sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

We look at a better way to fund your business's working capital requirements, an area that many SME's overlook

Business
We look at a better way to fund your business's working capital requirements, an area that many SME's overlook

Lending to businesses is dominated in New Zealand by banks.

Borrowing by small businesses is similarly dominated, but this is unique in that most banks basically require real estate security for their lending, often the owner's house.

On the other hand, most small businesses require funding for working capital.

This mismatch generates a distortion and can induce financial stress.

It is easy to see why banks insist on this structure. Houses are more 'liquid' than SME debtors and stock and their value is more certain.

It also means that banks don't really need to make much effort to understand the business they are lending to. In fact, they can much more easily push lending decisions down to quite junior staff using well-understood mortgage lending criteria.

But for the business owner, this completely distorts how they fund their business, turning good practice on its head.

All businesses require funding in three areas:

1. Start up funding

This is the risk capital of the business - also known as 'equity'. Ideally, this will be unencumbered cash resources invested by the owner. But often owners don't have such liquid funds available and they may use their house as the ATM, increasing their mortgage to provide the funds needed. Borrowing money to make an equity investment is not ideal, certainly not recommended. But it happens, by increasing a mortgage or from friends or relatives. Hopefully not by using a credit card, but even that does happen.

Another source is to use funds from a third party investor. In that case however, they will want a generous shareholding and share of the profits. They will want it to be 'generous' because you will be in control of the business and therefore their risk is much higher. Third party shareholders are probably best brought in when the business has a provable track record.

2. Fixed asset finance

This is for specific items of plant and machinery (or land and buildings), things that will have multi-year productive lives for the business.

Asset vendors and suppliers often can supply this, and there are also specialist asset funders and finance companies (like UDC, Kiwi Asset Finance, and GE Capital). Some trading banks may also offer this asset-specific finance. The key here is to have the lending solely secured by the asset itself. It is not actually asset funding if a 'general security' is also taken over all the assets of the business and/or the owner.

Asset funding usually works best when the business is able to purchase the asset with a substantial deposit (of at least 25% or more).

Both start up capital and fixed asset funding address the long term needs of the business. But they don't help with the day-to-day operating requirements, which in many businesses can be quite mismatched with cash receipts. For this you need ...

3. Working capital funding

This is the lubricant that keeps most businesses running smoothly. Many businesses that have been running for a long time have built sufficient cash reserves to fund their working capital needs internally.

But many others can't do that, or they are expanding faster than their internal cash generation can support.

This is the funding that bridges the gap between buying the inputs and generating the cash from the regular business activity.

The cycle is usually between 30 and 90 days.

As such, the best funding for this is significantly different to equity or asset finance.

Working capital funding should be secured by working capital assets - that is, debtors and stocks.

It is the most often funded by an overdraft, which is appropriate. The other common credit used is 'creditors' (accounts payable).

It may also be funded by other options such as invoice financing, factoring, or single invoice discounting.

But there are problems with each of these and the main one is the cost. These are all high-cost options.

A bank overdraft also has 'security' issues in that the bank will usually want belts-and-braces protection that almost always requires the owner's house. Signing their 'debenture' or 'general security' documents also usually means they have a veto over you using any other form of finance. Asset financing is out unless you use them. Bank loan agreements are a straight-jacket. They may be your 'partner' but they are a very fair-weather friend.

As Terry Haydon of Auckland-based Cashflow Funding  says, "The approach taken by banks is totally at odds with the definition of working capital and ignores the fundamental reasons for working capital".

A working capital finance plan

Assuming your business has been financially set up with a sensible (and unencumbered) base of equity (something like 30-40% of the total asset value of the business), then the best approach is to get your working capital funding plan sorted first.

Objective 1. Working capital funding should be strictly related to your working capital needs and 'secured' only by those assets if possible. Don't try and make this funding cover fixed asset requirements and certainly not covering for a shortfall in the core capital requirements of the company.

Objective 2. Plan exactly what you will require over the working capital cycle of your business. Know the 'highs' of when your cash will flow in, and the 'lows' of when it flows out. You should have a continuous method to monitor this in advance in weekly blocks up to 3 months ahead. No surprises is the goal.

Objective 3. Prepare to give security on your working capital assets to your funder.

Objective 4. Work hard to keep costs for working capital funding under control. It is easy to get working capital funding that is high cost, but sensible research can make it quite manageable.

In fact, you might be surprised at how much a bank overdraft actually costs you. Overdraft costs are not transparent. There is the overdraft base rate which a bank will happily tell you. There is the margin, which will be on a document you sign somewhere which the bank will hope you will forget. And there is the facility fee, which you may not have realised at all. All up, they represent the cost to you of a business overdraft.

What can surprise is that these total costs can look more like credit card interest rates. Banks love business lending because it can be very profitable given all the 'extras' they can participate in. They and other non-bank lenders have more than $83 bln loaned out to businesses (plus another $54 bln loaned out to rural businesses).

About half of that is for working capital.

Some banks do offer working capital funding secured on current assets - banks like BNZ Partners and Heartland Bank - but they tend to charge interest rates on a cost scale as though they are unsecured, often touching the 20% pa level.

Your job is to minimise these finance costs.

You can do that best by understanding them. A good place to start is our business overdraft calculator.

If you are set up with best practice, working capital finance should cost you about 10% or 11% pa. (when most owners seem to be paying 14-20% pa for overdrafts). There is no point subsidising those who aren't at that level, or are embellishing bank margins.

Best practice does not use the owners house as an ATM for their business. Mortgage interest rates are seductively lower but it is usually a trap. 11% on a weekly or monthly up-and-down proper working capital funding arrangement may well be less than 5% on a omnibus, maximum-draw permanent home loan used for business purposes.

Besides, working capital funding is active, positive management of a real business issue. A background house loan is not and it can so easily mask corrosive issues that should be addressed when they arise.

A proper working capital funding arrangement:

- does not require security of your house,

- does require specific security of current assets,

- will require you to manage your stock and debtors to a plan agreed with your funder,

- works with your operating business cycle over a rolling 90 days period,

- can accommodate growing working capital requirements,

- should not cost more than an interest rate of about 10-12% pa when secured on current assets and you are organised with best practice.

- does not inhibit alternative funding requirements for fixed assets, nor separate equity raising,

- does not require you sign an all-obligations security document.

Knowing best practice should help you set up your working capital funding systems sustainably and as an integral element of your overall business.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

10 Comments

Excellent  advice David.

It's hard tho to get past those inadequate staff, intent with mortgaging your house for you.

Sometimes I have had to shout.

 

Up
0

There are some (at least one I have a working knowledge of) Bank/s out there who have teams of experienced staff who do "real" working capital lending

 

However, you are correct in two very key points - for "start ups" most financiers expect the owners to put their own "skin in the game" first (ie Mortgage security over their property)

 

Secondly, often to "qualify" to move up the pecking order at your Bank (to someone who has the specialist Skills and knowledge to do more complex lending) your business often has to have either a very large borrowing requirement or a turnover of around $2M (or both)

 

In saying that, there are always exceptions and I am aware of  many instances where one bank recognised that although the request/customer didn't fit the "pegholes" the Bank itself used to classify where their file should sit - the person reviewing their application had the common sense to refer them on "up the pecking order".  In all the instances I can think of the clients ended up "changing" banks.

 

So if you have hit the "ceiling" when it comes to the available equity left in your mortgage to grow your business (or you simply don't have mortgage secuirty availbe to support further growth for your current business) I suggest you have a quiet word with your accountant who will no doubt be able to point you to someone who can help.

Up
0

Check out BNZ Partners Working Capital Solutions Product  - Invoice Finance Facility   - which is no where near the " touching 20% rates quoted as above".

Its a standalone facility geared [securitised] off your debtors with rates aligned to the borrowing entity's key Balance Sheet and coverage ratios.

Great prodoct, highly responsive to growth and hightly rated amongst users. 

Up
0

Yes, The BNZ Partners 'invoice finance facility' is a good, proper working capital finance solution. Keen to get an idea of the costs though. That part is not very transparent - unless you get into a deep-and-meaningful 'sales' conversation with them. Any clues on costs for readers ?

Up
0

I guess CP is not an option for SMEs?

Up
0

A number of companies do varoius types of Invoice Financing (From lending based on individual Invoices to using your entire average Debtor Book balance to provide a Revolving Credit Facility) - many for much less than the "often touching the 20% level" figure quoted above.

 

For example, I would suggest looking at companies such as PFNZ Limited who specialise in tailoring their product to each specific business based on their overall Debtor levels (and quality) for significantly less than 20%

 

ASB Bank also provide working capital facilities for their Commercial clients secured by specific charges over Stock and Debtors including Overdrafts, Trade Finance and Commercial Credit Advance Facilities.   Once again, all priced under the rates suggested above.  No Mortgage security necessary provided your numbers stack up......

 

So, a lot of choices out there - you just need to make yourself aware of all of the options and get the appropriate advice.

 

:-)

 

Up
0

Fair enough. But I still think the only proper comparison is the total cost of credit. That is, the interest cost plus the facility fee. In my experience when you add these two you get a surprisingly high total rate. Do you know what each of these rates are for the institutions you mentioned? They are very hard to find out and I suspect the reason is that they don't look too flattering. Transparency is not a feature of this industry. I hope some of them engage here and reveal these costs. But I doubt they will.

Up
0

ASB's Overdraft Facility Fee is advertised on their web site and the Bank in most instances can provide an indicative Letter of Offer disclosing all fees etc as part of the application process (often even before any full financial application/assessment is completed).  It is how they do business.

 

PFNZ charge and administration fee for managing the business' shadow ledger in their system.  The Fee (as I understand it) is client specific depending on the size and complexity of the business but any one can contact them via their website and get an indication of fees . 

Any business person worth their salt would of course do their own due dilligence prior to committing to any Financier's product but it is not as difficult as you infer to get the information to be able to make an "apples with apples" comparison.

 

Up
0

Any updates you have to this page would be appreciated by many readers.

 

http://www.interest.co.nz/borrowing/business-base-rates

 

We want to fill in as many of the "?" as possible, even if it is with $0.00s or 0.00%s.

Up
0

I looked at the ASB website but their business lending base rate (11.3%)  is before any lending margin is applied, they also charge a 1.44% annual line fee. Why can't banks be transparent to SME's? I couldn't even find base rates on some bank websites. I also looked at invoice discounters and when you annualise their rates it becomes scary (could find any rates on the PFNZ site).  Hopefully I'll win lotto this week.

Up
0