The comment stream

Join the Interest community to be a registered commenter so you can:
- Edit your comments
- Avoid the CAPTCHA
- Vote on comments
Register Here

Already registered? log back in here ..

Forgotten your password? No problem! Click here

Finance sector jobs

Senior Liability Underwriting Manager
Lead from the front utilising your strategic, technical and leadership qualities within th...more
New Zealand
Senior Liability Product Underwriter - Product Management
Lead from the front utilising your technical expertise in this highly attractive senior li...more
New Zealand
High Performing Senior Liability UnderwriterHigh Performing Senior Liability Underwriter
Customer focus, high performance, exceeding client expectations and achieving profitable g...more
New Zealand
Manager Operational Effectiveness and Assurance IT
Reporting to the Senior Manager Operational Risk Effectiveness and Assurance, the key focu...more
New Zealand
efinancialcareers.com

Reader poll

Should you fix your mortgage now or stay floating?

Choices

Auckland City Council plans to raise NZ$200 million through 7 year retail bond

Posted in News

The Auckland City Council has approved plans to offer a AA rated 7 year retail bond to raise NZ$200 million.

"A retail bond issue will give ratepayers and other investors the opportunity to participate in Auckland city's future development and growth by investing in a portion of Auckland City Council's debt, and receiving a competitive rate of interest," the City Council said.

"Debt, when well managed, is a fair way to fund capital projects in the city, as the cost of large projects is spread across current ratepayers as well as those who will benefit in the future. Bonds are an effective method for any organisation to raise funds and borrow money. The retail bond issue will be used to increase funding certainty by refinancing existing short-term debt and covering the remainder of the current financial year's borrowing requirements. for a term of seven years," Councilor Douglas Armstrong, chairperson of the Finance and Strategy Committee said.

Earlier this year, the Securities (Local Authority Exemption) Amendment Act was passed with the intention of encouraging local authorities to return to the retail debt market.

The issue is the latest in a slew of retail bond offers by corporates unable to access the usual pension fund customers because they are not government guaranteed. Corporates with well known brand names are however finding strong demand among retail investors hunting for yield now that term deposit and debenture rates offered by banks and finance companies have slumped in line with the Official Cash Rate.

* This article was first published yesterday in our daily subscription newsletter for the banking and finance industries. The email costs NZ$365 per annum and carries exclusive news and analysis for New Zealand banking and finance industry executives, regulators and investors. Sign up for a free trial here.

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment in the box on the right or click on the "'Register" link at the bottom of the comments. Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making these comments.

3 Comments

Bet that will get snapped

Bet that will get snapped up pretty quickly. Wonder what the rate will be. 7.25%?

I'd want it well over

I'd want it well over 8% for such a long term bond without a government guarantee.
cheers
Bernard

We need regulations. City councils

We need regulations. City councils have huge money wasting bureaucracy. Why big city council CEOs are paid more than ministers? Many US city councils are in red. City councils are not businesses. They should not be allowed to borrow more than the annual rates. Let them set an example to save first and then invest the saving for capital expenses. Would it be unreasonable to expect city councils to save for 50% of the capital expenses first before they resort to borrow the rest?