sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Treasury says budget deficit of NZ$1.063 bln in 7 mths to Jan was NZ$637 mln worse than forecast; sees underlying weakness in GST receipts

Treasury says budget deficit of NZ$1.063 bln in 7 mths to Jan was NZ$637 mln worse than forecast; sees underlying weakness in GST receipts

By Bernard Hickey

The Government's budget deficit outlook has worsened slightly because of weaker than expected GST and corporate tax receipts, but Treasury is hopeful most of the weakness is timing related and Finance Minister Bill English has reiterated his confidence the budget will return to surplus in the next financial year to June 30, 2015.

Treasury has reported the Government's Operating Balance before Gains and Losses (OBEGAL) was a deficit of NZ$1.063 billion in the seven months to the end of January, which was NZ$637 million worse than forecast in the Half Year Economic and Fiscal Update (HYEFU) in December.

Treasury said core tax revenues were NZ$892 million below forecast, but this was partly offset by core spending being NZ$138 million lower than forecast.

It said GST receipts were NZ$354 million lower than forecasts, with a third of that because of earthquake related refunds, which was likely to worsen further. About a third was likely to be due to timing differences, which should reverse out by the end of June, Treasury said.

"The remainder of the variance reflects underlying weakness in the tax type," Treasury said.

Corporate tax receipts were NZ$135 million below forecasts, due largely to some large taxpayers being part of tax pooling schemes. Treasury said it expected this variance to reverse out by June when they filed their final returns.

Income taxes from source were NZ$85 million below forecasts, which Treasury said was likely to continue, albeit to a lesser extent in the second half of the year as the economy strengthened.

A further NZ$155 million of the lower-than-expected tax receipts was due to tobacco excises being lower than forecast, with about NZ$80 million of this lower-than-expected figure likely to be permanent.

The majority (NZ$114 million) of the lower-than-expected Government spending was due to Treaty settlement expenses being NZ$114 million below forecast because of settlement delays.

Finance Minister Bill English said the Government remained on track for a surplus in the 2014/15 financial year, "but this is a challenging goal and we need to remain disciplined."

"The extent to which tax revenue is likely to remain below forecast will become clearer as officials work through forecasts for the Budget. Timing issues appear likely to see some of the current variation narrow by the end of the financial year," English said.

"The lower revenue is at odds with other macro-economic indicators that have been broadly in line with the Half-Year Update forecasts and, if anything, point to even stronger economic growth in the second half of the 2014 fiscal year," he said.

The bottom line Government surplus of NZ$3.4 billion was NZ$690 million better than forecast because continued strength in financial markets generated gains on financial instruments of NZ$2.8 billion, which was NZ$1.4 billion ahead of forecast.

Reaction

Labour Finance Spokesman David Parker said the result raised serious questions about National's management of the economy

“For the November figures Treasury said there were timing issues. They said the same for December. But the third time even Treasury admits it doesn’t know why the books are even more in the red. Once looks like misfortune, twice looks like carelessness. Three times sounds like mismanagement," Parker said.

“Either the much-hyped ‘rock star’ economy has already turned into a one-hit wonder or National isn’t as good at running the books as it claims to be," he said.

“If the economy is recovering the tax take should be increasing and the deficit reducing. The opposite is happening. Serious questions need to be asked of National’s economic credibility."

(Updated with comments from Bill English, detail, reaction from David Parker).

No chart with that title exists.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

13 Comments

Dont worry about the nations budget deficit, just look at Aucklands horrendous debt of $7,4 Billion  

Thats  $7,400, 000,000, 000.00.

And its being carries by a mere 600,000 ratepayers .

They have pre- spent the better part of the next 7 years homeowners  rates income , much of it wasted with nothing to show for it .

This is fiscal indiscipline at its worst .

Imagine if the average household lived like this ?

Its not sustainable

The Auckland Council has in true socialist form recklessley spent other peoples money , and like socialism everywhere it will collpase when it runs out of other peoples money to spend .

We ratepayers can be thankful that the money is running out , at least the recklessness will stop

Too much money is being wasted on freebies , special minority interest groups ,  crap like ATEED , a variety of nice- to- haves , riduculous salaries for unproductive civil servants , and a massive fleet of near new motor vehicles , to name but a few .

Its not sustanable

Up
0

Boatman you think ACC has spent $7 billion on a few freebies and nice to haves? Not new infrastructure that will last generations so quite appropriately will be paid off by those same beneficiaries. Auckland is desperately trying not to get clogged up in a transport nightmare. It is trying to offer the same facilities as other modern cities. Central government are past masters of using debt, frugal revenue sharing and inadequate transport funding as the means of controlling local government.

 

It is a turf war that is slowly turning NZ into a third world country. NZ like Australia gets very little lasting benefit from the current export resource boom. Open your eyes and read about it here.

Up
0

Uh, last time i check the Accident Compensation Corporation(ACC) did not spend auckland ratepayers money, the Auckland Council (AC) does.

Up
0

Sorry typo due to spelling stupidity..... I hope that doesn't interfere with the argument.

Up
0

@Brendon .. I think you are mistaken . The new major roads in Auckland are ALL being built by Central Government with general taxpayer money .

The 4 tunnels , the State highways out at Westgate , the loop to the Airport from Manakau the Newmarket viaduct , the Warkworth by- pass road ,  new bridges in Lincoln road etc

The NZTA is overseeing these projects in joint ventures and PPP's with the likes of Leightons ( Australia) and Fulton Hogan , etc

Up
0

No Boatman they are joint ventures between Local Government and Central Government. NZTA and CG only 'commit' to investing in parts of the Auckland transport system if LG also invests in part. CG binds LG to whatever direction they want to proceed with.

 

CG are quick to 'commit' to transport plans that they ideologically agree with and slow to 'commit' to plans they do not. In this way it is actually central government that has shaped our urban environments not local government.

 

Go to the following links and see where central government interference has got us. It is no doubt why we are still reliant on dairy when our cities are such ideological battlegrounds.

 

Other countries cities are not such ideological battle fields and they have been able to modernise and develop there businesses.

 

These links go directly to the only two comments you need to see the ideological nature of planning, sprawl, transports etc. The first has the link to the Chris Harris paper, read that.
 
The second is my 'take' on it. 
 
http://transportblog.co.nz/2014/02/27/bill-english-on-intensification-vs-sprawl/#comment-100140
 
http://transportblog.co.nz/2014/02/27/bill-english-on-intensification-vs-sprawl/#comment-100212

 

 

Up
0

Business Confidence survey results hasn't flowed through to the Tax take.

 

http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/9776099/Business-confidence-…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Up
0

Hmmm.  Evasion and black economy expansion aside, I do believe that tax takes are a reliable indicator of just where things sit.  Just as plants won't lie about the number of growing-degree-days in a season that they have experienced, taxes do tend to follow incentives, disincentives and other environmental pressures. 

 

(I mean - 'Tobacco excises permanently down' - Did they expect it to be Up?  What were They smoking - the Other Baccy?)

 

Plus, we've been through a major scaling-up in construction (Christchurch, perhaps other areas) and now that the easy stuff is done, and there's only the hard stuff left, some of that spend will come to be seen as a bubble.  After all, the massive spike in light commercial vehicle sales had to end, eh - not enough room left for yet another double-cab wellside ute in Christchurch, now ;-)

Up
0

Quote "Treasury is hopeful"

I would rather we lived in a country where "Treasury is realistic"

Up
0

I think most people would agree with you dh.

I am always surprised that Governments and Bureaucrats break the fundamental rules of budgeting.......counting the chickens before all the eggs have hatched is not a method that should be subscribed too.

 

Up
0

Afraid 'Governments and Bureaucrats break the fundamental rules of budgeting' is par for the course:  it's actually cultural.

 

Because these coots have zero Revenue responsibility, merely managing Costs, they tend to simply assume that Revenues can be pencilled in and then arrive on schedule.  Just like their salaries.

 

Nothing in their entire Gubmint career has ever been any different - talk to a branch of State about debtors, receivables, days sales outstanding, collection percentages or other Revenue-related metrics, and their eyes glaze - they simply haven't ever experienced such things.  Revenue Arrives with the regularity of sunrise.

 

Whereas they are always keen to spend exactly 100% of each and every expense budget available - in the very appropriate fear that if they Underspend, it will be clawed back into the gaping maw of Treasury or the Consolidated Account.  And if they Overspend, who's gonna get fired?  Nobody.. if even a mild reprimand is issued, the PSU will be on Socialism at Seven that very night, wailing and gnashing their teeth and ready to call a strike.

 

Like, anyone would Notice?

 

But I digress.

 

Falling or failing revenues are phenomena which yer average Gubmint drone simply cannot imagine.  So, it can nevah Happen.

 

Until it does.....

Up
0

Speaking of taxes, in the news is Colorado's 2 to 3.5 US million in taxes from legalized pot in January.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-26523833

what makes it relevant to this article is that a month ago state officials were projecting 70 to 98 million in taxes for the year, so as taxes go it looks like they were being a bit optimistic in how much people would be smoking.

Up
0

... or the stuff still gets sold on the black market. Can't see why those dealers would suddenly voluntarily part with say 30% of their income?

Up
0