In this section
Offers for readers
The comment stream
Recent comments
- 1 of 19102
- ››
Editors choice
- 1 of 276
- ››
The news stream
Latest news
Most commented
- 90 seconds at 9 am with BNZ 115
- Wednesday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 77
- Friday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 26
- Amanda's Take Five for Wednesday 19
- More bank mortgage rate cuts 16
- Govt lifts minimum wage 50 cts to $13.50 an hour 16
- Thursday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 15
- 90 seconds at 9 am with BNZ 14
- Full time jobs fall 13,000 in Dec qtr 14
- 90 seconds at 9 am with BNZ 9
Most viewed
Interest on Twitter
New Zealanders need to learn Mandarin to thrive in the Chinese century

By Bernard Hickey
Dave Dobbyn's 'Welcome Home' song and video (embedded below) is one of the best signposts of how New Zealand has changed over the last decade.
It celebrates a more open, more inclusive New Zealand that looks outward more than it looks inward. It has a generosity of spirit that I think is one of New Zealand's best national attributes in the new millennium.
I love Dave Dobbyn's music, but love even more how this song and the video that went with it seemed to capture the cultural mood of the nation in the late 2000s. I remember seeing how Dobbyn was even asked to sing it at the opening of the New Zealand war memorial in Hyde Park in London in 2006, welcoming home those who had fallen overseas. It transcended generations and seemed to bring people together. It was the anti-Winston and I loved it for that.
It spoke of a New New Zealand, after the immigration surge in the wake of 9/11, after the Nuclear free policy, after the Springbok tour, and after the flowering of Maori and Pacific Island cultures in the 1980s and 1990s.
The video simply showed a range of new immigrants to New Zealand, and mostly to Auckland. It had a American golfer, some Indian dairy owners, a Pacific Islander, a Maori cultural group, an Indian bank teller, an Aussie forklift driver and even a South African family standing proudly in front of their Toyota Camry.
But it seemed to me to be missing something important. It had no Chinese faces. There was a fleeting glimpse of a martial arts group, but there was no Chinese family or Chinese event.
This seemed strange to me at the time when the video came out in 2006 and even more so as time has passed.
I live in Epsom where more than a third of the kids at my daughter's school are Chinese. More than half of the families on our street are Chinese. In 2006 the New Zealand census showed we had 147,570 Chinese people living in New Zealand, 78,117 of whom were born in mainland China. At least 100,000 spoke Mandarin back in 2006 and that number is set to double by 2026.
There's good research here from AsiaNZ on these demographic projections out to 2026, which would see our Asian population rise to nearly 900,000 and surpass our Maori population. Are we ready for that?
Mandarin is already our third most spoken language after English and Maori, with the latest estimates of the number of Maori speakers at around 157.000.
I'm sure it was not deliberate on Dave Dobbyn's part that he left out New Zealand's Chinese faces. A pure oversight or logistical issue. But it did remind me that New Zealand sometimes talks a good game about engaging with China and Chinese New Zealanders, but doesn't often actually include or celebrate this part of our nation in a public way.
We have two Chinese New Zealand MPs, Raymond Huo and Pansy Wong, but we don't have Chinese faces on our television. There is no Mandarin spoken on National Radio or National Television. Yet Mandarin is set to become our second most spoken language within 15 years. The free Chinese language newspapers are among the most printed in Auckland and Skykiwi.com is one of most popular local websites. Why isn't this part of our mainstream?
China is already our second largest trading partner after Australia. We exported NZ$4 billion to China in the year to May, more than than double that exported in calender 2008. It is our second largest buyer of exports and our second largest provider of imports. Australia is our largest on both counts. Interestingly, imports from China have risen just 7% to around NZ$6 billion over the last two years while exports have doubled.
Yet, as John Key pointed out over the weekend in his Q+A interview on TVNZ, the number of our students learning Mandarin has only just surpassed the number learning Latin.
Why is it cultural and business New Zealand is so far behind trading New Zealand?
Where is our strategy on truly engaging with China in what will no doubt be the Chinese century?
John Key has admirably started the conversation with his comments about Mandarin and his call to double two way trade to NZ$20 billion within five years.
But this level of trade is a quantum leap again. For example, our two way trade with Australia is only NZ$17 billion a year at the moment.
Such a jump would require New Zealanders across the business, political and cultural spectrum to get serious about China. It would mean Chinese language television, correspondents based in China, mass Chinese language learning and a much deeper understanding of how China works. It would require New Zealanders broadly, including pakeha, Maori and Pacific Island New Zealanders, to really welcome home the 400,000 or so Chinese New Zealanders who will live here by 2026.
We should start with a serious debate about our strategy for engaging with China. Some basic questions have to asked.
Should most New Zealand children be learning Mandarin in the same way that most European children learn English?
Should we encourage Chinese investment in New Zealand land and companies here?
How would we feel if a Chinese state owned construction company or food company bid for a major project or a major farming group here?
Should we have a Chinese language quota on television?
Should our first thoughts about our political relations with China always be about human rights and democracy? Or should our first priority be trade?
Should we be strengthening our defence and diplomatic links with China at the expense of links with America?
What other questions should be asked? I welcome your thoughts below.
125 Comments
“knee how ma?” All strong
“knee how ma?”
All strong points Bernard. More importantly Mandarin will increasing displace English as the language of business just as English did to Dutch over 200 years ago. More importing there will be more websites in non-English then English soon. If you want to keep an information advantage over your competitors you will have to be able to read blogs not in your native tongue.
Not so sure about this. Come
Not so sure about this. Come to China and see what language the next generation is learning. ie the educated people who will take up positions in Government and commerce
Not quite true, if my
Not quite true, if my experiences are even near true. Mandarin is an artificial language based on the Beijing language that was created of ideological reasons after the PRC was established. It is very useful for every day chats and in the restaurant, but hopelessly impractical for business use. Chinese are now using English between themselves for business communication, but English Chinese style, with Chinese culture and business ways built in, a sort of pidgin English, but you still need to know Chinese language and understand Chinese thinking to use it.
Just one more point of
Just one more point of interest. There are more people studying English in China today than there are people speaking English in the USA. Where will that leave us in 10 years. It is the Chinese ways, thinking, and culture that is important to understand, studying the language is a way to achieve that.
When I was in college 25 odd
When I was in college 25 odd years ago, it was Japanese we were all meant to be learning.
What changed?
When i was in college it was
When i was in college it was French...and Latin...French was then the international language of business with Spanish/Portugese/German not far behind, and Esparanto the mooted international languge..
That all got throw aside and Japanese was the 'in' thing...now its Chinese
A couple yrs back it was American English according to Mr.Gates
By the time our current students graduate in Chinese it will then be Russian or korean, or even Arabic.
Steps, Interesting point on
Steps,
Interesting point on Japanese/Indonesian etc. The difference this time around is that China is already our largest trading partner. We have at least 150,000 Chinese already living here. China is clearly much larger (1.4 bln vs 130 mln in Japan and 227 mln in Indonesia).
That's not going away in a hurry.
cheers
Bernard
Yeah thats what we
Yeah thats what we said...before your time ...about Europe..And we had imported a hell of a lot of Poms, Dutch, Dalis back then to.
and on a weaker note Iran and Russia later.
Personally Im sure JK is no really serious on the subject, but right now gets a few brownie pionts with the 'neighbours' right?
China maybe our biggest
China maybe our biggest trading partner, but most of the trade is one way, from china to NZ. Chinese would be better to learn english, if they want to be a more western country.
The thing about chinese and Japanese is that they are similar languages, and they use the same/similar characters, so it sshouldn't be too difficult to port from japanese to chinese. I learnt japanese at college
Since when did China become
Since when did China become our largest trading partner - I thought that was Australia?
Exactly. I can speak
Exactly. I can speak Japanese, the language of the future I was told. In my business career it was helpful for me during my time as a tourism bus driver while at uyniversity studying business. A side from that nil.
Mineral resources, thriving economy, on Asias doorstep.Australian is the way forward "Bonza mate" Strewth Sheila" "You Flaming Galah".
everything
everything
A very warm and fuzzy, hug a
A very warm and fuzzy, hug a Chinese piece Bernard!
But it does make me laugh a bit :-).
I grew up in the States in the 60s and of course the same "our children must learn Japanese" opinion was being promoted in political and educational circles there at the time. Had a friend who went and got a tertiary degree in the language - he's since retrained as an accountant.
Had a brother-in-law who took Japanese as an elective as part of his engineering degree - he even travelled to Japan with US Steel once he started working... the Japanese engineers all spoke English.
I've worked in UN forums - had alot to do with Chinese delegates - they all spoke English.
Frankly - look at the jobs ads in NZ - the second language to speak here from a career prospective is Maori. It's easy and free for kids to learn as all children regardless of ethnicity are welcome at Kohanga - we sent our kids way back in the 80s and the benefit to them has been tremendous, not just from a language but from a cultural perspective as well.
I'm not saying mandarin is a waste of time, but one would have to want to live in China in order to maximise the benefit.
Interesting idea. I have a
Interesting idea. I have a Master in Business that was conjoint with a Chinese (Mandarin) language degree. I graduated in 1999 from Waikato and had excellent native speakers teaching me. I have heard much of this discussion and agree the numbers are small. It's not a sexy language (cmon it's true!) and most of my classes had native speakers or people from Chinese descent trying to get easy credits. Personally, I would like to see Maori compulsory in schools first and see the main benefits of learning Asian languages the fact that you understand the people better through the language. I'm a bit rusty nowadays just through lack of use. Most people from Mainland China make a huge effort to learn English and they are shocked that you would try and learn their language. English is still the language of business. I am grateful for the the support I had from Asia 2000 (now Asia NZ) who have done a lot of work supporting tertiary students studying Asian languages and who helped me to go to Asia to study and intern at NZ companies overseas. This type of work is targeted and hugely successful.
The three things allowing
The three things allowing English supremacy in the world currently and they are: the fact that English is the language of science (it used to be Latin), English is the de facto language of aviation, and currently the US has naming rights over the internet. There is no historical precedent to assume English will always stay the default language of science, aviation, internet communication, or business. There is a better argument to be made that English will lose its supremacy.
'US has naming rights over
'US has naming rights over the internet'
huh?
Don't over rate the China
Don't over rate the China factor. It's a huge ,diverse empire ready to blow apart at the seams. If that happens it wont be pretty for anyone ,least of all the long suffering Chinese people.
Learn Mandarin ,bollocks,they're learning English.Just like over reliance on the Chinese market,learn Mandarin and you're a one trick horse.
Worse still learn Maori! I thought this was a finance blog not a touchy feely multi culti one.Learn Maori for a NZ govt job,maybe.
Mandarin wont get you very far in Guangdong (Canton) where they speak their own lingo and consider Mandarin speaking northerners as foreigners. Like I said China is big and diverse and held together by the strong arm of the Party.
It's closer ties we need with our American friends who don't view us as a farm good only for milking.The American Republic will be around alot longer than the single party celestial kingdom!
"Don't over rate the China
"Don't over rate the China factor. It's a huge ,diverse empire ready to blow apart at the seams."
That is my understanding.
Yet it never quite does blow
Yet it never quite does blow apart at the seams.
I've been hearing predictions of China's downfall since the late 1990s. Yet it just keeps growing and has managed the social strains so far.
Our exports to China more than doubled in the last two and a half years. It's not going away in a hurry.
And it's going to get much bigger.
It's either an opportunity or a threat. Neither can be ignored.
cheers
Bernard
You say: since the late
You say: since the late 1990s. Have a little patience! After all, people were predicting the GFC before that.
China will either fall apart from the inside out, or through war with the USA to keep its citizens happy. When China is at war, how will our exporting look then? I say stick with the USA.
Should our government/army also practice driving over people in Cathedral Square with tanks, to make us more like China? Our politicians would enjoy being like China, no more embarassing apologies.
It's more difficult for us to
It's more difficult for us to learn Mandarin than for the Chinese to learn English. Learning to speak is not too bad but learning to read the Mandarin characters is tough. I'm happy for my children to learn Mandarin as I expect they would have more Chinese colleagues and customers in NZ and it could be an advantage if the company they work for set up branches in China.
Why would it be easier for
Why would it be easier for them to learn english than it would be for us to learn mandarin?
Sounds similar to how it is "easier" for them to work 80 hour weeks doing the jobs we used to do.
We are lazy. They aren't. Learning mandarin is a good idea, I agree - but there are much better things one can learn from asians than just the language.
No, no it is up to the
No, no it is up to the Chinese to learn English, they are clever and intelligent. Us, here in New Zealand we go fishing and hunting and have a good life. In 5 years time there are enough Chinese (Millions) and others, who want to immigrate to New Zealand and capable and keen to run a business, even the country and the Prime Minister for us, while us Kiwi’s go boating, golfing, skiing, beering, rugbiing having a good time.
Good as gold –mate. See you in the Takaka caves boyracing and mix together – tomorrow and afterwards !
WK
Hi Bernard, Good questions
Hi Bernard,
Good questions indeed. However, I don't think it'll be an exclusively Chinese century but more likely a BRIC century. So I think most of your questions apply to our dealings with all four of these countries with emerging vast economies.
Bernard already speaks
Bernard already speaks Mandarin most of the time. So whats the issue?
..and of course sailing
..and of course sailing houses to each other.
WK
One of the problems is that
One of the problems is that state run education systems (in NZ ) are very slow beasts to change, and we seem to jump on one of the "we must learn their language" bandwagons every 20 years or so, in the 60s it was the language of diplomacy with French, in the 80s it was the language of the coming Asian superpower Japan, and now in the 2010s it is Chinese.
When you look at the languages that year 9+ students take, French continues to be the most popular, probably because there is a whole pile of BBoomer teachers who trained in 60s to teach French that have no inclination or desire to learn another language from scratch.
By the time we have enough Chinese language teachers we will probably urging our kids to learn Urdu for the upcoming dominance of India...
Can't help reading Bernard's
Can't help reading Bernard's comments without the example of Britain's Iceni King Prasutagus coming to mind. Here was a leader, like New Zealand's top brass, who bowed to the dictates of a great power and made his kingdom (modern Norfolk and Suffolk) a 'client state'. In the case of Prasutagus it was to Imperial Rome but he retained his naive idea that the relationship could be on equal terms (sound familiar?) Thus, when he died, his will divided his kingdom equally between his wife Boudicca and her daughters and the Roman Emperor Nero. What followed was the bloodiest episode in the history of Britain's Islands as the Iceni and other tribes rebelled against their new corporate masters.
History may not repeat, but it does rhyme. More and more we hear the voices in New Zealand calling us to abandon our liberal ideas in favour of appeasing whoever has money at any given moment. The Roman historian Tacitus reminds us, that at the heart of the Iceni's discomfort was debt (sound familiar?). That debt was imposed by Rome, so that a replacement population could be financed in the major centres now referred to as Colchester, London, and St. Albans (Does this sound familiar?).
The tragedy for New Zealand is that it was cast adrift from Britain as we were deceived into joining the then EEC (European Economic Community). If you want to know the consequences of progressively surrendering yourselves to a vast, alien, and fundamentally unsympathetic socialist Leviathan then I suggest due diligence in respect of the plight of England. All the same arguments advanced by Bernard about China were advanced to us in respect of what is now the EU.
Interesting piece. But we
Interesting piece.
But we already have a free trade deal with China. We'll never have one with Europe.
At least the Chinese like trade.
cheers
Bernard
Well, yeah, they're masters
Well, yeah, they're masters at it obviously given they can squeeze $6 billion a year from a population the size of little 'ol New Zealand .... and only trade in "return" with $4 billion per year in "reciprocal" purchases!!!! And they maintain very tight control with their trade tariffs, which JK himself speaks with optimism about slowly but surely removing :-) It's all very humerous watching our leaders defend the totalitarian regime whilst continuing to subject us to their neo-liberal, free market, floating currency, minimalist regulatory agenda.
The Chinese government will never let it's economy get so imbalanced as the West has done. If faced with potential deficits such as we've taken on, they would simply introduce more tariffs and restrict capital flow. Totalitarianism has it's benefits!
The martial arts in the vid
The martial arts in the vid is Brazilian Capoeira, no?
Could well be. I wanted to
Could well be. I wanted to give Dave Dobbyn the benefit on the doubt.
cheers
Bernard
Pansy Wong must be one of
Pansy Wong must be one of the worst MP's in Parliament. Try and find a native born NZ'er who she has assisted. She is totally pro-Chinese. It was recently reported in the NZ Herald that she had written a letter of support for a Chinese immigrant who was now being deported for criminal activities. When questioed about this she claimed that she hardly knew him. It seems to be fashionable to condemn Winston Peters and his immigration policies but I would remind native born NZ'ers that Enoch Powell was similarly ridiculed about his stance on immigration into the UK in the 1970's. How many Poms are now leaving the UK permanently because they feel like a second class citizen in their own country.
Bernard - your analysis is
Bernard - your analysis is based on the fact that we will have business as usual in the present century, allowing China to continue to grow as it has done in the past 10 years, in order for it to eventually dominate ('the Chinese century').
Resource depletion tells me that is not remotely likely to happen. Throw in the soaring costs of what the Chinese are doing both to their own and the greater environment and you have even less liklihood that it will happen. The Chinese have consumed huge resources just lifting a relatively small percentage of their population to a comparable living standard to Westerners. It would take the resources of a second earth to move the rest of the population there.
We face a future of globalization in reverse. Being small, far away, lowly populated and effectively self sufficient in a range of basic resources is going to be something to cherish in the next decades. Hold those nations which are infinetly less gifted at arms length - we have incomparably more that they would want from us in the future than the other way around. Most people just don't know it yet.
I'm with you AndyH. Being
I'm with you AndyH. Being small, far away, lowly populated and self sufficient is going to be paradise in the times ahead.
I don't understand this China frenzy that is suddenly overwhelming New Zealand. Their interest in us is very simple. We grow food and they want food. Actually, they want the land so they can grow the food themselves and cut out the middleman (us). We don't make anything else that they need- people who think they are going to make their fortune selling NZ made stuff to China are going to be very disappointed. China make stuff- that is what they do. They buy in stuff (raw materials) to make stuff with, and they buy in food. That is all.
And at the rate we are going the only need we are going to have for mandarin is so we can communicate with our new landlords.
Dunno Bernard...might be
Dunno Bernard...might be easier to perfect the art of kowtowing! Landlord not want peasant serf speaking up. Just do what told like Donkey.
I agree with Bernard. Even if
I agree with Bernard.
Even if Chinese growth slows it is still likely to be a major player over the coming years.
Remember too that Mandarin is also widely spoken in other parts of Aisa, such as Singapore, not to mention our own back yard Auckland, and cities like Vancouver, Sydney etc.
Certainly seems a lot more relevant to me that our children learn Mandarin than French or German (nice languages for sure, but surely of rather quaint irrelevance, although I did use my dusty old schoolboy French to some use in Noumea recently)
Speaking Mandarin helped
Speaking Mandarin helped Kevin Rudd.
Read George Friedman's 'The
Read George Friedman's 'The Next 100 years' (of Stratfor.com) as an antidote to your thinking Bernard. Of course China is a large country and growing but it will not become the superpower everyone expects. As always people predict the future based on the immediate past and extrapolate the same trends to continue on and on - this thinking is what causes bubbles. It rarely acknowledges turning points and yet these are what define history. As mentioned by earlier posters look what happened to the supposed Japanese hegemony of the late 80's.
English will always be the language of business that is why we have so many ESL schools here.
Big mistake ! Mandarin is
Big mistake !
Mandarin is the language of officials
A bit like us learning Latin.
We should be learning Cantonese if we wish to communicate in business.
They are all learning English in this respect we are just old fashioned lucky.
Cantonese is spoken in one
Cantonese is spoken in one southern province, Guangdong. Putonghua is the national language. Rather like in the Philippines there are 80-90 dialects but Tagalog is the national language. (Although in their case, the language of government is American-English)
Putonghua is the national
Putonghua is the national language but what about all the dialects. You can learn Mandarin but you do not have a hope in hell of understanding Shanghaihua or any of the other regional dialects. I have been in meetings with locals along with fluent European Mandarin speakers and the foreigner dohave not had a clue what is going on . I have also seen this with groups of Chinese.
We need to stop thinking of China as one giant homogenous unit . It is far far more complex than that . This applies to language , cultural norms , economic development and regional objectives.
The learning of languages
The learning of languages has been underemphasized for years in NZ. Comments like "everyone uses English these days" are naive and ignorant. Just go to Europe where it is quite normal to speak 3 languages. Which language to learn? It doesn't matter, I say. Different languages present different opportunities - we don't all want to have the same toolbox, otherwise innovation will never occur. I say learn English, Maori, and at least one additional language, starting in primary school. 10 years compulsory study of each language ought to do it.
Bernard's thoughtful and
Bernard's thoughtful and timely article is much more than just about language. It is rather more about how we answer the massively important question of how we engage China.
I suspect that we should continuee largely as we have been. That is, balancing the importance of trade with the importance of ethics and morality. Just like we have with Japan (with respect to whaling and trade)
I agree with Pythagoras, use
I agree with Pythagoras, use English for global easy communication, Maori for NZ/regional feel and then something else for specialised travel/trade. I was always envious when in the Europe most could speak x number of languages, especially those Scandanavians, their English is far better than others!
I can't see Maori giving away
I can't see Maori giving away control of their language to the masses.
I worked in HK for the best
I worked in HK for the best part of a decade and just before the Handover my company provided a free Putonghua course (that's Mandarin to you). It's a bloody hard language to learn, but about 1/2 as hard as Guangdonghua (that's Cantonese to you). Both languages are monosyllabic (for you Kiwis, that means every word is only one syllable), so intonation is used to differentiate similar sounding words. In Putonghua, there are 3 intonations, in Cantonese there are (depending on who you speak to) either 7 or 9. To us Gweilos (white ghosts), there's damn all difference. The only way to learn is total submersion. Having said that, it would make far more sense to teach Putonghua at school rather than French or German. There aren't many colonies of either in the neighbourhood.
Anyhow, I thought Jonkey talked surprising sense on the interview shown yesterday, but not as much as David Mahon. Can't you get an article from him Bernard. He hit the nail right on the head.
http://envirohk.wordpress.com/
Mandarin has 4 intonations
Mandarin has 4 intonations IIRC :)
Angus, Good idea on David
Angus,
Good idea on David Mahon. I'll work on getting a Double Shot interview.
Here's the TVNZ Q&A interview with Mahon in both text and video form. Well worth a read.
cheers
Bernard
I agree with what most others
I agree with what most others are saying here, we don't need to all learn to speak Mandarin. If our future landlords and masters want the rent they can damn well ask for it in Engrish.
This is a joke right? For
This is a joke right? For starter there are hundreds of languages in china, not just manderin. I suggest China first learn about democracy, freedom of speech and THEN go tell John Key! haaa!
为什么没有更多的人只是使用谷歌翻译? (Why do
为什么没有更多的人只是使用谷歌翻译?
(Why do not more people just use Google Translation?)
http://www.google.co.nz/language_tools?hl=en
Nice try! The sentence
Nice try! The sentence structure is wrong in your question. Unfortunately, one can not literally translate word for word into Chinese because the syntax is different in Chinese grammar.
That's why google accepts
That's why google accepts alternative suggestions. It's a continuous work in process and can only get better.
Is google allowed in China?
Is google allowed in China?
It wouldn't need to be,
It wouldn't need to be, unless they we're the ones required to do the translating from Inglish to mandarin.
We should be trying to hide
We should be trying to hide from the Chinese and go under the radar, not trying to buddy up with them. They do not really want to be our friends and do not want to help us. They want to take what we have for themselves, end of story.
We are a very special and lucky country with lots of natural gifts and not too many people. This is a unique gift in the modern world and we should be trying to protect that. If we flood our country with immigrants or let our politicians continue to sell off our land and assets to the highest bidder we will sorely regret it over the years to come as the world population continues to explode while at the same time the world also runs out of everything.
We seem to in this country currently have a warped sense of what real wealth is, like some how life would be better if we could just import more consumerist cr@p from overseas. I would contest that measured correctly we are already one of the wealthiest countries in the world, we just don't realise it....yet.
From the childrens book the Lorax ... "The Truffula trees are what everyone needs" not mindless plastic junk made in some stupid polluting factory in China.
It's about a whole lot more
It's about a whole lot more than consumerist junk - we are a country that like it or not makes a majority of our living by exporting primary products. You can recommend we hide from China but NZ'd be a lot sorrier place if it was not for their recent economic expansion you so despise. And this will increasingly be the case as time goes by. A lot of our aspirations and our future well being is inextricably linked with China , however unapalatable that may be to some.
Your utopian self sufficient fortress NZ sounds rosy until you need the latest medical technology or a university to educate your kids. Ma & Pa with a cow and few hens on a lifestyle block ain't going to buy you a new hip or other essential infastructure. It is large scale primary production and trade that buys those essentials.
We are hardly 'flooding the country with immigrants' and your fear of large scale land sales to Chinese interests is paranoia. Govt has made it clear they respect NZrs unease about rural spaces being sold to (some) foreigners even although NZrs have no issue with them buying our companies. Japanese interests can buy sawmills with nary a NZ eyebrow raised, New York money men can buy farms and turn them into private golf course, Forests can be sold to Canadians, Ruskies can buy milk processing facilities but immediately the 'rapacious' Chinese express interest in investing in NZ , we shriek with horror, citing the negative experiences African and other states with weak governments have had over poorly controlled Chinese investment. As if NZ were the South Pacific equivalent of Angola.
At the risk of stereotyping them, Asians would have to be one of the most industrious and easy to integrate immigrant categories. And while the idea of a static or shrinking population has superficial appeal, we face a future significant demographic, and consequent economic, crisis without immigration. We should welcome properly regulated Chinese immigration and investment in this country
Middleman - I dont think you
Middleman - I dont think you really grasp whats happening here. Haven't the events of the last 2 years taught you anything? Late in 2008 we were days from a complete meltdown in the global financial system. Do you think that was just an invention, a figment of someone's imagination? The next 20 years will not remotely be like the last 20. We are at, or very nearly so at the point at which the economic growth that has been characterised as an essential of global economic development grinds to a halt because of resource depletion (of course with additional contributions from the on-going effects of the GFC). 'Aspirations' as you term them are going to be set backward, not forward. For every 10 years forward in time, think a retreat backwards in time in terms of living standards of the order of 20 years or more. Hip replacements? Guess what - they arent going to be on many peoples agenda 20 years down the track.
Faced with such a scenario, offering permanent ownership of any of our resources to overseas interests (of whatever nation) is idiocy. To repeat- we are a small, underpopulated nation, a long way away from others, with an abundance of our own resources - wonderful!. We will never have the ephemeral surge in living standards that the Aussies have had and that many seem to crave - but then in 10 years time we won't (hopefully) have a population base which has exhausted its freshwater and biological resources either.
andyh 2008 was a money market
andyh
2008 was a money market meltdown, little or nothing to do with a resources imbalance.
Economic growth will remain a key target for a very long time yet ; the battle for resources has much further to go than your short timeframes , before it forces modification of our attitude towards growth.
NZs ratio of resources to poulation means we have an abundant surplus and thus in the happy position of being able to have 'aspirations'. Your dystopian vision of thousands of people with dodgy hips limping around in pain unnecessarily might appeal to you hair shirt types but thankfully it will remain just that - a vision.
We need capital to build the sort of society we want and NZrs are poor at creating it. Those of us for whom a return to a horse and cart lifestyle doesn't really appeal, have only one place to get it - offshore, including from capital wealthy Chinese.
Lloyds of London and the
Lloyds of London and the Institute of Strategic Studies/Chatham House are only the most recent organizations to see the writing on the wall Middleman:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/jul/11/peak-oil-energy-disruption
Your living in a perma-growth mirage which is hitting the walls as we speak. And yes there are very clear links between the financial crash and resource depletion. Ultimately debt is a long term call on energy, as energy lies at the base of our entire financial system.
I'm with andyh. And although
I'm with andyh. And although I see access to technological advances retreating (the example of widely available, publicly funded hip operations being a good one), it doesn't necessarily mean society must therefore become less humanitarian, or caring, so to speak. Letting nature take it's course is a concept we in the West have become blind to as the level of intervention, both socially and economically, has gone so far that "normal and natural" in many cases is beyond our present ability to comprehend.
Those that persue a simpler way have been largely ridiculed. Take the programme, "The Good Life" which basically was a brilliant comedy about growing your own vegetables!
Humans are just another
Humans are just another species on this planet therefore part of nature and part of the 'system'. Trying to separate 'humans' and 'nature' is a futile exercise in my opinion.
Not trying to separate them.
Not trying to separate them. Rachel Carson put it this way:
"We still talk in terms of conquest. We still haven't become mature enough to think of ourselves as only a tiny part of a vast and incredible universe. Man's attitude toward nature is today critically important simply because we have now acquired a fateful power to alter and destroy nature.
"But man is a part of nature, and his war against nature is inevitably a war against himself. The rains have become an instrument to bring down from the atmosphere the deadly products of atomic explosions. Water, which is probably our most important natural resource, is now used and re-used with incredible recklessness.
"Now, I truly believe, that we in this generation, must come to terms with nature, and I think we're challenged as mankind has never been challenged before to prove our maturity and our mastery, not of nature, but of ourselves."
In that I still read a
In that I still read a separation of the two. Man at war with nature. In this generation we must come to terms with nature.
Like any other species and at an individual level, we utilise the resources around us. Space, food, shelter etc. Things have changed a bit over the centuries I guess. Where once groups of humans would move to new resources when those around them were depleted or unavailable, now we stay put and push/pull them to each other. Who really knows how long this phase could go on?
Who in their right mind would give up their own access to resources to favour another? It's all in the selfish gene.
A natural system is all about equilibrium isn't it? Don't get too hung up on how far out to the side we've gone (if we have). It will go back the other way sooner or later.
Don't know where you get the
Don't know where you get the idea I'm a believer in the feasibility of permanent gowth. It's bleedingly obvious resource constraints will eventually force we humans to adopt a different life value measure to the present GDP growth based one. Unless we can develop different technology. A 19th century observer would have predicted the end of modernisation and death to the aspirations of the ordinary person when the coal runs out. And been wrong.
Your belief that a major philosophical change on consumption is essential is correct but your hope that this will occur soon is doomed to disappointment.
"Unless we can develop
"Unless we can develop different technology" then the change won't need to be a philosophical one - it will simply be a material one, and I suspect within my lifetime.
I think learning a second or
I think learning a second or even third language is a great idea - especially those of our closest trade partners.
1. Learn a language helps you understand cultural imperatives and thereby reduce cultural assumptions
2. It imparts discipline;
3 It gives you a competative advantage.
I believe we should ALL be learning Maori firstly
Second Mandarin. and third
Arabic
That way, we can learn to moderate our inherent racism - brought about from an attitude that western culture and ways of doing things are the only way; and we can learn to understand what makes them tick, and therefore what products they will buy :-)(
Remember - knowledge is power, and to "mis" quote the sage - keep your friends close, and your comptetion closer
The Chinese Century if it
The Chinese Century if it ever comes to light will still have English as its core language. English being the most “international” language is much more than a means of communication. It is the cornerstone of the Law & Justice systems, the Technical language of Science & Engineering and for Arts & Entertainment. The bulk and accelerating rise of the library of information & knowledge today is in English.
Therefore to thrive in the future and in any century for that matter, master the English language. English is the language that binds the world together the most. Learning Mandarin or the language of any other potential future Superpower is but a “just a nice to have”.
www.shanghai2010.co.nz/market
www.shanghai2010.co.nz/marketing_2.html
In the current climate
In the current climate talking the same language is for all of us far more crucial then learning Mandarin.
WK
What a load of bollocks,
What a load of bollocks, Bernard. Forget Mandarin, let everyone else learn English, that's a much easier solution.
I was the last at my school to do Latin, which subsequently metamorphosed into Maori and Japanese. (Clearly Japanese was never needed, unless you are a whaling activist). Personally I think Latin will be of more use than Mandarin, quidni Bernardum?
Shouldn't we be
Shouldn't we be learning Esperanto?
New Zealanders should at
New Zealanders should at least try and grasp financial literacy first. To me their are arguments against learning mandarin as there is when NASA recklessly sends messages into space not knowing if their are hostile aliens deciphering them.
That was an ironic post,
That was an ironic post, right?
The alternate
The alternate view;
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeff-schweitzer/chinas-downfall-the-ultim_b_158338.html
China's Downfall: The Ultimate Impact of Environmental Degradation.
first learn to eat wth chop
first learn to eat wth chop sticks!
by Chris_j | 12 Jul 10,
by Chris_j | 12 Jul 10, 10:51pm
What a load of bollocks, Bernard. Forget Mandarin, let everyone else learn English,
Everyone should learn Maori, the language of New Zealand's first people.
Why not Welsh? At least it
Why not Welsh? At least it has a literature, and more speakers than Maori, too!
Or better still everyone
Or better still everyone should learn how to get along, something that we are lacking at the moment.
An article about a Chinese
An article about a Chinese migrant in the NZ Herald http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10658402
China will either fall apart
China will either fall apart from the inside out, or through war with the USA to keep its citizens happy. When China is at war, how will our exporting look then? I say stick with the USA.
Should our government/army also practice driving over people in Cathedral Square with tanks, to make us more like China? Our politicians would enjoy being like China, no more embarassing apologies.
Spot on!
the people who say that
the people who say that mandarin is next to useless in China are being disingenous. Mandarin is China's lingua franca - the national language that binds all linguistic groups. That means that in most parts of China, people will speak a regional dialect - Sichuanese, Shanghainese, Cantonese, Hunanese etc but they will also speak Mandarin. So Mandarin is the most useful Chinese language to learn because it will be understood by much of China - and also the increasing Chinese diaspora around the world.
This fear of an Asian planet stuff amuses me. Of course speaking Chinese will be useful now and in the future. But importantly, future generations of New Zealanders will be competing in a global labour market, applying for jobs at multinationals and their competition will be bilingual and multilingual Asians, many of them Chinese who can speak several languages as well as English. Now if I were an employer at a multinational company, given I was judging two candidates of equal qualifications, enthusiasm and experience, I would certainly pick the one with more language skills. It makes sense, doesn't it? Bit like putting your head in the sand to say but they'll all learn English.
Nice piece, Bernard. Well done.
Good debate Bernard. A few
Good debate Bernard. A few years ago one of the foreign banks in NZ, with significant interests in Asia did some modelling on Chinese migration not just to NZ, but across the globe. As nations reach a certain level of development (education etc), their populations become increasingly mobile and up to 5% of their population departs for greener shores. The UK and India are prime examples with 40m people from India/Pakistan now residing outside India. Projections were that up to 50m people of Chinese descent will move abroad in the next decade or so. Assume 95% of those choose other countries such as USA, Oz, UK etc.) and 5% chose NZ as their destination (and why not? clean green with good healthcare, education etc.) then we have a latent demand of 2.5m Chinese wanting to immigrate to NZ. Boom times ahead methinks (buy houses!), but politically we could be in for interesting times.
Of course learning Mandarin
Of course learning Mandarin would be useful but, realistically, the number of Kiwis needing to interact with Chinese speakers is always going to be small. Is'nt english language skills a requirement for immigration?
What is disconcerting with this Chinese obsession we are suffering is a failure to appreciate who/what we are dealing with.
This is one of the most repressive, totalitarian regimes on earth, an ally of the Norks no less, serial polluter and colonial bully and opressor in Africa and elsewhere.
China is buying up or taking over farmland, fisheries, forests, mines and oil reserves from any country dumb enough to let them.
China doesn't want to buy anything from New Zealand, it wants to own us and all we've got.
Very correct Kiwidave
Very correct Kiwidave
I lived in China for over 6
I lived in China for over 6 years and studied Mandarin for most of that time. Mandarin is widely spoken in China and is the only language you need to learn. Regional dialects are also spoken but there would be little benefit for a foreigner to learn them unless they lived there permanently. Written Chinese is the same except China uses simplified characters (as does Singapore) where as Taiwan and Hong Kong still use the complicated (traditional characters).
Its true English is becoming more widely spoken in China and is seen as a way for getting a better job. But like any country, people respond better if you can speak their own language. If you visit China regularly, then its handy to be able to get around without needing an interpreter.
Learning more than one language at school is normal in most countries outside of English speaking countries like NZ. The problem with learning Chinese in NZ is that it would be hard to find people to practice with (just like learning Japanese, German, French or Spanish). But countries like Singapore (where everyone learns English and a second language - Mandarin for the Chinese, Malay for the Malays, Tamil for the Indians) have a huge competitive advantage in the international workplace.
If Asia is where our future lies in terms of trade, it makes sense for children in school to be given opportunities to learn a second language. We have a huge resource of Asian immigrants who could be trained as teachers giving children opportunities to learn Mandarin, Japanese, Korean, Indonesian, Hindi etc.
My wife is from Singapore and taught Mandarin to children after school twice a week at a Chinese church near where we live. The Chinese understand the usefulness of Mandarin and many teach their children their children at home (including writing) although not all. If schools gave the option, I'm sure this would provide a good pool of future workers who were bi-lingual and able to do business comfortably in Asia to the benefit of everyone in NZ.
Good idea I was talking to a
Good idea
I was talking to a mandarin the other day - didn't understand a word
Try to peel him and I’m
Try to peel him and I’m sure he’s talking.
WK
In reply to Troy's first post
In reply to Troy's first post - quantity is often meaningless. Spanish is spoken more widely than English and yet it has never been the main language of trade/business as far as I know (unless you go way, way back. In which case English wasn't even around).
I could be wrong of course!
English has grown in use throughout the world mainly due to its use by non-native English-speaking nations. It could well be that the majority of English speakers are not in fact of British descent...
I'm with Andyh and Kate on
I'm with Andyh and Kate on this one - Bernard H and Middleman should get out more, there's a real world away from the computer screen.
China can't get to where we are, en masse, in terms of income or material wealth per head. Nor can India. But the two trying, spells the very immediate end of the surplus world we have taken for granted.
a 100 pear-to-peak Hubbert curve for a finite URR, gives you 18 years for the 'second half'' to depletion. Not long. It doesn't happen like that of course - the very increase was only underwritten by the supply, so its a bumpy decay, with multiple -dumb - attempts to kick-start growth along the way.
Society probably falls apart en route. China will succumb to internal problems (environmental and logisitcal and angst-directional) before them. Historically she has always re-schism'd.
China has less than a decade left, Bernard. The question is whether she goes military when the penny drops - as the Greater co-prospherity Sphere experience suggests.
Might as well learn Hindi,
Might as well learn Hindi, Korean and Australian because they are our major trading partners
Interesting backdrop to some
Interesting backdrop to some of the above reasoning is a comparison of GDP projections to 2015 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_future_GDP_%28nominal%... about 2015 China's GDP is forecast to be around half that of the USA and less than half that of the EU. Impressive and a massive opportunity but maybe a spread of trade interests is best with a corresponding marketing focus.
Welcome to the Chinese way
Welcome to the Chinese way of doing business!
Kiwis will not know what has hit them
From Money Morning
There is a big upset in the Rare Earths market right now, and with good reason.
China has steadily positioned itself as the world's biggest producer of rare earths in recent years. Even though it is sitting roughly a third of the world's deposits, it is now controlling95% of global supply. It has squeezed other producers out of the market by undercutting their prices, and now has a monopoly on the market.
Last week China cut exports quotas by 72%. This brings down shipments from roughly 28,000 tonnes to a measly 8,000 tonnes. The Chinese Society for Rare Earths said that its producers weren't making enough profit. Well, this move should drive rare earth prices through the roof, and give the producers all the profits they could imagine.
So, what are rare earths, and why should you care as an investor?
Well rare earths are as the name suggests, relatively rare. Only 75,000 tonnes are produced each year worldwide. Industries use their unique properties for technological applications like computer hard drives, cell phones, as well as green uses such as wind turbines and hybrid vehicle technology. The rare earths are needed badly for green technology in a modernising economy. Demand is rising and Chinese supply (effectively most of global supply) has just been deliberately bottle-necked.
Shocking stuff PP. This is
Shocking stuff PP.
This is precisly why we would be very foolish to allow Chinese companies to key own sectors of our economy.
We are told that they want to ensure continuity of supply etc. Absolute nonsense. They are free to buy everything they need on the open market, we can sell them all the dairy products they want for example. This is all about ownership and control, can you imagine anything more short sighted than selling your vital industries to your customers.
Really dumb.
With all this nauseating
With all this nauseating grovelling to China going on, let's look at a few facts. A couple of years ago the pollies were patting themselves on the back over the NZ China FTA.
What have we got? We're buying 50% more from them than they are from us and our total exports to China are a pathetic 2.5% of GDP. And that's the good news.
China has a right under the FTA to use Chinese personal in any NZ operation they own, we are forbidden from owning Chinese real estate. On and on, in short a massive sell out of our sovereignty.
It is real scary to hear that Brownlee is talking to Sinopec and Sinosteel about setting up operations here. All negotiations hidden away under the guise of "commercial sensativity" With the attitude the Key administration have, god knows what sort of a half arsed, pennies in the dollar deal we'll end up with. Oh and no need for enviromental protection, same rules as mainland China I don't doubt. Brilliant!
Bernards latest PR campaign,
Bernards latest PR campaign, for China this time.
What a load of rubbish
What a load of rubbish Bernard why do you keep on sounding like John Keys Parrot, If you hadnt noticed lately that New Zealand is not China or even a small part of china.Yes there are Chinese living here and there has been for over 120 years , how about getting the public to learn,speak and understand English first....And the fact that China is a hard core commie outfit that respects nobody that includes their own people. they have no freedoms ie speech,right to a fair trial,private property rights, forced abortion,mass exections the list goes on and on .....they can get stuffed. The Peoples Party is 100% corupt they also control the Business arm as well , Wake up Bernard.
BAZ
Not letting kiwi students
Not letting kiwi students learn Chinese won't stop the Chinese evading.
Building a Great Wall around New Zealand will.
Just do what China did 3000 years ago.
Why do our children have to
Why do our children have to learn Mandarin?
The recurring theme here is that its for the purpose of "Business", how is it going to benefit a 7 year old? I only say 7 year old because most of the media have portrayed this new language learning in primary schools but im guessing they want to introduce it to high school aswell? How does it really benefit someone learning Mandarin because of "Business"?
The chinese are the ones coming into an ENGLISH speaking country therefore it only seems right for them to learn ENGLISH not the other way around?
I would most certainly think it to be natural to want to learn a countrys language before travelling there, why would i go into a country with no prior knowledge of the language and customs etc? If you want to be able to succeed in a foreign country and be able to relate to the people of the land then you become one of them, to the best of your ability right?
It doesnt make sense to me that we have to make the effort when we are in our own country with our own language, communicating in English which is far more universal then chinese.
Any opinions?
"The chinese are the ones
"The chinese are the ones coming into an ENGLISH speaking country therefore it only seems right for them to learn ENGLISH not the other way around?" - Quite right. It'd be nice if English speakers did the same when they travel overseas, instead of expecting everybody to speak English.
But seeing how little enthusiasm in learning foreign languages English speakers seem to have, it seems unlikely they'd even try to learn a language that is so different to their own anyway (let alone a third language!).
"It doesnt make sense to me
"It doesnt make sense to me that we have to make the effort when we are in our own country with our own language, communicating in English"...now now Person calm down...deep breathing...you are probably old enuff not to have to worry about what the main language in NZ will be in the year 2080...Mandarin! Now stop that...it's no good screaming at the computer screen...take it like a girl...have a good cry and a sniff....that's better isn't it?
Well funny enough Wally, im
Well funny enough Wally, im a 19year old female at the University of Auckland specialising in Education so it IS going to matter to me whether or not schools are going to be teaching Mandarin. Do you not agree with me that Chinese people commuting into New Zealand should more importantly be learning english? Doesnt it make more sense? If they want to run businesses and investments here then should'nt they learn the predominant native tounge here not the other way around? Im open to discussion.
Im also very calm thank you, i've done no screaming whatsoever, im simply stating my opinion on the matter, what were your thoughts exactly?
Fair enuff point but you
Fair enuff point but you misunderstand me person....you see I think Kiwi kids should be learning English.(.hopefully they will stop saying "nuthink" and start saying "nothing")...and Mandarin and a third language!....But if you are 19 now you will be 89 in 2080 and Kiwi culture will be as different then...as it is today compared to 70 years ago. Don't biff out your Apple stuff cos it will be worth a bundle.
(No subject)
"Chinese people commuting
"Chinese people commuting into New Zealand"
Crikey love, that's a heck of a commute!
Anonymous. Im pretty sure
Anonymous.
Im pretty sure you understand the context im using it in.
I agree, NZ is becoming what
I agree, NZ is becoming what the UK has become a place where the exisiting citizens feel like second class citizens. It so easy to see that when you walk round Auckland these days you feel like this isn't your country even though you were born there and your family have lived there for generations, whereas some of the Chinese have only lived here for a few years and treat this place as if it is there country which I think is wrong. What makes things worse though there are Chinese writing everywhere in Auckland and slowly the NZ kiwi culture is dying and the government want to make things worse by trading with China and forcing them to make allowances and learn there language, when in fact it is them who should be learning how to speak English and learning the Maori langauge.
The main fear I have is NZ forming a superstate like the UK did with the EU signing away all the countries freedom. NZ will be swamped by rapid immigration if NZ gets any closer to china demanding more resourses and more money from the poor kiwi citizens like us.
Nzullun's cultcha uz
Nzullun's cultcha uz dyung?
NOOOOOOOOOO...!
Luck, I wunt down tu thu
Luck, I wunt down tu thu shops tuduy tu gut sum fush un chups and mulk but ut wuz rully cold utsud un I forgot tu tuck moy swutshut, so, luck, I wuz rully froozing culd, un thun thus stupud chunk un thu shop sud thut I shud huv brought moy swutshut, cuz, luck, ut uz rully cold utsud tuduy, so, luck, I tuld hum tuh shuttup, yu knoooOOOOW?
"NZ is becoming what the UK
"NZ is becoming what the UK has become a place where the exisiting citizens feel like second class citizens. It so easy to see that when you walk round Auckland these days you feel like this isn't your country even though you were born there and your family have lived there for generations"....circa 1850
LOL!
LOL!
Hey mate there are Chinese
Hey mate there are Chinese people whose families have lived in the Otago region longer than many of the "true blue Kiwi families" I know have been in NZ.
Quite right Dunnie...and the
Quite right Dunnie...and the miners really got up the noses of the Brits on the gold fields on account they worked a dam sight harder. The circa 1850 comment relates to what the indigenous Kiwi were thinking at that time in the Auckland region!
Applying today's standards to
Applying today's standards to yesterday's actions always gets a laugh.
Wally thats because you are a
Wally thats because you are a second class citizen mate. The rest of us feel just fine, and we enjoy cultural diversity. It provides a richness and vibrance to a country. Crawl back into your hole.
Blow it out your ear
Blow it out your ear anon...my comment relates to the thoughts Maori rightly had in the 1850s regarding the waves of British immigrants flooding in. Go learn some history and try passing a year 9 exam ..I am quite happy to have cultural diversity. Just understand that culture changes over time especially when diversity is encouraged.
Clearly you are a small
Clearly you are a small minded racist. Maybe you should move to the Chatham Islands where you will feel less threatened.
This is bizarre Wally, look
This is bizarre Wally, look better. Who is really controlling this country and making most profit: Banking sector and oil companies, how many are owned by Chinese? From my window I see McDonalds, Subway, Pizza Hutt, Kmart down the road, all Chinese brands, right? Not to mention our Foreign Affair Minister is having weekly briefings with US ambassador.
Not just you are racists but also very close minded.
Maori should court Chinese
Maori should court Chinese military backing and kick the rest of us out of the country. Most people on this site would welcome the chance to gain refugee status as they are obviously unable to leave NZ by anyother means.
How about using those of us
How about using those of us that already live in China, read and write Chinese to some degree, know the place, know how to operate here, instead of moaning about the non existent foreign language skills and unwillingness to learn in New Zealand, and trying to send out "greenhorns" who have no idea of how and what to do in China. A person speaking three languages are trilingual, a person speak two languages are bilingual, a person speaking one language is a Kiwi????
I read all the comments
I read all the comments again. I once learned Japanese too, and that is how I started. Even if Japan and China often are at loggerheads, their cultures, language and writing is very similar, as is the underlying paths and thoughts that is expressed in a language. In fact, maybe half the Japanese language is actually Chinese, imported from China. “Mountain” is Zhan in Chinese and San in Japanese, region or area is Qu I Chinese and Ku in Japanese, etc. The writing character is exactly the same, the pronunciation is almost exactly the same. The basic structure of the languages is almost also exactly the same. Chinese writing is spoken language independent, you can easily read it in English, it has nothing to do with pronounciation. Reading Chinese is a bit like looking at a series of pictures telling a story. You don’t need any language at all to understand the story, but the perception and interpretation may be different depending on the background of the person, just as everyone does not laugh at the same things looking at a silent movie. This is what is so important in working in and with China, to understand and work with the Chinese mind, and where the Kiwis fall so short.
Hey I am a Malaysian Chinese
Hey I am a Malaysian Chinese who can speak English, Mandarin and Malay.
I read many things related to anti-Asian sentiment in New Zealand recently.
What do you guys think of Asians/Chinese in general? Feel threathened by their influx?
no worries learning chinnese
no worries learning chinnese is good
learning chinese can be good
learning chinese can be good for connecting to chinese people as new settlers as well as making friends from china.
But busisness ties and political ties are currupting our nations stand on human rights as well as local jobs ,lets be senseable and stop our trade aggreements with them now,
they must improve human rights thier manners and honnest not curruptive trade.