sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Friday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: Breaking an 80 year old social contract; Why China's nearly-naked Ferrari crash matters; Why Super Mario's Big Bazooka won't solve Europe's austerity trap; Clarke and Dawe

Friday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: Breaking an 80 year old social contract; Why China's nearly-naked Ferrari crash matters; Why Super Mario's Big Bazooka won't solve Europe's austerity trap; Clarke and Dawe

Here's my Top 10 links from around the Internet at 12 pm today in association with NZ Mint.

As always, we welcome your additions in the comments below or via email tobernard.hickey@interest.co.nz.

See all previous Top 10s here.

My must read today is #1 on the chance of an epic change in America's social contract in this election.

1. Breaking the social contract - Princeton Economics professor Alan Blinder has written a cracking editorial at the Wall St Journal about how Republican Presidential co-candidates Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan seem determined to destroy the bipartisan consensus that has existed in America since the 1930s.

Blinder is saying that since the Great Depression and Roosevelt's New Deal both sides of Congress essentially agreed on a 'mixed economy' model with a modest safety net.

Ryan and Romney want to shred that consensus utterly.

It is the furtherest right the Republicans have ever been.

He says Reagan would have appeared too socialist for Romney and Paul.

This is the best summary I've seen yet of the competing visions for America now before voters. We should all brace for a Depression if Romney and Ryan win.

The two political parties certainly had their differences between the 1930s and the 2000s, but the broad consensus often had bipartisan support. Thus Eisenhower built public infrastructure; Nixon declared himself a Keynesian and established the Environmental Protection Agency; both Reagan and Bush II acted like Keynesians; Bush I promised a "kinder, gentler nation" and Bush II expanded Medicare—unfortunately, without a way to pay for it.

But with Messrs. Romney and Ryan, it's out with Franklin Roosevelt and in with Ayn Rand. As many observers have noticed, even Ronald Reagan would be considered a bit too lefty for the current Republican Party. After all, he signed several tax increases to shrink the budget deficit and barked at but never seriously bit the safety net.

President Obama stands with (Republican) President Eisenhower's emphasis on building infrastructure, with (Republican) President Reagan's willingness to raise taxes to reduce the deficit, and with (Republican) President George H.W. Bush's call for a kinder, gentler economic policy. Mitt Romney stands with Barry Goldwater and Herbert Hoover.

2. How Washington Lobbyists work with regulators - It's rare to see behind the scenes to show how America writes and polices its laws for banks. This Bloomberg piece is fascinating.

It shows how a revolving doore between regulators and lobbyists works to slowly, but surely, kill democracy and protect the interests of the powerful. A must read for the detail.

Nazareth’s e-mails to Schapiro and then-SEC General Counsel and Senior Policy Director David Becker, obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request filed by Bloomberg News, demonstrate how lobbyists and lawyers draw on bonds they formed in government service to gain access for clients, and how they work to maintain those ties.

It’s “a real advantage” to send a familiar face into the agency, said Adam Pritchard, a University of Michigan law professor and ex-SEC lawyer. “If I’m a client, I’m very pleased. I’m willing to pay top dollar for that.”

3. Why the Ferrari crash matters - A story has been doing the rounds in China in recent days about the details of a insanely-fast Ferrari crash where the son a Princeling was killed with a couple of nearly naked fellow students in the car with him.

This piece from Evan Osnos at The New Yorker helps explain why it matters.

He harks back to a Russian example before the collapse of the Wall...

In Beijing this week, another Communist Party is straining to suppress discussion of a scandal that suggests an inconvenient contrast between the experiences of ordinary people and the lifestyles of the rich and connected. On Monday, the South China Morning Post put to paper a story that had been making the rumor-rounds for months: a black Ferrari that crashed in Beijing in the predawn hours of March 18th, claiming the life of “a half-naked man in his twenties” and seriously injuring “two young women—one naked, one semi-naked” has been tied to the highest ranks of the Party élite. The man in the car was reportedly Ling Gu, son of Ling Jihua, one of President Hu Jintao’s closest aides.

It’s tempting to write off these stories as tabloid fodder. But the story of the Ferrari crash—yes, already blocked on the Chinese Web—is the second full-blown political scandal of the year, after Party leader Bo Xilai was stripped of his power and his wife was convicted of murdering a British businessman. Along the way, the Chinese people were treated to competing reports about whether their son drove a Porsche, or a Porsche and a Ferrari. The Ferrari crash has touched off a round of odds-making on élite politics, since we are weeks away from a major leadership transition. (Gady Epstein has a good take on The Economist blog.) But the broader consequences, the impact outside the halls of power, may be more lasting.

Beijing is not Moscow in 1990, as far as anyone can tell. China’s defining problem is not deprivation; it is, perhaps, something closer to fairness and expectation. Any political party relies, in the end, on a fragile foundation that balances performance and faith. It can lose one or the other at various times, but if it loses both at once, it’s in trouble. The Chinese Communist Party is bracing for tougher economic times ahead, and it will need rely more than ever on faith. With each new story, that gets harder. Those are the rules, and they were the rules twenty two years ago, on a cold night in Chernigov.

4. Don't count the Euro-zone chickens yet - Marshall Auerback writes at CreditWritedowns that the saving of the Euro-zone by the Big Bazooka is no sure thing. The Germans are still imposing a long, slow death by austerity to the Euro-zone.

The problem is that the renewed bond buying will be tied to the conditionality of yet more fiscal austerity, and Greece is being held up as the poster boy of what happens when you don’t comply with the conditions laid out by the ECB, or the Troika. In addressing the solvency issue, the ECB’s conditionality ironically will make the very “problem” of fiscal profligacy and higher government deficits much worse, as demand gets crushed by yet more austerity. In effect, one is left with the Scylla of a quick death via exit from the euro zone, or death via slow strangulation of aggregate demand via the fiscal austerity conditionality laid out by Mario Draghi today. Pick your poison.

5. That'll learn ya - The Euro-zone wants Greeks to work six day weeks to dig themselves out of their austerity hole and stay in the Euro. Interesting that the Syriza party, which is in favour of defaulting and pulling out of the Euro, is now the most popular party in the opinion polls, if not the parliament. From now it's all about politics.

Here's the Guardian:

The demand is contained in a leaked letter from the "troika" of the country's lenders, the European commission, European Central Bank, and International Monetary Fund. In the letter, the officials policing Greece's compliance with the austerity package imposed in return for the bailout insist on radical labour market reforms, from minimum wages to overtime limits to flexible working hours, that are likely to worsen the standoff between the government and organised labour in Greece.

After a long delay caused by months of political paralysis in Greece, the troika inspectors return to Athens this week to scrutinise Greek observance of its bailout terms. They are expected to deliver a verdict next month that will determine whether Greece is ultimately allowed to remain in the single currency.

The letter, sent last week to the Greek finance and labour ministries, orders the government to extend the working week into the weekend. "Measure: increase flexibility of work schedules: increase the number of maximum workdays to six days per week for all sectors.

6. 'How low can you go'? - The Arctic Sea ice is melting fast. So what does it mean. Faster climate change, suggests the Spec.com

Now we begin to see the consequences. The polar jet stream, an air current that circles the globe in the higher northern latitudes and separates cold, wet weather to the north from warmer, drier weather to the south, is changing its behaviour.

In a paper in Geophysical Letters last March entitled Evidence Linking Arctic Amplification to Extreme Weather in Mid-latitudes, Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University and Stephen Vavrus of the University of Wisconsin-Madison offered a hypothesis that may explain why world grain prices have risen 30 per cent in the past four months (and are still going up).

First, a warmer Arctic reduces the temperature gradient between the temperate and polar zones. That, in turn, slows the wind speeds in the zone between the two and increases the “wave amplitude” of the jet stream. The jet stream flows around the planet in great swooping curves, like a river crossing a flat plain, and those curves — Rossby waves, in scientific language — are getting bigger and slower.

This is a recipe for extreme weather

7. The PIGS, competitiveness and New Zealand - The big problem in Europe is Southern Europe is uncompetitive and doesn't have an exchange rate to help it become more competitive.

New Zealand has the same problem. We're uncompetitive and our exchange rate isn't adjusting because of capital flows.

This chart showing competitiveness vs wages is courtesy of Zerohedge and is a cracker. It shows NZ on the wrong side of the line, along with the PIGS.

The more competitive a country is, the higher its wages can be justified. There is a clear relation between the two variables. Countries below the regression curve have a strong competiveness rank relative to their labour costs while countries above the curve have a lower competiveness rank relative to their labour costs. Greece is one of the most extreme outliers, but Italy, Spain, and Argentina are also above the curve. They have a long way to go to get close to competitive.

8. Oops - This is too bizarre to behold, courtesy of CBSlocal in Philadelphia.

An Occupy Easton protester faces an attempted bank robbery charge following an arrest at an organized event at a bank – during which the “Occupier” was holding a sign that reportedly read “You’re being robbed.”

According to The Express-Times, Dave Gorczynski allegedly held cardboard signs outside a Wells Fargo Branch that read, “You’re being robbed,” while the other said, “Give a man a gun, he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank, and he can rob a country.”

9. Night of the long spreadsheets - A wave of executives of listed Chinese companies resigned yesterday after their companies reported big profit drops or losses, Want ChinaTimes reported.

Some of them 'passed away'.

In just a single day, Sept. 4, 16 companies disclosed changes in their executive staff. Most of them are listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange. Except for two senior executives who passed away, high-level personnel changes included three corporate chairmen, three vice presidents, two board supervisors, one director, one business supervisor and one corporate securities representative who all abandoned their posts, reported the Beijing Business Today newspaper.

The total number of listed enterprises that have reported executive departures was estimated at more than 100 in the 10 most recent trading days in Shanghai and Shenzhen.

10 Totally Clarke and Dawe on how Australian politicians answer every questions. Robert Dazzler has all the answers. He wins a well known newspaper company. He's not

 

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

60 Comments

The US is considering a release from the SPR - how dumb is that?

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/white-house-consults-oil-experts-225150250.html

Up
0

Its election year....

regards

Up
0

As dumb as as the 'NZ Climate Science Coalition Trust' who lost in court?

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10832396

Up
0

One can't form an opinion from that article, no real arguments shown from either side or for that matter the ruling itself, why it was denied and on what grounds.

If its dumb for people to have an opinion and to challenge scientific opinion I'm all for a world of dumb people.

 

Up
0

Some interesting comments,

For instance that the denial side couldnt get any expert witnesses. 

That the denial side is expected to meet NIWA's costs, that usually suggest the Judge thinks the case presented so bad it lacks any merit at all.

another piece with a litle more detail,

http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/7634556/Climate-sceptics-fail-in-NIWA-c…

regards

 

Up
0

@#6 Climate gate

I guess for a balanced view you should also note that the antarctica is increasing in ice.  I guess that never gets shown as its contrary to us getting taxed for Climate change.

http://en.mercopress.com/2012/03/31/height-of-antarctica-ice-sheet-incr…

Up
0

excellent link, thanks bwilt

Up
0

Many denial sites claim that Antarctica is gaining ice. However, the actual scientists doing the research say that it's gaining sea ice but losing land ice with an overall nett loss. It's somewhat complex and varies over huge tracts of a rather large chunk of real estate.

Unfortunately the gained sea ice melts come summer.

Of course, Lord Christopher Monckton, 3rd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley (with his journalism degree) and his fellow travellers may be in a much better position to discern the situation from afar than are the qualified people on the ground.

Remains to be seen.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/antarctica-gaining-ice.htm

http://scrippsnews.ucsd.edu/Releases/?releaseID=1264

Personally I hope the denialists win the day, at least for a couple of years - I need to sell my sea-level house.

 

 

Up
0

Hi Alan, you should be safe with your house by the sea, Al Gore just bought a huge mansion on the coast line a couple of years back so he's happy with whats going to happen. He used his money earned selling Global warming to great use...

This study shows "there is no evidence for an apparent acceleration in the past 100+ years" (ref: http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/1992/92JC01133.shtml).

 

Up
0

Here's an even later study

 

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/sea-level-rises-are-sl…

 

"Without acceleration in sea-level rises, the 20th-century trend of 1.7mm a year would produce a rise of about 0.15m by 2100."

 

You've got more worries if your house by the sea can't handle 0.15m by the year 2100 !

Up
0

Stop dreaming and read the orignal stuff from climate scientists, not newspaper reports from climate denier newspapers.  You will then realise 1 metre a century sea level rise is closer to our reality.

Up
0

That was just a secondary link for Alan so he didn't have to worry about his property falling into the sea.

 

I guess you failed to read the first link http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/1992/92JC01133.shtml

 

That article is from one of the top ranked climate research journals.

 

The conclusion from Scientists with real tide data concluded "there is no evidence for an apparent acceleration in the past 100+ year"

Up
0

Received 10 February 1992; accepted 28 April 1992; .

You are refering to a 20 year old paper?

Maybe try something more up to dat elike 2012,

http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/currents-ice-loss.html

regards

 

Up
0

Again thanks for the opinion.

If you read the original article I mentioned from a leading scienfic journal   "there is no evidence for an apparent acceleration in the past 100+ years"

 

http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/1992/92JC01133.shtml

 

Contrary to Al Gores 21 feet fiasco which then he admitted was wrong and corrected to 21 inches and now the real evidence is showing there has been no acceleration in the past 100+ years  that is significant either statistically, or in comparison to values associated with global warming"

Up
0

bwitt - yours is a foolish approach, and sooner or later it would end the species, if not from the CC angle, from something else.

 

We are the dominant factor on a finite planet, and we have - as the inaction shows - no ability to deal with the impacts of any change we make to what is our only habitat.

 

The precautionary approach is the only valid one, given that it's a game of Russian Roulette - the stats will eventually get you if not.

 

Precautionary says you don't proceed, until you have absolute certainty it's OK to do so. The same opportunutues will still be there - just later - if it turns out to be OK.

 

What's your need to believe? A vested interest in money, now?

Up
0

@Podonkey (since we are resorting to name calling)

 

Read the latest study then on tide levels from Oz & NZ from 2011....

 

http://www.jcronline.org/doi/full/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-10-00141.1

 

The facts are the same no evidence of sea level rise, this is real data.

 

"In a nutshell, this factual information means the high sea-level rises used as precautionary guidelines by the CSIRO in recent years are in essence ridiculous," he said. During the 20th century, there was a measurable global average rise in mean sea level of about 17cm (plus or minus 5cm).

 

 

Up
0

The CSIRO begs to differ:

http://www.cmar.csiro.au/sealevel/

It's a sad fact of life that you can find data to reinforce your choice of prejudice.

:(

Up
0

Yes well CSIRO used Church and White data, I'd be very worried using that data.

Personally I like this quote from their 2005/06 paper :-

 

"An additional spatially uniform field is included in the reconstruction to represent changes in GMSL. Omitting this field results in a much smaller rate of GMSL rise

 

Basically just add an adjustment factor to your data if it doesnt fit the study you are trying to prove.

Link and highlight below

http://awurl.com/TCRPnD0dR#first_awesome_highlight

Up
0

Another view—a little geeky—of the Journal of Coastal Research's arithmetic:

http://tamino.wordpress.com/2011/07/22/how-not-to-analyze-tide-gauge-data/

Up
0

...... I think it is prudent to follow Mr bwilt's approach , and continue a vested interest in money ......

 

If we ( as a species ) are to " end " , it would be a massive emotional  blow for our pets : Our dogs , cats , budgies ..... newts ! ....... they whom have given so much love to our species , over the years ....... are we to abandon them , simply because we've gone extinct ourselves ?

 

The only valid precautionary approach would be bolster the country's stock of qualified animal psychologists .... and for their sterling work , they will require ample renumeration ....

 

.... hence the need to maintain " a vets interest  in  money "  .....as you put it ....

Up
0

bwilt : Keep up the good work ! ...

 

...... as Winston Churchill noted , " A lie goes halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on . "

 

He must've foreseen the climate change debate & the peak oil nonsense !

Up
0

I couldn't remember if GBH was a climate denier, but should have figured. Twist the truth to suit yourself once, twist it every time. Nothing to lose at that point, one supposes.

Up
0

Not at all , I fully believe in the climate , and enjoy a daily dose of it .......

 

...... what I don't believe in is the climate of fear ....

Up
0

Al Gore said that 21' was the worst case scenario.  He did not predict it as inevitable.

Up
0

@mist42mz

Your arguments are very clear and solid...

 

Maybe another example of actual tidal data till the present time could convince you....

 

http://www.jcronline.org/doi/full/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-10-00141.1

 

Its not just Oz and NZ tide gauges showing this "this decelerating trend was also evident in the detailed analysis of 25 U.S. tide gauge records longer than 80 years in length"

Up
0

"We can lose an awful lot of ice to the sea without ever having summers warm enough to make the snow on top of the glaciers melt," said the study's lead author Hamish Pritchard of the British Antarctic Survey in Cambridge, United Kingdom. "The oceans can do all the work from below."

"The researchers concluded that 20 of the 54 ice shelves studied are being melted by warm ocean currents. Most of these are in West Antarctica, where inland glaciers flowing down to the coast and feeding into these thinning ice shelves have accelerated, draining more ice into the sea and contributing to sea-level rise."

http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/currents-ice-loss.html

 

Up
0

Europe 1:  The currency float solution

It's a mistake to hang the problems on the hat of exchange rates; inferring that somehow everything would come right if Greece, Solenvia, Spain, Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Cyprus just went back to their own currencies.

Huge external deficits in a zone moving into a deepening recession with high public and private debt in countries that have lost interbank and wholesale market access.  A fragmented banking system that is subject to mass balkanisation, which we have seen in Spain in recent days where huge amounts of money have been sent out of the country starving all investment.

 

Right now spreads on public debt in Spain, Portugal are not sustainable and this will almost certainly move to Italy as the systemic causes of the problem are not dealt with.  Eventually this will spread until even the Germans are in recession.

The cycle of spreading and deepening recession, growing banking system collapse and soveriegn debt paralysis cannot be solved by simply floating a currency.

 

Up
0

The capital flight from Greece and now Spain demonstrates the underlying motivation for the last 30 years of financial deregulation. Forget the free trade hype; that's a sidebar for popular consumption. The real reason for deregulation, floating currencies, unrestricted capital flows, is the ability of big players to pump and dump asset markets in one country after another and get their money out before an economy collapses and capital controls are imposed.

For a tiny economy like NZ to think it can survive and prosper in the face of speculative hurricanes is ridiculous. When it comes time to "dump" NZ Inc, the speed at which both the money of foreigners and high net worth kiwis leaves these shores will be horrifying. We have laid ourselves open and are completely defenceless to financial predation, not just from outside but from the greedy sociopaths amongst us who lack empathy and have no compunction about exploiting their fellow citizens, their country of birth and its resources for outsized personal gain, because they can

Up
0

I had hoped when we got John Key as PM he would fix this - there's probably no more qualified person in the country to understand the flows. He must see the damage the speculative capital inflows is doing to our economy - housing over investment mania and stunted exports by high exchange rate.

Sadly I completly misjudged the man. He's done nothing, worse still, most policies encourage more it e.g. govt. spending more, govt. borrowing more offshore, putting off reserve banks local despoit to lending limits, accomodation susidies to prop up house prices and now he's hell bent on state asset sales. Unbelievable.

Maybe we need an Argentina moment here - that would certainly inform everyone to the sustainability of this way of running and economy. It could help set us on a healthier path in future. 

Up
0

Why would he change something that has been very rewarding to him personally?

No Road to Damascus moment for Key is likely because as far as he's concerned the current situation is how things are supposed to work. Deep down I think Bill English knows it is all wrong but he's not about to ruin his future prospects and fall on his sword.

Up
0

Yes, as I say, completely misjudged him. Let's see. Reality may just catch up with him as you mention....then he won't have to fall on his sword, the public will put him to the sword...

Up
0

I was sucked in too. I thought he would want to make a difference. All he wants is a knighthood and photo-ops with the big boys. It's cring-making.

He had a mandate which would have allowed him to turn this country around. He made no attempt whatsoever. The man disgusts me and the majority of our citizenry who think he's the messiah disgust me even more.

It's a sad fact of life that 50% of people are, by definition, below average intelligence.

 

"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter. "

Winston Churchill

 

The Western democratic model is totally dysfunctional and getting worse by the minute.  Karl Marx must be having a real chortle right now.

What to do?

Up
0

Winston Churchill also said:

"Democracy is a terrible system, but it's better than all the rest"

Up
0

Winston Churchill also said : " Some see private enterprise as a predatory target to be shot , others as a cow to be milked , but few are those who see it as a sturdy horse pulling the wagon . "

Up
0

I completely agree. I have not voted for either Labour or National since Labour betrayed us in 1984. Labour is the liberal wing of the Act Party, National is the conservative wing of the Act Party. Wake up, we have been rayally conned. I vote for Winston Peters every election even though I dont agree with many of his social policies. He knows that we have to protect our borders, jobs, currency,industries, fisheries, legal system and land 

Up
0

I'd love to see the NZ First Party take a judicial review of the Government's cancellation of elections in Canterbury to the Courts.  Would be great publicity for the party .. and Winston!  It's just up his alley.  I'd contribute to the war chest.

Up
0

We are seeing two moves concurrently, both of which signal the end of real growth.

 

One is the taking of that which is publicly owned, by a lesser (and ressering) number. It wouldn't have to happen if there were unlimited opportunities.

 

The other is a silencing of the publicly-representative voices. It may partly be a dumb attempt to 'grow', coupled with an inability to understand exponential growth (the brake of democracy is not as big as the real limitations, and by a goodly measure.

 

So we see theft, and a silencing of those who would complain. The question is to be asked, of the types who agree to 'serve' in place of the displaced democracy. Someone should be keeping track of the names.

Up
0

Winston Churchill also said : " Socialism is a philosophy of failure , the creed of ignorance , and the gospel of envy , it's inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery . "

Up
0

Wonder what he would have said about Crony capitalism

 

 

Up
0

...... the closest quote I can find is :

 

...  " The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings ; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries . "

 

Not quite wotcha looking for , I admit ..... but then , crony capitalism is several steps towards socialism ... and equally , several steps away from the pure market model of commerce .....

Up
0

There was nothing wrong with capitalism until its principal beneficiaries bought out the regulators. As GBH pointed out, Clinton was conned by Volcker into setting the foxes loose in the henhouse.

Unfortunately, most voters have no idea how money is created, what fractional reserves are, why the debt spiral is locked in, and why the kings of capital are wedded to exponential growth on a finite planet.

Whether proponents of the status quo like it or not, it will not continue. Thomas Malthus has been subject to more unjust crticism than Roger Douglas, but like Roger he was correct. He just got the timing wrong because he didn't know that the sun had charged up a giant battery of fossil fuel reserves.

Ultimately, the laws of physics and basic arithemtic will out.

I was contemplating the exponential US debt growth this morning and thinking that maybe the problem's been exagerated because such graphs don't usually adjust for inflation or population growth. Like this scary one:

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Federal-Government-Debt.png

So I found lots of 'em adjusted for inflation and population. They're just as scary:

http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/mt/assets/business/assets_c/2011/07/debt%20per%20capita%202011-05-56188.php

Bit of a worry.

Up
0

" Bit of a worry " for you , maybe ...... but the Gummster doesn't sweat the big stuff ..... 'cos the lunatics running governments / central banks / big business will always behave badly , greedily , and cock things up ........

 

... always have , and always will ......

 

And yet , life in 2012 ( particularly if you reside in NZ or in Oz ) is pretty darned good ..... gooder than it's ever been at any time in history ..... and getting even more gooderer every day .......

 

I'll let you do the worrying for me , Alan ....... cheers for that !

Up
0

look up his comments on facism....same same.

regards

Up
0

What PDK is actually commenting on is akin to fascism....not socialism.

Winston C made a good dictator. Heidnt survive the war in power though, he was all for the gilded age returning......and the poor left to starve.

regards

Up
0

It most certainly looks like the death rattle - those last breaths where the body refuses to give up what nature dictates.

 

We also see the important emergence of the judiciary as an agonistic actor - attempting to uphold the democratic institutions, e.g. this recent ruling;

 

http://www.stuff.co.nz/manawatu-standard/news/7622685/One-Plan-ruling-divides-opinion

 

Of course the executive can either displace democracy through authoritarian means as we have seen in Canterbury - or it can move such decision-making to the new EPA - thus bypassing both the public and the judiciary.

 

The implications must be at the forefront of thinking within our judiciary at the moment.  I would be keen to get Jeffery Palmer or Mai Chen's opinion on the constitutional implications of the ECan announcement - and last time I looked at it, the proposed amendments to the LGA make this type of action by the central executive more explicit.

 

 

 

 

   

Up
0

I'm not sure of that/ Palmer will go on at length, and correct the last full-stop or comma, while leaving out essential para2. I always lost track when he speaks, and the machinery seems more important than the required effect. 

 

Is Skelton still on? He's an ex-Judge, from the old T&C PA days.

Up
0

Considering the damage farmers were doing to our rivers and lakes this looks to be a great ruling.

Next is to get them to pay for the clean up.

This heads us back to the 100% clean and green image we no longer deserve.

regards

Up
0

wtf: This is one of the best summations of the situation NZ faces that I have seen. Although there is much attention on the problems facing EUR, USA, etc, very little cogent analysis is carried out on the NZ predicament.

Up
0

Yes it can, as it allows countries to default and start again. No different to to allowing a debtor to go bankrupt as opposed to keeping them in poverty for your benefit. i.e. no asset procedure stops young people being pay day slaves to debt for one bad decision.

Default is a lenders risk and is why they charge certain rates of interest.

Currently the Germans don't want the PIGS to leave and default as their exchange rate would shoot through the roof and become uncompetitive relative to there production output, funny how thats just like the PIGS have now.

The exchange rate can be used as a safety valve but like all safety valves it has limits, and should preventative action not be taken then she blows. Currently not an option with the euro, slavery to the masters is the current solution, work harder you layabouts, but not too hard that the euro appreciates as that will cause us problems.

Up
0

Europe 2:  The fantasy of no strings

It is lazy to point out the problems with linking bailout money with austerity measures.

It is lazy because it ignores the limitations of the current federal system the Euro currency works with.

First, Spain and Italy represent the third and fourth largest economies in the eurozone.  So the scale is a problem in it's own right and it is therefore a huge ask of those tax payers who will foot the bill.

At the moment the euro zone stands in a sort of no mans land.  What is lacking is closer economic union with debt mutualisation, banking union with euro wide deposit insurance which must lead to greater political union to give democractic legitimacy to the loss of national fiscal and banking control.

Under the current, and insufficient federal arrangement german tax payers are being asked to virtually gift money to spanish tax payers.  It is hardly surprising in the circumstance german tax payers are not very keen on doing it without strings attached.

Would you?

Up
0

It's Friday YaY..! and in keeping with 80 year old social contacts, here's a letter from Grandma, still driving , still getting herself to Church ...Praise the Lord..!

 

Grandma is eighty eight years old and still drives her own car.     She writes: Dear Grand-Son,   The other day I went up to our local Christian book store and saw a 'Honk if you love Jesus' bumper sticker ..    I was feeling particularly sassy that day because I had just come from a thrilling choir performance, followed by a thunderous prayer meeting..    So, I bought the sticker and put it on my bumper.    Boy, am I glad I did; what an uplifting experience that followed.    I was stopped at a red light at a busy intersection, just lost in thought about the Lord and how good he is, and I didn't notice that the light had changed.    It is a good thing someone else loves Jesus because if he hadn't honked, I'd never have noticed.    I found that lots of people love Jesus!    While I was sitting there, the guy behind started honking like crazy, and then he leaned out of his window and screamed, 'For the love of God!'    'Go! Go! Go! Jesus Christ, GO!'    What an exuberant cheerleader he was for Jesus!    Everyone started honking!    I just leaned out my window and started waving and smiling at all those loving people.    I even honked my horn a few times to share in the love!    There must have been a man from Florida back there because I heard him yelling something about a sunny beach..    I saw another guy waving in a funny way with only his middle finger stuck up in the air.    I asked my young teenage grandson in the back seat what that meant.    He said it was probably a Hawaiian good luck sign or something.    Well, I have never met anyone from Hawaii , so I leaned out the window and gave him the good luck sign right back.    My grandson burst out laughing.    Why even he was enjoying this religious experience!!    A couple of the people were so caught up in the joy of the moment that they got out of their cars and started walking towards me.    I bet they wanted to pray or ask what church I attended, but this is when I noticed the light had changed.    So, grinning, I waved at all my brothers and sisters, and drove on through the intersection.    I noticed that I was the only car that got through the intersection before the light changed again and felt kind of sad that I had to leave them after all the love we had shared.    So I slowed the car down, leaned out the window and gave them all the Hawaiian good luck sign one last time as I drove away. Praise the Lord for such wonderful folks!!    Will write again soon,    Love, Grandma
Up
0

Ref #3

 

For those, like myself, who're mystified by the reference to Chernigov.

 

A very similar incident involving a car crash there in 1990 set off a chain of events which, it could be argued,  led to the demise of the USSR.

Up
0

I thought that was hilariously funny , watching Bill Clinton tell the democrat audience not to blame President Obama , 'cos he just inherited the financial crisis ....... he didn't create it .......

 

....... this from the former president who repealed the Glass-Seagull Act , which subsequently  unleased the banks onto an orgy of derivatives trading & outrageously risky lending practices ....

 

Fecking hell , I do wish I'd been sitting in that audience , close enough to the stage for Cigar-Billy  to cop a Gummy ear-full .........

Up
0

While I mostly disagree with you, this is one thing I will agree on....Clinton has a lot to answer for....He did some good but he did some bad as well.

regards

Up
0

Not to mention the psychological harm he did to us dedicated cigar lovers ......

 

....... it's impossible to light up , now ... without thinking of Monica Lewdwinky .......

 

Popcorn is meant to be buttered , not  panatellas ......... yuk !

Up
0

Elizabeth Warren's speech was also surreal. Most of what she said to ecstatic applause and ostensibly in support of Obama could almost have been used verbatim by the Republicans to crucify him.

 

Is she positioning herself for 2016?

 

Liz vs Hills?

Up
0

1) "President Obama stands with (Republican) President Eisenhower's emphasis on building infrastructure"

Oh really, what infrastructure?

Up
0

I'm sure he was meaning building China's infrastructure :-)

Up
0

".........................if you want to destroy the euro - the second most important central bank in the world now says it will be there to stop you."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-your-money-19517579

Up
0