sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

National return on investment for residential property less than 2%; rents will have to rise or property values to fall "significantly" to make a difference

Property
National return on investment for residential property less than 2%; rents will have to rise or property values to fall "significantly" to make a difference

By Amanda Morrall
 
Despite rising rents, low interest rates and stable housing values,  residential property remains an overall marginal investment as measured by the return on investment.
 
Data collected by interest.co.nz  shows average after-tax operating returns* were (as of May) less than 2%.
 
Interest.co.nz publisher David Chaston, said while ROI on residential property had risen to its highest level in five years (which is how long the website has been monitoring performance of this asset class) the lift hasn't been enough "to transform this investment from its poor return status.''
 
Factoring for steady or modest gains on property value and the removal of depreciation as a tax deduction, didn't change the outcome either, said Chaston commenting on the data shown in the following graph.
 
Period May 2011 May 2010 Dec 2010 Dec 2009 Dec 2005
Rental income $330.00 $320.00 $320.00 $310.00 $280.00
Mortgage payment $269.58 $272.47 $276.72 $282.29 $277.09
Mortgage interest $183.55 $187.56 $196.78 $196.79 $223.29
Rates & Insurance $27.03 $23.96 $25.39 $24.05 $19.19
Maintenance $10.12 $9.60 $9.81 $9.30 $8.40
Cash flow performance $23.27 $13.97 $8.08 -$5.64 -$24.68
Depreciation $0.00 $47.88 $47.16 $49.04 $40.52
Operating performance $109.30 $51.00 $40.86 $30.82 -$11.40
Income tax $32.79 $15.30 $12.26 $10.17 -$3.76
After tax income $76.51 $35.70 $28.60 $20.65 -$7.64
Investment $82,088 $82,170 $80,933 $84,150 $69,527
ROI (excl gains and losses) 1.47% 0.88% 0.52% -0.035% -1.85%
 
To be competitive with other asset classes, some investment experts (including financial advisor and bestselling writer Martin Hawes) suggest returns should be at a minumum of 7% after tax with 9% being the "sweet spot." Yet listed property trusts, haven't exactly been hitting that target either.
 
Over the last five years, AMP Office Trust, Kiwi Income Property Trust and  Argosy Property Trust have all been in negative territory, with -4.8%, -4.4% and -5% annual returns. By comparison, the NZX 50 Gross (which represents the prices of New Zealand's biggest companies and dividends) has delivered annual returns of 2.76%.

While some individual properties may have fared relatively better than the national ROI average on residential property, Chaston said the overall landscape suggests this is "not the time for this asset class.''

For residential property investors, the nearest proximity to a happy place is Gisborne, Timaru and Wanganui where improving ROIs are hovering around the 5% mark. Canterbury is also in that zone but the unique circumstances and uncertainty surrounding that market it put it in its own class as an investment.
 
While rents have been rising in some select areas, most obviously in Auckland, those increases look to be offset by rate hikes and also insurance, which is increasing as much as 50% with some insurers. (See chart below showing local authority rate increases).

Rental revenues fall short of hitting sweet spot

"Rents may be high and rising, but they are still not enough to cover the normal operating costs - even after depreciation expense is no longer provided for.''

Central Otago Lake was an exception said Chaston. He said the removal of depreciation deduction had the effect of pushing ROIs in that region into positive territory in April and May.

Chaston said national returns have also been dragged down by Auckland, Waikato, Bay of Plenty and Nelson/Malborough where returns are in negative territory.

For residential property to reinstate itself as the darling of the investment space it was five to seven years ago, either rents (limited by their affordability) will need to rise "significantly"  or property prices will need to fall significantly.

Chaston said a potential capital gains tax wouldn't alter the equation much.
 
"A proposed CGT will have little impact on this sector because such gains seem very unlikely for some considerable time. A proposed land tax would turn poor current returns into negative outcomes quickly without offsetting benefits.''
 
 
 
Real property investment retuns:      
net returns after tax, excluding capital gains      
 
May-2011
Apr-2011
May-2010
May-2009
May-2008
May-2007
New Zealand
1.47%
0.57%
0.88%
0.10%
-4.14%
-5.04%
Northland
1.15%
2.64%
-1.63%
-2.25%
-6.58%
-7.04%
Auckland
-0.74%
-1.30%
-1.26%
-2.10%
-6.26%
-6.09%
Waikato/BOP
-0.42%
-0.84%
-0.22%
-1.59%
-5.07%
-5.44%
Hawkes Bay
2.70%
5.35%
2.00%
3.37%
-2.23%
-2.46%
Manawatu/Wanganui
3.43%
3.59%
1.85%
1.27%
-2.47%
-2.49%
Taranaki
3.29%
3.85%
1.54%
0.84%
-3.72%
-3.52%
Wellington
1.73%
1.59%
0.53%
0.73%
-5.09%
-5.94%
Nelson/Marlborough
0.17%
-1.17%
0.16%
-1.12%
-6.24%
-6.53%
Canterbury/Westland
1.87%
0.62%
0.76%
-0.12%
-3.80%
-4.84%
Central Otago Lakes
3.71%
-2.87%
1.11%
-1.01%
-7.15%
-7.14%
Otago
3.29%
3.67%
4.11%
2.85%
-2.35%
-3.44%
Southland
3.83%
2.84%
4.80%
3.77%
-3.95%
-2.06%
--------------
*Assumptions used to calculate ROI: Three bedroom house, lower quartile purchased in good condition and rented as median rent. Mortgage on two-thirds of the purchase price, amortised over 25 years with weekly payments on a variable interest rate. Prior to August 2009, it was a two-year fixed rate. Balance of  purchase price funded with savings.
 
 

Local Authority income

Select chart tabs

NZ$ mil.
% y on y

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

44 Comments

..."To be competitive with other asset classes, some investment experts (including financial advisor and bestselling writer Martin Hawes) suggest returns should be at a minumum of 7% after tax with 9% being the "sweet spot.""

Isn't that a bit like the tail wagging the dog?

If the mathematics tell you that rental housing isn't as profitable as you think you would like, then perhaps it simply isn't such a great investment.

While my evidence is more anecdotal, investment rentals in stable markets (where housing price is stable) are quite low.

Up
0

Amanda what am I missing here.

Shouldnt the ROI after tax be calculated as; Net Return over Investment. Investment should equal investor outlay ie deposit on house.

($76.51*52 weeks)/$82088 = 4.8% ROI after tax or 6.9% before tax

??

Up
0

That got me confused too.

ROI = Cashflow Performance * 52 / Investment not after tax income which includes interest payments but excludes loan repayments.

Up
0

Yes this analysis beggars belief!

By my reckoning even this staged example shows a 6.9% pre-tax ROI!

And why no capital gains return? Would you ever analyse returns on a share portfolio without including capital gains?

If this property appreciates just 2% per annum over the life of the investment (less than inflation) then that is another 6% tax free ROI (assuming 2/3 loan to value ratio).

So in total there would be a 12.9% before tax ROI and a 10.8% after tax ROI.

That doesn't seem so bad to me!

(And yes I'm aware that sometimes property prices go down, but over the longterm that has not been the case in NZ. And if you just want to talk about the short term then in many years property prices have gone up a great deal more than 2%!)

Up
0

"Data collected by interest.co.nz  shows average after-tax operating returns..."  ummm  very independent study and unbiased..  This is a bit like data collected by Takeways Food Association shows that heavy consumption MSG is harmless!

Up
0

The table of real property investment returns highlights the solution ........ Invercargill !

....... getcha fat lazy property spruiking arses out of Yuckland , and waddle on down to Timmy's Town .

Fresh air ....... real bracingly fresh , Bluff oysters , the Burt Munro motorcycle collection , Southland has it all . And as the table shows , table-topping housing rentals , year after year .

........ And it's so clean in Invercargill , no littler in the streets , no rubbish anywhere ...... the great southerly gales just whip that stuff right outta there , and send it to Dunedin .

Up
0

Careful GBH - it might be a bubble. Lotta roofing contractors fixing a stadium roof, right about now. they might be from Auckland.....

When you live on the plains, it's all flats.

Up
0

I went there once....its cold and bleak....and Im being polite on what I think of it, easily the most un-pleasant winter days ive spent somewhere in NZ...

....but in terms of being a PI I would assume the rates are quite low, houses are quite cheap? and the population stable and reasonably well paid.....What would happen to it if the smelter shutdown though?

regards

Up
0

I've got a data point. The place that we rent has just been listed for mortgagee sale, I have no idea how many other properties the owner had.

My back of the envelope calculation suggests that he should have been making a 5% return on our place in Rotorua, he must have blown it in cities where housing is more expensive. I gather though he had problems with unpaid bills and damage from the previous tenants; one of the risks of being a property investor.

Ancedotal evidence suggests that a lot of PIs aren't keeping up with their bank payments now that the capital gains are gone, it would be interesting to see some figures.

Up
0

And perhaps the banks are being a little bit quiet about what's happening in the property world? Ring any bells:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-13925465

Up
0

If you buy something at a low enough price, that doesnt leak, in a good enough area, and fix a good enough rate it's quite possible to do well.

Not that difficult really.

Up
0

I agree with that, but will add that the right gearing ratio needs to be applied and that the money put into the property needs to be on a par with investments in various other activities (shares,bonds,mutual funds)

Up
0

Incredible - someone agreed with me!

Up
0

fortunately in Auckland we don't have this problem... there is a massive housing shortage and landlords can charge as much as they want, particularly in the greater city centre. A home doesn't have to be leak free to get desperate tenants throwing bunches of cash at it. High immigration and refugees fleeing Christchurch are just ramping up that rental bubble... punters need to rush out and buy now... not tomorrow... NOW!  If they don't want to be paying double the rent next year... making the average weekly rent in the big smoke 950 sweet smackers...

Thanks for the inside word Olly! 

Up
0

Median rental in C Auckland in May 11 was $395, or 7% higher than May 10.

So how are rents going to rise by 140% in a year in order to get to the $950 figure you are suggesting?

Are you another of Olly's personas?

Up
0

$950? Which Auckland do you live in?

Up
0

You can't get much for under 900$ for a house in Psnby/Hrne Bay now.

Reminds me of a few years ago when everyone was shocked at the first $40 main in an Auckland restaurant.

Now no one bats an eyelid.

Up
0

Median rent for a 3 bed house in Herne Bay in May 11 was $750 pw.

In Ponsonby it was $677.

Up
0

...and these areas are a tiny proportion of Auckland, and mostly owner-occupied I would imagine.

Up
0

When has "Three bedroom house, lower quartile purchased in good condition and rented as median rent. Mortgage on two-thirds of the purchase price, amortised over 25 years with weekly payments on a variable interest rate" EVER been a good rental investment guide - what rubbish !. 

Rental investment is all about the number of units you can put on a piece of LAND.

A far better indicator would be a three unit property investment as a guide.

How do you make money from renting a single house ?  - the yield can never be there.

Up
0

If you are absolutely sure that "the yield can never be there"

Then you will be absolutely right.

Up
0

The yield would be even worse for a lower quartile three bedroom house purchased in good condition and rented at a LOWER QUARTILE rent.

Up
0

Apart from Auckland , residential rentals nation wide will be very tough.

you have to specialize , l have a large 7 bedroom house north dunedin.

with senior students, fully set up , returning 11% gross , 8%before tax.

so it dosnt really matter short term  house price fluctuations (5 years).

long term , 10 years + , things are sweet . students are back every year.

52 week lease.  cheers gecko..

 

Up
0

I don't care what garbage the PIs spout, for the most part property investment remains a very poor choice at present. And I think rental gains have hit their limit for the time being. Seen plenty of significant rent reductions in the grammar zone recently - clearly landlords who believed the hype from the likes of Olly, but the reality does not match the hype 

Up
0

Quite, MIA! The unit next door was vacant for 8 weeks last Christmas, and the building manger dropped the rent $50 to re-let it . Last weekend, the new tenants ( 3 singltons - a policeman, a dental nurse and another of unknown trade)) moved out. It might be time to saunter down for another rent review if it stays unlet for a couple of weeks :)

Up
0

Bigger picture Matt....once the cost of credit reflects the piigs and USA fiasco, affording a mortgage here will be far tougher and the peasantry will move toward renting...OllyN is likely to be right there. But his point has always been that buying property should be done when prices are low and then only in the right places.

Also there is likely a tipping point where the % renting supports a 'landlord nation' which dominates the market, keeping prices high and so porking the rental demand. If there are bugger all privately owned properties and a govt policy that supports landlording one way or another, then what chance has the peasant.

On offer is a 3br semi rotten cement board clad Rhubarb and mold house in grottsville two hours commute from any work what so ever, or one of OllyN's inner city apartments ten minutes walk from plenty of jobs, a rental that is safe, clean, mold free and distant from the thuggish car wreck covered suburban nightmare.

Take your pick.

Up
0

Wolly,  I think the "big picture" you put forward is....unusual....yes I expect credit to be very hard to get because in a credit event aka the Great Depression this was the case....and we have a credit event looming.....So not even PIs will be getting credit and in fact if the admittedly small view I have from the last 3 years is anything to go by, PIs will find it harder than first time buyers to get credit they look/seem to be mortgagee sales fodder....so what will happen is a  property meltdown....Olly will be totally wrong.....and I believe you.....50% collapse in house prices maybe as much as 90% If Nicole Foss is correct....

Olly is right on location, location, location.....but there are many factors determining the location and these will change....cost and availability of transport being a growing one....Driving the Rangee to work when petrol is rationed wont be very easy....MiEV range will be the ideal max....2 hours commute, no one will be doing a 2 hours commute petrol is too expensive now and it will be significantly more so in the future, and even rationed.  Those 2 hours away will be tele-commuting or working locally....or on something like the main railway line routes and I doubt the tickets will be very affordable....

regards

Up
0

Hi MIA

May I ask you investment vehicle of choice?

The last rental I bought (2010) was in the low $260s and I collect $360 per week so a gross yield around 7%. Yes I know not flash and not the the magical 8% NET! But not bad with someone else's money (100% mortgaged) and in less than 20 years its mortgage free and part of my retirement package

Regards,

Up
0

thats not bad, but not great

what area?

I'd be concerned with that sort of property whether capital losses are a possibility. If it in a very handy location then you probably won't lose value at least.

of course some properties will still stack up - I'm talking in a general sense that property investment is poor at present

my investment? In my wife's business that is doing quite nicely

 

Up
0

Western suburbs, ticks the boxes near bus/rail, close to schools and quick jump onto motorway, will always be rented out.

 

Up
0

MIA just wondering are you manufacturing something or a service business?

Up
0

A Median is no good - who wants a little shoebox to live in?

Just had a quick look on trade me - yes you can get a 3bed house for $750 but you can also get a 3bed for $2000 pw

Up
0

Remember the $40 main.....let it be a lesson.

Up
0

There's such a thing as price resistance, SK. I know, I owned retaurants in the dim, dark past, and there is always a price barrier that consumers balk at. Maybe $40, maybe $50 ~ but when your customer has gone, it's hard to get them back. The all you can do, is lower the price again!

Up
0

Exactly....I started to deal with a fastener outlet recently (nuts and bolts) the first guy I delt with gave me good prices with a 25% markup on the catalouge price, not to bad.....then I got the other guy....he told me the prices had jsut jumped and were now  x 3 the cat price,,,except now Bunnings are cheaper.....I went and will continue to go to Bunnings....he lost a return customer through greed.....

regards

Up
0

As illogical as ever.

Why arent I paying 20$ for a main at the grove and clooneys - why arent they lowering their prices because you say they should? Why are they still packed out every night?

Good thing you got out of that game.

Up
0

It is correct that a lot of residential rentals don't make much return on capital, especially if purchased in more recent times, but remember Winston Churchill's comment 'that democracy was the worst form of government he knew except for every other form'. My experience in NZ is that property has been the worst form of investment except for every other form.

Up
0

nailed it again Muzza... couldn't have said it better myself... actually I can. Property sucks in NZ, but it sure sucks less than any other investment in NZ...

Up
0

Hehe, you feeling provocative today Amanda.

Up
0

Not deliberately. Easy to push buttons when property is such a sacred cow in NZ. Still think this guy has his finger on the pulse of where future prosperity will be found --  http://www.caseyresearch.com/editorial.php?page=articles/keeping-capita…

Up
0

For all the posters here who decry the residential property market for being the cause of all of NZ’s economic woes, I would have thought that you would be celebrating this news? After all, what better news could there possibly be that the returns from residential rental properties are simply too poor to justify them as an investment?  What better encouragement could you have to stop people speculating in property?

And all without a capital gains tax in sight too. Who would have thought it?

Up
0

Between you & me , DB , house prices are only a proxy for the inflation rate , aren't they . This lot at interest.co.nz  twitter on endlessly about what is an unproductive asset .

..  In any mature economy ( such as NZ ) if house prices consistently out-pace the CPI then we either have a catch-up from a previous period of underperformance ..... or we're in a bubble ....

..... now , at the risk of having the gang here kick my Gummy nuts in , I'll just express my opinion of the residential housing market in New Zealand and in Austrailer .....

........................blup - blup - blup - gurgle - yurgle - blup ..................

Up
0

This is such a weird piece of analysis!

You should do a story on the sharemarket next. Here is your headline:

"Share prices have to fall "significantly" to make shares an attractive investment"

I suppose if rental property prices went up 10% this year that will make them an even worse investment - except if you own one!

Up
0

I just got 90% finance for a home and income property investment in South Auckland.  Bought it very well (below true value as the vendor was leaving for Aussie and needed quick cash) at $290K.  After a $10K reno it is now worth $350K.  I revalued to 90% again, and have a strong cashflow positive investment even at the 3 year fixed rate I took, and after holding costs I have over $10K spending money!  Cool.

So Amanda - just how do you calculate the ROI on this, where I have been paid to do this deal by the bank.  I can't do this with deposits or shares.  No point leveraging a deposit and too risky borrowing on any NZ share?  Try adding value to these too - LOL

Up
0