sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Wednesday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: Britain rows back from PPPs; 'Eventually we all have to have our moment'; China's 'Mistress-Industrial complex'; How nano-trading hurts regular investors; Dilbert

Wednesday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: Britain rows back from PPPs; 'Eventually we all have to have our moment'; China's 'Mistress-Industrial complex'; How nano-trading hurts regular investors; Dilbert

Here's my Top 10 links from around the Internet at 11 am in association with NZ Mint.

As always, we welcome your additions in the comments below or via email tobernard.hickey@interest.co.nz.

See all previous Top 10s here.

My must watch is #9 on China's shadow banking system, which grew lending at more than 50% last year...

1. More public and less private - The BBC's Robert Peston reports the British government is edging away from the same Public Private Partnerships that New Zealand's government is keen to use.

It turns out the PPPs done in Britain over the last decade were great deals for the companies, but not so much for the government or taxpayers.

The Conservative/Liberal Democrats coalition is likely to announce the more controlled Private Finance initiative tonight.

Is our government wary enough of these PPPs?

There's a big risk they store up huge public liabilities for the future.

I still can't work out why the government would need to do this when it can borrow at 3.5%.

The last government financed the building and maintenance of vast numbers of schools, hospitals and other expensive investments by asking the private sector to bear the big costs, in return for regular payments from the public sector.

But the Treasury under George Osborne became concerned that huge long-term liabilities were being created for taxpayers - and that lousy negotiation by civil servants was allowing private companies to make huge windfall profits.

So in the Autumn Statement on Wednesday George Osborne will unveil what will be called Private Finance 2 (PF2) - which will involve the public sector taking stakes of up to 49% in individual private finance projects (20% stakes are likely to be typical) and appointing a director to the boards of each project. This is to ensure that the taxpayer gets a share of any profits from the deal.

In today's money, future PFI liabilities for taxpayers are £144bn, according to the Office for National Statistics.

2. Useful advice - NZTE's Guangzhou Trade Commissioner John Cochrane has written a useful guidance note to those businesses approached by distributors in China that may not be completely legitimate.

While China remains a lucrative market with enormous growth potential for many New Zealand companies, like many markets, it is not entirely without risks. For a fraction of the cost of an air ticket, even basic level due diligence should be performed at the start of any financial transaction.

3. 'Eventually we all have to have our moment' - AFR reports former Fletcher Building CEO and now Woolworths Chairman Ralph Waters saying the Australian economy is in for a quiet time it was always had to have.

He says Australia's manufacturing sector is toast and its dairy farmers are wasting their time too.

“Australia avoided [a recession] but you can’t do that forever and ­eventually we all have to have our moment. The difference in our moment is we are paying the debt and interest we tried to run up to avoid this.”

Mr Waters said he held grave fears for many Australian manufacturing companies given structural changes caused by the strong dollar and the carbon tax. “Those businesses are in tremendous stress and not one is going to get through a tough year with a few interest rate cuts,” he said.

“They’re going to be gone.” The structural changes would weed out inefficient or impractical businesses, he said, citing the dairy industry as one example.

4. '7 years of fat and 7 years of lean' - PIMCO boss Bill Gross reckons in his December newsletter that economic growth in the US and in other developed nations is slowing to below 2% because of structural headwinds. HT Bloomberg

“The biblical metaphor of seven years of fat leading to seven years of lean may be quite apropos in the current case with the observation that the developed world’s growth binge has been decades in the making,” Gross wrote in his monthly investment outlook posted on the Newport Beach, California-based company’s website today. “We may need at least a decade for the healing.”

5. The corruption crackdown starts - WSJ reports the new Chinese government has begun a crackdown on the shadowy agents that organise junkets for the super-rich to Macau's casinos.

In recent weeks, police in mainland China and Macau have detained people from at least three of Macau's biggest junket operators, the middlemen who extend credit to high-roller players and collect the debts in China, according to people familiar with the situation. Some of the detentions have occurred in China and in other cases, the detainees have been moved there, these people say.

Casino operators in Macau have also noticed more restrictions on cross-border financial transactions involving Chinese funds and recently received requests for information from Macau police about the people staying at their hotels, casino executives and others said. Such requests aren't unheard of but have raised concerns in light of the other events, these people say.

Here's the key line:

Macau boomed in recent years as Chinese gamblers flooded into the former Portuguese colony, which now generates more than five times the gambling revenue of the Las Vegas Strip. International authorities, including in the U.S., have raised concerns that wealthy Chinese were using the casinos to launder the proceeds of corruption and to illegally get money out of the country. Chinese individuals aren't allowed to move more than $50,000 a year out of the country, including to Macau, which, like Hong Kong, is part of China but has its own financial system and its own set of laws. That restriction has prompted some high-roller gamblers to rely on junket operators to get around Chinese laws and provide access to greater sums.

6. The Mistress Industrial complex - Foreign Policy's Christina Larson reports on whether China can solve its corruption problem by targeting adultery. My favourite adverb in this piece is  'atop'.

The Chongqing sex-bribes-videotape saga comes to light just days after Xi Jinping, who was appointed Communist Party chairman in mid-November, made anti-corruption pledges a centerpiece of an important speech: "Much evidence tells us that worsening corruption's only outcome will be the end of the party and the end of the state. We must be vigilant," he told top officials in Beijing; Xi also likened graft to "worms breeding in decaying matter." Whether or not Xi's intentions are genuine, similar pledges have been repeated for more than a decade. So how, exactly, do you crack down on corruption in China?

Li Chengyan, a professor at Peking University's Research Center for Government Integrity, has an idea: Involve the mistresses. No, seriously. A staunch party loyalist, he is researching the role of kept women, or ernai, as whistleblowers, intentionally or otherwise. "The phenomenon of mistresses is so common in Chinese history, but the scale today is really unprecedented," says Li, who thinks the problem is caused by loopholes in the discipline system and lack of effective supervision. "If we examine corrupt officials, about 80 to 90 percent of them also have mistresses."

Li sees a connection between China's modern concubine culture and its runaway graft: the "emperor psychology" of the unrestrained: "Absolute power corrupts absolutely. When officials have absolute power, they become bold to ignore the law and social norms and do everything they like." This ultimately hurts the party: "It's misleading to think that keeping a mistress is not a big problem -- that it won't affect the official's main work, records, and achievements. Temptation brings temptation."

7. The Japanese bank problem - Lots of people worry about Japan's debts. Now their banks are too because they are so exposed to painfully high Japanese bond prices (low yields).

Here's the FT on the problem.

The risk facing Japanese banks from their vast holdings of government bonds has been underlined by the chief executive of the country’s largest bank who said it would struggle to reduce its exposure.

Nobuyuki Hirano, chief executive of Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, admitted that the bank’s Y40tn ($485bn) holdings of Japanese government bonds were a major risk but said he was powerless to do much about it.

“This is analysts’ main concern,” he told the Financial Times. “A default of Japanese government bonds would have a severe impact on us. But we need to be responsible to keep that market in order.”

According to data produced by the Bank for International Settlements, and published last week by the Bank of England, the holdings of JGBs by Japan’s banks equate to 900 per cent of their tier one capital, compared with about 25 per cent for UK banks’ exposure to gilts and 100 per cent for US banks’ exposure to US Treasuries.

8. High speed trading hurts investors - So reports the New York Times.

A top government economist has concluded that the high-speed trading firms that have come to dominate the nation’s financial markets are taking significant profits from traditional investors.

The chief economist at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Andrei Kirilenko, reports in a coming study that high-frequency traders make an average profit of as much as $5.05 each time they go up against small traders buying and selling one of the most widely used financial contracts.

9. China's shadow banking system - This FT analysis by Simon Rabinovitch of China's slightly precarious shadow banking system (finance companies) is well worth a read.

The chairman of Bank of China, a big commercial lender, is far more candid about the potential hazards of shadow banking. “To some extent, this is fundamentally a Ponzi scheme,” Xiao Gang wrote in the China Daily. “The music may stop when investors lose confidence.”

For all the difficulties of making a calculation, one thing is apparent: its rapid growth. Trusts, the backbone of the shadow sector, had Rmb6.3tn of assets under management at the end of the third quarter, up 54 per cent from a year earlier and five-times more than at the start of 2009. KPMG says trusts could surpass insurance this year as the second-biggest institutional component of China’s financial system, smaller only than banks.

A senior commercial banker who worked as a regulator until last year says the complexity of the shadow products was also increasing. “It has begun to get to a degree like we saw in the financial crisis in the west. Products are being created that regulators don’t fully understand, banks don’t fully understand and customers don’t fully understand,” he says.

10. Totally Jon Stewart talks to a deranged Millionaire.

 

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

23 Comments

 and now Woolworths Chairman Ralph Waters saying the Australian economy is in for a quiet time it was always had to have.

Did Ralph really say that...? some bad England there from Ralphie, was he drunk..? 

Up
0

#1 - "lousy negotiation by civil servants"

 

Whodathunk?

Up
0

Buck passing, I think you will find the politics behind it left the civil servants hands tied as much as anything else.

regards

 

Up
0

So Raiph Waters agrees that evev the Lucky Aussie economy is in a recession, and the good time is ending.....What happened ?? No more places to dig ???

 

Lets see how long our own NZ economy with million dollars Auckland houses can last...

Up
0

its not so much how long this lasts as how long it takes us to recover afterwards (2 decades+)...and of course such as he cant resists a dig at keynesian economics.....while preaching voodoo economics that got us here for 30 years.

ho hum

regards

Up
0

I think you'll find the keynesian policies of the last few decades had a great deal to do with our current problems

Up
0

Uh no, the last 30 years wasnt a keynesian economic era.  It was more austrian....or maybe quasi-austrian.

regards

Up
0

Lol you clearly have no idea what Austrian economics is if you think the last 30 years have been even remotely Austrian.  Austrians are opposed to fiat currency and central banks, which have been at the root of our problems.  Blaming Austrians for our current woes makes as much sense as blaming Ross Taylor for the All Blacks losing to England.

Up
0

Perhaps, Steven, it was the (mis?) application of Keynesian economics that has taken us to this point. The bursting of this colossal government bond bubble is going to create one hell of a mess. Even as debt levels hit new records; Japan, UK, US and Euro area bond prices are the highest (lowest interest rates) in hundreds of years. The mother of all bubbles.

You might enjoy this little discourse on where we are now.

 

 "Since the Second World War, policymakers concerned with both fiscal and monetary policy have opportunistically followed certain Keynesian principles, particularly using government spending as a stabilizer during periods of economic contraction. In 1968, steady economic growth and low inflation had led optimists to declare that the business cycle was dead. When President Nixon ended gold convertibility of the dollar in 1971 he justified it by declaring that he was a Keynesian. Even Milton Friedman, founder of the monetary school of economics, told Time magazine that from a methodological standpoint, “We’re all Keynesians now.”

  In dampening each successive downturn, authorities accumulated increasingly larger deficits and brought about a debt supercycle that lasted in excess of half a century. The complementary aspect of Keynes’ guidance on deficit spending – raising taxes during upswings – was rarely followed because of its political unpopularity. As a result of the constant fiscal support without the tax increases, businesses and households became comfortable operating with continuously higher leverage ratios. The conventional wisdom was that this government backstop could never be exhausted."   Read more: http://guggenheimpartners.com/Perspectives/Media/The-Keynesian-Depressi…    
Up
0

No it wasnt....Greenspan et al are more in the mold of austrians/objectivists.  At best it can be said that they leaned on keynesian principles when their own mantra failed....

While I think that article l is mostly politically blinkered rubbish some points are correct "certain Keynesian principles, particularly using government spending as a stabilizer during periods of economic contraction"  this though if you read Keynes and even Paul Krugman clearly indicate that that accumilated debt had to be cleared.  It hasnt been hence why I call the last 40 years quasi or voodoo economics....

The second point is its dated late 60s early 70s when yes the quasi-keynesians held sway....that blew up in the 1970s and was replaced with monetarism. Though that to I think became quasi-moneterism....ie bent to Pollies will beyond what it was sane to do (with it). 

"The complementary aspect of Keynes’ guidance on deficit spending – raising taxes during upswings – was rarely followed because of its political unpopularity"

Which is frankly cherry picking....hence when you take bits of something to an extent that whats taken isnt sufficient to be sound its a misnomer to call it an original....it isnt.

The author for me is just one of the right wing whinners who probably has been busy chearleeding the last 30 years "successes" Now he's whining as he faces losing his "hard earned" gains.

"so-called Keynesian policies." what he fails to do is attach these policies where they truely belong with the witch doctors we voted in.

What he fails to see is the cause of the Great Depression, a credit bubble/debt trap....and guess what this is here again today only a lot bigger.

One last thing Keynes said, he expected that the world would get out of the Great Depression because we had the energy, resources and man power to do so....this time we dont have the energy or resources...the man power has consumed them.

"The conventional wisdom was that this government backstop could never be exhausted."

So thats proving in-correct, so when the prop stops?

So the Q is where do we end up and how long will it take.  Hence why I say the Greater/Greatest Depression is here real soon....and with it deflation.....

regards

 

 

 

 

Up
0

Anyone who thinks that the recent economic policies of western countries is Austrian or quasi -Austrian is totally ignorant of Austrian economic philosophy.  Please read Ludwig von Mises, Frederick Hayek or for a modern Austrian economist Detlev Schlichter to find out why you are so wrong.  If the U.S. had been using Austrian economic policies why did Ron Paul always vote against increases in Gov't spending?  

Up
0

???????.

Up
0

If Chinese individuals can't move more than $50,000pa out of China how do they buy property in NZ, Australia, Canada, US etc? Are they using companies like the Crafar Farm purchase? Do banks, who must be aware of the $50,000 limit, question these people? If not are they complicit in subverting Chinese law? Will the NZ govt be asked by a new Chinese regime desperate to hold their economy together, to assist in the repatriation of these funds, like the US asking for account details from Switzerland.

Up
0

What?  Do you think Chinese are some kind of "do-gooder" folk?  You are obviously naive. 

If a person, trying to move millions, is trying to move millions, he simply finds a way and prays he doesn't get caught.  The risk is worth it to these people. 

NZ is happy to receive their money.  Who would object?  Many "homeowners" who bought at the peak in 2007, are get bailed-out right now, along with banks who hold the mortgages. 

China may not have an extradition treaty with NZ, so your question would be moot.  NZ government wouldn't care, and can ignore requests.  It isn't murder.  See "Citizen Liu" on 20/20. 

As history shows, people find a way.  If you had millions of ill-gotten loot, stolen from your government or other ill-gotten gain, and had to get it out of China, to save your own and your family's life, I'm sure you would find a way.  Unless you would be one that would stay behind and wait for permission that would never be provided. 

These prices in Auckland represent the storm passing through...of those trying to get out before it all collapses on itself.  Safe-haven buying, I reckon.  Those inside China will tell you is isn't so rosy.  Next time you can ask the Chinese store clerk how things are with family in the home land. 

Up
0

Am not sure the authorities actually try very hard to stop such activity. Most of the wealthy people will also be high up in the "Party" and as long as they keep their nose politically clean, then no real problem, one imagines.

Separately anyone with a senior management, or shareholding position, in an export or import trading company will necessarily be dealing in foreign currency. It would not be difficult at all to siphon foreign money off through that process- potentially perfectly legally.

Up
0

# 5

 

Bernard Hickey quotes WSJ
Wealthy Chinese are using the casinos to launder the proceeds of corruption and to illegally get money out of the country. Chinese individuals aren't allowed to move more than $50,000 a year out of the country. That restriction has prompted some high-roller gamblers to rely on junket operators to get around Chinese laws and provide access to greater sums.

What Bernard Hickey doesn't mention
New Zealand's complicity in acquiescing to the same activities without a murmur
See applications for Speed Visa requests by Southern China Airlines to NZ authorities

Special Dispensation for Chinese High-Rollers to New Zealand Casinos 
New Zealand Immigration and Border Patrol acquiesces
Where does the money end up. Where does it go?

Gamblers Bankroll comes into New Zealand. Does it go back out?

See previous articles.

Up
0

Curious as to what the laundering process is at a casino. Does the casino management have to be complicit for it to work?

Up
0

What makes you think they even go near a casino when they get here?

First Pit Stop - one of the many asian money-changers lining Queen Street

Up
0

But they must either be getting dispensation to take more than $50,000 from their account in China, doing it illegally or with bribes and no one here is asking questions, or smuggling cash.

Up
0

There is no dispensation required to withdrawl 50,000 or more from their account in China. There is only capital control to remit or take out more than 50,000 from the country.

 

Just withdraw 50,000 or more from their account in China and the money changer in Queen St will do the rest ......Current rate is 5 % commission on value

Up
0

Google "Triffin's Dilemma" 

 

Explains a lot of China's actions, of late, especially after they quoted same in a speech in 2008.  Well worth a read. 

 

All of these high prices in Auckland are ot because property investors are geniuses, it's because of hot money leaving the shores of places like China before the music stops.  "Naked policitician" is a new phrase in China.  It matters. 

That said, it won't last.  It's a matter of getting completely out of debt, including mortgage, or get so hopelessly into debt that you will require a baliout, along with most others on your street. 

Up
0

#1 Quelle surprise....!

Cheers

Up
0

Huang Nubo, chairman of Beijing-based Zhongkun Investment Group, is planning to protest directly to the Icelandic government after it ordered him to reapply for permission to go ahead with a major tourist project on the northeast coast of the island.

 

Huang was first invited to invest by local landowners in Iceland in August 2011, and proposed a $200 million deal to build a high-end tourist project in the country's northeast, which involved buying 300 square kilometers of land.

The deal was first rejected by the Icelandic interior minister in November 2011, despite the possible creating of 400 to 600 jobs.

http://usa.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2012-12/05/content_15986598.htm

Up
0