HOT TOPICS:   QE  |   Macroprudential tools  |    Private equity

The comment stream

Reader poll

Which 1 of BNZ chief economist Tony Alexander's 8 ideas for tackling the over-heating housing market do you like best?

Choices
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

ANZ targets home buyers with seminar series and new accounts for first time buyers

Posted in Property

ANZ has launched two new initiatives aimed at attracting home buyers ranging from first-timers to those seeking to get involved in property investment.

The bank will be holding a series of free public seminars on a range of housing-related topics, initially in the Auckland area, starting from late February.

It is planned to conduct similar seminars in other parts of the country later in the year.

Additionally, the bank has launched a specific new product - ANZ First Home - targeting depositors saving for their first house. People registering for the package before March 31 could be up for a $10,000 prize to "kick-start" their deposit.

The seminars, titled the ANZ Property Unlocked Speaker Series brings together industry experts to help buyers through the steps to home ownership, the ANZ said.

The six different seminars will cover:  How to buy a first home, how to buy at auction, maximising the value of existing property, buying property for people who are new to New Zealand, and how to become a property investor.

ANZ retail managing director Kerri Thompson said the seminar series "arms people with the knowledge they need to avoid the pitfalls and to be in control of one of the biggest purchases of their lives".

“The series will also benefit those who are investing in property or renovating property. We’ve sourced industry experts to share their experience and knowledge with buyers,
renovators and investors,” she said. Industry experts include representatives from: Bayleys Real Estate, Withers Tsang and Co Chartered Accountants, Wadsworth Ray Lawyers, the Auckland Property Investors Association and  Jennian Homes.

Mrs Thompson said the ANZ First Home package combined all ANZ’s products, services and resources that first-home buyers needed.

"For most home buyers, the first step – saving the deposit – is the biggest challenge of all. Staying focused on a major savings goal isn’t easy, especially when it can take
months or years,” Mrs Thompson said.

“We wanted to make it easy for home buyers and help keep them on track – from deciding what their target deposit is, to tracking their savings against this target, to providing them information that they need at the time they need it.”

She said customers could  view their progress on the ANZ First Home website, which displays a virtual house that starts from the foundations and comes together as a buyer’s savings grow. At certain milestones, customers will receive emails marking their progress and providing tips and tricks relevant to that stage.
 

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment in the box on the right or click on the "'Register" link at the bottom of the comments. Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making these comments.

4 Comments

Staggering

Which is the stupidity

Which is the stupidity Wolly?
The council accepting that the building was up to standard, despite unchecked work being signed off?

The couple trusting that a council inspector did a through and legally responsible job?

That the building codes in NZ were up to scratch, and the system properly supported/represented any kind of Quality Control function (despite the huge graft/bakesh the various parties receive for their participation (aka "fees"))?

That yet again the legal system is plucking random numbers and refusing to hold government responsible for their duty of care?  And making uninformed assumptions about the ability and accuracy of unpresented "expert reports"?
That a couple would think they would get anything more than Soloman's "Justice" for a civil action against the system?
 
Reminding you that Builders' reports are non-binding and often they will carry a bunch of disclaimers about stuff they don't check (ie they usually only do really obvious stuff and insist the client signs away liability for the rest).  Real _Justice_ would have the judge prove that the builders report would have influenced the buying decision and detected the problems, (as most Builders Reports I've seen do not check such things because the builder would have to temporarily remove panels and re-finish the job afterwards, to be able to check inside cavities, and behind sealant/paint/gibb.

The entire package has

The entire package has stupidity written all over it...the council..the buyers..the building code bureaucracy..the Law...
It has TV entertainment stamped on it...where are the writers...the producers...prime time stuff...competes with Holmes on Homes!

I have the feeling that is

I have the feeling that is what the Judge was trying to say, although they're not allowed to disrespect their profession by stating it so bluntly.  Thus the more tactful "contributary neglience and failure to do full due diligence".

Buying an expensive investment, in a troubled times, without paranoia levels of tests..."Caveat Emptor" is also statement I'm reading between the lines that a Judge is not permitted to throw at the parties involved.  
 I also note that no mention of Impleader was raised by the Council which I find curious, but could be manuevering by (legal) council.