sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Wednesday's Top 10 at 10: What the 'new normal' of unstable disequilibria looks like; Another Greek ultimatum; Europe's OBR-style fears of 'bail-in' wipeouts; Beijing's 'Universities of Wild Chickens'; Dilbert

Wednesday's Top 10 at 10: What the 'new normal' of unstable disequilibria looks like; Another Greek ultimatum; Europe's OBR-style fears of 'bail-in' wipeouts; Beijing's 'Universities of Wild Chickens'; Dilbert
This daily collection of links and comment was previously sponsored by NZ Mint. We'd welcome a new sponsor.

Here's my Top 10 links from around the Internet at 10 am today.

As always, we welcome your additions in the comments below or via email to bernard.hickey@interest.co.nz.

See all previous Top 10s here.

My must read today is #7 on what actually happened in China's credit crunch and why. It includes a serious forecast that China's growth rate will drop to 3%.

1. 'An unstable disequilibrium' - Uber-bear economist Nouriel Roubini and global political commentator Ian Bremner talk here to Charlie Rose about the new normal.

The global economy and markets just can't seem to get back to normal.

Why is that?

Is it the debt weighing down on developed economies?

Is it that financial markets are addicted to stimulus?

Is it that politicians and voters can't find a way to restructure and stimulate their economies at the same time.

The discussion is interesting here. 

“Our point is that this situation is one that is not a stable equilibrium, is not even a stable disequilibrium. It’s an unstable disequilibrium. Take for example the eurozone. You cannot have just a monetary union without banking, political, economic, fiscal union. Either you move towards more integration or you’re going to have more fragmentation and disintegration. So the situation we face right now in the global economy, same in the eurozone, is of a unstable disequilibrium, therefore a new abnormal, that cannot be sustained.”

Historically, whenever you start with too much private and public debt, there is a painful period that can last over a decade, where growth is going to be anemic. Why? Because you have to spend less, to save more or dissave less to gradually reduce this tox of deficit and debt. And that implies that economic growth has been very weak in the United States, in Europe, in Japan and other advanced economies. And that’s going to continue. Eventually, that slow economic growth is associated with rising unemployment rate, and also with social and political unrest. That’s the situation we’re facing right now – is unstable disequilibrium, is the new abnormal. We’re ahead of decade of very low economic growth.” 

2. 'Stand and deliver' - Keep an eye on this Greek situation, which could blow up in everyone's faces very quickly.

Here's Reuters with the report:

Greece has three days to reassure Europe and the International Monetary Fund it can deliver on conditions attached to its international bailout in order to receive the next tranche of aid, four euro zone officials said on Tuesday. The lenders are unhappy with progress Greece has made towards reforming its public sector, a senior euro zone official involved in the negotiations said, while another said they might suspend an inspection visit they resumed on Monday.

Athens, which has about 2.2 billion euros of bonds to redeem in August, needs the talks to conclude successfully. If they fail, the International Monetary Fund might have to withdraw from the 240-billion-euro bailout to avoid violating its own rules, which require a borrower to be financed a year ahead.

3. 'Renminbi appreciation' - We've become so used to China keeping its currency under-valued and pegged vs the US dollar that we've forgotton that the new leadership has actually allowed a significant appreciation in recent months, which is again helping to slow the export and investment centric economy.

What happens if an outflow of funds forces a depreciation?

Izabella Kaminska looks at the implications here at FTAlphaville:

 The opposition to PBOC currency policy highlights internal concerns about potential outflows, and the degree to which the government’s exchange rate strategy may have inflamed this.

“Yuan appreciation has been too fast…. Current appreciation may have reached its limits,” said a regulator in recent comments. “In future, depreciation expectations may create more negative issues than appreciation did though massive capital outflows still aren’t happening.” “The PBOC made a big mistake — they shouldn’t have let the yuan appreciate so quickly.” The PBOC should be setting the yuan’s daily central parity against the dollar more in line with the capital flow picture, the regulator said.

4. Europe's OBR fears - FT reports on the growing fear in Europe of a Cypriot-style Open Bank Resolution forcing 'bail-ins' of ordinary depositors and big corporate savers in any European bank collapses. And they have deposit insurance...

Analysts warn the latest initiative to build a resilient eurozone “banking union” – which will put deposits by large corporations at risk of being “bailed-in” to rescue trouble-hit banks – may have the opposite effect and spark renewed capital movement away from the continent’s troubled southern economies while benefiting banks in the north.

“There’s already been a reassessment of risk between periphery and core over the past two years which has led to foreign deposits being moved away from the periphery,” says Huw van Steenis, banking analyst at Morgan Stanley. “The bail-in directive could potentially accentuate this reallocation.”

5. Beijing's diploma mills - This piece in the Economic Observer about Beijing's often dodgy 'colleges'. We have a few with similarly trumped up names in Auckland too. My rule of thumb is to be sceptical of anything with the names Cornell, Oxford, MIT, Cornell and Harvard in them if they have an address in the Auckland CBD. There are a few.

If you see a school like Capital University of Finance and Economics, Beijing Economic and Trade Institute, or Beijing Foreign Trade Institute while brushing over a job applicant’s resume, you might be forgiven for thinking it’s a legitimate institution.

In China, these kinds of schools are called “Universities of Wild Chickens” (野鸡大学), referring to private schools with deceptively similar names to well-known universities that aren’t even licensed to accept students. Those who didn’t get a good score on the college entrance exam (or never even took it) can pay comparatively high tuition to these fly-by-night schools and get a “diploma.”  

6. How China's Shadow Banking system works - Here's a nice backgrounder from The Atlantic. 

 Over the last four years, the GDP growth generated by each yuan of additional loan has fallen from 0.85 to 0.15, an indicator that the limits of debt-fuelled growth are being reached. In effect, the very engine that caused China's growth ---fixed asset investment fuelled by local debt -- wasn't sustainable, and the government began to worry about the negative consequences of an overheating economy: inflation, real estate bubbles, and overcapacity.

So in 2009 they slammed on the breaks. An economy that was addicted to credit needed to go somewhere else to get its fix. This was where shadow banking came in.

Desperate for credit, banks began working closely with trust companies and other entities to refinance bad loans by bundling them up and repackaging them as "wealth management vehicles", or WMVs. These vehicles, which require a tenure ranging from a year to a few days, offered a higher rate of return than conventional bank deposits. They also allowed banks to keep their lending off their balance sheets and were sold through their branches or online, effectively turning banks into middle men between recipients and investors. In theory, this should have solved the problem of obtaining local financing. But the problems have only begun.

7. How the PBoC stuffed up - Here's the WSJ with a insider's look behind the Chinese credit crunch that sparked rumours one of the big four state owned banks had defaulted. 

It is a cracking read.

The People's Bank of China instigated the cash shortages that catapulted Chinese interest rates to nosebleed highs during the past two weeks because the central bank felt it had no alternative amid what it saw as out-of-control credit growth, according to an internal document reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.

But by failing to make that clear—at a time when worries about slowing Chinese demand had already scared away some foreign capital, and as signals from the U.S. Federal Reserve also were redirecting global cash flows—the Chinese central bank inadvertently contributed to a surge in global market anxiety.

A top Chinese leader, Vice Premier Ma Kai, has ordered an investigation into a market rumor of insolvency at Bank of China Ltd., 601988.SH -0.74% one of China's top four state-owned banks, said people with direct knowledge of the probe, which could be a signal leaders are looking for clues about the sources of the market turmoil that came to a head on June 20.

Since early June, the PBOC has sought to force Chinese banks to redirect their lending away from shadow bankers—a mélange of trust companies, pawnbrokers, leasing companies and others—whose lending is putting further stress on an economy already slowing, economists say.

Barclays is particularly worried.

 "Based on an increasingly likely downside scenario," GDP growth in China could drop to 3% or less within the next three years, Barclay's said, though the Chinese economy would bounce back "dramatically" from any such "hard landing" because it would approve economic reforms.

8. How about a land tax? - The Economist thinks it should be seriously considered, describing property taxes as an 'unexploited resource.'

Taxing land and property is one of the most efficient and least distorting ways for governments to raise money. A pure land tax, one without regard to how land is used or what is built on it, is the best sort. Since the amount of land is fixed, taxing it cannot distort supply in the way that taxing work or saving might discourage effort or thrift. Instead a land tax encourages efficient land use. Property developers, for instance, would be less inclined to hoard undeveloped land if they had to pay an annual levy on it. Property taxes that include the value of buildings on land are less efficient, since they are, in effect, a tax on the investment in that property. Even so, they are less likely to affect people’s behaviour than income or employment taxes.

study by the OECD suggests that taxes on immovable property are the most growth-friendly of all major taxes. That is even truer of urbanising emerging economies with large informal sectors.

9. Totally irrelevant but interesting article - This NYTimes Magazine piece from Clay Tarver is about Jason Everman, the guitarist fired from Nirvana and Soundgarden (two of my favourite bands) and who became a US special forces solider fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. Certainly an interesting life with more twists than most.

10. Totally John Oliver on America's greatness "because what's in your head can be misleading..."

(Adds cartoon)

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

24 Comments

#1  language.

"the new normal....unstable disequilibrium"

mmmm.  Have to go and have quiet think about what that means.

But there is language I can understand.

"Historically, whenever you start with too much private and public debt, there is a painful period that can last over a decade, where growth is going to be anemic. Why? Because you have to spend less, to save more or dissave less to gradually reduce this tox of deficit and debt."

Economics to me is ultimately about ordinary things.  Jobs, incomes, peoples security and control over their lives.  It's good to see language I can understand.  I find it difficult to get to grips with QEs and helicopters etc.  Financialisation of everything and linguistic complexity just don't cut it -- For me. 

Up
0

And me

Up
0

Language is powerful in creating negative or positive perceptions. On finance/economy replace the common usage of two words, "investors" and "credit" with "speculators" and "debt" and see how perceptions change over time

Up
0

#8 There's a lot to like about a land tax - it's progressive and taxes wealthy land holders; it's a steady stream of income for the government (unlike CGTs which rely on transactions); we can become less reliant on income taxes which are easily avoided.

Up
0

Er, yes, but we already have one, it's called Rates. Perhaps you don't pay them directly. Mine have been going up at 11% per annum for the last ten years. Even so the local councils have been going gangbusters on borrowing as much as they can to build really useful stuff like Sports Stadia for the Rugby World Cup (remember that). If they have more, will they not just waste more?

Up
0

Rates don't satisfy the criteria of the tax suggested in the article. Rates are not flat, not universal, and they do take into account development value of the property. They don't create the same incentive for efficient land use. Rates are also collected by local government whereas land tax would assumedly be collected by central government.

It would be a mistake to conflate rates with a land tax, although their interaction should for sure be considered. 

Up
0

Quite right - in fact only a proportion of rates are a 'wealth' tax based on the value of the property.  That 'wealth' tax component of rates is called the "General Rate" whereas the balance of rates are made up of various "Targeted Rates" - for example a fixed fee for connection to a service, such as sewer or water - and universal charges (i.e. the same amount per rating unit/property).

 

Have a look at your rates bill - most councils these days break it down in to these various components.

 

In fact, it has been argued by officialdom that rates are not a tax at all - but rather a set of charges for goods and services - and hence why they charge GST on rates.

 

So rates are not (in the main) a land (i.e. 'wealth') tax as suggested by this OECD study.

 

 

Up
0

Roger, I think my rates have gone up by 150% in 6 years! RUC& Rego, all insurance, GST &etc. at riotous percentiles, but we, you and I, are wrong - deluded even; Treasury, Dept of Stats and the RB all decree that annual inflation is c1% and well under control, no problem.

Regards, Ergophobia 

Up
0

Roger - exactly - and I guess some people are just wasteful as they like throwing other people's money away.

 

Our rates have doubled and we do not receive anything other than an annual grade of the road and gravel when we really whinge. We have had enormous problems getting stock trucks in and out of our farm over the years. Then they crush this hard rock which goes through your tyres and you end up with endless flat tyres of which I have threatened to dump on the Councils main door.

 

I had one rude city slicker tell me I shouldn't be so lazy and clean my car when the mud had slid off in big heaps from the mud guards while in a supermarket car park.

 

 

Up
0

Some of us here have been on to this for some time.

The opponents ( personally biased?) complain about the lack of cashflow to meet the bill, but is that not the purpose? Would that land banker in Flat Bush who bought 27Ha for under $900k in 1995 still be holding out for $112m if they had to meet a 5% levy on land value each and every year? As an aside to that one, if the land tax had been in existence over the same period the price of $112m would not be asked as the land value would have been perhaps a more realistic $10m allowing for inflation and demand only.

BTW rates are not a land tax. They are a cost of running the facilities of the level of use for the land and they are a miniscule percentage of the capital value anyway, say ½%

 

 

Up
0

BBlll - I have to disagree with you here. 

All taxes distort the economy so call me biased if you like but instigating a land tax does not change the housing issues that are present.

 

The whole housing fiasco could be sorted out in about half an hour if the real problems were addressed.

 

 

Up
0

And how about less tax and more productive, meaningful, efficient activity and self-reliance?

Up
0

Alex13 - those quality  things you mention don't belong in a Nanny State ;-) 

Up
0

Roger

Loved your' "perhaps you don't pay them directly comment" brilliant,

Can't wait for you to have a land tax- a real one. Nothing to do with rates, simply a tax on land. Land tax will be with us whether you like it or not. It will happen because it cannot be avoided. The land simply is. The taxing authority does not have to care who or what pays the tax , only that it is paid.

Lets see all the reasons not to have  a Land tax.

I pay too much already

I don't want to pay for poor people who don't work anyway

 

 

Up
0

#8 - Surely a window tax would be much better? ;-)

Up
0

No, no, sheesh, what we need is a poll tax.

Up
0

What a load of bollocks "land tax encourages efficient land use".  Talk about a narrow minded view on what land is used for. So the farmer who plants say a riparian strip would have to pay a land tax on that land even though it is not usable land. Forestry, indigenous plantings, the high country, scrub etc would also be captured under a land tax in fact so would a persons garden.

 

What the heck do they mean by efficient use?

Up
0

They mean what you call sustainability, but isn't.

 

Producing a surplus.

Up
0

So is a Land Tax good or bad?

It would help in getting under used land developed or released for others.

It would avoid the need for any CGT.

It would eventually lower the capital land values.

It would reduce the attractiveness to overseas land bankers.

It would reduce or slow down the prices of all real estate including farms. The amount and effect would depend on the other assets on the land.

Hence it would reduce the amount borrowed on mortgages and therefore the interest bills.

There would be a number of other adjustments too complicated to argue here.

I would suggest we have a land tax initially at a low level but with future hikes in level being telegraphed to all those affected so they can make adjustments to their asset allocations.

 

 

 

 

Anybody got any better ideas?

Up
0

Yes - install Basel Brush III as the Minister of Revenue as soon as possible.

Up
0

Haven't Ministers of Revenue a poor history of political survival?

:o)

Up
0

Coupla comments Basel

 

1. Elderly widow on a pension still living in the poorly insulated family home that was used to raise her family, in AKL, therefore (now) asset rich (through no fault of her own), cash poor, currently spending $5,000 per annum on rates and power bills out of her pension, before property maintenance, lawn-mowing contractor and living expenses.

 

2. Do you provide a carve out for cash-poor pensioners. If so then you are getting into exemptions and exploitable loop-holes.

 

3. If you are going to have carve-outs and loop-holes, then you are targetting

 

4. If you are going to target, then simply target, a surcharge of $10,000 pa for every 600 sqm of land held by non-resident owners, resident-owners who dont have an nz-passport or citizenship (and havent paid income tax in last 5 years), owners who aren't pensioners and havent paid any income-tax, any owner who doesn't have an IRD number.

 

5. Otherwise, the net effect of your list is like Gareth Morgan's Big Kahuna.

 

PS: I'm flexible on the $10,000

Up
0

Yes I can see that and previously I suggested both deferring  and writing off (say 5 year continued occupancy) or payment out of sale proceeds.

The use of a future known impost is a real incentive to action!

Up
0

Money at play - an example of what you are dealing with

The 45-year-old from Castle Hill spent the money on seven prestige properties
Never used
Never lived in
Never rented out

Ignore the anti-social stuff

http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/motivated-by-revenge-sydney-accountant-who-stole-43-million-has-sentence-cut-20130703-2pawg.html

Up
0