sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Siah Hwee Ang looks at what will happen in the giant Chinese economy in 2024, with a special focus on how that could affect New Zealand

Economy / opinion
Siah Hwee Ang looks at what will happen in the giant Chinese economy in 2024, with a special focus on how that could affect New Zealand
Shanghai Bund

By Siah Hwee Ang*

Having been a main driver of world economic growth in recent times, the prospects of China in 2024 would be on the front of mind of many across the globe.

Here I provide highlights of 5 key observations that we should expect from China in 2024. They are not in any particular order of importance, and by no means an exhaustive list.

1. China will remain as the world’s largest trading nation.

Since 2013, China has been the world’s largest product trading nation. It also became the world’s largest trading (including both product and service) nation in 2020. A major lesson from the last few years has been the need for economies to be as self-sufficiency on key resources. Yet, any shift in production and trade will take time. China’s strengths in product exports will continue to break new grounds in 2024, ensuring the economy’s status as the world’s largest trading nation.

2. China’s economy will continue to slow down.

This has been a major talking point and the expectation of China’s GDP to continue to grow at 5% or more is just unrealistic. In the last couple of years, the government has also conceded that its growth needs adjustments downwards. This is an economy that has been economically growing at the size of Russia in 2018, Ireland in 2019, Norway in 2020, UK in 2021, and Morocco in 2022. In 2022, its growth was only 3%. China will (need to) activate more actors in managing its next stage of growth. The relatively high local government debts will mean intervention from central government, deeming it necessary to generate more income. With stagnant and potentially declining work force in the coming years, relying on state-owned and state-linked enterprises won’t be adequate. We should see the private sector feature more in its planning as well. Further, investment in agriculture is pivotal for self-sufficiency in light of limited arable land. Not to say the least the importance to maintain balanced growth across regions within China. For stability in growth, we should expect China to pace itself in 2024, and its GDP to grow between 4-5%. Just to contextualise, a growth of 4% would be equivalent to the size of the Poland economy while 5% is that of Turkey’s.

3. China will continue to grapple with a consumption-led growth model.

Chinese are good at savings. In 2023 alone, new bank deposits exceed new loans by about NZ$10 trillion. Given such pattern of behaviour, it will require a major effort from the Chinese government to try to get its citizens to spend their share of the US$40 trillion of bank deposits to fuel internal consumption growth. Rising living costs will lend a hand on this. But the consumption-led model will take shape very slowly.

4. China will continue to push for more trade with developing countries.

In its export growth, the percentage of China’s exports to developing countries has been rising and has in fact recently overtaken exports to US, EU and Japan combined. We should expect this trade pattern to continue as it engages further in developments globally. This should not be taken as China distancing itself from the West or the developed, rather it is more due to the relative untapped opportunities that the developing world brings. This will be consistent with its Belt and Road Initiative and Global Development Initiative. We should also see more actions on the BRICS front, a bloc initiated by Brazil, Russia, India and China in 2009, joined by South Africa in 2010, and now Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates in 2024.

5. China will maintain a central role in many value and supply chains.

The topic of diversifying away from China has received a lot of discussion globally. There have been attempts by companies to do that and by other economies to seek to be an alternative to China in some areas. Without specific mention of companies or countries, it has been clear the success rate of shunning away from China has been low. Such efforts can only be possible if a company moving away is willing to take a bullet to lose efficiency and income in the short run, and for the new location to have the infrastructure to pick it up in the short to medium term. This equation is too complex and global competition is stiff enough to deter such a patient approach. While China is a known world factory, it has capabilities that were built over time and is across many parts of the value chain in most manufactured goods, if not services. It is also a key player in commodities and/or the processing of these. While we expect the diversification conversation to continue in 2024, there is unlikely to be a lot of traction in practice.


*Siah Hwee Ang is Professor in International Business and Strategy, Professorial Chair in Business in Asia, and Director of Southeast Asia Centre of Asia-Pacific Excellence at Victoria University of Wellington.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

8 Comments

Interesting point that the Chinese people are good at saving in that it seems to be odd that that could be interpreted, to a degree, in any nation at all,  in a negative sense. Could this indicate as well, that there is quite some level of insecurity and unease amongst the people,  a lack of confidence within society in general, causing them to hang onto their money for a rainy day, or similar dark event.

Up
1

Similar behaviour in US.

Large Bank Loan Volumes Continue To Shrink Despite Soaring Deposit Inflows

The current rate of US bank asset growth is not a harbinger of confidence.

Up
1

Aye as a much less sophisticated indicator on our visit back to our old neighbourhood last year it was much changed from when we lived and worked there 25 years ago. A perception that the old air of confidence and trust has been truly sapped and there is a lot more heed to budgets and cautionary spending From talking to our friends four things mostly emerged. Covid and the aftermath. Trump and accompanying societal and political division. Illegal immigration continuously seeping in. Crime, ok it’s always been bad but now it is really drug fuelled and  crazy.  Folk that we never would have thought would think to, are arming themselves in their homes.  Not good. 

Up
3

In fact, the rate of savings have gone up in recent years (vis-a-vis traditional high) and it is definitely a reflection of the uncertainty that people are facing.

Up
0

Good luck increasing consumption; there are not enough kids to take care of the parents so the parents need to provide for themselves, and investing over there seems to be a lottery. 

Up
2

Elderly people are capable of spending. We only save because we have children; without children we splurge. Elderly Chinese can be no different. 

Up
1

interesting idea but we are not seeing that dynamic emerge.

Up
1

A 'law' exists that allows parents to take their children to court for not taking care of them.

Up
0