimacy' comments.
Who knows there might well be a good business case for this investment, although I have my doubts from the balance of comments here. However, the quick reaction to this news here is also quite telling. While it might be legal, it seems there are a fair number of reasonably well informed people here questioning the legitimacy of this move. It'll be interesting to see how this unfolds further, Bernard and co, please keep us informed.
The Boston Globe weren't impressed
The Boston Globe weren't impressed with Queenstown (but that was 2004).
"Up the road in Queenstown, nature is in full flight.
Queenstown advertises itself as "The Adventure Capital of the World," where you can bungy jump, heli-ski, jet-boat, or sky-dive. The confines of the modest town can no longer accommodate the throng of thrill-seekers. Soaring mountains still fringe the lake, but condos are creeping along the shore, a snake of traffic clogs the road into town, and Louis Vuitton has set up shop along with Global Culture, a clothes store.
If your idea of a holiday is a seething mass of cars and people, topped off by a cacophony of helicopters, Queenstown may be for you. Otherwise, it serves only as a warning of the perils of overdevelopment."
http://www.boston.com/travel/articles/2004/11/07/new_zealand_at_a_crossr...
It's an absolute God sent
It's an absolute God sent Blessing to finally see the people and investors at Hanover get a break. It's not just old retired Mum's and Dad's that have invested with them, there are so many younger people who worked and sacrificed practically anything and everything to share a better life with their Family and provide for their children so that they may enjoy a 'modern society' with dignity and prosperity. This can only be a good thing for the Nation. We need to work together and strive for the betterment of everyone who has been effected by 'this' calamity the world is in at the present moment. This is a 'team' effort folks and things will get better if we collaborate with one another. Imagine if everyone cared...
Too right Bank Manager, we
Too right Bank Manager, we can't have the peasants starting to believe they have a right to a share of the cake, can we.
Since its an Underwrite I
Since its an Underwrite I suspect the reason for this, is that BOS has NO money.
KFS is all sold too. Has been for sometime. The first stage will be finished in Nov.
The project has four Hotels and will transform Qtown to a new level. Its a very high quality resort and will add greatly to the area.
Its not "billions" more like about $250 mio.
I would be wary of the settlement risk from buyers though. Factor in decreased valuations on the asset once completed, tighter Bank lending rules to offshore buyers and lower rent because of lower tourism numbers, then you end up with a problem.....
Insanity - doing the same
Insanity - doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different outcome.
Is Mr Key is allowing
Is Mr Key is allowing his tourism portfolio duties to overwhelm his financial responsibilities to New Zealand as a whole?
There again, it maybe part of the grand-plan to turn us into a tax haven with commensurate accommodation to intern rich refugees.
I certainly get the impression we are about to get a European style police force armed to defend such individuals from possible civil unrest.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/2433585/Budget-will-pay-for-Taser-...
People are still in make
People are still in make believe land. Super fund and your super is fake and illussion.
There will be no more super within the next 10 years. we just don't have anymore money to pay everybody that's entitled...so you either don't get anymore or you get a pittance adjusted for inflation which wont' buy you a cup of coffee a day.
At least Kevin over the ditch is honest to delay the entitlement after 2012 or something. you think we are not in the same boat or worse ??? There is no hole to dig ourselves out unlike the ozzies.
It not unusual for addictive
It not unusual for addictive parents to empty the piggy banks of their children to pay for their drug of choice. In the case of Queenstown you have the cotton, the syringe, the lighter and the spoon, waiting for something to put in it and melted down. In a societal sense; we are addicted to real estate: No different than our American cousins were. Until kiwis get down to the business of getting out of debt, stop consuming cheap Chinese crap from the Warehouse and put some effort into producing wealth that other nations want we will writhe in the pain of addicted.
I lived in Queenstown for
I lived in Queenstown for 13 years, when Sam (Neal) was saying what a lot of us thought; that unbrideled development would ultimately be the ruination of place. And today people are astounded when I respond to their "What a beautiful place, Don't you miss it?', with a, "I woudn't touch it with YOUR barge pole..." Good luck, Super Fund.
The wrong question is being
The wrong question is being asked. Instead ask if the super fund should be closed.
Close it and cut the losses. At best the fund is degenerating into high risk investments in an attempt to cover previous losses.
Note the results of the poll you are running - only 7% woud invest in a managed fund. That if they started debt free and had cash. But NZ is in debt and that debt is increasing.
Run the poll again starting from being in debt and include an option to pay down debt. Then extrapolate the results to the Super fund.
TonyNZ, are you serious? I
TonyNZ, are you serious? I don't ask the latest Lotto Powerball winner to cut me in on their winnings, and similarly, I wouldn't have any sympathy for the person that spent their last dollar on Lotto tickets queuing up for a hand out....
Why would we want to
Why would we want to underwrite an apartment/hotel complex in a town where we already have a glut of such types of accommodation - just look at the occupancy rates (and balance sheets) of the ones already in existence and do the math!!! Many brand new apartments are still on the market for sale by the developers and others are being sold by mortgagee sale. Both apartments and hotels are heavily discounting their rates to try to fill their rooms. I hate to fuel the property "doom & gloom" talk, but to involve the Super fund in something like this is suicide.
Crazy just crazy. Greedy porkers
Crazy just crazy. Greedy porkers at the trough with their piggy mates. Bail out hanover owners and investors, no thanks, they should have known better. If they had read the business section of the herald once in a blue moon for the 2 years previous, they would have known this. Where is personal responsibility. Use the superfund to help them. It makes me want to puke.
Qtown may need some help, but look at Dubai, everything was built and they said the people would come. Huh. At last look property down 40%.
If Key does this, I will have to retire from public life and become a hermit. I wont be able to face society. I voted for the man.
Easy, William! He hasn't allowed
Easy, William! He hasn't allowed it to happen, yet. But the words "I told you so" are starting to form on my lips.....
William: <i>Greedy porkers at the
William:
Greedy porkers at the trough with their piggy mates.
Yes. These are the porkers that should be in crates: we'd have a bit of control over them then, plus would at least know they weren't enjoying themselves on our money.
Where is personal responsibility.
It's the welfare state, silly. What did we all expect?
Separate state and economy (my sig from now on I think).
Super fund should go for
Super fund should go for housing projects for the lower income groups who pay a good rent, which increases the rental yield. Super fund should not go for luxury projects and places, which provide poor rental returns and only notional capital gains. Old brick government houses are solid and sought after rental properties for investors.
http://www.interest.co.nz/ratesblog/index.php/2008/07/11/henders
http://www.interest.co.nz/ratesblog/index.php/2008/07/11/henderson-says-...
How much did Fortress Vulture Fund Buy the distressed project for, and how much are they wanting to sell it back to the general public for?
No doubt spinning our very Bankster sympathetic government the well worn yarn about it somehow being in the national interest.
I say the market got them into it, the market can get them out. How about the banks give back some of the profits they have already gained from the now failing loans from freshair that they issued in the first instance.
The pessimism and negativity is
The pessimism and negativity is certainly thriving. So many opinions obviously expressed by those so close to the source.
This post is nothing more than a bitch session for those who didn't make it, lost it, or never will have it.
Why not first understand the underlying premise of the story before pointing finger at every man and his dog. Not one person who's commented has provided any accurate and substantiated facts by which to base their opinion.
And guess what, this has nothing to do with bailing out Hanover. I have no time for Hanover, but the story is about McKenna and the so-called Super Fund.
Let's see some constructive discussion based on facts, not speculation and conjecture.
Given the reputation/record/means of many
Given the reputation/record/means of many who contribute to this site, jeremy, I suggest YOU are the one speculating in more ways than you know. Take your own advice and '...provide(d) any accurate and substantiated facts by which to base (your)their opinion."
Janet, I haven't given an
Janet, I haven't given an opinion. Rather an observation, of you and others.
Janet.. Point to add, you
Janet.. Point to add, you shouldn't comment on peoples reputations, record, or likewise, when you don't have the faintest idea who you're directing your comments too. Let's just say it is more than unlikely that anyone on this post, Bernard included, has more direct knowledge re the specifics surrounding the subject in question.
Jeremy, Are you saying the
Jeremy,
Are you saying the Sunday Star Times is wrong?
I welcome any facts you have to improve this article and thread.
cheers
Bernard
And of course, you could
And of course, you could be a Priddy, but then again I'm only speculating. I do however have a good knowldge of all sorts of projects, going way back before Philip sold the camping ground a few years ago. Ah.... aren't nom de plumes great!
Jeremy said: ''This post is
Jeremy said:
''This post is nothing more than a bitch session for those who didn't make it, lost it, or never will have it''.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL........
And it's gone all Simon
And it's gone all Simon and Garfunkle on us, Andy! The Sounds of Silence....
Hamish, we're not talking about
Hamish, we're not talking about Powerball or Lotto here ! Some people had their hard earned 'Life Savings' invested with these Finance Company's. How you can compare the two is beyond my comprehension. Obviously your life has been totally care free and don't have any money to lose...
I guess you only have
I guess you only have to ask yourself, TonyNZ; What would (will?) you do if Hanover offers you a swap of your money in the finance company for equity in the Kawarau Falls Station development ( or another) at par. Will you take it? What about at a discount?
Bernard.. in reply, there is
Bernard.. in reply, there is a lot of speculation surrounding the proposed transaction, which has unfortunately gone off on a tangent. Way out in left field.
I guess time will tell.
Enjoyed the banter. It was entertaining.
"Hanover offers you a swap
"Hanover offers you a swap of your money in the finance company for equity in the Kawarau Falls Station development "
This is a nonsense. If it fails then that means there is no "equity" for Hanover to "offer'. As second mtgee they would be out the back door with nothing left on realisation for them.
Most of you guys have no idea what you are talking about. Its just speculative rubbish.
Well lets hope they didnt
Well lets hope they didnt get involved: at least some of it has just gone into receivership:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/southland-times/business/2444121/Hotel-deal-in-re...
The wastage at the NZ
The wastage at the NZ Super Fund is extreme.
1. Why do they need to be a waterfront plush office over a whole floor spread out miles away from each staff member? They could squeeze 75 or 80% more staff in there.
2. The staff should at least be wealthy in their own lives, before they are hired and decide how to gamble with tax payer's money. Research showed most staff are on the breadline and many are renting their residences.
3. It's a given to them that they have tones of money to play with and wastage is shocking. They even celebrate when they make it through the end of a bad year of losses.
4. They need to look and learn how retired people scrimp, save and spend carefully, for this is the people they are holding the money for, do you think retired people live in waterfront pads with heating blasting, lights on endlessly. No way!!
5. Very few of the staff actually punt any of their own cash into stocks for their own wealth creation in their own life. Perhaps lack of balls to back themselves?
6. The fund should close up shop after loaning all funds to government at 8% for roading and infrastructure. These no need for all the plush ego of a so call strong empowered office, because it isn't at all, its losses money hand over fist. THE FACT THAT THEY WOULD CONSIDER TIPPING 1billion INTO QUEENSTOWN IS ANOTHER BIG LOSS WAITING TO HAPPEN. Over 20 years Queenstown grows fast for 7 years then goes ghostly quiet again in growth. HOW DARE THEY EVEN CONSIDER THIS. Who is lining up their own next jump into another job in property development? It sure smells of this.
Investigation over the whole place is required, the wastage and performance wouldn't wash in a normal corporation, trust me!!!!! Turn the lights off before you do any further erosion to the fund. NZ does need a pack of losers such as these guys playing with serious money. It's not the degrees and references that should be needed to work there, it's the 'Millionaire status at least that should be a prerequisite.
~ They are a pack of Losers
Golly, Captain Crab! "....If it
Golly, Captain Crab! "....If it fails then that means there is no "equity" for Hanover to "offer'. As second mtgee they would be out the back door with nothing left on realisation for them."
I guess we're just about to find out.....
Indeed you will Janet. Heres
Indeed you will Janet.
Heres how I see iit. BOS intended to roll the first stage funding over to the second stage from settlement proceeds from the first stage.
The buyers of the first stage are now struggling to settle because
a) it was sold offshore and bank funding for offshore buyers has disappeared
b) the valuations have dropped so even a 30% deposit on pp goes no where, even if funding could be got.
c) BOS has had a meltdown and has no cash to fund the second stage until the settlement issues for the first stage is fixed.
So no funding means things stop.
Up to the Receivor what happens now. I'd not like to be second mtgee...
Shame. Its a beautiful development.
You'll have guessed my view
You'll have guessed my view on that from mine 25th at 1.36PM. But no one, not even me, wants to see a vision fail. Cheers, Captain....
Kawarau falls now in receivership.
Kawarau falls now in receivership. Even at a fire sale price (at todays prices) It would be a brave super fund manager that gets involved in any form of property development at the moment. Who knows where the bottom is.
Putting a value on an unfinished development at this stage of a declining market should be left for the people with the money and skills required.
The sooner that the NZ super fund is put under the control of someone like Gareth Morgan the better we will all sleep at night.
The old saying "the return of your money is more important than the return on your money" should be printed in big bold letters and put on the wall of the NZ fund managers office.
If they want to play roulette let them do it with their own money not everyone elses. In 12 years time I want to collect some super, not collect an old betting slip.
Good to see it has
Good to see it has turned to custard - wonder who will pick up the pieces?
"Good to see it has
"Good to see it has turned to custard"
What an unbelievable comment. I am sure the familes of the 500 workers employed there think you are a total jerk.
The Bank Manager is far
The Bank Manager is far more than "a Total Jerk" If you are an actual bank
manager and even think about making statements like "Good to see it has all turned to custard" you're an embarrassment to society. To be honest, I wish I knew who you are. Remember, what goes 'round, comes 'round and I'm sure your day will come soon enough...