sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Tuesday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: Euromageddon approaching within weeks; Iceland's new property bubble; US vs China Trade War v2.0; The Mega-bear chart; Spanish capital flight charted; Clarke and Dawe; Dilberts

Tuesday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: Euromageddon approaching within weeks; Iceland's new property bubble; US vs China Trade War v2.0; The Mega-bear chart; Spanish capital flight charted; Clarke and Dawe; Dilberts

Here's my Top 10 links from around the Internet at 11:00 am today in association with NZ Mint.

We welcome your additions in the comments below or via email to bernard.hickey@interest.co.nz.

See all previous Top 10s here.

My apologies for no Top 10 on Friday. I was travelling to Christchurch. My must read today is #1. Ambrose can't see much of a future for the euro.

1. The week that Europe stopped pretending - Ambrose Evans Pritchard at the The Telegraph has been one of the most trenchant critics of the Euro zone's response to the Global Financial Crisis and the existence of the Euro itself.

He is right.

Europe's economies are not aligned enough to allow the sustainable existence of the euro, unless there are massive transfers of wealth and subsidies within the region.

Essentially, to save the Euro, Germany now has to transfer large chunks of its wealth to Southern Europe.

At the moment Germany thinks it can have its cake of a weak euro and the strong export economy that allows, and have a Euro-zone at the same time.

It will have to allow the creation of Eurozone bonds that it guarantees and allow the European Central Bank to bail out Southern Europe's banks.

Or it will have to give up the Euro.

Or worse still, it could do nothing while the Euro implodes under the weight of its own inconsistencies. That's what Germany is doing now.

Here's Pritchard:

On a single day, the European Commission said monetary union was in danger of "disintegration" and the European Central Bank said it was "unsustainable" as constructed. Their plaintive cries may have fallen on deaf ears in Berlin, but they were heard all too clearly by investors across the world.

Joschka Fischer, Germany’s former vice-Chancellor, said EU leaders have two weeks left to save the project.

"Europe continues to try to quench the fire with gasoline – German-enforced austerity. In a mere three years, the eurozone’s financial crisis has become an existential crisis for Europe."

And this is most interesting. Serious (well at least high profile) people in Italy and Spain are now talking about leaving the euro, or forcing Germany out.

Ex-premier Silvio Berlusconi offered us his cunningly pitched "mad idea" on Friday. If the ECB refuses to act as a lender of last resort, Italy should take matters into its own hands. "We should use our own mint to print euros," he said. It is a thinly veiled threat.

"If Europe refuses to listen to our demands, we should say 'bye, bye’ and leave the euro. Or tell the Germans to leave the euro if they are not happy," he said.

2. Hit the speculators - Nobel Prize winning economist Joe Stiglitz talks at Bloomberg about the need for a fairer tax system that directs activity to production rather than speculation speculation rather than production.

“It’s absolutely essential that we have a fair tax system and one that directs our economic activity to production not to speculation,” Stiglitz, a Columbia University professor, said today in a Bloomberg Television interview on “Surveillance Midday” with Tom Keene.

“If you have a tax system in which people at the very top pay half the rate of somebody who is working hard for their income simply because they get their income from speculation, that’s an unfair system,” said Stiglitz, 69, who won the Nobel Prize in economics in 2001. “It’s a distorting system. It leads to lower economic growth.”

Stiglitz appeared to discuss his new book, “The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future.”

3. Maybe Japan hasn't done so badly - Many see Japan's experience over the last 20 years as a sign of failure to deal with the bursting of an asset bubble.

Here's Paul Krugman saying Japan has actually done better at keeping unemployment relatively low. Better than America.

4. Don't rely on China again - Reuters reports China will not be able to repeat its 4 trillion yuan stimulus of late 2008 and early 2009.

The 4 trillion yuan ($628 billion) stimulus package launched to counter the post-Lehman global crisis won worldwide applause but left a stellar bill - a 10.7 trillion yuan ($1.7 trillion) mountain of local government debt, the risk of sour loans as growth slows and a super-heated property market.

Add in a naturally declining growth rate and China's ability and willingness to deliver a forceful response to mitigate the global impact from Europe's deepening debt crisis are seriously curtailed, analysts say.

"Not only is the policy room smaller, but the incentives for the government to produce a large stimulus package are smaller," Qinwei Wang, China economist at Capital Economics in London, told Reuters.

5. How political clout made banks too big to fail - Here's Bloomberg with the argument.

The circumstances that make policy makers succumb to the “too big to fail” doctrine are similar. An important difference, however, is that a Federal Reserve chairman’s resolve to bail out banks actually increases the likelihood of disaster, since the implicit promise to intervene has a perverse influence on the banks’ willingness to take risk.

Worse, “too big to fail” creates a self-fulfilling prophecy: Shortsighted policy makers will always prefer the cost of a bailout to the cost of upsetting the market. As a consequence, the problem continues and expands. Anticipating government bailouts in case of emergency, lenders are willing to lend to large financial institutions very cheaply and without restrictions. The managers of these financial institutions find it attractive to borrow a lot and to take wildly risky gambles, because they can maximize their profits by doing so.

6. Iceland property bubble - Who would have thunk it? Bloomberg reports property prices are up 40% in the last year in Iceland...

Iceland’s rebound is now being driven by household spending, a team of Arion economists led by Sveinsson said in a May 21 note. The central bank has raised borrowing costs four times since August, bringing the benchmark lending rate to 5.5 percent. The bank signaled this month more tightening is needed to cool the economy as inflation hovers well above its 2.5 percent target. Consumer prices grew an annual 6.4 percent in April, Statistics Iceland said April 27.

Faster inflation is adding to risks in the housing market as most mortgages are linked to theconsumer price index, meaning debt burdens swell as inflation accelerates. Household debt grew to 270 percent of disposable incomes in 2010, according to the latest figures available from the central bank. That compares with 217 percent a year before the banks collapsed and about 50 percent in the 1980s, according to the bank.

7. Winds of Trade War - Reuters reports the US has imposed duties on Chinese wind tower imports, alleging government subsidies that are putting US wind tower makers out of business.

U.S. producers also are asking for anti-dumping duties on wind towers from both China and Vietnam to offset what they say is unfairly low pricing. A Commerce Department decision in that phase of the case is due in late July.

Two weeks ago China accused the United States of "deliberating provoking trade friction in the clean-energy sector" by setting preliminary duties of 31 percent to 250 percent on billions of dollars of Chinese-made solar panels and cells. Beijing also issued a broad complaint last week at the World Trade Organization against how the United States calculates anti-dumping and countervailing duties on Chinese goods.

In a separate case on Wednesday, the U.S. International Trade Commission, gave final approval to duties ranging from about 21 percent to 46 percent on high-pressure steel cylinders from China in a petition for import protection filed last year by a Texas manufacturer.

8. Pettis and China's unbalanced economy  - I always link to Michael Pettis when he issues his latest views on China. 

He argues China's economy remains deeply unbalanced in favour of investment and light on consumption. The Chinese leadership knows this and it's one more reason why China can't repeat the 'magic' stimulus of 2008 and 2009.

Even in 2011, the latest year in which the China bulls have promised that the long-awaited rebalancing towards consumption had finally begun, there has been no rebalancing. I have argued, of course, most recently in my April 6 newsletter, that absent a massive and unlikely privatization program I cannot even conceive of how rebalancing could occur with growth rates much above 5 or 6%. That is why I have asserted, without evidence of course, that there has been no major rebalancing in 2011. Perhaps the evidence is finally emerging.

9. The great mega-bears chart  - This is one scary and self explanatory chart courtesy of BusinessInsider, showing the US, European and Japanese stock markets starting in 1990 and 1979 respectively.

Spooky.

And remember that Japan's stock market fell on Monday to its lowest levels since December 1983. Bonds anyone?

9 (bonus) Capital flight - This chart courtesy of FTAlphaville shows the capital flight in Spain up until the end of March. This is BEFORE the Greek election results and Spain's own budget blowout.

10. Totally Clarke and Dawe - A political scientist studies politics scientifically.

 

(Updated with correction to #2)

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

49 Comments

Well post a synopsis here and/or URL or if it looks really good send an email to news@interest.co.nz

regards

Up
0

This is an aggregation service Ivan, just things of interest to us moles.  I dont see how you can expect 10? ppl to find and post everything on the Internet on one site that interests you........do you know how many web servers there are?

If you want a classic expotential growth curve here it is,

http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2012/01/03/january-2012-web-server-su…

In 14 years since I threw my web site up the numbers have gone up 10 fold.....

regards

 

Up
0

Its pretty obvious that receivers are creaming. They are not accountable to anyone, its the perfect situation. 

The mums and dads are too stupid to know better or to complain - thats why they invested in finance companies (its a biased selection).

Case in point is - How the SCF receivers can sell the 'Good Bank' - yes, debt which repaid every month and was not at risk of default which would have brought in $900m, all they had to do was cash the interest payment cheques, for $120m to Nomura and GE is criminal. Yet little Billy said nothing...

 

 

Up
0

criminally negligent.........

regards

Up
0

I am glad someone has posted his one on tax as it is highly relevant given #2. Always a cracking read is out Bob.

Up
0

So even the Herald gets put extremist view point(s) as mainstream....

"There's only one indisputable fact about tax, namely, that by definition it is theft."

laughable if it wasnt so sad.

regards

Up
0

Actually if you go to the trouble to find the ingredients of theft, that is the individual components the have to be proven in a court, you will find the statement is highly accurate. The only thing that prevents it from being theft is another piece of legislation saying it is okay for the government to do it.

 

If you find the Iain Wishart piece on tax you will find that an interesting read. Was about 7 years ago in the Investigate magazine.

Up
0

http://theautomaticearth.org/Finance/crashing-the-operating-system-liqu…

Default, just what it means, no drugs, credit, spare parts,  fuel...hello <3rd world status in months.....

regards

 

Up
0

Currency markets going crazy – gold price exploding !

Time to protect NZ citizen from losing money: The introduction of a NZ GOLD DOLLAR

 

Please, listen to the entire video, especially last 7 min. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJuyL84cdWQ

 

Up
0

..... there is a Kiwi gold dollar , Walter .... they're cute little coins , containing pure gold , minted for us in Perth , Australia ....

 

You're free to buy as many of them as you wish !

Up
0

Gold Kiwis are minted in NZ, aren't they?

 

Up
0

Well tickle me pink , Bankman ....... they are ... at the NZ Mint , in 1/4 .. 1/2 and 1 whole ounce sizes , 24 carat gold !

 

..... may the fleas of a thousand camels infest my Gummy jock strap , for getting that wrong ....

Up
0

Don't call me Bankman.

Up
0

...... oooops , sorry ..... my bad ..... stay cool Bankbuddy ...

Up
0

All good.

 

Up
0

Again Gummy you miss the point.

A gold dollars should  be circulating within the population - another official NZcurrency.

Up
0

Kunst. That is just plain wrong. Yes in the past few hours the gold price has popped back up to where it was in early May which is roughly where it was at the beginning of 2012. Hardly 'exploding'. Gold is just moving like other commodities, inversely to the US dollar.

Is oil 'exploding' going from US$81.60 to $84.60 in the past few days? I don't think so ... just a bounce, maybe as in 'dead cat ...' - same with gold?

Up
0

..... only two years ago the Marc Faber " all is lost , all is woe " crowd were hectoring us that gold would rocket to $US 2500 , 5000 , even $US 10 000 an ounce .......

 

Where are they now ? .....

Up
0

Watch this space!

 

Up
0

more than happy to....

regards

Up
0

OOOOH their here GBH.....they are just a little...weee...teensy...bit subdued at the mo...why I see even zero hedge has toned down a mite......

 But their here GBH...don't make me name names....or noms.

 

Up
0

Oil price trend now looks to be setting in as steep(ish) and prolonged as 2008's drop.

http://www.oil-price.net/

BDI,

http://www.bloomberg.com/quote/BDIY:IND

regards

Up
0

David - in increasingly difficult time the value of money decreases – the purchasing power is going down.

Please, listen.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qeQtpRGSI_8

David - how do you stop the decrease of the purchasing power of the NZ$ ?

Up
0

Kunst - you keep berating the current government, yet when it comes to saving your arse, you still insist the government do it for you!!!! Buy your own gold fool and get out of the socialist mindset that the government will save you.

I tell ya now, if the shit is really going to hit the fan do things yourself, the government is broke.

Up
0

I am thinking Kunst beilives our unit of currency should exist independant of the government.  And isolated from any means for the government or banks to manipulate is value.

 

In this way the free market will require governments to live within its means in the way individuals, businesses and households do currently. 

 

Banks and governments are not currently restrained by the same market forces as they have been granted the exclusive monopoly to create new money.  This process debases existing money in circulation and affects the rest of us, in effect it is theft.

 

Kunst is asking for at least a honest monetary unit to be allowed to be used, it is a bit of a long shot to say he is a socilist for wanting to be able to use money that doesn't extract wealth from him and diverts it to bankers and his government!

Up
0

The best status – I spend most of my life in a country with a different political culture. The government serves the country has more meaning to me, then the government shouldn’t interfere. Especially now in  increasingly difficult times, the current trend, the divorcing from the government with the NZpublic is extremely damaging.

How do you stop the decrease of the purchasing power of the NZ$ ?

Up
0

re #8... It's not just China. It seems everywhere in the world is weak on consumption at the moment. Everyone wants a job, and everyone wants returns on investment but nobody wants to buy things. Hmmmm....

Up
0

... you're 100 % right there , mate .. .. . I'll buy that ....

Up
0

demand destruction......

regards

Up
0

Everywhere else in the world they call it " deleveraging " , ..... as the balance has tipped across a tadge towards saving more and spending less .....

 

..... only here in the hickeyzone can something so prudent and positive be labelled  negatively , " demand destruction ! " ....

Up
0

It's hard to know how to treat debt-fuelled consumption. On the one hand sure, it's consumption... but on the other hand, the people who effectively paid for it (ie the lenders) were investors seeking return. So is it investment, or is it consumption? Would it be reasonable to consider it an investment in demand?

 

Of course, a large amount of that debt won't ever get recovered by the investors. So for that lot, I guess it amounts to consumption spending via a large gift from lenders to borrowers! Hardly a sustainable model. 

Up
0

For Amanda:

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01j5h51#synopsis

30mins of Steve Keen at LSE gig.

 

Nutbar anyone?

 

Steven - you'll like what he says about Engineers at about 25-26 mins.

Up
0

Raf - maybe it's catching, in The Press today:

 

Creating money out of thin air

 

http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/opinion/columnists/chris-trotter/7042818/Creating-money-out-of-thin-air

 

"Surveying the global havoc wreaked by the world's privately owned financial institutions, I am moved to inquire whether any of them should ever again be permitted to create money out of thin air.

 

And looking at the huge number of homes that need to be built in Christchurch and around New Zealand, perhaps the best place to turn for the financial resources required to build a fair and prosperous future - is to ourselves."

Up
0

Surveying the global havoc wreaked by the world's privately owned financial institutions, I am moved to inquire whether any of them should ever again be permitted to create money out of thin air.
 

Les, while you seem content to propagate Mr Trotter's contention, do you or he have any proof that our local banks do anything other than lend borrowed deposits, whether they be local or foreign?  

Up
0

Stephen - nope, I think  that is what they do. I think the system works as per the RB paper by Gillian Lawrence, which outlines what many would call, "the text book 'money multiplying process". Individual banks and the banks, as a whole system, lend borrowed deposits, in a repetative process, where deposits become loans and vice versa, as the money changes hands around the 'whole system'. However, I don't see that as inconsistent with the attention grabbing saying, "banks create money out of thin air", given the process of multiplication and depositors being shown statements that indicates their money is safely sitting in their account ready to be withdrawn, even if some notice is required. It appears to me that the 'thin air' is actually in the depositors account and given loans must be balanced by deposits = lots of thin air = how banking works once this 'fraud' was legitimised way back when. Otherwise how can money be in two places at once?

 

Cheers, Les.   

 

Up
0

Thanks Les - I guess you mean this article , and in particular pages 26-28.

 

Which leads me to wonder what the Governor is doing diverting attention away from the mechanics of a possible bank run, as you see it, with a statement like this.

 

The Reserve Bank’s new prudential liquidity policy, introduced in 2010, has helped to reduce this vulnerability of the banks to liquidity shocks, by requiring banks to hold more ‘core funding’ (i.e. retail deposits and long-term wholesale funding). However, the underlying vulnerability will remain until New Zealand achieves a sustained improvement in national savings. Excerpt from this.

 

 

Up
0

Regarding (2), once you understand that tax is a theft, then how do you get to 'fair' from that point?

Pertaining to the point, itself, in terms of allocating scarce resources in an economy, speculators have every bit as an important function as producers do. The civlised answer to the free, civilised society, is not for the fist of government to whack the speculators, it's for it to stop whacking the producers. Stop the state theft, and let business, and free people, pursue their happiness, and don't get all envy ridden just because someone might have more than you. Just like the Swedish government, ironically, is doing.

Up
0

Even Adam Smith and John Stuart Mill wanted to whack speculators with property tax and the "unearned" gain of inheritance. 

Up
0

Why whack anybody with tax.

 

Do you realise where we're heading for ... Are you happy with that?

Up
0

Sod the TSB breaking wind ..! this is the news....http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/commidity-prices-drop-on-economic-woes-in-europe-china-us/2012/06/04/gJQApJsVEV_story.html

It'll be the talk of the town on the morrow......

 In theory Bernard you should not even have time this week to amuse the property junkies (pro / anti) with a little thread they can berate each other on...

 We've got a crisis coming.....!

http://www.smh.com.au/business/lower-exports-to-weigh-on-economic-growth-20120605-1zt82.html

sorry A.J....I'll stop now....I'm sure the team are on it.....!!. 

Up
0

..... not wishing to pour sunshine upon the commodity markets' misery ...... but isn't this also a good thing , I mean , cheaper corn ... cheaper petrol ..... copper down , so no incentive for Wolly to risk falling off the Government House roof at 3 a.m. .....

 

Cheaper petrol is a good as a tax cut in my wallet !

Up
0

Only if commodities fall faster than the NZD. Oil's way down but hasn't moved much at NZ pumps yet. At some point a fall in the NZD will trigger overseas selling of NZ shares and property especially if they've borrowed in a safe haven currency.

Up
0

Just hang fire on the ol petrolie there GBH.....note the kiwi's attempts to fly have taken a gluttenous turn for the worse......

.as it is the catchphrase of the day I'll join in...

 

Watch this space...

yep that one just there...any news on the auctions yet..?

Up
0

It's an un-named depression, where people are stopping borrowing and paying off their debts, where they can, as money is subsequently destroyed, so there is less to lend. But this is an inevitable process, and the danger of refinancing (QE) the banks to 'solve' the depression, which they have been doing continuously since 2008 (it hasn't worked), is that they will overdo it and it will cause out of control inflation. Well, the QE thus far has failed, and more is not likely to do anything except create more debt - and lead to an even bigger problem down the road. It's time to stop (it was time to stop ages ago) and let the cookie crumbles fall where they will. The world will not end for the average guy, but it will for the banksters. It's time for the politicians to wake up and act with responsibility. Yes, there will be chaos for a time, but better sooner than much worse later, in my opinion.......

Up
0

...... as most of the QE to date has merely falling into the banks' balance sheets , and turned them less red & more black , I don't see inflation as a concern of central banks ....

Up
0

As Kiwi living in Europe, for now, I see first hand the effect this corrupt banking system is having, grinding most economies to a shuddering crawl, while the gutless self serving pollies 'fiddle while Rome burns'... I repeat, let the cookie crumble ....

Up
0

Worth readng MoM on all this too:  she's an analyst for one of the East Coast regional banks and has a way with words....and figgers.

Up
0

#2, Stiglitz: "“It’s absolutely essential that we have a fair tax system and one that directs our economic activity to production not to speculation"

Stiglitz obviously hasn't studied the Kiwi economic miracle, where economic growth is guaranteed by our unique refusal to countenance a CGT.  We know here that the secret to a robust and sustainable economy is to implicitly favour property speculation.  Poor benighted uncomprehending fool that he is, not understanding the key to true riches!

 

Up
0