sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Michael Humphries says a US debt default could trigger dollar’s collapse – and severely erode America’s political and economic might

Currencies / opinion
Michael Humphries says a US debt default could trigger dollar’s collapse – and severely erode America’s political and economic might
b
Kevin McCarthy., left, Chuck Schumer, right, and President Joe Biden meet at the White House on May 9, 2023. AP Photo/Evan Vucci.

Michael Humphries*

Congressional leaders at loggerheads over a debt ceiling impasse have met again with President Joe Biden, as the clock ticks down to a potentially catastrophic default if nothing is done by the end of the month.

Republicans, who regained control of the House of Representatives in November 2022, are threatening not to allow an increase in the debt limit unless they get spending cuts and regulatory rollbacks in return, which they outlined in a bill passed in April 2023. In so doing, they risk pushing the U.S. government into default.

It feels a lot like a case of déjà vu all over again.

Brinkmanship over the debt ceiling has become a regular ritual – it happened under the Clinton administration in 1995, then again with Barack Obama as president in 2011, and more recently in 2021.

As an economist, I know that defaulting on the national debt would have real-life consequences. Even the threat of pushing the U.S. into default has an economic impact. In August 2021, the mere prospect of a potential default led to an unprecedented downgrade of the the nation’s credit rating, hurting America’s financial prestige as well as countless individuals, including retirees.

And that was caused by the mere specter of default. An actual default would be far more damaging.

Dollar’s collapse

Possibly the most serious consequence would be the collapse of the U.S. dollar and its replacement as global trade’s “unit of account.” That essentially means that it is widely used in global finance and trade.

Day to day, most Americans are likely unaware of the economic and political power that goes with being the world’s unit of account. Currently, more than half of world trade – from oil and gold to cars and smartphones – is in U.S. dollars, with the euro accounting for around 30% and all other currencies making up the balance.

As a result of this dominance, the U.S. is the only country on the planet that can pay its foreign debt in its own currency. This gives both the U.S. government and American companies tremendous leeway in international trade and finance.

No matter how much debt the U.S. government owes foreign investors, it can simply print the money needed to pay them back – although for economic reasons, it may not be wise to do so. Other countries must buy either the dollar or the euro to pay their foreign debt. And the only way for them to do so is to either to export more than they import or borrow more dollars or euros on the international market.

The U.S. is free from such constraints and can run up large trade deficits – that is, import more than it exports – for decades without the same consequences.

For American companies, the dominance of the dollar means they’re not as subject to the exchange rate risk as are their foreign competitors. Exchange rate risk refers to how changes in the relative value of currencies may affect a company’s profitability.

Since international trade is generally denominated in dollars, U.S. businesses can buy and sell in their own currency, something their foreign competitors cannot do as easily. As simple as this sounds, it gives American companies a tremendous competitive advantage.

If Republicans push the U.S. into default, the dollar would likely lose its position as the international unit of account, forcing the government and companies to pay their international bills in another currency.

A mincer shows dollars being inserted in the top and shredded underneath.
A U.S. debt default would mangle the dollar’s international reputation. photovideostock/E+ via Getty Images.

Loss of political power too

The dollar’s dominance means trade must go through an American bank at some point. This is one important way it gives the U.S. tremendous political power, especially to punish economic rivals and unfriendly governments.

For example, when former President Donald Trump imposed economic sanctions on Iran, he denied the country access to American banks and to the dollar. He also imposed secondary sanctions, which means that non-American companies trading with Iran were also sanctioned. Given a choice of access to the dollar or trading with Iran, most of the world economies chose access to the dollar and complied with the sanctions. As a result, Iran entered a deep recession, and its currency plummeted about 30%.

President Joe Biden did something similar against Russia in response to its invasion of Ukraine. Limiting Russia’s access to the dollar has helped push the country into a recession that’s bordering on a depression.

No other country today could unilaterally impose this level of economic pain on another country. And all an American president currently needs is a pen.

Rivals rewarded

Another consequence of the dollar’s collapse would be enhancing the position of the U.S.‘s top rival for global influence: China.

While the euro would likely replace the dollar as the world’s primary unit of account, the Chinese yuan would move into second place.

If the yuan were to become a significant international unit of account, this would enhance China’s international position both economically and politically. As it is, China has been working with the other BRIC countries – Brazil, Russia and India – to accept the yuan as a unit of account. With the other three already resentful of U.S. economic and political dominance, a U.S. default would support that effort.

They may not be alone: Recently, Saudi Arabia suggested it was open to trading some of its oil in currencies other than the dollar – something that would change long-standing policy.

Severe consequences

Beyond the impact on the dollar and the economic and political clout of the U.S., a default would be profoundly felt in many other ways and by countless people.

In the U.S., tens of millions of Americans and thousands of companies that depend on government support could suffer, and the economy would most likely sink into recession – or worse, given the U.S. is already expected to soon suffer a downturn. In addition, retirees could see the worth of their pensions dwindle.

The truth is, we really don’t know what will happen or how bad it will get. The scale of the damage caused by a U.S. default is hard to calculate in advance because it has never happened before.

But there’s one thing we can be certain of. If Republicans take their threat of default too far, the U.S. and Americans will suffer tremendously.

*Also see: Rohan Grey on how minting a platinum coin could solve the US debt ceiling crisis.


*Michael Humphries, Deputy Chair of Business Administration, Touro University. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

39 Comments

They'll reach an agreement at the 11th hour. They always do. 

Up
18

I think they have another 10 years tops at playing this game, at which time they will have lost the USD as the world reserve currency. The war in the Ukraine started the ball rolling, its only a matter of time now.

Up
6

Very low probability event

Up
4

Be best caveat this with a specific timeframe. In the next 30-50 years I’d say it’s a good probability - unlikely this year…but the next 10-20 years it’s a real threat. 
 

They really need to get their spending under control. It’s a risk to the whole word - at least how we have come to know in the post-WW2 period. 

Up
3

Right now. 
Would be a massive black swan if it did occur this year

Up
2

Yes agree - it is interesting though that what they will do to avoid default this year will increase the probability that they default in a subsequent period because they never fix the cause of their problem - and this seems to typify a problem that we have in modern western thinking. It is selfish and shortsighted - avoiding pain now but making it worse in the future. 

Up
10

Can kicking

 

Up
7

Mate we see this every year or every other year from those guys in the states.

They just love the limelight and pomp show around it to make themselves feel important. 

They invented Hollywood after all. They will just all agree to lift the debt ceiling till the next time. 

So no point worrying as it's all part of the rigged game. 

Up
11

It’s a serious problem - ‘Changing World Order’ by Dalio is a must read on this topic. 
 

If the problem isn’t resolved well, it may mean our grandchildren end up speaking mandarin not English. 

Up
3

There isn't enough surplus energy in China to teach all Westerners Mandarin. 

Up
2

True. The Chinese have racked up huge piles of debt in a very short span of time. Either they begin unwinding it gradually and bear the pain of not being the factory to the world or risk the debt bomb imploding under its own weight pushing China into a decades-long economic depression.

Up
2

I guess the debt ceiling refers to total debt not net debt.

Up
0

But there’s one thing we can be certain of. If Republicans take their threat of default too far, the U.S. and Americans will suffer tremendously.

Ahh, it took until the last sentence to nail his colours to the mast.  One must remember, in a negotiation, it is *both* sides that are risking the outcome.

Couldn't the statement equally be:

But there's one thing we can be certain of.  If Democrats take their attachment to profligate spending too far, the U.S. and Americans will suffer tremendously.

Up
10

The profligate spending has already been agreed upon though.

If there is a problem with spending(there probably is) then the time to question it was before the wallet was opened, not once the cheque arrives.

Up
3

Good point.

Up
1

An intelligent bipartisan agreement is required. Both sides need to get off their high horses and their politically deluded/limited thinking as it risks destroying the empire/society as it stands. It is foolish. There is no point having such one sided, politically motivated views, if those views will ultimately destroy the nation, unless you comprimise. 

As Mark said in the bible: If a kingdom is divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand (Mark 3-24)

Ray Dalio gives a very good summary in this interview (if you have a spare 1hr) - this from 3 weeks ago.

https://youtu.be/GDuXvOs0d_k

Hopefully there are actually people sane enough on each side of their respective political parties to see the need to reach out to the other side an cooperate in a spirit of goodwill - knowing that protecting the system/nation is more important than getting their own way. 

Up
2

US deficit is about 5% of GDP and the US inflation rate is about 5%. This only represents a nominal increase in the debt ceiling, in absolute terms US debt has substantially stabilised.

Up
3

 in absolute terms US debt has substantially stabilised.

Rubbish. 

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GFDEGDQ188S

Up
1

In 10 years, everyone will remember who the president was when the U.S defaulted, no one will remember who was in congress. Congress have all the power here at the table....

Up
2

Politicians and pundits talk about balancing the budget, paying down debt, and living within one's means. They don’t understand that that is deflationary, it is impossible to do under the current monetary system without collapsing the whole economy.

Up
4

Correct - that is why it is foolish to get yourself into too much debt in the first place as it starts and unstoppable loop that can't be controlled without eventual collapse. But the dynamics of global power mean that who ever wins the most recent global significant battle, always ends up overextending (from excess spending to control their empire/global dominance/big military) and then money printing to monetise the debt - but this is the beginning of the end for them - as it probable is for the US who are in a gradual decline. 

Up
2

for reference

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GC.DOD.TOTL.GD.ZS?view=chart

USA 120% of gdp but falling.  Look how trump and the GOP went mad.  This is a long standing pattern with USA politics.  Republicans get into power slash taxes to the rich and corporations, and also increase expenditure because that maintains their popularity with the voting public. Their prime objective is to retain power so that they can protect the wealth transfer to the wealthy.  When the Democrats get into power they try to increase income from the rich but increase social spending while tightly managing the economy otherwise.  While the Democrats are doing this, the GOP are trying to do every thing that they can to force a reduction in spending in the narrow areas that directly will affect traditional Democrat voters.  That is what Thee GOP are doing right now with Biden.  That is what all this debt ceiling stuff is all about.  The GOP are not really worried about the debt ceiling (they demonstrate that every time that they are in power), what they really are trying to achieve is to alienate the Democrat party from their traditional voters in up coming elections.  This has been the pattern for decades. 

UK 186% holly hell.

Up
1

The USA has never defaulted on its debt and that's why US Treasury Bonds are the safest bet on the planet.

Goldbugs are always banging on about it. They've got no idea.

Up
0

The USA has never defaulted on its debt and that's why US Treasury Bonds are the safest bet on the planet.

Goldbugs are always banging on about it. They've got no idea.

Yes. Compared to what the debt slaves are taught and believe, we're considered fools. But we're still not giving up our gold. It's insurance. Despite narratives like this. 

Up
2

Goldbugs are an eccentric lot. 'Stackin' a useless metal that hasn't done anything for the last 12 years, and trails massively behind property and stock markets. In inflation-adjusted terms it has to be one of the worst bets on the planet.

Insurance against what? Getting rich?

Up
1

Goldbugs are an eccentric lot. 'Stackin' a useless metal that hasn't done anything for the last 12 years, and trails massively behind property and stock markets. In inflation-adjusted terms it has to be one of the worst bets on the planet.

Insurance against what? Getting rich?

Against currency debasement. Are you saying that goldbugs are not allowed to own stocks, businesses, property or even the ol' rat poison? 

Why is that? Is there a rule?

Up
2

Against currency debasement? Who keeps their money in 'currency'? Most people keep it in stocks, businesses, fixed interest or property - investments that generate a return. 

Up
0

Against currency debasement? Who keeps their money in 'currency'? Most people keep it in stocks, businesses, fixed interest or property - investments that generate a return.

Goldbugs are not "most people" though and keep their money in a range of different assets. The fact that the 'everything bubble' has outperformed gold is somewhat irrelevant.   

That being said, I feel the fiat price of gold has underperformed and should be at least USD3K+. The BRICs nation will not be complaining.   

Up
2

Really...will let the low to middle income folks with 3 kids and a large mortgage currently fighting cost of living, inflation and rising interest rates where they can park their $10 savings per week.

Up
1

For me it's insurance against a precipitous collapse in confidence in fiat currency.

BRICS countries are building up towards challenging the dominance of the USD, and they have been "stacking" too.  If there is a sizable shift to a BRICS currency, it could well be partly backed by gold, so would be good to have a stake in that move.

However, doing the opposite of whatever I do could also be considered a wise move :)

Up
1

This week old news , It wont happen

Up
0

But then there's the Second Liberty Bond Act 1917 and then, "The 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution states that "the validity of the public debt of the United States...shall not be questioned."

They can not, not increase the debt, but, they have to agree to approve the amount of the debt increase. They just have to agree to it. That's when the horse trading starts.

They can keep on increasing their debt mountain for as long as it's sustainable. Or not. Then they go to war I guess?

Up
1

This is what a poloarised internal mess will cause.  Eventually one party will decide to push it over the edge and damn the consequences.  Likely a party with a libertarian bent, so they can finally "get rid of the awful government".

Go back 30-40 years and there was no way this was a possibility in the US. Since 1995 when the US government was shutdown because of the crisis and the 4 times since then, it's now a real likelihood that this keeps playing out with increasingly dire consequences.  And ratings agencies will notice and possibly downgrade the US credit rating.  This erodes the US hegemony, bit by bit. 

Who was it that said a country cannot stand if it is divided against itself? Clearly playing out now inside the US and once it really bites, they will go into free fall and all their overspending will quickly become a real problem. Then its all on for ascendancy of a new world order, probably dominated by BRICS if they get their act together.

Up
2

"Who was it that said a country cannot stand if it is divided against itself?"

Lincoln - but I think he plagerised it from Mark in the bible. 

Up
4

The BRICS...a collection of failed states , dictators and tyrants. I don't think so.

Up
1

The only reason BRICS has decided to move against the USD is because they have seen what the USA did to Russia, the rest of the world is getting sick of the bully the USA can be because of currency control and the SWIFT system. It will take them a while but they will bypass the USD.

Up
6

What are we gonna use instead of USD when we travel? Worthless Russian washers or maybe some el cheapo South African or Indian rubbish? I wonder what would happen when I turn up in London and try to pay for my dinner with 3,000,000 trashy Russian Rubles. 

You're probably a goldbug.

Up
0

The trouble is some of the republican's seem to be not the sharpest pencil in the cup,..do the really understand the consequences?

Up
0

When it comes to them, there are not even any pencils in the cup let alone sharp ones.

Up
1