sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

McCully apologises to Key over Malaysian immunity "ambiguity"; Key says wouldn't accept McCully resignation; Govt launches family violence policy; Labour to end school donations

McCully apologises to Key over Malaysian immunity "ambiguity"; Key says wouldn't accept McCully resignation; Govt launches family violence policy; Labour to end school donations

By Bernard Hickey

With 80 days left until the September 20 election, here's my daily round-up of the political and governmental news from in and around Wellington on July 2.

A clearly shaken Foreign Minister Minister Murray McCully held a news conference 'on the tiles' outside Parliament's debating chamber on Wednesday morning to explain why Malaysia thought New Zealand was OK with Malaysian diplomat Muhammad Rizalman bin Ismail returning home to face disciplinary action rather than being charged with sexual assualt in New Zealand.

McCully and Prime Minister John Key clearly stated on Tuesday that New Zealand had formally asked Malaysia to waive diplomatic immunity and that it had called in Malaysia's Head of Mission in New Zealand to express its concern about the diplomat being called home in defiance of the request.

Instead, Malaysian Foreign Affairs Minister Anifah Aman said at a news conference in Kuala Lumpur on Tuesday that Malaysia had been prepared to waive immunity, but decided to bring the diplomat home after New Zealand offered an alternative where the man was prosecuted in Malaysia.

McCully was then forced into an embarrassing statement late on Tuesday night saying "it is now clear to me that officials engaged in informal communications over what is a complex case, in a manner that would have been ambiguous to the Malaysian Government."

McCully told reporters on Wednesday he was not aware of the informal ambiguous comments by officials and had therefore not informed the Prime Minister before Key made his comments on Monday. Startlingly, McCully also said he had not been told by MFAT that the diplomat had been called home.

McCully said he had apologised to Key earlier on Wednesday morning about the lack of information and declined to say whether he had considered or discussed his own resignation with Key. 

"I told the Prime Minister that he had not been given all of the information he should have been given. And I have taken responsibility for that and apologised to him," McCully said.

Key later told a news conference in the Beehive Theatrette that he had not discussed resignation with McCully and wouldn't accept any resignation if it was offered. He said the lack of information provided to ministers was surprising.

McCully said he had asked MFAT CEO John Allen to investigate why the Government had not been better informed and why the informal indication was given that led to Malaysia deciding not to waive immunity. McCully declined to say if Allen had offered his own resignation or had been asked to resign.

"The unseemly situation you saw yesterday when the Malaysian Foreign Minister and I were talking at odds with each other is something that should not have occurred. My own view is that it falls short of the standards we should expect," McCully said.

Labour Foreign Affairs Spokesman David Shearer said McCully had apologised to the wrong person.

“He should apologise to the woman who was allegedly sexually assaulted and burgled. It is the bungling by Murray McCully and his ministry which has denied her justice weeks after the alleged crimes against her," Shearer said.

“Murray McCully has also said he was not kept up to date or informed about the progress of the Malaysian case until last week. Either he’s not telling the whole story, or that is an extraordinary indictment of the functioning of his office and Ministry," he said.

“Surely a charge of attempted rape is something a Minister would take an active interest in."

Family violence package

Meanwhile in the Beehive Theatrette, Key, Justice Minister Judith Collins and Police Minister Anne Tolley announced a package of measures designed to reduce family violence.

They included:

  • The establishment of a Chief Victims’ Advisor to the Minister of Justice, similar to the Chief Science Advisor.
  • The trial of an intensive case management service for family violence victims at risk of serious harm or death
  • The trial of mobile safety alarms with GPS technology, so victims can alert police to their location in an emergency
  • Introduction of legislation to change the Sentencing Act, which will allow courts to stipulate GPS monitoring of high-risk domestic violence offenders who can’t currently have this condition imposed on them.
  • Looking at a conviction disclosure regime to allow a person to know if a partner has previous convictions for violence,
  • Looking at whether prosecutors should be able to invite the judge or jury to draw an adverse inference when a defendant refuses to give evidence in sexual violence cases. Current law only allows the defendant, the defendant’s lawyer or the Judge to comment on a defendant’s failure to give evidence.

The package is estimated to cost NZ$9.4 million over four years. Here's the policy factsheet.

Labour's school donation policy

Meanwhile at an event at the Fergusson Intermediate School in Upper Hutt, Labour Leader David Cunliffe and Education Spokesman Chris Hipkins announced a Labour Government would pay schools who offered not to ask parents for 'donations' a grant of NZ$100 per student to offset the loss of donations.

Schools received NZ$97 million in donations in 2012. Here's the policy factsheet.

Labour costed the policy at NZ$50 million a year on the basis that all state schools in Deciles 1-7, 30% of schools in Deciles 8-10 and integrated schools accepted the NZ$100 per student payment to stop soliciting donations.

Schools would still be able to require activity fees to be paid for the actual costs of extra-curricular activates such as school camps. Those participating in the optional scheme would not be able to ask for a general ‘donation’ to help fund school operations.

Cunliffe later clashed with Key on the issue of school donations in Parliamentary question. (See the video above). Key described Cunliffe as "tricky Dave" and said schools were likely to simply increase their activity fees and take Labour's NZ$100 per child grant. Cunliffe then went on to describe Key as "slippery John."

I'll continue to update this through the day.

(Updated with video of Cunliffe question in Parliament to Key on school donations, comments from Shearer)

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

13 Comments

Pity they have got down to childish name calling ........ we pay these buggers huge Dollars each year to  lead us into the promised land , and expect more than seven year-old schoolground name calling  

Up
0

Weren't you joining in when National were calling the Green's Stalinist back in January?...

...Yup...

http://www.interest.co.nz/news/68125/pm-john-key-says-national-could-wo…

Up
0

Wow, considering you are almost certianly the worst offender, that is a bit rich.

regards

Up
0

oh steven you wag

 

Up
0

Oh come on.....Boatman must be foaming at the mouth....

regards

Up
0

Thank God  for freedom of speech ...Okay guys , I often say things for effect or to provoke a response  .......... no one should take them too seriuosly.

 I get belligerent when I am hungry and my blood sugar levels are low , so I have a rant occasionally

Truth is , we actually have the most balanced democracy of any country , no unbridled power here , and I actually would be uncomfortable if  National was able to govern without minority voices being heard , power corrupts and absolute power............ well look at Rob Muldoon

 

Up
0

"..Okay guys , I often say things for effect or to provoke a response"

That is the _definition_ of trolling.

And unbridled power?  I take it you haven't tried standing up to Child Support, MPI or MBIE, and it's getting worse.   Just because we have reasonable freedoms compared to some others (1) don't assume that means "we're the best", best of bad is still bad.  and (2) don't assume for a moment that it's going to stay that way or not get worse unless we're willing to fight to keep it that way.   And current government major parties are defiately looking like they're pulling straws from the same barrel.

Up
0

MFAT is well known for incompetence.

A simply example I heard was a request to some embassy for some commercial information about something overseas.  What came back was a google search.   Why do we need a high status person, on high salary, with high benefits and priviledge to do that.  Could have been done by some clerk here in New Zealand.

Actually I could see those positions being very useful to New Zealand.  But they are not doing the work.  Nor have the skills to match the salaries.  Nor see the problem.

Up
0

can we accept on his (keys) behalf.  since when has "acceptance" been an option, resignation is resignation (or it's a farce)

Up
0

You do have a point there.

Up
0

Gotta luv that 'donations' ban the Lab crew have 'promised'.

 

A simple tweak of the school stationery, and a quick search of synonyms via the InterWebs, and 'donations' will transmogrify into 'fees', 'levies', service costs', 'materials charges', recreation entry' and a myriad, a plethora and other Greek words which add up to - Anything But Donations.

 

Introduce a ban, a tax and any other incentive to Redescribe, and whodathunk, whaddyagit but Redescribed Versions of the Same Old Stuff.

 

Pertickerlerly when there are heavily unionised teachers' salaries and jobs at risk if them Fees don't keep rollin' in.  Ya nevah wants ter git between a Union Member and their Paycheck....

Up
0

Gotta love the Lab rats indomitable spirit in convincing us that spending our money for us , rather than allowing us to make the choice , is " the fair thing " to do ...

 

.... and let's not even tread that thorny path of performance attached pay slips for the purveyors of education ... dearie me no , the union knows best , no ?

 

... they're way mad , that lot ...

Up
0

or...
as some friends of mine found when they won a competition with a nice prize, is that the prize didn't come as cash or goods but in training and parts of services supplied free from the sponsors.  (Fair enough really...but doesn't pay the bills or sit in your driveway)

So the schools might just find that their incentives turn out to be "discounts" against consultancy fees and supervisory levies.  (which will, of course, be calculated to already have discounts calculated into them)

Union -organiser- and their paychecks.  Just look at the Novapay system, given the labyrinth of special nocks and cranies and levels it's no wonder the thing was a disaster.  Check modern business without union influence, none of that kind of piecemeal stuff.  Each person has a rate, there's a few organisation wide pay-jumps but it's easy stuff because decent people really aren't going to spend that much time over small detail (and lose out on big stuff like after hour meetings and requirement to front sports teams in your own time ... which would be illegal in a private business)

Up
0