We review how much New Zealand households have in financial assets, the components, and how they are growing (or not). The levels may surprise you

New Zealand households have a huge portfolio of assets on their balance sheets - far more than most of us realise.

Most conversation around the household balance sheet revolves around liabilities, and mainly those for housing.

But you are likely to be surprised by the scale of the assets.

No-one is suggesting this wealth is evenly distributed, but conversation about wealth distribution should start by understanding this data.

Household assets are growing modestly - over the past ten years they have grown on average +4.0% pa. This is entirely credible because if you remove inflation, that basically mirrors GDP growth over the period.

But the key thing is, apart from the Global Financial Crisis, that growth has been steady and compounding.

Over the past 10 years, these assets have risen from $545 billion to $806 billion, almost a 50% rise.

These are the components of these assets, according to the excellent analysis by the Reserve Bank. It is very comprehensive and is missing just one element that we can think of; what households have invested into mortgage trusts and property syndicates. (And we also don't know how much is 'loaned' by loan sharks and held as loans in the black economy).

NZ$ bln, as at March, Note 2007 2012 2017 avg pa
growth
only as held by households ...   $ $ $ %
           
Notes & Coin C22 1.9 2.5 3.3 +5.8
Deposits at banks S40 67.9 101.9 157.8 +8.8
Deposits at non-bank deposit takers T4 12.1 4.9 3.4 -11.8
Kiwibonds, other Govt bonds D30 0.6 0.7 0.5 -1.7
Local Govt securities C22 0.3 0.4 0.3 +2.4
Corporate bonds C22 2.9 4.4 3.9 +3.1
Loans via lawyers/contributory mortgages C22 0.8 0.5 0.3 -9.8
NZ listed shares C22 109.3 76.3 120.4 +1.0
Unlisted shares C22 59.3 91.6 117.9 +7.1
Equity in unincorporated businesses C22 196.8 228.0 246.9 +2.3
Overseas listed shares C22 7.8 6.3 7.8 +0.1
Managed Funds C22 42.2 37.6 45.4 +0.7
Cash management trusts T46     7.9  
Mortgage trusts/property syndicates   ?? ?? ??  
Equity in life insurance policies T42 10.5 8.1 8.7 -0.2
KiwiSaver T43   12.5 41.0  
GSF / NPF / other Superannuation T44 31.9 31.7 35.4 +1.0
Non-life insurance claims C22 0.8 9.9 5.3 +20.8
Peer-to-peer       0.1  
Loan shark / black economy assets   ?? ?? ??  

  ===== ===== ===== -----
Total household financial assets C21 $ 545.0 $ 617.3 $ 806.4 +4.0

The overall growth may be just +4.0% pa, but that masks some other significant changes which are shown above. Specifically, bank deposits are up +8.8% pa, and the collapse of the finance company industry can also be seen in the above table.

Also the growth in equity in the businesses of sole traders and other unincorporated enterprises has been very sub-par.

However that low growth hasn't shaken the dominance of these sorts of enterprises - it's just that they are not really growing. And neither are the holdings of households in listed shares.

This huge asset base is not being propped up by debt. Leaving housing debt to one side for the moment (because housing assets are not included in this analysis either), this $806.4 bln of household assets comes with just $30.5 bln of financial liabilities.

That $30.5 bln of liabilities are made up of $15.3 bln in consumer debt (of which $6.8 bln is for credit cards), plus $15.2 bln in student loans. (And consistent with having no coverage on the asset side, we just don't know the level of what is owed in the black economy, including to loan sharks.)

If you have read this far, you are likely to be wanting to know what the assets and liabilities are for households related to housing.

Here is that data: (the blue line is the asset value, the orange line is the liabilities owed by households to both banks, and to other housing lenders).

Adding the two components (housing and non housing assets), total household assets in New Zealand are an amazing $1.8 trillion. Who knew? Household liabilities total $264.5 bln or only 15% of the asset values.

That is the size of the pie. Now we are ready to talk about the distribution of this wealth.

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment or click on the "Register" link below a comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current Comment policy is here.

21 Comments

I'm loving this recent approach to data presentation and analysis on a variety of topics. Hard data (even if incomplete in some cases) that may confirm or may challenge suppositions, but fundamentally allows for evidence-based arguments.

That's what marks out Interest as being in a class of its own in NZ journalism.

"you are likely to be wanting to know what the assets and liabilities are for households" Yes, but....Assets are on a Revaluation Basis ( they can fluctuate up and down) whereas liabilities are Nominally fixed.

Yes, that was my first thought too. And if assets are overvalued in an snapshot/period ....

Interesting

Given the influx of skilled visa migrants over the same period of time the rise in Notes & Coin and Deposits at Banks is not suprising as they are better than proportionate. What is surpising is the poor increase in equity in "sole trader" businesses or unincorporated businesses which suggests NZ is failing to attract the entrepreneurial cohort it is designed to do

Maybe I'm reading it wrong

up
13

Interesting analysis David and on the face of it all looks healthy.

A few observations.

The value of housing and shares is based on the very small subsection of those assets that are being traded at any one time and extrapolated to the total and, as they say in the prospectus, can move up or down.

The value of Term Deposits is fixed and not subject to market value but is dependant on financial stability.

Of total household assets 55% are in housing, 8.7% in Term Deposits, 6.6% in NZ listed shares and 2.3% in Kiwisaver.

Of total household liabilities 88% are offset against housing.

57% of total bank lending is against housing. In other words the security of a large proportion of Term Deposits is inextricably linked to housing.

By having such a large proportion of our household assets linked to a single country, single asset class we are engaging in a very dangerous gamble.

For the future of the country household assets need to become alot more diversified.

There are far too many people in this country whose asset tally starts off with "five eighths of" and ends with "all"

Five eighths of a mothball?

Be great to see the pie graphs for Aus, UK , USA

David,

Query on household listed NZ equities at $ 120 B when NZ Listed market cap is only $ 125 B.

Take out the non household e.g. AIA VCT by council and trusts.

Take out pension funds including kiwisaver ... is that in households ?

Take out foreign ownership of NZ listed equities ? How are dual listed treated - ANZ ?

Looks very high at first glance ? Anyone help here ?

"Equity in unincorporated businesses" looks massively high as well. Roughly the same as the value of all companies (listed and unlisted)?

There's a lot of small to medium business wholly owned by NZ residents. It's why policy should largely be geared towards encoring success in these business, not supporting big business/listed companies.

great report David - thank you

Tom, I take your point re 55% of bank debt is secured on housing, however housing debt is only 23% of total housing value. Granted we don't know how much of this total housing asset has no or little debt secured against it. That sort of data would allow more analysis and aid understanding of what level of risk there is for banks in this asset class as values decrease. Anyone have that data?

But the debt has not been revalued, whereas the assets have been. For years, I've been living in properties I could not afford to buy on my wages were it not for good old capital gains. I've often thought, is that how the world should work?

Sorry that should read 57%

Gold and silver missing from the list. Also P2P loans. I find the latter interesting because unlike bank lending, P2P lending has zero net affect on aggregate demand.

Boats, cars, art, trophy partner

What advantage is it to have lots of these assets, and yet somehow lose the thing/s of real value?

Good point on peer-to-peer. Have added it. But it is tiny. Four or five platforms, but the largest by far mostly funds wholesale. They may have $538 mln in loans, but the amounts funded by households is not known and likely to be quite small. Their largest funding comes from others like Heartland, etc. Will update with actual data when we can find it reliably.

Overseas equities is truly pathetic. Compare with the overseas interest in NZ would show how bad.
Of course we should blame the FIF tax which is totally misguided.

Even including a large portion of kiwi saver, overseas equities investment is very low.